Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
duke wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:51:30 -0700, "C The Shocker" <chrispdx@comcast.F.U.SPAMMERS.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
>>news:ROptc.47157$bS1.41329@okepread02...
>>
>>>Al Rantel
>>>Thursday, May 27, 2004
>>>
>>>America has just witnessed once again how dangerous it would have been had
>>>Al Gore become President in 2000 instead of George W. Bush.
>>
>>Oh for ----'s sake. Please die.
>
> Afraid of the truth, aren't you.
> duke
The religious right wouldn't know the truth if it came up and hit it in
the face screaming "Hello!!! I am the truth".
You people are hilarious, thanks for the laughter over the years. Go
shove your bible up your scrawny ****.
HTH
> On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:51:30 -0700, "C The Shocker" <chrispdx@comcast.F.U.SPAMMERS.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
>>news:ROptc.47157$bS1.41329@okepread02...
>>
>>>Al Rantel
>>>Thursday, May 27, 2004
>>>
>>>America has just witnessed once again how dangerous it would have been had
>>>Al Gore become President in 2000 instead of George W. Bush.
>>
>>Oh for ----'s sake. Please die.
>
> Afraid of the truth, aren't you.
> duke
The religious right wouldn't know the truth if it came up and hit it in
the face screaming "Hello!!! I am the truth".
You people are hilarious, thanks for the laughter over the years. Go
shove your bible up your scrawny ****.
HTH
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
duke wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:51:30 -0700, "C The Shocker" <chrispdx@comcast.F.U.SPAMMERS.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
>>news:ROptc.47157$bS1.41329@okepread02...
>>
>>>Al Rantel
>>>Thursday, May 27, 2004
>>>
>>>America has just witnessed once again how dangerous it would have been had
>>>Al Gore become President in 2000 instead of George W. Bush.
>>
>>Oh for ----'s sake. Please die.
>
> Afraid of the truth, aren't you.
> duke
The religious right wouldn't know the truth if it came up and hit it in
the face screaming "Hello!!! I am the truth".
You people are hilarious, thanks for the laughter over the years. Go
shove your bible up your scrawny ****.
HTH
> On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:51:30 -0700, "C The Shocker" <chrispdx@comcast.F.U.SPAMMERS.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
>>news:ROptc.47157$bS1.41329@okepread02...
>>
>>>Al Rantel
>>>Thursday, May 27, 2004
>>>
>>>America has just witnessed once again how dangerous it would have been had
>>>Al Gore become President in 2000 instead of George W. Bush.
>>
>>Oh for ----'s sake. Please die.
>
> Afraid of the truth, aren't you.
> duke
The religious right wouldn't know the truth if it came up and hit it in
the face screaming "Hello!!! I am the truth".
You people are hilarious, thanks for the laughter over the years. Go
shove your bible up your scrawny ****.
HTH
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
duke wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:51:30 -0700, "C The Shocker" <chrispdx@comcast.F.U.SPAMMERS.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
>>news:ROptc.47157$bS1.41329@okepread02...
>>
>>>Al Rantel
>>>Thursday, May 27, 2004
>>>
>>>America has just witnessed once again how dangerous it would have been had
>>>Al Gore become President in 2000 instead of George W. Bush.
>>
>>Oh for ----'s sake. Please die.
>
> Afraid of the truth, aren't you.
> duke
The religious right wouldn't know the truth if it came up and hit it in
the face screaming "Hello!!! I am the truth".
You people are hilarious, thanks for the laughter over the years. Go
shove your bible up your scrawny ****.
HTH
> On Thu, 27 May 2004 10:51:30 -0700, "C The Shocker" <chrispdx@comcast.F.U.SPAMMERS.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
>>news:ROptc.47157$bS1.41329@okepread02...
>>
>>>Al Rantel
>>>Thursday, May 27, 2004
>>>
>>>America has just witnessed once again how dangerous it would have been had
>>>Al Gore become President in 2000 instead of George W. Bush.
>>
>>Oh for ----'s sake. Please die.
>
> Afraid of the truth, aren't you.
> duke
The religious right wouldn't know the truth if it came up and hit it in
the face screaming "Hello!!! I am the truth".
You people are hilarious, thanks for the laughter over the years. Go
shove your bible up your scrawny ****.
HTH
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Regan/ Bush took
>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>in on its self.
But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
understand your point.
>Regan/ Bush took
>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>in on its self.
But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
understand your point.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Regan/ Bush took
>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>in on its self.
But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
understand your point.
>Regan/ Bush took
>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>in on its self.
But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
understand your point.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Regan/ Bush took
>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>in on its self.
But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
understand your point.
>Regan/ Bush took
>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>in on its self.
But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
understand your point.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
"jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>Regan/ Bush took
>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>in on its self.
But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
understand your point.
>Regan/ Bush took
>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>in on its self.
But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
understand your point.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
nobody wrote:
> "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Regan/ Bush took
>>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>>in on its self.
>
>
> But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
> collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
> helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
> saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
> understand your point.
>
Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
understanding.
> "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Regan/ Bush took
>>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>>in on its self.
>
>
> But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
> collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
> helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
> saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
> understand your point.
>
Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
understanding.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
nobody wrote:
> "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Regan/ Bush took
>>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>>in on its self.
>
>
> But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
> collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
> helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
> saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
> understand your point.
>
Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
understanding.
> "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Regan/ Bush took
>>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>>in on its self.
>
>
> But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
> collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
> helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
> saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
> understand your point.
>
Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
understanding.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Leftists Are Loonier Now Than They Were Then
nobody wrote:
> "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Regan/ Bush took
>>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>>in on its self.
>
>
> But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
> collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
> helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
> saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
> understand your point.
>
Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
understanding.
> "jaonajames" <jaonajames@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Regan/ Bush took
>>credit for the collapse but what really happened was the USSR could not
>>compete with the US, went broke trying and like all Russian governments fell
>>in on its self.
>
>
> But if you agree that USSR coudn't compete with USA and thus
> collapsed, why is it that USA cannot take credit for the policies that
> helped her outcompete USSR and forced her into the collapse? I am not
> saying that cold war was a good thing, it's just that I cannot
> understand your point.
>
Libraries could be filled with points that you are incapable of
understanding.