Re: MI5 Persecution: Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
And I suppose you enjoy having somebody Spam your inbox with their personal
problems when your paying for a service and bandwidth. Do you think I should have to put up with what Mr. Mike Corley has for problems when I'm paying to enjoy this newsgroup. Do you think that I should have to endure Responses from immature name calling individuals to my response to this blatant abuse of Usenet etiquette? <?> wrote in message news:fl1j635d9cub0u7ke72ehpgtni03vmuq2j@4ax.com... > On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger" > <cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote: > > >Cross Posters SUCK........ > >Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters..... > > Go suck ----, you dirty ------! > > ><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com... > >> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn) > >> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british > >> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley > >> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995 > >> > >> In referenced article, David Wooding says... > >> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I > >> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative. > >> > > >> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me. > >> > >> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it > >> is a forgery. > >> > >> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except > >> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's > >> mail to news gateway, which is strange. > >> > >> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems > >> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g. > >> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net > >> > >> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net. > >> > >> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list > >> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups > >> - he would not have had access to their address in that case. > >> > >> > >> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14 > >> +0500 > >> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net> > >> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury > >> 1.20); > >> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500 > >> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net > >> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94) > >> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net> > >> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT > >> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp > >> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT > >> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> > >> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk, > >> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk, > >> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, > > >> mikeh@mordor.com, > >> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk, > >> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk > >> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british, > >> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy > >> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) > >> >Subject: Oops! Sorry! > >> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net > >> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] > >> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT > >> >Lines: 27 > >> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560 > >> > >> -- > >> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050 > >> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225 > >> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749 > >> > >> 4247 > >> > > > |
Re: MI5 Persecution: Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
And I suppose you enjoy having somebody Spam your inbox with their personal
problems when your paying for a service and bandwidth. Do you think I should have to put up with what Mr. Mike Corley has for problems when I'm paying to enjoy this newsgroup. Do you think that I should have to endure Responses from immature name calling individuals to my response to this blatant abuse of Usenet etiquette? <?> wrote in message news:fl1j635d9cub0u7ke72ehpgtni03vmuq2j@4ax.com... > On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger" > <cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote: > > >Cross Posters SUCK........ > >Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters..... > > Go suck ----, you dirty ------! > > ><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com... > >> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn) > >> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british > >> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley > >> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995 > >> > >> In referenced article, David Wooding says... > >> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I > >> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative. > >> > > >> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me. > >> > >> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it > >> is a forgery. > >> > >> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except > >> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's > >> mail to news gateway, which is strange. > >> > >> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems > >> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g. > >> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net > >> > >> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net. > >> > >> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list > >> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups > >> - he would not have had access to their address in that case. > >> > >> > >> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14 > >> +0500 > >> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net> > >> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury > >> 1.20); > >> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500 > >> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net > >> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94) > >> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net> > >> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT > >> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp > >> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT > >> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> > >> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk, > >> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk, > >> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, > > >> mikeh@mordor.com, > >> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk, > >> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk > >> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british, > >> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy > >> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) > >> >Subject: Oops! Sorry! > >> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net > >> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] > >> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT > >> >Lines: 27 > >> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560 > >> > >> -- > >> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050 > >> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225 > >> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749 > >> > >> 4247 > >> > > > |
Re: MI5 Persecution: Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
And I suppose you enjoy having somebody Spam your inbox with their personal
problems when your paying for a service and bandwidth. Do you think I should have to put up with what Mr. Mike Corley has for problems when I'm paying to enjoy this newsgroup. Do you think that I should have to endure Responses from immature name calling individuals to my response to this blatant abuse of Usenet etiquette? <?> wrote in message news:fl1j635d9cub0u7ke72ehpgtni03vmuq2j@4ax.com... > On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger" > <cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote: > > >Cross Posters SUCK........ > >Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters..... > > Go suck ----, you dirty ------! > > ><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com... > >> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn) > >> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british > >> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley > >> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995 > >> > >> In referenced article, David Wooding says... > >> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I > >> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative. > >> > > >> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me. > >> > >> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it > >> is a forgery. > >> > >> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except > >> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's > >> mail to news gateway, which is strange. > >> > >> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems > >> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g. > >> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net > >> > >> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net. > >> > >> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list > >> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups > >> - he would not have had access to their address in that case. > >> > >> > >> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14 > >> +0500 > >> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net> > >> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury > >> 1.20); > >> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500 > >> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net > >> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94) > >> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net> > >> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT > >> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp > >> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT > >> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> > >> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk, > >> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk, > >> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, > > >> mikeh@mordor.com, > >> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk, > >> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk, > >> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk > >> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british, > >> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy > >> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) > >> >Subject: Oops! Sorry! > >> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net > >> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] > >> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT > >> >Lines: 27 > >> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560 > >> > >> -- > >> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050 > >> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225 > >> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749 > >> > >> 4247 > >> > > > |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands