Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 03:32:07 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
>
>I will post it back dark.
It's fine by me either way, I just saw the smaller pic I didn't see
the larger pic redone. If you zoom in close on the larger pic you can
see my friends fiancee' sitting in the back.
>My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
I didn't play with it, I just posted it as he gave it to me.
>And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
>shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
I don't know about that but I do know that yEnc is now supported by
everyone except Outlook Express. Larger binary files really need yEnc
and some groups the FAQ will even tell you yEnc only. Try posting 400+
Megs a day like some peopel do and you will find out very quickly that
UUEncoding doesn't cut it. I stayed away from yEnc for a long time.
But it's much better now.
Bill Gates stole DOS from Digital Research, doesn't make it right but
everyone still used DOS.
>I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
>file.....
Not at all that was the original unedited size that was given to me.
yEnc does not change the overall file size. Basically it adds more
characters per post so you cut down on a lot of wasted space.
It works, I use it all the time. But in no way did it alter that file.
I'm not suggesting you give up Outlook Express and switch to yEnc but
I am saying yEnc is more efficient and wastes a lot less bandwidth.
Which is good for everyone.
>Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Groan....
>> >
>> >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
>>
>> yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
>>
>> All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
>> amount of time of very large downloads.
>>
>> >What photo editor are you using?
>> >
>> >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
>> >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
>> >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
>> >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
>>
>> The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
>> up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
>> There were 2 pics.
>>
>> >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
>>
>> It was 600K not M
>>
>> 600K is jpeg size all the way.
wrote:
>That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
>
>I will post it back dark.
It's fine by me either way, I just saw the smaller pic I didn't see
the larger pic redone. If you zoom in close on the larger pic you can
see my friends fiancee' sitting in the back.
>My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
I didn't play with it, I just posted it as he gave it to me.
>And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
>shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
I don't know about that but I do know that yEnc is now supported by
everyone except Outlook Express. Larger binary files really need yEnc
and some groups the FAQ will even tell you yEnc only. Try posting 400+
Megs a day like some peopel do and you will find out very quickly that
UUEncoding doesn't cut it. I stayed away from yEnc for a long time.
But it's much better now.
Bill Gates stole DOS from Digital Research, doesn't make it right but
everyone still used DOS.
>I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
>file.....
Not at all that was the original unedited size that was given to me.
yEnc does not change the overall file size. Basically it adds more
characters per post so you cut down on a lot of wasted space.
It works, I use it all the time. But in no way did it alter that file.
I'm not suggesting you give up Outlook Express and switch to yEnc but
I am saying yEnc is more efficient and wastes a lot less bandwidth.
Which is good for everyone.
>Scooby Don't wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Groan....
>> >
>> >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
>>
>> yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
>>
>> All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
>> amount of time of very large downloads.
>>
>> >What photo editor are you using?
>> >
>> >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
>> >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
>> >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
>> >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
>>
>> The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
>> up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
>> There were 2 pics.
>>
>> >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
>>
>> It was 600K not M
>>
>> 600K is jpeg size all the way.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
Even better, 'you' send me the original via email like I asked for.
I will post it back to the binary group in Corel Photohouse jpg format
and we wil see the size difference for sure.
The copy I have was emailed to me, so who knows what software he was
using....
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
>
> I will post it back dark.
>
> My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> file.....
>
> I will post it back without touching it up using Corel Photohouse.
>
> Mike
>
> Scooby Don't wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Groan....
> > >
> > >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >
> > yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >
> > All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> > amount of time of very large downloads.
> >
> > >What photo editor are you using?
> > >
> > >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> > >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> > >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> > >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >
> > The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> > up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> > There were 2 pics.
> >
> > >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >
> > It was 600K not M
> >
> > 600K is jpeg size all the way.
I will post it back to the binary group in Corel Photohouse jpg format
and we wil see the size difference for sure.
The copy I have was emailed to me, so who knows what software he was
using....
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
>
> I will post it back dark.
>
> My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> file.....
>
> I will post it back without touching it up using Corel Photohouse.
>
> Mike
>
> Scooby Don't wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Groan....
> > >
> > >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >
> > yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >
> > All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> > amount of time of very large downloads.
> >
> > >What photo editor are you using?
> > >
> > >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> > >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> > >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> > >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >
> > The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> > up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> > There were 2 pics.
> >
> > >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >
> > It was 600K not M
> >
> > 600K is jpeg size all the way.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
Even better, 'you' send me the original via email like I asked for.
I will post it back to the binary group in Corel Photohouse jpg format
and we wil see the size difference for sure.
The copy I have was emailed to me, so who knows what software he was
using....
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
>
> I will post it back dark.
>
> My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> file.....
>
> I will post it back without touching it up using Corel Photohouse.
>
> Mike
>
> Scooby Don't wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Groan....
> > >
> > >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >
> > yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >
> > All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> > amount of time of very large downloads.
> >
> > >What photo editor are you using?
> > >
> > >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> > >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> > >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> > >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >
> > The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> > up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> > There were 2 pics.
> >
> > >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >
> > It was 600K not M
> >
> > 600K is jpeg size all the way.
I will post it back to the binary group in Corel Photohouse jpg format
and we wil see the size difference for sure.
The copy I have was emailed to me, so who knows what software he was
using....
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
>
> I will post it back dark.
>
> My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> file.....
>
> I will post it back without touching it up using Corel Photohouse.
>
> Mike
>
> Scooby Don't wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Groan....
> > >
> > >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >
> > yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >
> > All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> > amount of time of very large downloads.
> >
> > >What photo editor are you using?
> > >
> > >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> > >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> > >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> > >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >
> > The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> > up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> > There were 2 pics.
> >
> > >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >
> > It was 600K not M
> >
> > 600K is jpeg size all the way.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
Even better, 'you' send me the original via email like I asked for.
I will post it back to the binary group in Corel Photohouse jpg format
and we wil see the size difference for sure.
The copy I have was emailed to me, so who knows what software he was
using....
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
>
> I will post it back dark.
>
> My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> file.....
>
> I will post it back without touching it up using Corel Photohouse.
>
> Mike
>
> Scooby Don't wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Groan....
> > >
> > >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >
> > yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >
> > All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> > amount of time of very large downloads.
> >
> > >What photo editor are you using?
> > >
> > >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> > >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> > >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> > >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >
> > The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> > up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> > There were 2 pics.
> >
> > >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >
> > It was 600K not M
> >
> > 600K is jpeg size all the way.
I will post it back to the binary group in Corel Photohouse jpg format
and we wil see the size difference for sure.
The copy I have was emailed to me, so who knows what software he was
using....
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
>
> I will post it back dark.
>
> My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> file.....
>
> I will post it back without touching it up using Corel Photohouse.
>
> Mike
>
> Scooby Don't wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Groan....
> > >
> > >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >
> > yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >
> > All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> > amount of time of very large downloads.
> >
> > >What photo editor are you using?
> > >
> > >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> > >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> > >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> > >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >
> > The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> > up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> > There were 2 pics.
> >
> > >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >
> > It was 600K not M
> >
> > 600K is jpeg size all the way.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
....and the gas tank directly under you @$$, where it belongs!
--
Jim
98 TJ SE
90 SJ GW
http://www.delawareja.com/gallery/JDJeep98
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f7e11e1$1_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vnrehvube562d@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> It was a joke...
> >> Bill only uses "real" computers!
> >
> >You know, the one's with the round headlights!
>
> And the leaf springs!
>
> :)
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
--
Jim
98 TJ SE
90 SJ GW
http://www.delawareja.com/gallery/JDJeep98
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f7e11e1$1_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vnrehvube562d@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> It was a joke...
> >> Bill only uses "real" computers!
> >
> >You know, the one's with the round headlights!
>
> And the leaf springs!
>
> :)
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
....and the gas tank directly under you @$$, where it belongs!
--
Jim
98 TJ SE
90 SJ GW
http://www.delawareja.com/gallery/JDJeep98
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f7e11e1$1_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vnrehvube562d@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> It was a joke...
> >> Bill only uses "real" computers!
> >
> >You know, the one's with the round headlights!
>
> And the leaf springs!
>
> :)
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
--
Jim
98 TJ SE
90 SJ GW
http://www.delawareja.com/gallery/JDJeep98
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f7e11e1$1_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vnrehvube562d@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> It was a joke...
> >> Bill only uses "real" computers!
> >
> >You know, the one's with the round headlights!
>
> And the leaf springs!
>
> :)
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
....and the gas tank directly under you @$$, where it belongs!
--
Jim
98 TJ SE
90 SJ GW
http://www.delawareja.com/gallery/JDJeep98
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f7e11e1$1_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vnrehvube562d@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> It was a joke...
> >> Bill only uses "real" computers!
> >
> >You know, the one's with the round headlights!
>
> And the leaf springs!
>
> :)
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
--
Jim
98 TJ SE
90 SJ GW
http://www.delawareja.com/gallery/JDJeep98
"Peter Parker" <nospam@zero.com> wrote in message
news:3f7e11e1$1_2@nntp2.nac.net...
> In article <vnrehvube562d@corp.supernews.com>,
> Gerald G. McGeorge <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> It was a joke...
> >> Bill only uses "real" computers!
> >
> >You know, the one's with the round headlights!
>
> And the leaf springs!
>
> :)
>
> --
> <html><form><input type crash></form></html>
> nospam@zero.com Replace nospam with jetta to reply via e-mail
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
I use Netscape....
Mike
Scooby Don't wrote:
>
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 03:32:07 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
> >
> >I will post it back dark.
>
> It's fine by me either way, I just saw the smaller pic I didn't see
> the larger pic redone. If you zoom in close on the larger pic you can
> see my friends fiancee' sitting in the back.
>
> >My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> I didn't play with it, I just posted it as he gave it to me.
>
> >And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> >shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I don't know about that but I do know that yEnc is now supported by
> everyone except Outlook Express. Larger binary files really need yEnc
> and some groups the FAQ will even tell you yEnc only. Try posting 400+
> Megs a day like some peopel do and you will find out very quickly that
> UUEncoding doesn't cut it. I stayed away from yEnc for a long time.
> But it's much better now.
> Bill Gates stole DOS from Digital Research, doesn't make it right but
> everyone still used DOS.
>
> >I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> >file.....
>
> Not at all that was the original unedited size that was given to me.
> yEnc does not change the overall file size. Basically it adds more
> characters per post so you cut down on a lot of wasted space.
> It works, I use it all the time. But in no way did it alter that file.
> I'm not suggesting you give up Outlook Express and switch to yEnc but
> I am saying yEnc is more efficient and wastes a lot less bandwidth.
> Which is good for everyone.
>
> >Scooby Don't wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Groan....
> >> >
> >> >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >>
> >> yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >>
> >> All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> >> amount of time of very large downloads.
> >>
> >> >What photo editor are you using?
> >> >
> >> >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> >> >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> >> >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> >> >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >>
> >> The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> >> up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> >> There were 2 pics.
> >>
> >> >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >>
> >> It was 600K not M
> >>
> >> 600K is jpeg size all the way.
Mike
Scooby Don't wrote:
>
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 03:32:07 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
> >
> >I will post it back dark.
>
> It's fine by me either way, I just saw the smaller pic I didn't see
> the larger pic redone. If you zoom in close on the larger pic you can
> see my friends fiancee' sitting in the back.
>
> >My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> I didn't play with it, I just posted it as he gave it to me.
>
> >And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> >shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I don't know about that but I do know that yEnc is now supported by
> everyone except Outlook Express. Larger binary files really need yEnc
> and some groups the FAQ will even tell you yEnc only. Try posting 400+
> Megs a day like some peopel do and you will find out very quickly that
> UUEncoding doesn't cut it. I stayed away from yEnc for a long time.
> But it's much better now.
> Bill Gates stole DOS from Digital Research, doesn't make it right but
> everyone still used DOS.
>
> >I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> >file.....
>
> Not at all that was the original unedited size that was given to me.
> yEnc does not change the overall file size. Basically it adds more
> characters per post so you cut down on a lot of wasted space.
> It works, I use it all the time. But in no way did it alter that file.
> I'm not suggesting you give up Outlook Express and switch to yEnc but
> I am saying yEnc is more efficient and wastes a lot less bandwidth.
> Which is good for everyone.
>
> >Scooby Don't wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Groan....
> >> >
> >> >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >>
> >> yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >>
> >> All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> >> amount of time of very large downloads.
> >>
> >> >What photo editor are you using?
> >> >
> >> >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> >> >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> >> >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> >> >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >>
> >> The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> >> up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> >> There were 2 pics.
> >>
> >> >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >>
> >> It was 600K not M
> >>
> >> 600K is jpeg size all the way.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
I use Netscape....
Mike
Scooby Don't wrote:
>
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 03:32:07 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
> >
> >I will post it back dark.
>
> It's fine by me either way, I just saw the smaller pic I didn't see
> the larger pic redone. If you zoom in close on the larger pic you can
> see my friends fiancee' sitting in the back.
>
> >My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> I didn't play with it, I just posted it as he gave it to me.
>
> >And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> >shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I don't know about that but I do know that yEnc is now supported by
> everyone except Outlook Express. Larger binary files really need yEnc
> and some groups the FAQ will even tell you yEnc only. Try posting 400+
> Megs a day like some peopel do and you will find out very quickly that
> UUEncoding doesn't cut it. I stayed away from yEnc for a long time.
> But it's much better now.
> Bill Gates stole DOS from Digital Research, doesn't make it right but
> everyone still used DOS.
>
> >I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> >file.....
>
> Not at all that was the original unedited size that was given to me.
> yEnc does not change the overall file size. Basically it adds more
> characters per post so you cut down on a lot of wasted space.
> It works, I use it all the time. But in no way did it alter that file.
> I'm not suggesting you give up Outlook Express and switch to yEnc but
> I am saying yEnc is more efficient and wastes a lot less bandwidth.
> Which is good for everyone.
>
> >Scooby Don't wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Groan....
> >> >
> >> >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >>
> >> yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >>
> >> All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> >> amount of time of very large downloads.
> >>
> >> >What photo editor are you using?
> >> >
> >> >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> >> >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> >> >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> >> >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >>
> >> The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> >> up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> >> There were 2 pics.
> >>
> >> >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >>
> >> It was 600K not M
> >>
> >> 600K is jpeg size all the way.
Mike
Scooby Don't wrote:
>
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 03:32:07 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
> >
> >I will post it back dark.
>
> It's fine by me either way, I just saw the smaller pic I didn't see
> the larger pic redone. If you zoom in close on the larger pic you can
> see my friends fiancee' sitting in the back.
>
> >My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> I didn't play with it, I just posted it as he gave it to me.
>
> >And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> >shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I don't know about that but I do know that yEnc is now supported by
> everyone except Outlook Express. Larger binary files really need yEnc
> and some groups the FAQ will even tell you yEnc only. Try posting 400+
> Megs a day like some peopel do and you will find out very quickly that
> UUEncoding doesn't cut it. I stayed away from yEnc for a long time.
> But it's much better now.
> Bill Gates stole DOS from Digital Research, doesn't make it right but
> everyone still used DOS.
>
> >I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> >file.....
>
> Not at all that was the original unedited size that was given to me.
> yEnc does not change the overall file size. Basically it adds more
> characters per post so you cut down on a lot of wasted space.
> It works, I use it all the time. But in no way did it alter that file.
> I'm not suggesting you give up Outlook Express and switch to yEnc but
> I am saying yEnc is more efficient and wastes a lot less bandwidth.
> Which is good for everyone.
>
> >Scooby Don't wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Groan....
> >> >
> >> >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >>
> >> yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >>
> >> All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> >> amount of time of very large downloads.
> >>
> >> >What photo editor are you using?
> >> >
> >> >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> >> >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> >> >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> >> >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >>
> >> The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> >> up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> >> There were 2 pics.
> >>
> >> >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >>
> >> It was 600K not M
> >>
> >> 600K is jpeg size all the way.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Not a Jeep but pretty cool (0/2)
I use Netscape....
Mike
Scooby Don't wrote:
>
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 03:32:07 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
> >
> >I will post it back dark.
>
> It's fine by me either way, I just saw the smaller pic I didn't see
> the larger pic redone. If you zoom in close on the larger pic you can
> see my friends fiancee' sitting in the back.
>
> >My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> I didn't play with it, I just posted it as he gave it to me.
>
> >And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> >shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I don't know about that but I do know that yEnc is now supported by
> everyone except Outlook Express. Larger binary files really need yEnc
> and some groups the FAQ will even tell you yEnc only. Try posting 400+
> Megs a day like some peopel do and you will find out very quickly that
> UUEncoding doesn't cut it. I stayed away from yEnc for a long time.
> But it's much better now.
> Bill Gates stole DOS from Digital Research, doesn't make it right but
> everyone still used DOS.
>
> >I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> >file.....
>
> Not at all that was the original unedited size that was given to me.
> yEnc does not change the overall file size. Basically it adds more
> characters per post so you cut down on a lot of wasted space.
> It works, I use it all the time. But in no way did it alter that file.
> I'm not suggesting you give up Outlook Express and switch to yEnc but
> I am saying yEnc is more efficient and wastes a lot less bandwidth.
> Which is good for everyone.
>
> >Scooby Don't wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Groan....
> >> >
> >> >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >>
> >> yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >>
> >> All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> >> amount of time of very large downloads.
> >>
> >> >What photo editor are you using?
> >> >
> >> >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> >> >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> >> >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> >> >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >>
> >> The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> >> up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> >> There were 2 pics.
> >>
> >> >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >>
> >> It was 600K not M
> >>
> >> 600K is jpeg size all the way.
Mike
Scooby Don't wrote:
>
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 03:32:07 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >That was me, it was really dark on my system, so I lightened it.
> >
> >I will post it back dark.
>
> It's fine by me either way, I just saw the smaller pic I didn't see
> the larger pic redone. If you zoom in close on the larger pic you can
> see my friends fiancee' sitting in the back.
>
> >My Corel made it a 30.9K jpg.
>
> I didn't play with it, I just posted it as he gave it to me.
>
> >And NO, you are incorrect, Yenc is an abortion that the maker even says
> >shouldn't be public, a friend stole it from him and went nuts with it.
>
> I don't know about that but I do know that yEnc is now supported by
> everyone except Outlook Express. Larger binary files really need yEnc
> and some groups the FAQ will even tell you yEnc only. Try posting 400+
> Megs a day like some peopel do and you will find out very quickly that
> UUEncoding doesn't cut it. I stayed away from yEnc for a long time.
> But it's much better now.
> Bill Gates stole DOS from Digital Research, doesn't make it right but
> everyone still used DOS.
>
> >I mean really, my Corel made it a 31K file, your Yenc made it a 600K
> >file.....
>
> Not at all that was the original unedited size that was given to me.
> yEnc does not change the overall file size. Basically it adds more
> characters per post so you cut down on a lot of wasted space.
> It works, I use it all the time. But in no way did it alter that file.
> I'm not suggesting you give up Outlook Express and switch to yEnc but
> I am saying yEnc is more efficient and wastes a lot less bandwidth.
> Which is good for everyone.
>
> >Scooby Don't wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 16:09:16 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Groan....
> >> >
> >> >Yenc just doesn't work for most folks.
> >>
> >> yEnc works fine if people don't rely on OutHouse Express.
> >>
> >> All the large binary groups use yEnc because it saves an enormous
> >> amount of time of very large downloads.
> >>
> >> >What photo editor are you using?
> >> >
> >> >Crap man I use Corel photo shop and my Sony digital camera and both will
> >> >put 17 'excellent' quality 4x6's prints on one floppy. I do mean
> >> >excellent too! They will do 'good' quality 8x10's and 'excellent'
> >> >quality 640x480x 300dpi 20K images up.
> >>
> >> The photo was sent to me and I posted it as is. someone lightened it
> >> up and it honestly looks like crap on my system.
> >> There were 2 pics.
> >>
> >> >400 to 600M is a bitmap or *.bmp, not a *.jpg.
> >>
> >> It was 600K not M
> >>
> >> 600K is jpeg size all the way.