NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami
On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
Saturday, November 12, 2005
Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
worse.
The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
multinational corporations.
The researchers conclude:
"It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
rebuttal.
http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
Saturday, November 12, 2005
Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
worse.
The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
multinational corporations.
The researchers conclude:
"It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
rebuttal.
http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami
DougW wrote:
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>
>>Lon wrote:
>>
>>>agenda_communication@hotmail.fr proclaimed:
>>>
>>>
>>>>NASA has recently answered with a world press release to the prediction
>>>>of a mega tsunami, created by a possible impact of a fragment of the
>>>>comet SW-3 on MAY 25, 2006 in the Atlantic Ocean. This prediction,
>>>>based on a clear and precise psychic communication, was confirmed by
>>>>many sources.
>>>
>>>
>>>If you wear a tinfoil hat, or even put an aluminium pot on your head,
>>>you are fully protected against this disaster. Trust me.
>>>
>>
>>Against the disaster, yes, but not reliably against the mind reading.
>>Aluminum is far more reliable than tin against tsunami causing, extra
>>terrestrial, alien mind reading.
>
>
> Shiny side in or out?
> Regular foil or heavy-duty?
>
> I find that a good way to distort mind reading waves is to
> chew on the foil.
>
Shiny side out to reflect the invasive waves immediately. "Regular"
aluminum foil will do, but use "HD" tin. A word of caution on chewing
the foil during an attack. If you chew during your own thoughts, it will
distort your outward bound waves. However, if you chew between thoughts,
the 'noise' will be picked up by the aliens.
tw
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>
>>Lon wrote:
>>
>>>agenda_communication@hotmail.fr proclaimed:
>>>
>>>
>>>>NASA has recently answered with a world press release to the prediction
>>>>of a mega tsunami, created by a possible impact of a fragment of the
>>>>comet SW-3 on MAY 25, 2006 in the Atlantic Ocean. This prediction,
>>>>based on a clear and precise psychic communication, was confirmed by
>>>>many sources.
>>>
>>>
>>>If you wear a tinfoil hat, or even put an aluminium pot on your head,
>>>you are fully protected against this disaster. Trust me.
>>>
>>
>>Against the disaster, yes, but not reliably against the mind reading.
>>Aluminum is far more reliable than tin against tsunami causing, extra
>>terrestrial, alien mind reading.
>
>
> Shiny side in or out?
> Regular foil or heavy-duty?
>
> I find that a good way to distort mind reading waves is to
> chew on the foil.
>
Shiny side out to reflect the invasive waves immediately. "Regular"
aluminum foil will do, but use "HD" tin. A word of caution on chewing
the foil during an attack. If you chew during your own thoughts, it will
distort your outward bound waves. However, if you chew between thoughts,
the 'noise' will be picked up by the aliens.
tw
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami
DougW wrote:
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>
>>Lon wrote:
>>
>>>agenda_communication@hotmail.fr proclaimed:
>>>
>>>
>>>>NASA has recently answered with a world press release to the prediction
>>>>of a mega tsunami, created by a possible impact of a fragment of the
>>>>comet SW-3 on MAY 25, 2006 in the Atlantic Ocean. This prediction,
>>>>based on a clear and precise psychic communication, was confirmed by
>>>>many sources.
>>>
>>>
>>>If you wear a tinfoil hat, or even put an aluminium pot on your head,
>>>you are fully protected against this disaster. Trust me.
>>>
>>
>>Against the disaster, yes, but not reliably against the mind reading.
>>Aluminum is far more reliable than tin against tsunami causing, extra
>>terrestrial, alien mind reading.
>
>
> Shiny side in or out?
> Regular foil or heavy-duty?
>
> I find that a good way to distort mind reading waves is to
> chew on the foil.
>
Shiny side out to reflect the invasive waves immediately. "Regular"
aluminum foil will do, but use "HD" tin. A word of caution on chewing
the foil during an attack. If you chew during your own thoughts, it will
distort your outward bound waves. However, if you chew between thoughts,
the 'noise' will be picked up by the aliens.
tw
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>
>>Lon wrote:
>>
>>>agenda_communication@hotmail.fr proclaimed:
>>>
>>>
>>>>NASA has recently answered with a world press release to the prediction
>>>>of a mega tsunami, created by a possible impact of a fragment of the
>>>>comet SW-3 on MAY 25, 2006 in the Atlantic Ocean. This prediction,
>>>>based on a clear and precise psychic communication, was confirmed by
>>>>many sources.
>>>
>>>
>>>If you wear a tinfoil hat, or even put an aluminium pot on your head,
>>>you are fully protected against this disaster. Trust me.
>>>
>>
>>Against the disaster, yes, but not reliably against the mind reading.
>>Aluminum is far more reliable than tin against tsunami causing, extra
>>terrestrial, alien mind reading.
>
>
> Shiny side in or out?
> Regular foil or heavy-duty?
>
> I find that a good way to distort mind reading waves is to
> chew on the foil.
>
Shiny side out to reflect the invasive waves immediately. "Regular"
aluminum foil will do, but use "HD" tin. A word of caution on chewing
the foil during an attack. If you chew during your own thoughts, it will
distort your outward bound waves. However, if you chew between thoughts,
the 'noise' will be picked up by the aliens.
tw
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami
DougW wrote:
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>
>>Lon wrote:
>>
>>>agenda_communication@hotmail.fr proclaimed:
>>>
>>>
>>>>NASA has recently answered with a world press release to the prediction
>>>>of a mega tsunami, created by a possible impact of a fragment of the
>>>>comet SW-3 on MAY 25, 2006 in the Atlantic Ocean. This prediction,
>>>>based on a clear and precise psychic communication, was confirmed by
>>>>many sources.
>>>
>>>
>>>If you wear a tinfoil hat, or even put an aluminium pot on your head,
>>>you are fully protected against this disaster. Trust me.
>>>
>>
>>Against the disaster, yes, but not reliably against the mind reading.
>>Aluminum is far more reliable than tin against tsunami causing, extra
>>terrestrial, alien mind reading.
>
>
> Shiny side in or out?
> Regular foil or heavy-duty?
>
> I find that a good way to distort mind reading waves is to
> chew on the foil.
>
Shiny side out to reflect the invasive waves immediately. "Regular"
aluminum foil will do, but use "HD" tin. A word of caution on chewing
the foil during an attack. If you chew during your own thoughts, it will
distort your outward bound waves. However, if you chew between thoughts,
the 'noise' will be picked up by the aliens.
tw
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>
>>Lon wrote:
>>
>>>agenda_communication@hotmail.fr proclaimed:
>>>
>>>
>>>>NASA has recently answered with a world press release to the prediction
>>>>of a mega tsunami, created by a possible impact of a fragment of the
>>>>comet SW-3 on MAY 25, 2006 in the Atlantic Ocean. This prediction,
>>>>based on a clear and precise psychic communication, was confirmed by
>>>>many sources.
>>>
>>>
>>>If you wear a tinfoil hat, or even put an aluminium pot on your head,
>>>you are fully protected against this disaster. Trust me.
>>>
>>
>>Against the disaster, yes, but not reliably against the mind reading.
>>Aluminum is far more reliable than tin against tsunami causing, extra
>>terrestrial, alien mind reading.
>
>
> Shiny side in or out?
> Regular foil or heavy-duty?
>
> I find that a good way to distort mind reading waves is to
> chew on the foil.
>
Shiny side out to reflect the invasive waves immediately. "Regular"
aluminum foil will do, but use "HD" tin. A word of caution on chewing
the foil during an attack. If you chew during your own thoughts, it will
distort your outward bound waves. However, if you chew between thoughts,
the 'noise' will be picked up by the aliens.
tw
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami
Let me guess, that was a government funded study?
Our tax dollars at "work".
Jeff DeWitt
Pink Freud wrote:
> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>
> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>
>
> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>
> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
> worse.
>
> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>
> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
> multinational corporations.
>
> The researchers conclude:
>
> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>
>
>
> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
> rebuttal.
>
> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>
>
>
Our tax dollars at "work".
Jeff DeWitt
Pink Freud wrote:
> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>
> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>
>
> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>
> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
> worse.
>
> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>
> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
> multinational corporations.
>
> The researchers conclude:
>
> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>
>
>
> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
> rebuttal.
>
> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami
Let me guess, that was a government funded study?
Our tax dollars at "work".
Jeff DeWitt
Pink Freud wrote:
> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>
> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>
>
> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>
> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
> worse.
>
> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>
> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
> multinational corporations.
>
> The researchers conclude:
>
> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>
>
>
> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
> rebuttal.
>
> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>
>
>
Our tax dollars at "work".
Jeff DeWitt
Pink Freud wrote:
> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>
> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>
>
> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>
> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
> worse.
>
> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>
> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
> multinational corporations.
>
> The researchers conclude:
>
> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>
>
>
> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
> rebuttal.
>
> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami
Let me guess, that was a government funded study?
Our tax dollars at "work".
Jeff DeWitt
Pink Freud wrote:
> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>
> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>
>
> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>
> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
> worse.
>
> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>
> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
> multinational corporations.
>
> The researchers conclude:
>
> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>
>
>
> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
> rebuttal.
>
> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>
>
>
Our tax dollars at "work".
Jeff DeWitt
Pink Freud wrote:
> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>
> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>
>
> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>
> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
> worse.
>
> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>
> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
> multinational corporations.
>
> The researchers conclude:
>
> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>
>
>
> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
> rebuttal.
>
> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami
On Fri, 05 May 2006 02:18:21 +0000, Jeff DeWitt wrote:
> Let me guess, that was a government funded study?
>
> Our tax dollars at "work".
>
> Jeff DeWitt
Of course.
>
> Pink Freud wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>>
>> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>>
>>
>> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
>> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>>
>> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
>> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
>> worse.
>>
>> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
>> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
>> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
>> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>>
>> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
>> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
>> multinational corporations.
>>
>> The researchers conclude:
>>
>> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
>> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
>> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>>
>>
>>
>> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
>> rebuttal.
>>
>> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>>
>>
>>
> Let me guess, that was a government funded study?
>
> Our tax dollars at "work".
>
> Jeff DeWitt
Of course.
>
> Pink Freud wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>>
>> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>>
>>
>> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
>> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>>
>> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
>> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
>> worse.
>>
>> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
>> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
>> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
>> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>>
>> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
>> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
>> multinational corporations.
>>
>> The researchers conclude:
>>
>> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
>> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
>> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>>
>>
>>
>> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
>> rebuttal.
>>
>> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>>
>>
>>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami
On Fri, 05 May 2006 02:18:21 +0000, Jeff DeWitt wrote:
> Let me guess, that was a government funded study?
>
> Our tax dollars at "work".
>
> Jeff DeWitt
Of course.
>
> Pink Freud wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>>
>> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>>
>>
>> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
>> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>>
>> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
>> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
>> worse.
>>
>> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
>> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
>> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
>> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>>
>> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
>> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
>> multinational corporations.
>>
>> The researchers conclude:
>>
>> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
>> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
>> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>>
>>
>>
>> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
>> rebuttal.
>>
>> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>>
>>
>>
> Let me guess, that was a government funded study?
>
> Our tax dollars at "work".
>
> Jeff DeWitt
Of course.
>
> Pink Freud wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>>
>> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>>
>>
>> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
>> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>>
>> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
>> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
>> worse.
>>
>> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
>> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
>> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
>> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>>
>> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
>> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
>> multinational corporations.
>>
>> The researchers conclude:
>>
>> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
>> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
>> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>>
>>
>>
>> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
>> rebuttal.
>>
>> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>>
>>
>>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: NASA has recently answered to the prediction of a mega tsunami
On Fri, 05 May 2006 02:18:21 +0000, Jeff DeWitt wrote:
> Let me guess, that was a government funded study?
>
> Our tax dollars at "work".
>
> Jeff DeWitt
Of course.
>
> Pink Freud wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>>
>> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>>
>>
>> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
>> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>>
>> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
>> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
>> worse.
>>
>> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
>> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
>> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
>> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>>
>> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
>> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
>> multinational corporations.
>>
>> The researchers conclude:
>>
>> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
>> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
>> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>>
>>
>>
>> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
>> rebuttal.
>>
>> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>>
>>
>>
> Let me guess, that was a government funded study?
>
> Our tax dollars at "work".
>
> Jeff DeWitt
Of course.
>
> Pink Freud wrote:
>> On Thu, 04 May 2006 07:35:51 -0700, agenda_communication@hotmail.fr wrote:
>>
>> http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/
>>
>>
>> Tin Foil Hats: No Defence Against Mind Control
>> Saturday, November 12, 2005
>>
>> Researchers at MIT have discovered that wearing a tinfoil hat doesn't
>> necessarily defend you against mind control - in fact it might make things
>> worse.
>>
>> The researchers tested a variety of "tin" (actually aluminium) foil hats
>> and looked at how effective they were in blocking certain radio
>> frequencies. Although signals at many frequencies were attenuated, a few
>> fequencies were actually amplified by wearing the hat.
>>
>> What is really interesting is that the frequencies amplified by the tin
>> foil hats coincide with certain bands allocated to government and
>> multinational corporations.
>>
>> The researchers conclude:
>>
>> "It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the
>> current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the
>> Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC."
>>
>>
>>
>> The pro-foil community has already responded, for example with this
>> rebuttal.
>>
>> http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=20051..._effectiveness
>>
>>
>>
