M151 revamped? Is it a Real Jeep?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: M151 revamped? Is it a Real Jeep?
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
> on them faster than flies on stink.
Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
sold in the post WWII era.
In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
will *lose*.
- Elron
> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
> on them faster than flies on stink.
Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
sold in the post WWII era.
In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
will *lose*.
- Elron
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: M151 revamped? Is it a Real Jeep?
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
> on them faster than flies on stink.
Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
sold in the post WWII era.
In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
will *lose*.
- Elron
> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
> on them faster than flies on stink.
Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
sold in the post WWII era.
In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
will *lose*.
- Elron
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: M151 revamped? Is it a Real Jeep?
L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
> on them faster than flies on stink.
Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
sold in the post WWII era.
In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
will *lose*.
- Elron
> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
> on them faster than flies on stink.
Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
sold in the post WWII era.
In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
will *lose*.
- Elron
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: M151 revamped? Is it a Real Jeep?
L. Ron Waddle wrote:
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
>> on them faster than flies on stink.
>
> Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
> purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
> predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
> sold in the post WWII era.
>
> In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
> describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
> will *lose*.
>
> - Elron
True. I drove "jeeps" in the Army, but now I drive "Jeeps" (Liberty and
Wrangler). Notice how I capitalize. Definition: "jeep" "a small durable
motor vehicle with four wheel drive used by the armed forces. [From G.P.
"general purpose"]
--
FRH
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
>> on them faster than flies on stink.
>
> Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
> purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
> predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
> sold in the post WWII era.
>
> In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
> describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
> will *lose*.
>
> - Elron
True. I drove "jeeps" in the Army, but now I drive "Jeeps" (Liberty and
Wrangler). Notice how I capitalize. Definition: "jeep" "a small durable
motor vehicle with four wheel drive used by the armed forces. [From G.P.
"general purpose"]
--
FRH
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: M151 revamped? Is it a Real Jeep?
L. Ron Waddle wrote:
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
>> on them faster than flies on stink.
>
> Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
> purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
> predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
> sold in the post WWII era.
>
> In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
> describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
> will *lose*.
>
> - Elron
True. I drove "jeeps" in the Army, but now I drive "Jeeps" (Liberty and
Wrangler). Notice how I capitalize. Definition: "jeep" "a small durable
motor vehicle with four wheel drive used by the armed forces. [From G.P.
"general purpose"]
--
FRH
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
>> on them faster than flies on stink.
>
> Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
> purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
> predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
> sold in the post WWII era.
>
> In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
> describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
> will *lose*.
>
> - Elron
True. I drove "jeeps" in the Army, but now I drive "Jeeps" (Liberty and
Wrangler). Notice how I capitalize. Definition: "jeep" "a small durable
motor vehicle with four wheel drive used by the armed forces. [From G.P.
"general purpose"]
--
FRH
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: M151 revamped? Is it a Real Jeep?
L. Ron Waddle wrote:
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
>> on them faster than flies on stink.
>
> Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
> purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
> predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
> sold in the post WWII era.
>
> In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
> describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
> will *lose*.
>
> - Elron
True. I drove "jeeps" in the Army, but now I drive "Jeeps" (Liberty and
Wrangler). Notice how I capitalize. Definition: "jeep" "a small durable
motor vehicle with four wheel drive used by the armed forces. [From G.P.
"general purpose"]
--
FRH
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
>> on them faster than flies on stink.
>
> Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
> purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
> predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
> sold in the post WWII era.
>
> In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
> describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
> will *lose*.
>
> - Elron
True. I drove "jeeps" in the Army, but now I drive "Jeeps" (Liberty and
Wrangler). Notice how I capitalize. Definition: "jeep" "a small durable
motor vehicle with four wheel drive used by the armed forces. [From G.P.
"general purpose"]
--
FRH
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: M151 revamped? Is it a Real Jeep?
L. Ron Waddle wrote:
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>
>> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
>> on them faster than flies on stink.
>
>
> Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
> purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
> predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
> sold in the post WWII era.
As military slang it predates WWII.
> In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
> describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
> will *lose*.
In the real world, the loser is the one who runs out of money first.
Just because they would eventually lose doesn't mean that they can't
make an example of you and sue you into penury first.
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
>
>> Nope. And if they attempt to call it one, Daimler's ***** would be
>> on them faster than flies on stink.
>
>
> Use of the word "jeep" to describe a small four-wheel-drive general
> purpose military vehicle far predates any Daimler trademarks and indeed
> predates the use of the word to describe the civilian ****** product
> sold in the post WWII era.
As military slang it predates WWII.
> In other words, if DC attempts to sue over using the word "jeep" to
> describe a small four-wheel-drive general purpose military vehicle, they
> will *lose*.
In the real world, the loser is the one who runs out of money first.
Just because they would eventually lose doesn't mean that they can't
make an example of you and sue you into penury first.