Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
10-22-2006, 04:43 PM
#41
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
--------- leader himself.
" Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the capture
of the --------- leader.
The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists at
the specific direction of his masters.
That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he receives
all the justice he deserves.
To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
the media:
"There is such a thing as due process.
Out here, due process is a bullet."
"Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
> billy ray wrote:
>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
>> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
>> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
>> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>
>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>
>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>> come from her...
>
>
> ...or not...
>
> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>
>
> --
> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
--------- leader himself.
" Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the capture
of the --------- leader.
The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists at
the specific direction of his masters.
That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he receives
all the justice he deserves.
To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
the media:
"There is such a thing as due process.
Out here, due process is a bullet."
"Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
> billy ray wrote:
>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
>> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
>> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
>> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>
>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>
>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>> come from her...
>
>
> ...or not...
>
> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>
>
> --
> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
10-22-2006, 04:43 PM
#42
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
--------- leader himself.
" Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the capture
of the --------- leader.
The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists at
the specific direction of his masters.
That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he receives
all the justice he deserves.
To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
the media:
"There is such a thing as due process.
Out here, due process is a bullet."
"Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
> billy ray wrote:
>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
>> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
>> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
>> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>
>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>
>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>> come from her...
>
>
> ...or not...
>
> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>
>
> --
> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
--------- leader himself.
" Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the capture
of the --------- leader.
The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists at
the specific direction of his masters.
That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he receives
all the justice he deserves.
To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
the media:
"There is such a thing as due process.
Out here, due process is a bullet."
"Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
> billy ray wrote:
>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
>> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
>> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
>> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>
>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>
>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>> come from her...
>
>
> ...or not...
>
> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>
>
> --
> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
10-22-2006, 04:43 PM
#43
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
--------- leader himself.
" Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the capture
of the --------- leader.
The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists at
the specific direction of his masters.
That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he receives
all the justice he deserves.
To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
the media:
"There is such a thing as due process.
Out here, due process is a bullet."
"Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
> billy ray wrote:
>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
>> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
>> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
>> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>
>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>
>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>> come from her...
>
>
> ...or not...
>
> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>
>
> --
> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
--------- leader himself.
" Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the capture
of the --------- leader.
The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists at
the specific direction of his masters.
That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he receives
all the justice he deserves.
To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
the media:
"There is such a thing as due process.
Out here, due process is a bullet."
"Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
> billy ray wrote:
>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
>> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
>> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
>> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>
>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>
>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>> come from her...
>
>
> ...or not...
>
> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>
>
> --
> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
10-22-2006, 07:13 PM
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
It's obvious you've already made your mind up. When you don't like the
message, hang the messenger.
How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports from
what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them?
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET...
> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>
> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>
> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
> come from her...
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Proof?
>>
>> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET...
>>> Bill and Earle....
>>>
>>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated
>>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step to
>>> prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the murder?
>>>
>>>
>>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@***.net...
>>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder!
>>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans
>>>> won't cut and run.
>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>> Earle Horton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical"
>>>>> about
>>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day.
>>>>> That
>>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire
>>>>> gutted
>>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for
>>>>> police,
>>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but an
>>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the
>>>>> Republicans
>>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans are
>>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that
>>>>> at
>>>>> least one is.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to
>>>>> their
>>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree
>>>>> that
>>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and difficult
>>>>> process of fitting back into American society.
>>>>>
>>>>> Earle
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
message, hang the messenger.
How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports from
what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them?
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET...
> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>
> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>
> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
> come from her...
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Proof?
>>
>> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET...
>>> Bill and Earle....
>>>
>>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated
>>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step to
>>> prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the murder?
>>>
>>>
>>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@***.net...
>>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder!
>>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans
>>>> won't cut and run.
>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>> Earle Horton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical"
>>>>> about
>>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day.
>>>>> That
>>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire
>>>>> gutted
>>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for
>>>>> police,
>>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but an
>>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the
>>>>> Republicans
>>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans are
>>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that
>>>>> at
>>>>> least one is.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to
>>>>> their
>>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree
>>>>> that
>>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and difficult
>>>>> process of fitting back into American society.
>>>>>
>>>>> Earle
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
10-22-2006, 07:13 PM
#45
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
It's obvious you've already made your mind up. When you don't like the
message, hang the messenger.
How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports from
what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them?
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET...
> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>
> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>
> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
> come from her...
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Proof?
>>
>> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET...
>>> Bill and Earle....
>>>
>>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated
>>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step to
>>> prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the murder?
>>>
>>>
>>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@***.net...
>>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder!
>>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans
>>>> won't cut and run.
>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>> Earle Horton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical"
>>>>> about
>>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day.
>>>>> That
>>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire
>>>>> gutted
>>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for
>>>>> police,
>>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but an
>>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the
>>>>> Republicans
>>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans are
>>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that
>>>>> at
>>>>> least one is.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to
>>>>> their
>>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree
>>>>> that
>>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and difficult
>>>>> process of fitting back into American society.
>>>>>
>>>>> Earle
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
message, hang the messenger.
How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports from
what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them?
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET...
> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>
> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>
> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
> come from her...
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Proof?
>>
>> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET...
>>> Bill and Earle....
>>>
>>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated
>>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step to
>>> prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the murder?
>>>
>>>
>>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@***.net...
>>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder!
>>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans
>>>> won't cut and run.
>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>> Earle Horton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical"
>>>>> about
>>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day.
>>>>> That
>>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire
>>>>> gutted
>>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for
>>>>> police,
>>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but an
>>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the
>>>>> Republicans
>>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans are
>>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that
>>>>> at
>>>>> least one is.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to
>>>>> their
>>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree
>>>>> that
>>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and difficult
>>>>> process of fitting back into American society.
>>>>>
>>>>> Earle
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
10-22-2006, 07:13 PM
#46
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
It's obvious you've already made your mind up. When you don't like the
message, hang the messenger.
How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports from
what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them?
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET...
> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>
> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>
> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
> come from her...
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Proof?
>>
>> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET...
>>> Bill and Earle....
>>>
>>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated
>>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step to
>>> prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the murder?
>>>
>>>
>>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@***.net...
>>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder!
>>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans
>>>> won't cut and run.
>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>> Earle Horton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical"
>>>>> about
>>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day.
>>>>> That
>>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire
>>>>> gutted
>>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for
>>>>> police,
>>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but an
>>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the
>>>>> Republicans
>>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans are
>>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that
>>>>> at
>>>>> least one is.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to
>>>>> their
>>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree
>>>>> that
>>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and difficult
>>>>> process of fitting back into American society.
>>>>>
>>>>> Earle
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
message, hang the messenger.
How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports from
what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them?
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET...
> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>
> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>
> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
> come from her...
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Proof?
>>
>> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET...
>>> Bill and Earle....
>>>
>>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated
>>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step to
>>> prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the murder?
>>>
>>>
>>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@***.net...
>>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder!
>>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans
>>>> won't cut and run.
>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>> Earle Horton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical"
>>>>> about
>>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day.
>>>>> That
>>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire
>>>>> gutted
>>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for
>>>>> police,
>>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but an
>>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the
>>>>> Republicans
>>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans are
>>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that
>>>>> at
>>>>> least one is.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to
>>>>> their
>>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree
>>>>> that
>>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and difficult
>>>>> process of fitting back into American society.
>>>>>
>>>>> Earle
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
10-22-2006, 07:15 PM
#47
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Ware sounds like he's Australian. I'm sure you have proof that Ware knows
the whereabouts of Ibrahim Al-Shimary. If you don't I am sure you assume
that.
And you should love this, he used to be Time Magazine's Baghdad bureau
chief. More reason for you to slam him.
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:d2b05$453bd801$422afc51$28992@FUSE.NET...
> Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
> have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
> --------- leader himself.
>
> " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
> and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
>
> Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
> but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
> serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
>
> Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
> considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
> authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the
> capture of the --------- leader.
>
> The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists
> at the specific direction of his masters.
>
> That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
> family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he
> receives all the justice he deserves.
>
> To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
> the media:
> "There is such a thing as due process.
> Out here, due process is a bullet."
>
>
>
> "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
>> billy ray wrote:
>>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation...
>>> when a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and
>>> failed to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter
>>> while screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>>
>>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>>
>>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>>> come from her...
>>
>>
>> ...or not...
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
>
>
the whereabouts of Ibrahim Al-Shimary. If you don't I am sure you assume
that.
And you should love this, he used to be Time Magazine's Baghdad bureau
chief. More reason for you to slam him.
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:d2b05$453bd801$422afc51$28992@FUSE.NET...
> Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
> have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
> --------- leader himself.
>
> " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
> and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
>
> Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
> but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
> serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
>
> Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
> considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
> authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the
> capture of the --------- leader.
>
> The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists
> at the specific direction of his masters.
>
> That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
> family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he
> receives all the justice he deserves.
>
> To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
> the media:
> "There is such a thing as due process.
> Out here, due process is a bullet."
>
>
>
> "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
>> billy ray wrote:
>>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation...
>>> when a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and
>>> failed to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter
>>> while screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>>
>>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>>
>>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>>> come from her...
>>
>>
>> ...or not...
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
>
>
10-22-2006, 07:15 PM
#48
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Ware sounds like he's Australian. I'm sure you have proof that Ware knows
the whereabouts of Ibrahim Al-Shimary. If you don't I am sure you assume
that.
And you should love this, he used to be Time Magazine's Baghdad bureau
chief. More reason for you to slam him.
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:d2b05$453bd801$422afc51$28992@FUSE.NET...
> Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
> have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
> --------- leader himself.
>
> " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
> and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
>
> Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
> but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
> serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
>
> Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
> considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
> authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the
> capture of the --------- leader.
>
> The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists
> at the specific direction of his masters.
>
> That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
> family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he
> receives all the justice he deserves.
>
> To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
> the media:
> "There is such a thing as due process.
> Out here, due process is a bullet."
>
>
>
> "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
>> billy ray wrote:
>>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation...
>>> when a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and
>>> failed to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter
>>> while screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>>
>>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>>
>>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>>> come from her...
>>
>>
>> ...or not...
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
>
>
the whereabouts of Ibrahim Al-Shimary. If you don't I am sure you assume
that.
And you should love this, he used to be Time Magazine's Baghdad bureau
chief. More reason for you to slam him.
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:d2b05$453bd801$422afc51$28992@FUSE.NET...
> Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
> have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
> --------- leader himself.
>
> " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
> and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
>
> Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
> but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
> serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
>
> Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
> considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
> authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the
> capture of the --------- leader.
>
> The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists
> at the specific direction of his masters.
>
> That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
> family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he
> receives all the justice he deserves.
>
> To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
> the media:
> "There is such a thing as due process.
> Out here, due process is a bullet."
>
>
>
> "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
>> billy ray wrote:
>>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation...
>>> when a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and
>>> failed to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter
>>> while screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>>
>>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>>
>>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>>> come from her...
>>
>>
>> ...or not...
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
>
>
10-22-2006, 07:15 PM
#49
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Ware sounds like he's Australian. I'm sure you have proof that Ware knows
the whereabouts of Ibrahim Al-Shimary. If you don't I am sure you assume
that.
And you should love this, he used to be Time Magazine's Baghdad bureau
chief. More reason for you to slam him.
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:d2b05$453bd801$422afc51$28992@FUSE.NET...
> Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
> have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
> --------- leader himself.
>
> " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
> and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
>
> Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
> but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
> serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
>
> Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
> considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
> authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the
> capture of the --------- leader.
>
> The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists
> at the specific direction of his masters.
>
> That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
> family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he
> receives all the justice he deserves.
>
> To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
> the media:
> "There is such a thing as due process.
> Out here, due process is a bullet."
>
>
>
> "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
>> billy ray wrote:
>>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation...
>>> when a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and
>>> failed to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter
>>> while screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>>
>>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>>
>>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>>> come from her...
>>
>>
>> ...or not...
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
>
>
the whereabouts of Ibrahim Al-Shimary. If you don't I am sure you assume
that.
And you should love this, he used to be Time Magazine's Baghdad bureau
chief. More reason for you to slam him.
"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:d2b05$453bd801$422afc51$28992@FUSE.NET...
> Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
> have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the
> --------- leader himself.
>
> " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader
> and spokesman for the Islamic Army."
>
> Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth
> but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he
> serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network.
>
> Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be
> considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the
> authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the
> capture of the --------- leader.
>
> The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists
> at the specific direction of his masters.
>
> That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or
> family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he
> receives all the justice he deserves.
>
> To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of
> the media:
> "There is such a thing as due process.
> Out here, due process is a bullet."
>
>
>
> "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02...
>> billy ray wrote:
>>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation...
>>> when a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and
>>> failed to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter
>>> while screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>>
>>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>>
>>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>>> come from her...
>>
>>
>> ...or not...
>>
>> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html
>>
>>
>> --
>> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
>
>
10-22-2006, 07:43 PM
#50
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Well Matt, after reading about it on this very forum and most likely this
same thread I made it a point to see the ABC (Almost as Bad as the Commie)
news.
I haven't watched much of CNN since Gulf War 1's attack on Baghdad and just
a bit on the regular news when Comrade Geraldo Rivera got caught relaying
strategic information to the enemy via a live news broadcast in 2003.
I understand why Comrade Rivera did it, he was sucking up to the powers at
ABC who fired him a few years before when he attempted, for the first time
in his career, to tell the truth. Whether the firing was about the telling
the truth or because that the truth was about another Demoncratic ---
scandal I don't know
I've never understood why he was not executed on the spot as a the spy he
was.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:kYydnSapstyNZqbYnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> It's obvious you've already made your mind up. When you don't like the
> message, hang the messenger.
>
> How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports
> from what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them?
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET...
>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
>> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
>> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
>> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>
>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>
>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>> come from her...
>>
>>
>>
>> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Proof?
>>>
>>> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>>> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET...
>>>> Bill and Earle....
>>>>
>>>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated
>>>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step
>>>> to prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the
>>>> murder?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@***.net...
>>>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder!
>>>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans
>>>>> won't cut and run.
>>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> Earle Horton wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical"
>>>>>> about
>>>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day.
>>>>>> That
>>>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire
>>>>>> gutted
>>>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for
>>>>>> police,
>>>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the
>>>>>> Republicans
>>>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> least one is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to
>>>>>> their
>>>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and
>>>>>> difficult
>>>>>> process of fitting back into American society.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Earle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
same thread I made it a point to see the ABC (Almost as Bad as the Commie)
news.
I haven't watched much of CNN since Gulf War 1's attack on Baghdad and just
a bit on the regular news when Comrade Geraldo Rivera got caught relaying
strategic information to the enemy via a live news broadcast in 2003.
I understand why Comrade Rivera did it, he was sucking up to the powers at
ABC who fired him a few years before when he attempted, for the first time
in his career, to tell the truth. Whether the firing was about the telling
the truth or because that the truth was about another Demoncratic ---
scandal I don't know
I've never understood why he was not executed on the spot as a the spy he
was.
..
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:kYydnSapstyNZqbYnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> It's obvious you've already made your mind up. When you don't like the
> message, hang the messenger.
>
> How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports
> from what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them?
>
> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET...
>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been
>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when
>> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed
>> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while
>> screaming for the soldiers to take cover.
>>
>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News.
>>
>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the
>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have
>> come from her...
>>
>>
>>
>> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Proof?
>>>
>>> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
>>> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET...
>>>> Bill and Earle....
>>>>
>>>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated
>>>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step
>>>> to prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the
>>>> murder?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@***.net...
>>>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder!
>>>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans
>>>>> won't cut and run.
>>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>>>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> Earle Horton wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bill,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical"
>>>>>> about
>>>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day.
>>>>>> That
>>>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire
>>>>>> gutted
>>>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for
>>>>>> police,
>>>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but
>>>>>> an
>>>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the
>>>>>> Republicans
>>>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> least one is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to
>>>>>> their
>>>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and
>>>>>> difficult
>>>>>> process of fitting back into American society.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Earle
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>