Letters to Daimler Chrysler
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Letters to Daimler Chrysler
Well said Nathan. Owners of 'Jeep' will come and go, but Jeep owners are
here to stay. I'll wait out the current owners of the Jeep corporation
before I buy another new Jeep. You've got my support too, Nathan.
Nathan Collier wrote:
> hi kevin,
> your support is sincerely appreciated....moreso than i could express....and
> i will add only 1 thing. please never let the actions of daimler chrysler
> tarnish what jeeping really is. "Jeep" may be about trademarks and
> corporate attorneys, but "jeeping" is about _you_ brother....and me.....and
> bill.....and jeff...and tom....and tim.....and jim.....and sean.....and
> ron.....and pete.....and pete again just because hes pete......and
> cal.....and travis.....and doug.....and jen......and lon.....and
> matt.....and mike.....and dave....and earle.....and bob.....and
> casey.....and ken......and paul......and frank.....and david....and will
> will....and joe....and jerry....and twaldron.....and nearly everyone else
> here. im a jeeper in my heart no matter what i drive, and i suspect that
> you are too.
> thanks again brother,
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
here to stay. I'll wait out the current owners of the Jeep corporation
before I buy another new Jeep. You've got my support too, Nathan.
Nathan Collier wrote:
> hi kevin,
> your support is sincerely appreciated....moreso than i could express....and
> i will add only 1 thing. please never let the actions of daimler chrysler
> tarnish what jeeping really is. "Jeep" may be about trademarks and
> corporate attorneys, but "jeeping" is about _you_ brother....and me.....and
> bill.....and jeff...and tom....and tim.....and jim.....and sean.....and
> ron.....and pete.....and pete again just because hes pete......and
> cal.....and travis.....and doug.....and jen......and lon.....and
> matt.....and mike.....and dave....and earle.....and bob.....and
> casey.....and ken......and paul......and frank.....and david....and will
> will....and joe....and jerry....and twaldron.....and nearly everyone else
> here. im a jeeper in my heart no matter what i drive, and i suspect that
> you are too.
> thanks again brother,
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Letters to Daimler Chrysler
Well said Nathan. Owners of 'Jeep' will come and go, but Jeep owners are
here to stay. I'll wait out the current owners of the Jeep corporation
before I buy another new Jeep. You've got my support too, Nathan.
Nathan Collier wrote:
> hi kevin,
> your support is sincerely appreciated....moreso than i could express....and
> i will add only 1 thing. please never let the actions of daimler chrysler
> tarnish what jeeping really is. "Jeep" may be about trademarks and
> corporate attorneys, but "jeeping" is about _you_ brother....and me.....and
> bill.....and jeff...and tom....and tim.....and jim.....and sean.....and
> ron.....and pete.....and pete again just because hes pete......and
> cal.....and travis.....and doug.....and jen......and lon.....and
> matt.....and mike.....and dave....and earle.....and bob.....and
> casey.....and ken......and paul......and frank.....and david....and will
> will....and joe....and jerry....and twaldron.....and nearly everyone else
> here. im a jeeper in my heart no matter what i drive, and i suspect that
> you are too.
> thanks again brother,
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
here to stay. I'll wait out the current owners of the Jeep corporation
before I buy another new Jeep. You've got my support too, Nathan.
Nathan Collier wrote:
> hi kevin,
> your support is sincerely appreciated....moreso than i could express....and
> i will add only 1 thing. please never let the actions of daimler chrysler
> tarnish what jeeping really is. "Jeep" may be about trademarks and
> corporate attorneys, but "jeeping" is about _you_ brother....and me.....and
> bill.....and jeff...and tom....and tim.....and jim.....and sean.....and
> ron.....and pete.....and pete again just because hes pete......and
> cal.....and travis.....and doug.....and jen......and lon.....and
> matt.....and mike.....and dave....and earle.....and bob.....and
> casey.....and ken......and paul......and frank.....and david....and will
> will....and joe....and jerry....and twaldron.....and nearly everyone else
> here. im a jeeper in my heart no matter what i drive, and i suspect that
> you are too.
> thanks again brother,
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Letters to Daimler Chrysler
Well said Nathan. Owners of 'Jeep' will come and go, but Jeep owners are
here to stay. I'll wait out the current owners of the Jeep corporation
before I buy another new Jeep. You've got my support too, Nathan.
Nathan Collier wrote:
> hi kevin,
> your support is sincerely appreciated....moreso than i could express....and
> i will add only 1 thing. please never let the actions of daimler chrysler
> tarnish what jeeping really is. "Jeep" may be about trademarks and
> corporate attorneys, but "jeeping" is about _you_ brother....and me.....and
> bill.....and jeff...and tom....and tim.....and jim.....and sean.....and
> ron.....and pete.....and pete again just because hes pete......and
> cal.....and travis.....and doug.....and jen......and lon.....and
> matt.....and mike.....and dave....and earle.....and bob.....and
> casey.....and ken......and paul......and frank.....and david....and will
> will....and joe....and jerry....and twaldron.....and nearly everyone else
> here. im a jeeper in my heart no matter what i drive, and i suspect that
> you are too.
> thanks again brother,
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
here to stay. I'll wait out the current owners of the Jeep corporation
before I buy another new Jeep. You've got my support too, Nathan.
Nathan Collier wrote:
> hi kevin,
> your support is sincerely appreciated....moreso than i could express....and
> i will add only 1 thing. please never let the actions of daimler chrysler
> tarnish what jeeping really is. "Jeep" may be about trademarks and
> corporate attorneys, but "jeeping" is about _you_ brother....and me.....and
> bill.....and jeff...and tom....and tim.....and jim.....and sean.....and
> ron.....and pete.....and pete again just because hes pete......and
> cal.....and travis.....and doug.....and jen......and lon.....and
> matt.....and mike.....and dave....and earle.....and bob.....and
> casey.....and ken......and paul......and frank.....and david....and will
> will....and joe....and jerry....and twaldron.....and nearly everyone else
> here. im a jeeper in my heart no matter what i drive, and i suspect that
> you are too.
> thanks again brother,
>
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Letters to Daimler Chrysler
"twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
news:8TSyb.3469$JX6.3189@newssvr24.news.prodigy.co m...
> You've got my support too, Nathan.
thats one of the few things ive always been able to depend on, and always
appreciated as well.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:8TSyb.3469$JX6.3189@newssvr24.news.prodigy.co m...
> You've got my support too, Nathan.
thats one of the few things ive always been able to depend on, and always
appreciated as well.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Letters to Daimler Chrysler
"twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
news:8TSyb.3469$JX6.3189@newssvr24.news.prodigy.co m...
> You've got my support too, Nathan.
thats one of the few things ive always been able to depend on, and always
appreciated as well.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:8TSyb.3469$JX6.3189@newssvr24.news.prodigy.co m...
> You've got my support too, Nathan.
thats one of the few things ive always been able to depend on, and always
appreciated as well.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Letters to Daimler Chrysler
"twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
news:8TSyb.3469$JX6.3189@newssvr24.news.prodigy.co m...
> You've got my support too, Nathan.
thats one of the few things ive always been able to depend on, and always
appreciated as well.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
news:8TSyb.3469$JX6.3189@newssvr24.news.prodigy.co m...
> You've got my support too, Nathan.
thats one of the few things ive always been able to depend on, and always
appreciated as well.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Letters to Daimler Chrysler
WTF is this all about? DC's suing N. Collier? For what?
"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> That should have read:
>
> "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
>
> I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I know
> all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> lawsuit.
>
>
> >
> > To: Daimler Chrysler
> >
> > To whom it may concern,
> >
> > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> Collier.
> > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> although
> > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
your
> > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment of
> one
> > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that Nathan
> > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
lawsuit.
> > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> would
> > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> >
> > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for work
> > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> non-jeep
> > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> always
> > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a statement.
I
> > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many other
> > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> drove
> > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> never
> > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
getting
> > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not an
> > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in, I
> will
> > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
something
> > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You have
> > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
way
> > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only because
> it
> > has nothing to do with your company.
> >
> > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase (a
49
> > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
anything
> to
> > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that you
> are
> > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Kevin Sperle
> > Former Jeep enthusiast
> >
> > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> >
> >
>
>
"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> That should have read:
>
> "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
>
> I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I know
> all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> lawsuit.
>
>
> >
> > To: Daimler Chrysler
> >
> > To whom it may concern,
> >
> > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> Collier.
> > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> although
> > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
your
> > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment of
> one
> > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that Nathan
> > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
lawsuit.
> > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> would
> > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> >
> > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for work
> > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> non-jeep
> > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> always
> > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a statement.
I
> > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many other
> > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> drove
> > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> never
> > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
getting
> > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not an
> > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in, I
> will
> > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
something
> > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You have
> > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
way
> > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only because
> it
> > has nothing to do with your company.
> >
> > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase (a
49
> > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
anything
> to
> > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that you
> are
> > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Kevin Sperle
> > Former Jeep enthusiast
> >
> > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> >
> >
>
>
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Letters to Daimler Chrysler
WTF is this all about? DC's suing N. Collier? For what?
"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> That should have read:
>
> "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
>
> I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I know
> all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> lawsuit.
>
>
> >
> > To: Daimler Chrysler
> >
> > To whom it may concern,
> >
> > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> Collier.
> > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> although
> > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
your
> > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment of
> one
> > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that Nathan
> > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
lawsuit.
> > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> would
> > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> >
> > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for work
> > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> non-jeep
> > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> always
> > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a statement.
I
> > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many other
> > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> drove
> > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> never
> > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
getting
> > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not an
> > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in, I
> will
> > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
something
> > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You have
> > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
way
> > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only because
> it
> > has nothing to do with your company.
> >
> > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase (a
49
> > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
anything
> to
> > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that you
> are
> > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Kevin Sperle
> > Former Jeep enthusiast
> >
> > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> >
> >
>
>
"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> That should have read:
>
> "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
>
> I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I know
> all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> lawsuit.
>
>
> >
> > To: Daimler Chrysler
> >
> > To whom it may concern,
> >
> > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> Collier.
> > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> although
> > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
your
> > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment of
> one
> > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that Nathan
> > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
lawsuit.
> > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> would
> > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> >
> > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for work
> > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> non-jeep
> > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> always
> > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a statement.
I
> > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many other
> > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> drove
> > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> never
> > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
getting
> > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not an
> > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in, I
> will
> > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
something
> > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You have
> > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
way
> > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only because
> it
> > has nothing to do with your company.
> >
> > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase (a
49
> > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
anything
> to
> > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that you
> are
> > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Kevin Sperle
> > Former Jeep enthusiast
> >
> > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> >
> >
>
>
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Letters to Daimler Chrysler
WTF is this all about? DC's suing N. Collier? For what?
"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> That should have read:
>
> "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
>
> I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I know
> all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> lawsuit.
>
>
> >
> > To: Daimler Chrysler
> >
> > To whom it may concern,
> >
> > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> Collier.
> > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> although
> > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
your
> > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment of
> one
> > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that Nathan
> > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
lawsuit.
> > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> would
> > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> >
> > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for work
> > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> non-jeep
> > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> always
> > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a statement.
I
> > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many other
> > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> drove
> > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> never
> > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
getting
> > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not an
> > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in, I
> will
> > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
something
> > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You have
> > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
way
> > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only because
> it
> > has nothing to do with your company.
> >
> > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase (a
49
> > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
anything
> to
> > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that you
> are
> > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Kevin Sperle
> > Former Jeep enthusiast
> >
> > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> >
> >
>
>
"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> That should have read:
>
> "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
>
> I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I know
> all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> lawsuit.
>
>
> >
> > To: Daimler Chrysler
> >
> > To whom it may concern,
> >
> > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> Collier.
> > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> although
> > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
your
> > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment of
> one
> > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that Nathan
> > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
lawsuit.
> > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> would
> > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> >
> > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for work
> > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> non-jeep
> > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> always
> > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a statement.
I
> > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many other
> > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> drove
> > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> never
> > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
getting
> > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not an
> > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in, I
> will
> > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
something
> > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You have
> > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
way
> > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only because
> it
> > has nothing to do with your company.
> >
> > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase (a
49
> > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
anything
> to
> > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that you
> are
> > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Kevin Sperle
> > Former Jeep enthusiast
> >
> > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> >
> >
>
>
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Letters to Daimler Chrysler
now here's a couple!
http://www.oxford.emory.edu/Director...cfm?UserID=130
http://kilpatrickstockton.com/attorn...id=289&exbio=1
one trolls the usegroups and the other sues if the argument is lost.
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bqh4l20ifv@enews3.newsguy.com...
> WTF is this all about? DC's suing N. Collier? For what?
>
> "Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> > That should have read:
> >
> > "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> > harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
> >
> > I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I
know
> > all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> > lawsuit.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > To: Daimler Chrysler
> > >
> > > To whom it may concern,
> > >
> > > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> > Collier.
> > > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> > although
> > > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
> your
> > > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment
of
> > one
> > > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that
Nathan
> > > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
> lawsuit.
> > > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> > would
> > > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> > >
> > > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for
work
> > > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> > non-jeep
> > > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> > always
> > > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a
statement.
> I
> > > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many
other
> > > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> > drove
> > > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> > never
> > > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
> getting
> > > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not
an
> > > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in,
I
> > will
> > > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
> something
> > > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You
have
> > > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
> way
> > > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only
because
> > it
> > > has nothing to do with your company.
> > >
> > > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase
(a
> 49
> > > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
> anything
> > to
> > > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that
you
> > are
> > > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Kevin Sperle
> > > Former Jeep enthusiast
> > >
> > > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
http://www.oxford.emory.edu/Director...cfm?UserID=130
http://kilpatrickstockton.com/attorn...id=289&exbio=1
one trolls the usegroups and the other sues if the argument is lost.
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bqh4l20ifv@enews3.newsguy.com...
> WTF is this all about? DC's suing N. Collier? For what?
>
> "Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> > That should have read:
> >
> > "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> > harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
> >
> > I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I
know
> > all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> > lawsuit.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > To: Daimler Chrysler
> > >
> > > To whom it may concern,
> > >
> > > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> > Collier.
> > > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> > although
> > > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
> your
> > > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment
of
> > one
> > > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that
Nathan
> > > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
> lawsuit.
> > > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> > would
> > > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> > >
> > > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for
work
> > > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> > non-jeep
> > > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> > always
> > > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a
statement.
> I
> > > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many
other
> > > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> > drove
> > > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> > never
> > > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
> getting
> > > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not
an
> > > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in,
I
> > will
> > > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
> something
> > > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You
have
> > > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
> way
> > > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only
because
> > it
> > > has nothing to do with your company.
> > >
> > > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase
(a
> 49
> > > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
> anything
> > to
> > > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that
you
> > are
> > > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Kevin Sperle
> > > Former Jeep enthusiast
> > >
> > > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>