|
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the --------- leader himself. " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader and spokesman for the Islamic Army." Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network. Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the capture of the --------- leader. The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists at the specific direction of his masters. That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he receives all the justice he deserves. To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of the media: "There is such a thing as due process. Out here, due process is a bullet." "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02... > billy ray wrote: >> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been >> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when >> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed >> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while >> screaming for the soldiers to take cover. >> >> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News. >> >> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the >> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have >> come from her... > > > ...or not... > > http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html > > > -- > PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY. |
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the --------- leader himself. " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader and spokesman for the Islamic Army." Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network. Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the capture of the --------- leader. The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists at the specific direction of his masters. That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he receives all the justice he deserves. To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of the media: "There is such a thing as due process. Out here, due process is a bullet." "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02... > billy ray wrote: >> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been >> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when >> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed >> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while >> screaming for the soldiers to take cover. >> >> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News. >> >> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the >> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have >> come from her... > > > ...or not... > > http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html > > > -- > PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY. |
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they
have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the --------- leader himself. " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader and spokesman for the Islamic Army." Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network. Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the capture of the --------- leader. The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists at the specific direction of his masters. That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he receives all the justice he deserves. To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of the media: "There is such a thing as due process. Out here, due process is a bullet." "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02... > billy ray wrote: >> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been >> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when >> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed >> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while >> screaming for the soldiers to take cover. >> >> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News. >> >> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the >> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have >> come from her... > > > ...or not... > > http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html > > > -- > PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY. |
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
It's obvious you've already made your mind up. When you don't like the
message, hang the messenger. How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports from what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them? "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET... > The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been > standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when > a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed > to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while > screaming for the soldiers to take cover. > > Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News. > > FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the > store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have > come from her... > > > > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message > news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com... >> Proof? >> >> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message >> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET... >>> Bill and Earle.... >>> >>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated >>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step to >>> prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the murder? >>> >>> >>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message >>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@cox.net... >>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder! >>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans >>>> won't cut and run. >>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >>>> >>>> Earle Horton wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Bill, >>>>> >>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical" >>>>> about >>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day. >>>>> That >>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire >>>>> gutted >>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for >>>>> police, >>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but an >>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the >>>>> Republicans >>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans are >>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that >>>>> at >>>>> least one is. >>>>> >>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to >>>>> their >>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree >>>>> that >>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and difficult >>>>> process of fitting back into American society. >>>>> >>>>> Earle >>> >>> >> >> > > |
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
It's obvious you've already made your mind up. When you don't like the
message, hang the messenger. How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports from what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them? "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET... > The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been > standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when > a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed > to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while > screaming for the soldiers to take cover. > > Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News. > > FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the > store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have > come from her... > > > > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message > news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com... >> Proof? >> >> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message >> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET... >>> Bill and Earle.... >>> >>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated >>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step to >>> prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the murder? >>> >>> >>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message >>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@cox.net... >>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder! >>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans >>>> won't cut and run. >>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >>>> >>>> Earle Horton wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Bill, >>>>> >>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical" >>>>> about >>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day. >>>>> That >>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire >>>>> gutted >>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for >>>>> police, >>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but an >>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the >>>>> Republicans >>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans are >>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that >>>>> at >>>>> least one is. >>>>> >>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to >>>>> their >>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree >>>>> that >>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and difficult >>>>> process of fitting back into American society. >>>>> >>>>> Earle >>> >>> >> >> > > |
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
It's obvious you've already made your mind up. When you don't like the
message, hang the messenger. How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports from what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them? "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET... > The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been > standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when > a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed > to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while > screaming for the soldiers to take cover. > > Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News. > > FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the > store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have > come from her... > > > > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message > news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com... >> Proof? >> >> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message >> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET... >>> Bill and Earle.... >>> >>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated >>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step to >>> prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the murder? >>> >>> >>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message >>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@cox.net... >>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder! >>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans >>>> won't cut and run. >>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >>>> >>>> Earle Horton wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Bill, >>>>> >>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical" >>>>> about >>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day. >>>>> That >>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire >>>>> gutted >>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for >>>>> police, >>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but an >>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the >>>>> Republicans >>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans are >>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that >>>>> at >>>>> least one is. >>>>> >>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to >>>>> their >>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree >>>>> that >>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and difficult >>>>> process of fitting back into American society. >>>>> >>>>> Earle >>> >>> >> >> > > |
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Ware sounds like he's Australian. I'm sure you have proof that Ware knows
the whereabouts of Ibrahim Al-Shimary. If you don't I am sure you assume that. And you should love this, he used to be Time Magazine's Baghdad bureau chief. More reason for you to slam him. "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message news:d2b05$453bd801$422afc51$28992@FUSE.NET... > Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they > have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the > --------- leader himself. > > " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader > and spokesman for the Islamic Army." > > Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth > but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he > serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network. > > Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be > considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the > authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the > capture of the --------- leader. > > The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists > at the specific direction of his masters. > > That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or > family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he > receives all the justice he deserves. > > To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of > the media: > "There is such a thing as due process. > Out here, due process is a bullet." > > > > "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message > news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02... >> billy ray wrote: >>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been >>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... >>> when a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and >>> failed to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter >>> while screaming for the soldiers to take cover. >>> >>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News. >>> >>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the >>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have >>> come from her... >> >> >> ...or not... >> >> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html >> >> >> -- >> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY. > > |
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Ware sounds like he's Australian. I'm sure you have proof that Ware knows
the whereabouts of Ibrahim Al-Shimary. If you don't I am sure you assume that. And you should love this, he used to be Time Magazine's Baghdad bureau chief. More reason for you to slam him. "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message news:d2b05$453bd801$422afc51$28992@FUSE.NET... > Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they > have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the > --------- leader himself. > > " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader > and spokesman for the Islamic Army." > > Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth > but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he > serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network. > > Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be > considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the > authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the > capture of the --------- leader. > > The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists > at the specific direction of his masters. > > That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or > family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he > receives all the justice he deserves. > > To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of > the media: > "There is such a thing as due process. > Out here, due process is a bullet." > > > > "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message > news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02... >> billy ray wrote: >>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been >>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... >>> when a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and >>> failed to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter >>> while screaming for the soldiers to take cover. >>> >>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News. >>> >>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the >>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have >>> come from her... >> >> >> ...or not... >> >> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html >> >> >> -- >> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY. > > |
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Ware sounds like he's Australian. I'm sure you have proof that Ware knows
the whereabouts of Ibrahim Al-Shimary. If you don't I am sure you assume that. And you should love this, he used to be Time Magazine's Baghdad bureau chief. More reason for you to slam him. "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message news:d2b05$453bd801$422afc51$28992@FUSE.NET... > Let's take a quote from the story you reference where they admit that they > have been communicating, supposedly through intermediaries, with the > --------- leader himself. > > " Michael had been communicating with Ibrahim Al-Shimary, a shadowy leader > and spokesman for the Islamic Army." > > Now I don't know the country of Baghdad correspondent Michael Ware's birth > but he is surely an enemy of all that is good and that is how and why he > serves his Politburo masters at Ted's Commie News Network. > > Had he been a defender of freedom and liberty, or at least what would be > considered a decent human being, he would have immediately contacted the > authorities associated with the non-terrorists and cooperated in the > capture of the --------- leader. > > The action he took, however, was to further the agenda of the terrorists > at the specific direction of his masters. > > That is IF we believe this story..... in either case the authorities or > family of Michael Ware's victim should pursue Mr. Ware and see he > receives all the justice he deserves. > > To quote John Wayne (in reply to David Janssen who is playing a member of > the media: > "There is such a thing as due process. > Out here, due process is a bullet." > > > > "Thomas Waldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message > news:q5Q_g.2712$hK.2497@trnddc02... >> billy ray wrote: >>> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been >>> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... >>> when a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and >>> failed to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter >>> while screaming for the soldiers to take cover. >>> >>> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News. >>> >>> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the >>> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have >>> come from her... >> >> >> ...or not... >> >> http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/ande...per-video.html >> >> >> -- >> PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY. > > |
Re: Off Topic- CNN reporter film sniper kills
Well Matt, after reading about it on this very forum and most likely this
same thread I made it a point to see the ABC (Almost as Bad as the Commie) news. I haven't watched much of CNN since Gulf War 1's attack on Baghdad and just a bit on the regular news when Comrade Geraldo Rivera got caught relaying strategic information to the enemy via a live news broadcast in 2003. I understand why Comrade Rivera did it, he was sucking up to the powers at ABC who fired him a few years before when he attempted, for the first time in his career, to tell the truth. Whether the firing was about the telling the truth or because that the truth was about another Demoncratic --- scandal I don't know I've never understood why he was not executed on the spot as a the spy he was. .. "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:kYydnSapstyNZqbYnZ2dnUVZ_o6dnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > It's obvious you've already made your mind up. When you don't like the > message, hang the messenger. > > How often do you actually watch CNN?? Or do you only know their reports > from what you hear Limbag, Sean Insannity and Faux News say about them? > > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message > news:e2f2a$45398391$422afc51$13277@FUSE.NET... >> The only other plausible explanation is that the reporter had been >> standing there filming segment on..... say the traffic situation... when >> a group of terrorists set up within inches of the camera lens and failed >> to notice him standing there physically attacking the shooter while >> screaming for the soldiers to take cover. >> >> Which scenario do you think likely from Ted's Commie Network News. >> >> FWIW: I never met Ted but his mother always treated those of us at the >> store very well.... I've never been able to understand how he could have >> come from her... >> >> >> >> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message >> news:4-mdnf7B9qfhoaTYnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.com... >>> Proof? >>> >>> "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message >>> news:c8dd5$453910e8$422afc51$12867@FUSE.NET... >>>> Bill and Earle.... >>>> >>>> Does the fact CNN paid the terrorists to perform this premeditated >>>> murder of an American, and/or the reporter's failure to take any step >>>> to prevent the murder any kind of proof they are accessories to the >>>> murder? >>>> >>>> >>>> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message >>>> news:4538E7B4.791D4C09@cox.net... >>>>> The CNN reporter is an accessory to murder! >>>>> I think with the election this November 7th, you'll find Americans >>>>> won't cut and run. >>>>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >>>>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >>>>> >>>>> Earle Horton wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Bill, >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't follow this argument at all. There is nothing "unethical" >>>>>> about >>>>>> showing people being killed, which is apparently happening every day. >>>>>> That >>>>>> is like saying that showing auto accidents, murder victims and fire >>>>>> gutted >>>>>> buildings in the U.S. is a blatant attempt to get more tax money for >>>>>> police, >>>>>> fire and EMS departments. I don't see this article as anything but >>>>>> an >>>>>> unvarnished attempt to show the American People how stupid the >>>>>> Republicans >>>>>> and their supporters can be. I don't believe that all Republicans >>>>>> are >>>>>> stupid, but this Lykins fellow does a good job of convincing me that >>>>>> at >>>>>> least one is. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's time to bring the boys and girls home, and leave the Iraqis to >>>>>> their >>>>>> own devices, which is what they plainly want, to have a killing spree >>>>>> that >>>>>> will last decades. Then the soldiers can begin the long and >>>>>> difficult >>>>>> process of fitting back into American society. >>>>>> >>>>>> Earle >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands