I don't put any faith in the TireRack's customer surveys. Most drivers can't
tell if they have a low pressure tire, much less compare the performance to
other tires. New tires are always better than the old ones.
Mud kings are supposedly the same tire as the old MT, with one less sidewall
ply. That makes it a great tire, but for a vehicle driven mostly on
pavement, something with smaller lugs will work better, like an AT.
--
Stupendous Man,
Defender of Freedom, Advocate of Liberty

 

I don't put any faith in the TireRack's customer surveys. Most drivers can't
tell if they have a low pressure tire, much less compare the performance to
other tires. New tires are always better than the old ones.
Mud kings are supposedly the same tire as the old MT, with one less sidewall
ply. That makes it a great tire, but for a vehicle driven mostly on
pavement, something with smaller lugs will work better, like an AT.
--
Stupendous Man,
Defender of Freedom, Advocate of Liberty

 

Stupendous Man wrote:
> I don't put any faith in the TireRack's customer surveys. Most
> drivers can't tell if they have a low pressure tire, much less
> compare the performance to other tires. New tires are always better
> than the old ones. Mud kings are supposedly the same tire as the old MT, with one less
> sidewall ply. That makes it a great tire, but for a vehicle driven
> mostly on pavement, something with smaller lugs will work better,
> like an AT.

TireRack surveys need to be taken with a grain of salt slightly
smaller than a cowlick.

However, it's fairly easy to read the reviews and determine if
the rating is credible.

--
DougW

 

Stupendous Man wrote:
> I don't put any faith in the TireRack's customer surveys. Most
> drivers can't tell if they have a low pressure tire, much less
> compare the performance to other tires. New tires are always better
> than the old ones. Mud kings are supposedly the same tire as the old MT, with one less
> sidewall ply. That makes it a great tire, but for a vehicle driven
> mostly on pavement, something with smaller lugs will work better,
> like an AT.

TireRack surveys need to be taken with a grain of salt slightly
smaller than a cowlick.

However, it's fairly easy to read the reviews and determine if
the rating is credible.

--
DougW

 

Stupendous Man wrote:
> I don't put any faith in the TireRack's customer surveys. Most
> drivers can't tell if they have a low pressure tire, much less
> compare the performance to other tires. New tires are always better
> than the old ones. Mud kings are supposedly the same tire as the old MT, with one less
> sidewall ply. That makes it a great tire, but for a vehicle driven
> mostly on pavement, something with smaller lugs will work better,
> like an AT.

TireRack surveys need to be taken with a grain of salt slightly
smaller than a cowlick.

However, it's fairly easy to read the reviews and determine if
the rating is credible.

--
DougW

 

I have been running them since 95 & I like them.. they are in expensive, not
a lot of road noise, & for the wheeling I do they work fine!



--

"RAC" <Thamus1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fb99h.134399$L27.2039841@wagner.videotron.net ...
> Anyone have an opinion of Mud King tires? They are the older model BFG
> mud
> terrains, sold under a new name. Any thoughts on how they perform both on
> road and off, and what the tread wear is like?
>
> I'm considering a switch to a more aggressive tread pattern from the
> current
> Cooper ST's (which incidentally I like very much). Most mud terrains are
> within the budget....but they certainly do stretch it, and I can get the
> mud
> kings at a 25% discount relatively speaking; so needless to say I'm
> considereing them!
>
> Thanks,
> RAC
>
>
>

 

I have been running them since 95 & I like them.. they are in expensive, not
a lot of road noise, & for the wheeling I do they work fine!



--

"RAC" <Thamus1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fb99h.134399$L27.2039841@wagner.videotron.net ...
> Anyone have an opinion of Mud King tires? They are the older model BFG
> mud
> terrains, sold under a new name. Any thoughts on how they perform both on
> road and off, and what the tread wear is like?
>
> I'm considering a switch to a more aggressive tread pattern from the
> current
> Cooper ST's (which incidentally I like very much). Most mud terrains are
> within the budget....but they certainly do stretch it, and I can get the
> mud
> kings at a 25% discount relatively speaking; so needless to say I'm
> considereing them!
>
> Thanks,
> RAC
>
>
>

 

I have been running them since 95 & I like them.. they are in expensive, not
a lot of road noise, & for the wheeling I do they work fine!



--

"RAC" <Thamus1@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fb99h.134399$L27.2039841@wagner.videotron.net ...
> Anyone have an opinion of Mud King tires? They are the older model BFG
> mud
> terrains, sold under a new name. Any thoughts on how they perform both on
> road and off, and what the tread wear is like?
>
> I'm considering a switch to a more aggressive tread pattern from the
> current
> Cooper ST's (which incidentally I like very much). Most mud terrains are
> within the budget....but they certainly do stretch it, and I can get the
> mud
> kings at a 25% discount relatively speaking; so needless to say I'm
> considereing them!
>
> Thanks,
> RAC
>
>
>