Noticed on Ebay
#331
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
Nah, I never liked where the steering dampers are located the
superduty...first thing that will get hit by a rock.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE77C3.2F6E94B9@***.net...
> This would be good: http://www.----------.com/temp/excursion.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Open front diff, stock tires, long wheelbase on tight trails, driver
>> ability
>> all had a factor. I don't think I would bring my Excursion on trails like
>> that until I at least get some bigger tires and an LS in the front.
superduty...first thing that will get hit by a rock.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE77C3.2F6E94B9@***.net...
> This would be good: http://www.----------.com/temp/excursion.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> Open front diff, stock tires, long wheelbase on tight trails, driver
>> ability
>> all had a factor. I don't think I would bring my Excursion on trails like
>> that until I at least get some bigger tires and an LS in the front.
#332
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
Nah, the coil-spring superdutys are the same height at the leaf spring
ones...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE6700.36346A9A@***.net...
> Probably to get as low as possible to the ground to fight future
> rollover lawsuits, like the new TJs.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> 2005 4x4 Superdutys (F250-350) switched to the coil spring/3-link
>> configuration. Excursions remained leaf sprung in front for 2005.
>> Pre-2005
>> 4x4 Superdutys have leaf springs up front. All 2wd Superdutys had twin-I
>> beam front suspension with coils and radius arms
ones...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE6700.36346A9A@***.net...
> Probably to get as low as possible to the ground to fight future
> rollover lawsuits, like the new TJs.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> 2005 4x4 Superdutys (F250-350) switched to the coil spring/3-link
>> configuration. Excursions remained leaf sprung in front for 2005.
>> Pre-2005
>> 4x4 Superdutys have leaf springs up front. All 2wd Superdutys had twin-I
>> beam front suspension with coils and radius arms
#333
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
Nah, the coil-spring superdutys are the same height at the leaf spring
ones...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE6700.36346A9A@***.net...
> Probably to get as low as possible to the ground to fight future
> rollover lawsuits, like the new TJs.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> 2005 4x4 Superdutys (F250-350) switched to the coil spring/3-link
>> configuration. Excursions remained leaf sprung in front for 2005.
>> Pre-2005
>> 4x4 Superdutys have leaf springs up front. All 2wd Superdutys had twin-I
>> beam front suspension with coils and radius arms
ones...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE6700.36346A9A@***.net...
> Probably to get as low as possible to the ground to fight future
> rollover lawsuits, like the new TJs.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> 2005 4x4 Superdutys (F250-350) switched to the coil spring/3-link
>> configuration. Excursions remained leaf sprung in front for 2005.
>> Pre-2005
>> 4x4 Superdutys have leaf springs up front. All 2wd Superdutys had twin-I
>> beam front suspension with coils and radius arms
#334
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
Nah, the coil-spring superdutys are the same height at the leaf spring
ones...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE6700.36346A9A@***.net...
> Probably to get as low as possible to the ground to fight future
> rollover lawsuits, like the new TJs.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> 2005 4x4 Superdutys (F250-350) switched to the coil spring/3-link
>> configuration. Excursions remained leaf sprung in front for 2005.
>> Pre-2005
>> 4x4 Superdutys have leaf springs up front. All 2wd Superdutys had twin-I
>> beam front suspension with coils and radius arms
ones...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE6700.36346A9A@***.net...
> Probably to get as low as possible to the ground to fight future
> rollover lawsuits, like the new TJs.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> 2005 4x4 Superdutys (F250-350) switched to the coil spring/3-link
>> configuration. Excursions remained leaf sprung in front for 2005.
>> Pre-2005
>> 4x4 Superdutys have leaf springs up front. All 2wd Superdutys had twin-I
>> beam front suspension with coils and radius arms
#335
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
Nah, the coil-spring superdutys are the same height at the leaf spring
ones...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE6700.36346A9A@***.net...
> Probably to get as low as possible to the ground to fight future
> rollover lawsuits, like the new TJs.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> 2005 4x4 Superdutys (F250-350) switched to the coil spring/3-link
>> configuration. Excursions remained leaf sprung in front for 2005.
>> Pre-2005
>> 4x4 Superdutys have leaf springs up front. All 2wd Superdutys had twin-I
>> beam front suspension with coils and radius arms
ones...
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE6700.36346A9A@***.net...
> Probably to get as low as possible to the ground to fight future
> rollover lawsuits, like the new TJs.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> 2005 4x4 Superdutys (F250-350) switched to the coil spring/3-link
>> configuration. Excursions remained leaf sprung in front for 2005.
>> Pre-2005
>> 4x4 Superdutys have leaf springs up front. All 2wd Superdutys had twin-I
>> beam front suspension with coils and radius arms
#336
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
How about this low-rider Ford F650 ?
http://www.backcountryjournal.com/r11.jpg
Dave
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE77C3.2F6E94B9@***.net...
> This would be good: http://www.----------.com/temp/excursion.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Open front diff, stock tires, long wheelbase on tight trails, driver
ability
> > all had a factor. I don't think I would bring my Excursion on trails
like
> > that until I at least get some bigger tires and an LS in the front.
http://www.backcountryjournal.com/r11.jpg
Dave
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE77C3.2F6E94B9@***.net...
> This would be good: http://www.----------.com/temp/excursion.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Open front diff, stock tires, long wheelbase on tight trails, driver
ability
> > all had a factor. I don't think I would bring my Excursion on trails
like
> > that until I at least get some bigger tires and an LS in the front.
#337
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
How about this low-rider Ford F650 ?
http://www.backcountryjournal.com/r11.jpg
Dave
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE77C3.2F6E94B9@***.net...
> This would be good: http://www.----------.com/temp/excursion.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Open front diff, stock tires, long wheelbase on tight trails, driver
ability
> > all had a factor. I don't think I would bring my Excursion on trails
like
> > that until I at least get some bigger tires and an LS in the front.
http://www.backcountryjournal.com/r11.jpg
Dave
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE77C3.2F6E94B9@***.net...
> This would be good: http://www.----------.com/temp/excursion.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Open front diff, stock tires, long wheelbase on tight trails, driver
ability
> > all had a factor. I don't think I would bring my Excursion on trails
like
> > that until I at least get some bigger tires and an LS in the front.
#338
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
How about this low-rider Ford F650 ?
http://www.backcountryjournal.com/r11.jpg
Dave
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE77C3.2F6E94B9@***.net...
> This would be good: http://www.----------.com/temp/excursion.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Open front diff, stock tires, long wheelbase on tight trails, driver
ability
> > all had a factor. I don't think I would bring my Excursion on trails
like
> > that until I at least get some bigger tires and an LS in the front.
http://www.backcountryjournal.com/r11.jpg
Dave
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE77C3.2F6E94B9@***.net...
> This would be good: http://www.----------.com/temp/excursion.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Open front diff, stock tires, long wheelbase on tight trails, driver
ability
> > all had a factor. I don't think I would bring my Excursion on trails
like
> > that until I at least get some bigger tires and an LS in the front.
#339
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
How about this low-rider Ford F650 ?
http://www.backcountryjournal.com/r11.jpg
Dave
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE77C3.2F6E94B9@***.net...
> This would be good: http://www.----------.com/temp/excursion.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Open front diff, stock tires, long wheelbase on tight trails, driver
ability
> > all had a factor. I don't think I would bring my Excursion on trails
like
> > that until I at least get some bigger tires and an LS in the front.
http://www.backcountryjournal.com/r11.jpg
Dave
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:43EE77C3.2F6E94B9@***.net...
> This would be good: http://www.----------.com/temp/excursion.jpg
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Open front diff, stock tires, long wheelbase on tight trails, driver
ability
> > all had a factor. I don't think I would bring my Excursion on trails
like
> > that until I at least get some bigger tires and an LS in the front.
#340
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
Mall poser, if you notice the position of his header. I was going
to suggest air bags for temporary height for Matt's new truck,
in-between towing, until I saw these.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> How about this low-rider Ford F650 ?
> http://www.backcountryjournal.com/r11.jpg
>
> Dave
to suggest air bags for temporary height for Matt's new truck,
in-between towing, until I saw these.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Dave Milne wrote:
>
> How about this low-rider Ford F650 ?
> http://www.backcountryjournal.com/r11.jpg
>
> Dave