(OT?) Coming out (name change)
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT?) Coming out (name change)
You absolutely don't understand what your legal name is. I guess
you've never sign a legal document where we just initial to sign off
various paragraphs within a contract. Don't bother me until you get
little experience or an education, confused one.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Scooby Don't wrote:
>
> What about the CB's Bill? Oh that's verbal and doersn't count? I guess
> if you promise someone something we can't believe you because it's
> verbal and meaningless.
> Handles are acceptable on Usenet that is what the Newsgroups are. You
> don't like this so because of that you want to **** on everyones
> parade. Why do they legally need to change their names? That's not
> right they shoud keep their god given names that their parents gave
> them. It is you who don't understand what a Handle is. You even list
> yourself as L.W (Bill) ------ III Well that means you are lying as
> well since L.W isn't your real name it's an abbreviation, likewise
> with Bill, you aren't even using YOUR own name here and yet you are
> throwing stones anyway. Pretty hypocritical don't you think L.W.?
you've never sign a legal document where we just initial to sign off
various paragraphs within a contract. Don't bother me until you get
little experience or an education, confused one.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Scooby Don't wrote:
>
> What about the CB's Bill? Oh that's verbal and doersn't count? I guess
> if you promise someone something we can't believe you because it's
> verbal and meaningless.
> Handles are acceptable on Usenet that is what the Newsgroups are. You
> don't like this so because of that you want to **** on everyones
> parade. Why do they legally need to change their names? That's not
> right they shoud keep their god given names that their parents gave
> them. It is you who don't understand what a Handle is. You even list
> yourself as L.W (Bill) ------ III Well that means you are lying as
> well since L.W isn't your real name it's an abbreviation, likewise
> with Bill, you aren't even using YOUR own name here and yet you are
> throwing stones anyway. Pretty hypocritical don't you think L.W.?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT?) Coming out (name change)
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:18:30 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You absolutely don't understand what your legal name is. I guess
>you've never sign a legal document where we just initial to sign off
>various paragraphs within a contract. Don't bother me until you get
>little experience or an education, confused one.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Amazing how you only answer the part of the post that you prefer and I
have worked with many Gov't contracts, back when I was in
manufacturing. You still didn't answer the part about L.W. did you.
Also is Bill your real name or a nickname? Most likely it's William,
so you are just as bad as any one using a handle.
I understand far better than you do about what is and is not. You
should look up the word Irony in your dictionary assuming you have
one. Everything on the Usenet is the same as a verbal agreement by
your standards. You cannot prove anything on the Usenet. You do a lot
of talking but very little in the way of proof it's all opinions. Your
opinion is way out there hovering 5 feet off the edge of reality but
then again you don't care do you? You'll still not answer the parts of
this post that are questions just like last time because you cannot.
You use a nickname or an abbreviation and by your own admission you
should know better as you are being deceitful and cannot be trusted.
To me that's a lotta horse dung but it seems to matter a great deal to
you for some reason no one can fathom.
You are clearly in teh wrong as you have an L before Bill nad that
means you prefer to be called Bill but it's just another form of a
handle. Prove me wrong if you can. You can't but it will be fun to
watch you put up a front to get out from answering it.
>
>Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>> What about the CB's Bill? Oh that's verbal and doersn't count? I guess
>> if you promise someone something we can't believe you because it's
>> verbal and meaningless.
>> Handles are acceptable on Usenet that is what the Newsgroups are. You
>> don't like this so because of that you want to **** on everyones
>> parade. Why do they legally need to change their names? That's not
>> right they shoud keep their god given names that their parents gave
>> them. It is you who don't understand what a Handle is. You even list
>> yourself as L.W (Bill) ------ III Well that means you are lying as
>> well since L.W isn't your real name it's an abbreviation, likewise
>> with Bill, you aren't even using YOUR own name here and yet you are
>> throwing stones anyway. Pretty hypocritical don't you think L.W.?
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You absolutely don't understand what your legal name is. I guess
>you've never sign a legal document where we just initial to sign off
>various paragraphs within a contract. Don't bother me until you get
>little experience or an education, confused one.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Amazing how you only answer the part of the post that you prefer and I
have worked with many Gov't contracts, back when I was in
manufacturing. You still didn't answer the part about L.W. did you.
Also is Bill your real name or a nickname? Most likely it's William,
so you are just as bad as any one using a handle.
I understand far better than you do about what is and is not. You
should look up the word Irony in your dictionary assuming you have
one. Everything on the Usenet is the same as a verbal agreement by
your standards. You cannot prove anything on the Usenet. You do a lot
of talking but very little in the way of proof it's all opinions. Your
opinion is way out there hovering 5 feet off the edge of reality but
then again you don't care do you? You'll still not answer the parts of
this post that are questions just like last time because you cannot.
You use a nickname or an abbreviation and by your own admission you
should know better as you are being deceitful and cannot be trusted.
To me that's a lotta horse dung but it seems to matter a great deal to
you for some reason no one can fathom.
You are clearly in teh wrong as you have an L before Bill nad that
means you prefer to be called Bill but it's just another form of a
handle. Prove me wrong if you can. You can't but it will be fun to
watch you put up a front to get out from answering it.
>
>Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>> What about the CB's Bill? Oh that's verbal and doersn't count? I guess
>> if you promise someone something we can't believe you because it's
>> verbal and meaningless.
>> Handles are acceptable on Usenet that is what the Newsgroups are. You
>> don't like this so because of that you want to **** on everyones
>> parade. Why do they legally need to change their names? That's not
>> right they shoud keep their god given names that their parents gave
>> them. It is you who don't understand what a Handle is. You even list
>> yourself as L.W (Bill) ------ III Well that means you are lying as
>> well since L.W isn't your real name it's an abbreviation, likewise
>> with Bill, you aren't even using YOUR own name here and yet you are
>> throwing stones anyway. Pretty hypocritical don't you think L.W.?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT?) Coming out (name change)
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:18:30 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You absolutely don't understand what your legal name is. I guess
>you've never sign a legal document where we just initial to sign off
>various paragraphs within a contract. Don't bother me until you get
>little experience or an education, confused one.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Amazing how you only answer the part of the post that you prefer and I
have worked with many Gov't contracts, back when I was in
manufacturing. You still didn't answer the part about L.W. did you.
Also is Bill your real name or a nickname? Most likely it's William,
so you are just as bad as any one using a handle.
I understand far better than you do about what is and is not. You
should look up the word Irony in your dictionary assuming you have
one. Everything on the Usenet is the same as a verbal agreement by
your standards. You cannot prove anything on the Usenet. You do a lot
of talking but very little in the way of proof it's all opinions. Your
opinion is way out there hovering 5 feet off the edge of reality but
then again you don't care do you? You'll still not answer the parts of
this post that are questions just like last time because you cannot.
You use a nickname or an abbreviation and by your own admission you
should know better as you are being deceitful and cannot be trusted.
To me that's a lotta horse dung but it seems to matter a great deal to
you for some reason no one can fathom.
You are clearly in teh wrong as you have an L before Bill nad that
means you prefer to be called Bill but it's just another form of a
handle. Prove me wrong if you can. You can't but it will be fun to
watch you put up a front to get out from answering it.
>
>Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>> What about the CB's Bill? Oh that's verbal and doersn't count? I guess
>> if you promise someone something we can't believe you because it's
>> verbal and meaningless.
>> Handles are acceptable on Usenet that is what the Newsgroups are. You
>> don't like this so because of that you want to **** on everyones
>> parade. Why do they legally need to change their names? That's not
>> right they shoud keep their god given names that their parents gave
>> them. It is you who don't understand what a Handle is. You even list
>> yourself as L.W (Bill) ------ III Well that means you are lying as
>> well since L.W isn't your real name it's an abbreviation, likewise
>> with Bill, you aren't even using YOUR own name here and yet you are
>> throwing stones anyway. Pretty hypocritical don't you think L.W.?
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You absolutely don't understand what your legal name is. I guess
>you've never sign a legal document where we just initial to sign off
>various paragraphs within a contract. Don't bother me until you get
>little experience or an education, confused one.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Amazing how you only answer the part of the post that you prefer and I
have worked with many Gov't contracts, back when I was in
manufacturing. You still didn't answer the part about L.W. did you.
Also is Bill your real name or a nickname? Most likely it's William,
so you are just as bad as any one using a handle.
I understand far better than you do about what is and is not. You
should look up the word Irony in your dictionary assuming you have
one. Everything on the Usenet is the same as a verbal agreement by
your standards. You cannot prove anything on the Usenet. You do a lot
of talking but very little in the way of proof it's all opinions. Your
opinion is way out there hovering 5 feet off the edge of reality but
then again you don't care do you? You'll still not answer the parts of
this post that are questions just like last time because you cannot.
You use a nickname or an abbreviation and by your own admission you
should know better as you are being deceitful and cannot be trusted.
To me that's a lotta horse dung but it seems to matter a great deal to
you for some reason no one can fathom.
You are clearly in teh wrong as you have an L before Bill nad that
means you prefer to be called Bill but it's just another form of a
handle. Prove me wrong if you can. You can't but it will be fun to
watch you put up a front to get out from answering it.
>
>Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>> What about the CB's Bill? Oh that's verbal and doersn't count? I guess
>> if you promise someone something we can't believe you because it's
>> verbal and meaningless.
>> Handles are acceptable on Usenet that is what the Newsgroups are. You
>> don't like this so because of that you want to **** on everyones
>> parade. Why do they legally need to change their names? That's not
>> right they shoud keep their god given names that their parents gave
>> them. It is you who don't understand what a Handle is. You even list
>> yourself as L.W (Bill) ------ III Well that means you are lying as
>> well since L.W isn't your real name it's an abbreviation, likewise
>> with Bill, you aren't even using YOUR own name here and yet you are
>> throwing stones anyway. Pretty hypocritical don't you think L.W.?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT?) Coming out (name change)
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 22:18:30 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You absolutely don't understand what your legal name is. I guess
>you've never sign a legal document where we just initial to sign off
>various paragraphs within a contract. Don't bother me until you get
>little experience or an education, confused one.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Amazing how you only answer the part of the post that you prefer and I
have worked with many Gov't contracts, back when I was in
manufacturing. You still didn't answer the part about L.W. did you.
Also is Bill your real name or a nickname? Most likely it's William,
so you are just as bad as any one using a handle.
I understand far better than you do about what is and is not. You
should look up the word Irony in your dictionary assuming you have
one. Everything on the Usenet is the same as a verbal agreement by
your standards. You cannot prove anything on the Usenet. You do a lot
of talking but very little in the way of proof it's all opinions. Your
opinion is way out there hovering 5 feet off the edge of reality but
then again you don't care do you? You'll still not answer the parts of
this post that are questions just like last time because you cannot.
You use a nickname or an abbreviation and by your own admission you
should know better as you are being deceitful and cannot be trusted.
To me that's a lotta horse dung but it seems to matter a great deal to
you for some reason no one can fathom.
You are clearly in teh wrong as you have an L before Bill nad that
means you prefer to be called Bill but it's just another form of a
handle. Prove me wrong if you can. You can't but it will be fun to
watch you put up a front to get out from answering it.
>
>Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>> What about the CB's Bill? Oh that's verbal and doersn't count? I guess
>> if you promise someone something we can't believe you because it's
>> verbal and meaningless.
>> Handles are acceptable on Usenet that is what the Newsgroups are. You
>> don't like this so because of that you want to **** on everyones
>> parade. Why do they legally need to change their names? That's not
>> right they shoud keep their god given names that their parents gave
>> them. It is you who don't understand what a Handle is. You even list
>> yourself as L.W (Bill) ------ III Well that means you are lying as
>> well since L.W isn't your real name it's an abbreviation, likewise
>> with Bill, you aren't even using YOUR own name here and yet you are
>> throwing stones anyway. Pretty hypocritical don't you think L.W.?
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> You absolutely don't understand what your legal name is. I guess
>you've never sign a legal document where we just initial to sign off
>various paragraphs within a contract. Don't bother me until you get
>little experience or an education, confused one.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Amazing how you only answer the part of the post that you prefer and I
have worked with many Gov't contracts, back when I was in
manufacturing. You still didn't answer the part about L.W. did you.
Also is Bill your real name or a nickname? Most likely it's William,
so you are just as bad as any one using a handle.
I understand far better than you do about what is and is not. You
should look up the word Irony in your dictionary assuming you have
one. Everything on the Usenet is the same as a verbal agreement by
your standards. You cannot prove anything on the Usenet. You do a lot
of talking but very little in the way of proof it's all opinions. Your
opinion is way out there hovering 5 feet off the edge of reality but
then again you don't care do you? You'll still not answer the parts of
this post that are questions just like last time because you cannot.
You use a nickname or an abbreviation and by your own admission you
should know better as you are being deceitful and cannot be trusted.
To me that's a lotta horse dung but it seems to matter a great deal to
you for some reason no one can fathom.
You are clearly in teh wrong as you have an L before Bill nad that
means you prefer to be called Bill but it's just another form of a
handle. Prove me wrong if you can. You can't but it will be fun to
watch you put up a front to get out from answering it.
>
>Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>> What about the CB's Bill? Oh that's verbal and doersn't count? I guess
>> if you promise someone something we can't believe you because it's
>> verbal and meaningless.
>> Handles are acceptable on Usenet that is what the Newsgroups are. You
>> don't like this so because of that you want to **** on everyones
>> parade. Why do they legally need to change their names? That's not
>> right they shoud keep their god given names that their parents gave
>> them. It is you who don't understand what a Handle is. You even list
>> yourself as L.W (Bill) ------ III Well that means you are lying as
>> well since L.W isn't your real name it's an abbreviation, likewise
>> with Bill, you aren't even using YOUR own name here and yet you are
>> throwing stones anyway. Pretty hypocritical don't you think L.W.?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT?) Coming out (name change)
I guess you're f**kin' blind and do not see the parenthesis and
surely can't comprehend what they mean. If you want to know what the
initials stand for then open a phone book, search the Internet, or just
pop my domain: http://www.----------.com/ Grow up!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Scooby Don't wrote:
><snip babble>
surely can't comprehend what they mean. If you want to know what the
initials stand for then open a phone book, search the Internet, or just
pop my domain: http://www.----------.com/ Grow up!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Scooby Don't wrote:
><snip babble>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT?) Coming out (name change)
I guess you're f**kin' blind and do not see the parenthesis and
surely can't comprehend what they mean. If you want to know what the
initials stand for then open a phone book, search the Internet, or just
pop my domain: http://www.----------.com/ Grow up!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Scooby Don't wrote:
><snip babble>
surely can't comprehend what they mean. If you want to know what the
initials stand for then open a phone book, search the Internet, or just
pop my domain: http://www.----------.com/ Grow up!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Scooby Don't wrote:
><snip babble>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT?) Coming out (name change)
I guess you're f**kin' blind and do not see the parenthesis and
surely can't comprehend what they mean. If you want to know what the
initials stand for then open a phone book, search the Internet, or just
pop my domain: http://www.----------.com/ Grow up!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Scooby Don't wrote:
><snip babble>
surely can't comprehend what they mean. If you want to know what the
initials stand for then open a phone book, search the Internet, or just
pop my domain: http://www.----------.com/ Grow up!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Scooby Don't wrote:
><snip babble>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT?) Coming out (name change)
Wow...just when I missed this week's episode of American Choppers...
....luckily this week's reading of this newsgroup supplied an adequate
substitute of soap opera shenanigans...
}:)
Cheers,
/tom
--
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( * ) ) ) there is no antelope ) )
|
Rev. Tom Mary Dobrowolsky | The Information School
http://students.washington.edu/agent /-\ University of Washington
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT?) Coming out (name change)
Wow...just when I missed this week's episode of American Choppers...
....luckily this week's reading of this newsgroup supplied an adequate
substitute of soap opera shenanigans...
}:)
Cheers,
/tom
--
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( * ) ) ) there is no antelope ) )
|
Rev. Tom Mary Dobrowolsky | The Information School
http://students.washington.edu/agent /-\ University of Washington
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: (OT?) Coming out (name change)
Wow...just when I missed this week's episode of American Choppers...
....luckily this week's reading of this newsgroup supplied an adequate
substitute of soap opera shenanigans...
}:)
Cheers,
/tom
--
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( * ) ) ) there is no antelope ) )
|
Rev. Tom Mary Dobrowolsky | The Information School
http://students.washington.edu/agent /-\ University of Washington