just finished downloading that 127MB file
took 33 mins on my cable with speeds remarkably stable at 66...67 KB/sec (~500kb/sec)
and i'm no city boy...a town boy rather :-)

"Paul Calman" <spam@trap.com> wrote in message news:3ni2qgF1eklpU1@individual.net...
> No thanks, i'm on slow dialup, nothing else available here. I just wondered
> why so much video of low quality is on the web.
> I did enjoy the film, but it took 3 hours to download.
>
> --
> Paul Calman, Hathaway Pines, California
>
>

 

just finished downloading that 127MB file
took 33 mins on my cable with speeds remarkably stable at 66...67 KB/sec (~500kb/sec)
and i'm no city boy...a town boy rather :-)

"Paul Calman" <spam@trap.com> wrote in message news:3ni2qgF1eklpU1@individual.net...
> No thanks, i'm on slow dialup, nothing else available here. I just wondered
> why so much video of low quality is on the web.
> I did enjoy the film, but it took 3 hours to download.
>
> --
> Paul Calman, Hathaway Pines, California
>
>

 

just finished downloading that 127MB file
took 33 mins on my cable with speeds remarkably stable at 66...67 KB/sec (~500kb/sec)
and i'm no city boy...a town boy rather :-)

"Paul Calman" <spam@trap.com> wrote in message news:3ni2qgF1eklpU1@individual.net...
> No thanks, i'm on slow dialup, nothing else available here. I just wondered
> why so much video of low quality is on the web.
> I did enjoy the film, but it took 3 hours to download.
>
> --
> Paul Calman, Hathaway Pines, California
>
>