o.t any opinions on sbc dsl service????
12-17-2005, 11:46 PM
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: o.t any opinions on sbc dsl service????
I probably do not know what this is all about, *but* I am on Starband
satellite, and when I press the "send" button the message goes out from my
antenna to the satellite. Starband has the license and I am "leasing" a
portion of their bandwidth. Same with the satellite phone I had overseas.
The license is for the frequency, whether the transmitter sends to a
satellite or a terrestrial tower. The user is, by extension, granted a
license by the company that has the frequency rights. But maybe I probably
do not know what the situation is?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43A4D40E.D07792F6@***.net...
> I prefer she not be right. As I didn't think it was legal for an
> unlicensed civilian to transmit to a satellite.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
>>
>> You prefer disagreements with your son's mother?
>>
>> --
>> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
>> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
>> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
satellite, and when I press the "send" button the message goes out from my
antenna to the satellite. Starband has the license and I am "leasing" a
portion of their bandwidth. Same with the satellite phone I had overseas.
The license is for the frequency, whether the transmitter sends to a
satellite or a terrestrial tower. The user is, by extension, granted a
license by the company that has the frequency rights. But maybe I probably
do not know what the situation is?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43A4D40E.D07792F6@***.net...
> I prefer she not be right. As I didn't think it was legal for an
> unlicensed civilian to transmit to a satellite.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
>>
>> You prefer disagreements with your son's mother?
>>
>> --
>> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
>> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
>> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
12-17-2005, 11:46 PM
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: o.t any opinions on sbc dsl service????
I probably do not know what this is all about, *but* I am on Starband
satellite, and when I press the "send" button the message goes out from my
antenna to the satellite. Starband has the license and I am "leasing" a
portion of their bandwidth. Same with the satellite phone I had overseas.
The license is for the frequency, whether the transmitter sends to a
satellite or a terrestrial tower. The user is, by extension, granted a
license by the company that has the frequency rights. But maybe I probably
do not know what the situation is?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43A4D40E.D07792F6@***.net...
> I prefer she not be right. As I didn't think it was legal for an
> unlicensed civilian to transmit to a satellite.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
>>
>> You prefer disagreements with your son's mother?
>>
>> --
>> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
>> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
>> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
satellite, and when I press the "send" button the message goes out from my
antenna to the satellite. Starband has the license and I am "leasing" a
portion of their bandwidth. Same with the satellite phone I had overseas.
The license is for the frequency, whether the transmitter sends to a
satellite or a terrestrial tower. The user is, by extension, granted a
license by the company that has the frequency rights. But maybe I probably
do not know what the situation is?
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43A4D40E.D07792F6@***.net...
> I prefer she not be right. As I didn't think it was legal for an
> unlicensed civilian to transmit to a satellite.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
>>
>> You prefer disagreements with your son's mother?
>>
>> --
>> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
>> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
>> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
12-18-2005, 03:14 AM
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: o.t any opinions on sbc dsl service????
First, my condolences for being on StarBand. Second, you are mostly right
about the legal situation. That is why you had to pay someone to install
your system, who was a representative of StarBand. That way, only
"authorized personnel" got to play with the alignment of the transmitted
signal. If they had screwed it up and caused problems, it would have been
StarBand culpable, not you.
In my case, the antenna is receive-only, so there is no (legal) fault that
attaches to a bad installation.
Earle
"Billzz" <billzzstring@starband.net> wrote in message
news:6e060$43a4e9ad$9440b19b$24929@STARBAND.NET...
> I probably do not know what this is all about, *but* I am on Starband
> satellite, and when I press the "send" button the message goes out from my
> antenna to the satellite. Starband has the license and I am "leasing" a
> portion of their bandwidth. Same with the satellite phone I had overseas.
> The license is for the frequency, whether the transmitter sends to a
> satellite or a terrestrial tower. The user is, by extension, granted a
> license by the company that has the frequency rights. But maybe I
probably
> do not know what the situation is?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A4D40E.D07792F6@***.net...
> > I prefer she not be right. As I didn't think it was legal for an
> > unlicensed civilian to transmit to a satellite.
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > billy ray wrote:
> >>
> >> You prefer disagreements with your son's mother?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> >> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> >> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>
>
about the legal situation. That is why you had to pay someone to install
your system, who was a representative of StarBand. That way, only
"authorized personnel" got to play with the alignment of the transmitted
signal. If they had screwed it up and caused problems, it would have been
StarBand culpable, not you.
In my case, the antenna is receive-only, so there is no (legal) fault that
attaches to a bad installation.
Earle
"Billzz" <billzzstring@starband.net> wrote in message
news:6e060$43a4e9ad$9440b19b$24929@STARBAND.NET...
> I probably do not know what this is all about, *but* I am on Starband
> satellite, and when I press the "send" button the message goes out from my
> antenna to the satellite. Starband has the license and I am "leasing" a
> portion of their bandwidth. Same with the satellite phone I had overseas.
> The license is for the frequency, whether the transmitter sends to a
> satellite or a terrestrial tower. The user is, by extension, granted a
> license by the company that has the frequency rights. But maybe I
probably
> do not know what the situation is?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A4D40E.D07792F6@***.net...
> > I prefer she not be right. As I didn't think it was legal for an
> > unlicensed civilian to transmit to a satellite.
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > billy ray wrote:
> >>
> >> You prefer disagreements with your son's mother?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> >> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> >> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>
>
12-18-2005, 03:14 AM
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: o.t any opinions on sbc dsl service????
First, my condolences for being on StarBand. Second, you are mostly right
about the legal situation. That is why you had to pay someone to install
your system, who was a representative of StarBand. That way, only
"authorized personnel" got to play with the alignment of the transmitted
signal. If they had screwed it up and caused problems, it would have been
StarBand culpable, not you.
In my case, the antenna is receive-only, so there is no (legal) fault that
attaches to a bad installation.
Earle
"Billzz" <billzzstring@starband.net> wrote in message
news:6e060$43a4e9ad$9440b19b$24929@STARBAND.NET...
> I probably do not know what this is all about, *but* I am on Starband
> satellite, and when I press the "send" button the message goes out from my
> antenna to the satellite. Starband has the license and I am "leasing" a
> portion of their bandwidth. Same with the satellite phone I had overseas.
> The license is for the frequency, whether the transmitter sends to a
> satellite or a terrestrial tower. The user is, by extension, granted a
> license by the company that has the frequency rights. But maybe I
probably
> do not know what the situation is?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A4D40E.D07792F6@***.net...
> > I prefer she not be right. As I didn't think it was legal for an
> > unlicensed civilian to transmit to a satellite.
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > billy ray wrote:
> >>
> >> You prefer disagreements with your son's mother?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> >> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> >> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>
>
about the legal situation. That is why you had to pay someone to install
your system, who was a representative of StarBand. That way, only
"authorized personnel" got to play with the alignment of the transmitted
signal. If they had screwed it up and caused problems, it would have been
StarBand culpable, not you.
In my case, the antenna is receive-only, so there is no (legal) fault that
attaches to a bad installation.
Earle
"Billzz" <billzzstring@starband.net> wrote in message
news:6e060$43a4e9ad$9440b19b$24929@STARBAND.NET...
> I probably do not know what this is all about, *but* I am on Starband
> satellite, and when I press the "send" button the message goes out from my
> antenna to the satellite. Starband has the license and I am "leasing" a
> portion of their bandwidth. Same with the satellite phone I had overseas.
> The license is for the frequency, whether the transmitter sends to a
> satellite or a terrestrial tower. The user is, by extension, granted a
> license by the company that has the frequency rights. But maybe I
probably
> do not know what the situation is?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A4D40E.D07792F6@***.net...
> > I prefer she not be right. As I didn't think it was legal for an
> > unlicensed civilian to transmit to a satellite.
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > billy ray wrote:
> >>
> >> You prefer disagreements with your son's mother?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> >> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> >> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>
>
12-18-2005, 03:14 AM
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: o.t any opinions on sbc dsl service????
First, my condolences for being on StarBand. Second, you are mostly right
about the legal situation. That is why you had to pay someone to install
your system, who was a representative of StarBand. That way, only
"authorized personnel" got to play with the alignment of the transmitted
signal. If they had screwed it up and caused problems, it would have been
StarBand culpable, not you.
In my case, the antenna is receive-only, so there is no (legal) fault that
attaches to a bad installation.
Earle
"Billzz" <billzzstring@starband.net> wrote in message
news:6e060$43a4e9ad$9440b19b$24929@STARBAND.NET...
> I probably do not know what this is all about, *but* I am on Starband
> satellite, and when I press the "send" button the message goes out from my
> antenna to the satellite. Starband has the license and I am "leasing" a
> portion of their bandwidth. Same with the satellite phone I had overseas.
> The license is for the frequency, whether the transmitter sends to a
> satellite or a terrestrial tower. The user is, by extension, granted a
> license by the company that has the frequency rights. But maybe I
probably
> do not know what the situation is?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A4D40E.D07792F6@***.net...
> > I prefer she not be right. As I didn't think it was legal for an
> > unlicensed civilian to transmit to a satellite.
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > billy ray wrote:
> >>
> >> You prefer disagreements with your son's mother?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> >> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> >> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>
>
about the legal situation. That is why you had to pay someone to install
your system, who was a representative of StarBand. That way, only
"authorized personnel" got to play with the alignment of the transmitted
signal. If they had screwed it up and caused problems, it would have been
StarBand culpable, not you.
In my case, the antenna is receive-only, so there is no (legal) fault that
attaches to a bad installation.
Earle
"Billzz" <billzzstring@starband.net> wrote in message
news:6e060$43a4e9ad$9440b19b$24929@STARBAND.NET...
> I probably do not know what this is all about, *but* I am on Starband
> satellite, and when I press the "send" button the message goes out from my
> antenna to the satellite. Starband has the license and I am "leasing" a
> portion of their bandwidth. Same with the satellite phone I had overseas.
> The license is for the frequency, whether the transmitter sends to a
> satellite or a terrestrial tower. The user is, by extension, granted a
> license by the company that has the frequency rights. But maybe I
probably
> do not know what the situation is?
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:43A4D40E.D07792F6@***.net...
> > I prefer she not be right. As I didn't think it was legal for an
> > unlicensed civilian to transmit to a satellite.
> > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > billy ray wrote:
> >>
> >> You prefer disagreements with your son's mother?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Billy_Ray@fuseSPAM.net (Remove the SPAM)
> >> 2002 WJ Brilliant Black Crystal Pearl Coat
> >> Helping is why we are all here on RAMJ+W, or should be.
>
>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nomadinCA
Jeep Mailing List
0
04-28-2004 10:42 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)