Well said Nathan. Owners of 'Jeep' will come and go, but Jeep owners are
here to stay. I'll wait out the current owners of the Jeep corporation
before I buy another new Jeep. You've got my support too, Nathan.

Nathan Collier wrote:
> hi kevin,
> your support is sincerely appreciated....moreso than i could express....and
> i will add only 1 thing. please never let the actions of daimler chrysler
> tarnish what jeeping really is. "Jeep" may be about trademarks and
> corporate attorneys, but "jeeping" is about _you_ brother....and me.....and
> bill.....and jeff...and tom....and tim.....and jim.....and sean.....and
> ron.....and pete.....and pete again just because hes pete......and
> cal.....and travis.....and doug.....and jen......and lon.....and
> matt.....and mike.....and dave....and earle.....and bob.....and
> casey.....and ken......and paul......and frank.....and david....and will
> will....and joe....and jerry....and twaldron.....and nearly everyone else
> here. im a jeeper in my heart no matter what i drive, and i suspect that
> you are too.
> thanks again brother,
>

--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940

Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.

http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________

 

Well said Nathan. Owners of 'Jeep' will come and go, but Jeep owners are
here to stay. I'll wait out the current owners of the Jeep corporation
before I buy another new Jeep. You've got my support too, Nathan.

Nathan Collier wrote:
> hi kevin,
> your support is sincerely appreciated....moreso than i could express....and
> i will add only 1 thing. please never let the actions of daimler chrysler
> tarnish what jeeping really is. "Jeep" may be about trademarks and
> corporate attorneys, but "jeeping" is about _you_ brother....and me.....and
> bill.....and jeff...and tom....and tim.....and jim.....and sean.....and
> ron.....and pete.....and pete again just because hes pete......and
> cal.....and travis.....and doug.....and jen......and lon.....and
> matt.....and mike.....and dave....and earle.....and bob.....and
> casey.....and ken......and paul......and frank.....and david....and will
> will....and joe....and jerry....and twaldron.....and nearly everyone else
> here. im a jeeper in my heart no matter what i drive, and i suspect that
> you are too.
> thanks again brother,
>

--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940

Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.

http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________

 

Well said Nathan. Owners of 'Jeep' will come and go, but Jeep owners are
here to stay. I'll wait out the current owners of the Jeep corporation
before I buy another new Jeep. You've got my support too, Nathan.

Nathan Collier wrote:
> hi kevin,
> your support is sincerely appreciated....moreso than i could express....and
> i will add only 1 thing. please never let the actions of daimler chrysler
> tarnish what jeeping really is. "Jeep" may be about trademarks and
> corporate attorneys, but "jeeping" is about _you_ brother....and me.....and
> bill.....and jeff...and tom....and tim.....and jim.....and sean.....and
> ron.....and pete.....and pete again just because hes pete......and
> cal.....and travis.....and doug.....and jen......and lon.....and
> matt.....and mike.....and dave....and earle.....and bob.....and
> casey.....and ken......and paul......and frank.....and david....and will
> will....and joe....and jerry....and twaldron.....and nearly everyone else
> here. im a jeeper in my heart no matter what i drive, and i suspect that
> you are too.
> thanks again brother,
>

--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940

Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.

http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________

 

"twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
news:8TSyb.3469$JX6.3189@newssvr24.news.prodigy.co m...
> You've got my support too, Nathan.

thats one of the few things ive always been able to depend on, and always
appreciated as well.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
news:8TSyb.3469$JX6.3189@newssvr24.news.prodigy.co m...
> You've got my support too, Nathan.

thats one of the few things ive always been able to depend on, and always
appreciated as well.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

"twaldron" <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message
news:8TSyb.3469$JX6.3189@newssvr24.news.prodigy.co m...
> You've got my support too, Nathan.

thats one of the few things ive always been able to depend on, and always
appreciated as well.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com

 

WTF is this all about? DC's suing N. Collier? For what?

"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> That should have read:
>
> "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
>
> I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I know
> all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> lawsuit.
>
>
> >
> > To: Daimler Chrysler
> >
> > To whom it may concern,
> >
> > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> Collier.
> > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> although
> > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
your
> > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment of
> one
> > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that Nathan
> > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
lawsuit.
> > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> would
> > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> >
> > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for work
> > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> non-jeep
> > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> always
> > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a statement.
I
> > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many other
> > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> drove
> > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> never
> > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
getting
> > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not an
> > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in, I
> will
> > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
something
> > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You have
> > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
way
> > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only because
> it
> > has nothing to do with your company.
> >
> > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase (a
49
> > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
anything
> to
> > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that you
> are
> > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Kevin Sperle
> > Former Jeep enthusiast
> >
> > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> >
> >
>
>

 

WTF is this all about? DC's suing N. Collier? For what?

"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> That should have read:
>
> "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
>
> I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I know
> all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> lawsuit.
>
>
> >
> > To: Daimler Chrysler
> >
> > To whom it may concern,
> >
> > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> Collier.
> > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> although
> > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
your
> > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment of
> one
> > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that Nathan
> > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
lawsuit.
> > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> would
> > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> >
> > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for work
> > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> non-jeep
> > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> always
> > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a statement.
I
> > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many other
> > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> drove
> > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> never
> > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
getting
> > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not an
> > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in, I
> will
> > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
something
> > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You have
> > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
way
> > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only because
> it
> > has nothing to do with your company.
> >
> > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase (a
49
> > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
anything
> to
> > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that you
> are
> > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Kevin Sperle
> > Former Jeep enthusiast
> >
> > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> >
> >
>
>

 

WTF is this all about? DC's suing N. Collier? For what?

"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> That should have read:
>
> "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
>
> I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I know
> all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> lawsuit.
>
>
> >
> > To: Daimler Chrysler
> >
> > To whom it may concern,
> >
> > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> Collier.
> > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> although
> > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
your
> > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment of
> one
> > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that Nathan
> > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
lawsuit.
> > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> would
> > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> >
> > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for work
> > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> non-jeep
> > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> always
> > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a statement.
I
> > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many other
> > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> drove
> > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> never
> > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
getting
> > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not an
> > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in, I
> will
> > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
something
> > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You have
> > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
way
> > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only because
> it
> > has nothing to do with your company.
> >
> > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase (a
49
> > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
anything
> to
> > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that you
> are
> > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Kevin Sperle
> > Former Jeep enthusiast
> >
> > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> >
> >
>
>

 

now here's a couple!
http://www.oxford.emory.edu/Director...cfm?UserID=130
http://kilpatrickstockton.com/attorn...id=289&exbio=1

one trolls the usegroups and the other sues if the argument is lost.

"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bqh4l20ifv@enews3.newsguy.com...
> WTF is this all about? DC's suing N. Collier? For what?
>
> "Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:0wPyb.1483$eD2.44143@news.uswest.net...
> > That should have read:
> >
> > "This new threat of a lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited
> > harassment of one of your most vocal supporters."
> >
> > I pasted it in this message before I edited my original. As far as I
know
> > all Nathan got so far was a cease and desist order threatening another
> > lawsuit.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > To: Daimler Chrysler
> > >
> > > To whom it may concern,
> > >
> > > As an owner of two Jeeps, I am sickened by your treatment of Nathan
> > Collier.
> > > I understood why you took your first legal action against him, and
> > although
> > > I didn't think legal action was warranted I never the less understood
> your
> > > reasons. This lawsuit however seems to be a mean-spirited harassment
of
> > one
> > > of your most vocal supporters. I personally couldn't believe that
Nathan
> > > started a website that supported Jeep/off-roading after the first
> lawsuit.
> > > He didn't seem to hold any grudges and continued his support. He even
> > > purchased a 2003 Rubicon edition Wrangler AFTER you sued him. I never
> > would
> > > have supported a company that tried to destroy me.
> > >
> > > As I said I currently own two Jeeps: a 1981 CJ-7, and a 2000 Cherokee
> > > (bought new). I purchased my Cherokee as a daily driver to use for
work
> > > mostly but also camping and sight seeing. Although there were many
> > non-jeep
> > > choices when I purchased it, I chose Jeep because the Jeep brand has
> > always
> > > held a special place in my heart. I can no longer make such a
statement.
> I
> > > cannot say anything negative about the Cherokee I purchased, many
other
> > > people have reported problems but mine has run PERFECT since the day I
> > drove
> > > it home from the dealer (67,000 miles ago). Be that as it may, I will
> > never
> > > again purchase a new Daimler Chrysler vehicle. My fiancé and I are
> getting
> > > ready to replace her vehicle and I will make sure that a Jeep is not
an
> > > option. Also when I do get ready to sell my Cherokee, or trade it in,
I
> > will
> > > not be buying the Grand Cherokee I've always wanted. I will find
> something
> > > else instead; I cannot in good conscience support your company. You
have
> > > lost me as a customer and I find it hard to believe that there is any
> way
> > > you could win me back. I will continue to enjoy my 81 CJ-7, only
because
> > it
> > > has nothing to do with your company.
> > >
> > > P.S.- My family owns a grand total of 14 Jeeps. You can see them at
> > > http://www.geocities.com/co_big_cheese/ although our newest purchase
(a
> 49
> > > ****** roadster) hasn't been added to the site. I LOVED JEEP and
> anything
> > to
> > > do with it. If you can lose me as a supporter you have to worry that
you
> > are
> > > doing something DRASTICALLY wrong.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > > Kevin Sperle
> > > Former Jeep enthusiast
> > >
> > > Also sent to Jeep via the "Contact Us" link on their website.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>