--- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
06-08-2007, 09:35 AM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
--- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
In referenced article, David Wooding says...
>Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
>think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
>
>>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
is a forgery.
Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
mail to news gateway, which is strange.
Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
<DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
- he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
+0500
>Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
>Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
1.20);
> 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
>Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
>Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
>Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
>Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
mikeh@mordor.com,
> michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
>Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
>From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
>Subject: Oops! Sorry!
>Organization: Toronto Free-Net
>X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
>Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
>Lines: 27
>X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
--
Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
4247
Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
In referenced article, David Wooding says...
>Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
>think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
>
>>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
is a forgery.
Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
mail to news gateway, which is strange.
Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
<DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
- he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
+0500
>Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
>Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
1.20);
> 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
>Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
>Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
>Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
>Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
mikeh@mordor.com,
> michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
>Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
>From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
>Subject: Oops! Sorry!
>Organization: Toronto Free-Net
>X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
>Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
>Lines: 27
>X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
--
Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
4247
06-08-2007, 11:11 AM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
Cross Posters SUCK........
Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
<---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>
> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >
> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>
> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> is a forgery.
>
> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>
> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>
> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>
> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>
>
> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> +0500
> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> 1.20);
> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> mikeh@mordor.com,
> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >Lines: 27
> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>
> --
> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>
> 4247
>
Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
<---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>
> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >
> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>
> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> is a forgery.
>
> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>
> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>
> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>
> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>
>
> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> +0500
> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> 1.20);
> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> mikeh@mordor.com,
> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >Lines: 27
> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>
> --
> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>
> 4247
>
06-08-2007, 11:11 AM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
Cross Posters SUCK........
Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
<---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>
> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >
> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>
> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> is a forgery.
>
> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>
> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>
> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>
> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>
>
> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> +0500
> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> 1.20);
> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> mikeh@mordor.com,
> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >Lines: 27
> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>
> --
> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>
> 4247
>
Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
<---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>
> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >
> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>
> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> is a forgery.
>
> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>
> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>
> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>
> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>
>
> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> +0500
> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> 1.20);
> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> mikeh@mordor.com,
> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >Lines: 27
> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>
> --
> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>
> 4247
>
06-08-2007, 11:11 AM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
Cross Posters SUCK........
Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
<---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>
> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >
> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>
> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> is a forgery.
>
> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>
> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>
> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>
> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>
>
> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> +0500
> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> 1.20);
> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> mikeh@mordor.com,
> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >Lines: 27
> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>
> --
> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>
> 4247
>
Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
<---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>
> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >
> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>
> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> is a forgery.
>
> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>
> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>
> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>
> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>
>
> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> +0500
> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> 1.20);
> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> mikeh@mordor.com,
> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >Lines: 27
> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>
> --
> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>
> 4247
>
06-08-2007, 11:11 AM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
Cross Posters SUCK........
Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
<---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>
> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >
> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>
> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> is a forgery.
>
> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>
> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>
> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>
> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>
>
> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> +0500
> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> 1.20);
> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> mikeh@mordor.com,
> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >Lines: 27
> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>
> --
> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>
> 4247
>
Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
<---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>
> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >
> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>
> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> is a forgery.
>
> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>
> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>
> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>
> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>
>
> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> +0500
> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> 1.20);
> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> mikeh@mordor.com,
> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >Lines: 27
> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>
> --
> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>
> 4247
>
06-08-2007, 12:42 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
<cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>Cross Posters SUCK........
>Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
>> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
>> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
>> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
>> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>>
>> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
>> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
>> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
>> >
>> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>>
>> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
>> is a forgery.
>>
>> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
>> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
>> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>>
>> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
>> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
>> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>>
>> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>>
>> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
>> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
>> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>>
>>
>> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
>> +0500
>> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
>> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
>> 1.20);
>> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
>> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
>> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
>> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
>> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
>> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
>> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
>> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
>> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
>> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
>> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
>> mikeh@mordor.com,
>> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
>> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
>> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
>> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
>> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
>> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
>> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
>> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
>> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
>> >Lines: 27
>> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>>
>> --
>> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
>> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
>> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>>
>> 4247
>>
>
<cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>Cross Posters SUCK........
>Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
>> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
>> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
>> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
>> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>>
>> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
>> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
>> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
>> >
>> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>>
>> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
>> is a forgery.
>>
>> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
>> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
>> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>>
>> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
>> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
>> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>>
>> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>>
>> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
>> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
>> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>>
>>
>> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
>> +0500
>> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
>> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
>> 1.20);
>> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
>> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
>> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
>> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
>> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
>> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
>> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
>> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
>> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
>> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
>> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
>> mikeh@mordor.com,
>> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
>> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
>> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
>> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
>> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
>> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
>> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
>> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
>> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
>> >Lines: 27
>> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>>
>> --
>> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
>> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
>> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>>
>> 4247
>>
>
06-08-2007, 12:42 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
<cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>Cross Posters SUCK........
>Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
>> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
>> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
>> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
>> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>>
>> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
>> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
>> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
>> >
>> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>>
>> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
>> is a forgery.
>>
>> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
>> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
>> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>>
>> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
>> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
>> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>>
>> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>>
>> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
>> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
>> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>>
>>
>> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
>> +0500
>> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
>> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
>> 1.20);
>> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
>> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
>> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
>> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
>> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
>> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
>> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
>> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
>> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
>> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
>> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
>> mikeh@mordor.com,
>> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
>> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
>> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
>> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
>> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
>> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
>> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
>> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
>> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
>> >Lines: 27
>> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>>
>> --
>> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
>> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
>> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>>
>> 4247
>>
>
<cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>Cross Posters SUCK........
>Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
>> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
>> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
>> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
>> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>>
>> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
>> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
>> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
>> >
>> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>>
>> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
>> is a forgery.
>>
>> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
>> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
>> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>>
>> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
>> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
>> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>>
>> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>>
>> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
>> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
>> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>>
>>
>> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
>> +0500
>> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
>> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
>> 1.20);
>> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
>> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
>> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
>> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
>> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
>> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
>> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
>> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
>> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
>> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
>> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
>> mikeh@mordor.com,
>> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
>> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
>> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
>> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
>> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
>> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
>> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
>> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
>> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
>> >Lines: 27
>> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>>
>> --
>> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
>> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
>> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>>
>> 4247
>>
>
06-08-2007, 12:42 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
<cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>Cross Posters SUCK........
>Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
>> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
>> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
>> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
>> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>>
>> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
>> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
>> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
>> >
>> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>>
>> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
>> is a forgery.
>>
>> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
>> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
>> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>>
>> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
>> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
>> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>>
>> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>>
>> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
>> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
>> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>>
>>
>> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
>> +0500
>> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
>> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
>> 1.20);
>> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
>> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
>> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
>> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
>> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
>> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
>> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
>> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
>> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
>> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
>> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
>> mikeh@mordor.com,
>> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
>> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
>> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
>> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
>> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
>> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
>> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
>> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
>> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
>> >Lines: 27
>> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>>
>> --
>> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
>> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
>> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>>
>> 4247
>>
>
<cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>Cross Posters SUCK........
>Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
>> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
>> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
>> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
>> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>>
>> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
>> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
>> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
>> >
>> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>>
>> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
>> is a forgery.
>>
>> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
>> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
>> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>>
>> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
>> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
>> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>>
>> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>>
>> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
>> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
>> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>>
>>
>> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
>> +0500
>> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
>> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
>> 1.20);
>> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
>> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
>> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
>> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
>> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
>> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
>> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
>> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
>> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
>> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
>> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
>> mikeh@mordor.com,
>> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
>> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
>> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
>> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
>> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
>> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
>> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
>> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
>> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
>> >Lines: 27
>> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>>
>> --
>> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
>> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
>> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>>
>> 4247
>>
>
06-08-2007, 12:42 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
<cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>Cross Posters SUCK........
>Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
>> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
>> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
>> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
>> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>>
>> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
>> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
>> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
>> >
>> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>>
>> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
>> is a forgery.
>>
>> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
>> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
>> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>>
>> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
>> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
>> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>>
>> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>>
>> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
>> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
>> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>>
>>
>> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
>> +0500
>> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
>> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
>> 1.20);
>> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
>> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
>> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
>> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
>> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
>> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
>> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
>> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
>> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
>> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
>> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
>> mikeh@mordor.com,
>> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
>> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
>> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
>> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
>> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
>> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
>> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
>> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
>> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
>> >Lines: 27
>> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>>
>> --
>> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
>> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
>> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>>
>> 4247
>>
>
<cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>Cross Posters SUCK........
>Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
>> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
>> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
>> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
>> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
>>
>> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
>> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
>> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
>> >
>> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
>>
>> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
>> is a forgery.
>>
>> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
>> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
>> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
>>
>> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
>> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
>> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
>>
>> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
>>
>> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
>> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
>> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
>>
>>
>> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
>> +0500
>> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
>> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
>> 1.20);
>> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
>> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
>> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
>> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
>> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
>> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
>> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
>> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
>> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
>> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
>> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
>> mikeh@mordor.com,
>> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
>> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
>> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
>> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
>> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
>> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
>> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
>> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
>> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
>> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
>> >Lines: 27
>> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
>>
>> --
>> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
>> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
>> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
>>
>> 4247
>>
>
06-08-2007, 01:23 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: --- ------------- Watch Out, Forger About 27/9/95 (4247)
And I suppose you enjoy having somebody Spam your inbox with their personal
problems
when your paying for a service and bandwidth. Do you think I should have to
put up with what
Mr. Mike Corley has for problems when I'm paying to enjoy this newsgroup.
Do you think that I should have to endure Responses from immature name
calling individuals to my
response to this blatant abuse of Usenet etiquette?
<?> wrote in message news:fl1j635d9cub0u7ke72ehpgtni03vmuq2j@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
> <cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Cross Posters SUCK........
> >Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
>
> Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
>
> ><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> >> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> >> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> >> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> >> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
> >>
> >> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >> >
> >> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
> >>
> >> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> >> is a forgery.
> >>
> >> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> >> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> >> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
> >>
> >> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> >> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> >> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
> >>
> >> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
> >>
> >> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> >> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> >> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> >> +0500
> >> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> >> 1.20);
> >> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> >> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> >> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> >> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> >> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> >> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> >> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> >> mikeh@mordor.com,
> >> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> >> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> >> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >> >Lines: 27
> >> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> >> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> >> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
> >>
> >> 4247
> >>
> >
>
problems
when your paying for a service and bandwidth. Do you think I should have to
put up with what
Mr. Mike Corley has for problems when I'm paying to enjoy this newsgroup.
Do you think that I should have to endure Responses from immature name
calling individuals to my
response to this blatant abuse of Usenet etiquette?
<?> wrote in message news:fl1j635d9cub0u7ke72ehpgtni03vmuq2j@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 15:11:55 GMT, "/\\rtful ]\)odger"
> <cybersynapticsNOSP@Mhotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Cross Posters SUCK........
> >Especially OFF TOPIC Cross Posters.....
>
> Go suck ----, you dirty ------!
>
> ><---Victim@---.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07050813351754@4ax.com...
> >> From: ray@ultimate-tech.com (Ray Dunn)
> >> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british
> >> Subject: Re: An apology from Mike Corley
> >> Date: Wed Sep 27 14:20:36 1995
> >>
> >> In referenced article, David Wooding says...
> >> >Well, Mike Corley might or might not have written the apologies, but I
> >> >think not. I thought the following line both witty and imaginative.
> >> >
> >> >>>It was the razor blades stuffed down between the keys that told me.
> >>
> >> Corley himself denies posting this "apology", but I'm impressed if it
> >> is a forgery.
> >>
> >> Here's the header of my received email. It looks very genuine except
> >> for the fact that postings to newsgroups are directed through demon's
> >> mail to news gateway, which is strange.
> >>
> >> Also the message id is <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net> which seems
> >> to be in a different format from previous Corley postings, e.g.
> >> <DFJJB3.6Ft.0.bloor@torfree.net
> >>
> >> The mail seems to have been received directly from mail.torfree.net.
> >>
> >> One way of telling for sure would be if anyone on the recipient list
> >> contacted torfree, but did not publish any complaints on the newsgroups
> >> - he would not have had access to their address in that case.
> >>
> >>
> >> >Received: from SpoolDir by ULTIMATE (Mercury 1.20); 26 Sep 95 12:00:14
> >> +0500
> >> >Return-path: <bu765@torfree.net>
> >> >Received: from mail.torfree.net by smtp.ultimate-tech.com (Mercury
> >> 1.20);
> >> > 26 Sep 95 12:00:04 +0500
> >> >Received: from bloor.torfree.net ([199.71.188.18]) by mail.torfree.net
> >> > (/\==/\ Smail3.1.28.1 #28.6; 16-jun-94)
> >> > via sendmail with smtp id <m0sxbyy-000LXSC@mail.torfree.net>
> >> > for <ray@ultimate-tech.com>; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:31 EDT
> >> >Received: from torfree.net by bloor.torfree.net with smtp
> >> > (Smail3.1.28.1 #6) id m0sxbx2-000JEeC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 11:29 EDT
> >> >Message-Id: <m0sxbx2-000JEeC@bloor.torfree.net>
> >> >Apparently-To: bu765@torfree.net, snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk,
> >> > ray@ultimate-tech.com, Frank@acclaim.demon.co.uk,
> >> > p.marshall@axion.bt.co.uk, me93jrb@brunel.ac.uk, >
> >> mikeh@mordor.com,
> >> > michael@everyman.demon.co.uk, tim@xara.co.uk,
> >> > Alan.Holmes@brunel.ac.uk, uk.misc@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-misc@news.demon.co.uk, uk-media@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk.media@news.demon.co.uk, uk.legal@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > uk-legal@news.demon.co.uk, alt-conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > alt.conspiracy@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-british@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc-culture-canada@news.demon.co.uk,
> >> > soc.culture.canada@news.demon.co.uk
> >> >Newsgroups: uk.misc, uk.media, soc.culture.british,
> >> soc.culture.canada, uk.legal, alt.conspiracy
> >> >From: bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley)
> >> >Subject: Oops! Sorry!
> >> >Organization: Toronto Free-Net
> >> >X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
> >> >Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1995 01:23:45 GMT
> >> >Lines: 27
> >> >X-PMFLAGS: 33554560
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ray Dunn (opinions are my own) | Phone: (514) 938 9050
> >> Montreal | Phax : (514) 938 5225
> >> ray@ultimate-tech.com | Home : (514) 630 3749
> >>
> >> 4247
> >>
> >
>