LED arrays for turn signals, brake lights available yet?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LED arrays for turn signals, brake lights available yet?
Ya, I talked to a guy last week and he found some that were "authorized" lol
The old in candenscents were replaced about every 6months depending on the
storms rumbling thru. But they had a fresnel type of lens cover that gave
all around directional "beaconizing" lol
It was the LED ones they were worried about because they don't emit
360...they're strongest from their end points...
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:ivmme.10583$Ri4.1725@okepread07...
> Snow did pass the time by typing:
>> Think you'll find DOT will have objections to them, also 90% of our reg's
>> come from the FAA handbook. Your local international airport Gestapo
>> should
>> be able to answer any questions you have,.(assuming you work at a
>> smaller,
>> not major airport)
>
>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>> are they DOT approved?
>>>>> We have equipment at airfields and wanted to use them in our
>>>>> obstruction
>>>>> lights...but they were worried that the brilliance wouldn't be the
>>>>> same!
>
> Just got back from a biz trip.. They make FAA aproved LED obstruction
> lamps.
> http://www.pr-tech.com/products/ligh...s_led_main.htm
>
> Realizing, that FAA regs don't apply outside the US....
>
> Most of the airfields I see are switching over to LED because the lamps
> last
> much longer, use less power, and are brighter/more directional than the
> filement versions.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
>
The old in candenscents were replaced about every 6months depending on the
storms rumbling thru. But they had a fresnel type of lens cover that gave
all around directional "beaconizing" lol
It was the LED ones they were worried about because they don't emit
360...they're strongest from their end points...
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:ivmme.10583$Ri4.1725@okepread07...
> Snow did pass the time by typing:
>> Think you'll find DOT will have objections to them, also 90% of our reg's
>> come from the FAA handbook. Your local international airport Gestapo
>> should
>> be able to answer any questions you have,.(assuming you work at a
>> smaller,
>> not major airport)
>
>>>> Steve wrote:
>>>>> are they DOT approved?
>>>>> We have equipment at airfields and wanted to use them in our
>>>>> obstruction
>>>>> lights...but they were worried that the brilliance wouldn't be the
>>>>> same!
>
> Just got back from a biz trip.. They make FAA aproved LED obstruction
> lamps.
> http://www.pr-tech.com/products/ligh...s_led_main.htm
>
> Realizing, that FAA regs don't apply outside the US....
>
> Most of the airfields I see are switching over to LED because the lamps
> last
> much longer, use less power, and are brighter/more directional than the
> filement versions.
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LED arrays for turn signals, brake lights available yet?
An LED with the proper lens shape can emit a pretty much flat beam.
However, the real trick is to simply group them. Or use the newer
variety with far higher brightness capability. Or just use laser style
and lenses.
Steve proclaimed:
> Ya, I talked to a guy last week and he found some that were "authorized" lol
>
> The old in candenscents were replaced about every 6months depending on the
> storms rumbling thru. But they had a fresnel type of lens cover that gave
> all around directional "beaconizing" lol
> It was the LED ones they were worried about because they don't emit
> 360...they're strongest from their end points...
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:ivmme.10583$Ri4.1725@okepread07...
>
>>Snow did pass the time by typing:
>>
>>>Think you'll find DOT will have objections to them, also 90% of our reg's
>>>come from the FAA handbook. Your local international airport Gestapo
>>>should
>>>be able to answer any questions you have,.(assuming you work at a
>>>smaller,
>>>not major airport)
>>
>>>>>Steve wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>are they DOT approved?
>>>>>>We have equipment at airfields and wanted to use them in our
>>>>>>obstruction
>>>>>>lights...but they were worried that the brilliance wouldn't be the
>>>>>>same!
>>
>>Just got back from a biz trip.. They make FAA aproved LED obstruction
>>lamps.
>>http://www.pr-tech.com/products/ligh...s_led_main.htm
>>
>>Realizing, that FAA regs don't apply outside the US....
>>
>>Most of the airfields I see are switching over to LED because the lamps
>>last
>>much longer, use less power, and are brighter/more directional than the
>>filement versions.
>>
>>--
>>DougW
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
However, the real trick is to simply group them. Or use the newer
variety with far higher brightness capability. Or just use laser style
and lenses.
Steve proclaimed:
> Ya, I talked to a guy last week and he found some that were "authorized" lol
>
> The old in candenscents were replaced about every 6months depending on the
> storms rumbling thru. But they had a fresnel type of lens cover that gave
> all around directional "beaconizing" lol
> It was the LED ones they were worried about because they don't emit
> 360...they're strongest from their end points...
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:ivmme.10583$Ri4.1725@okepread07...
>
>>Snow did pass the time by typing:
>>
>>>Think you'll find DOT will have objections to them, also 90% of our reg's
>>>come from the FAA handbook. Your local international airport Gestapo
>>>should
>>>be able to answer any questions you have,.(assuming you work at a
>>>smaller,
>>>not major airport)
>>
>>>>>Steve wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>are they DOT approved?
>>>>>>We have equipment at airfields and wanted to use them in our
>>>>>>obstruction
>>>>>>lights...but they were worried that the brilliance wouldn't be the
>>>>>>same!
>>
>>Just got back from a biz trip.. They make FAA aproved LED obstruction
>>lamps.
>>http://www.pr-tech.com/products/ligh...s_led_main.htm
>>
>>Realizing, that FAA regs don't apply outside the US....
>>
>>Most of the airfields I see are switching over to LED because the lamps
>>last
>>much longer, use less power, and are brighter/more directional than the
>>filement versions.
>>
>>--
>>DougW
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LED arrays for turn signals, brake lights available yet?
An LED with the proper lens shape can emit a pretty much flat beam.
However, the real trick is to simply group them. Or use the newer
variety with far higher brightness capability. Or just use laser style
and lenses.
Steve proclaimed:
> Ya, I talked to a guy last week and he found some that were "authorized" lol
>
> The old in candenscents were replaced about every 6months depending on the
> storms rumbling thru. But they had a fresnel type of lens cover that gave
> all around directional "beaconizing" lol
> It was the LED ones they were worried about because they don't emit
> 360...they're strongest from their end points...
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:ivmme.10583$Ri4.1725@okepread07...
>
>>Snow did pass the time by typing:
>>
>>>Think you'll find DOT will have objections to them, also 90% of our reg's
>>>come from the FAA handbook. Your local international airport Gestapo
>>>should
>>>be able to answer any questions you have,.(assuming you work at a
>>>smaller,
>>>not major airport)
>>
>>>>>Steve wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>are they DOT approved?
>>>>>>We have equipment at airfields and wanted to use them in our
>>>>>>obstruction
>>>>>>lights...but they were worried that the brilliance wouldn't be the
>>>>>>same!
>>
>>Just got back from a biz trip.. They make FAA aproved LED obstruction
>>lamps.
>>http://www.pr-tech.com/products/ligh...s_led_main.htm
>>
>>Realizing, that FAA regs don't apply outside the US....
>>
>>Most of the airfields I see are switching over to LED because the lamps
>>last
>>much longer, use less power, and are brighter/more directional than the
>>filement versions.
>>
>>--
>>DougW
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
However, the real trick is to simply group them. Or use the newer
variety with far higher brightness capability. Or just use laser style
and lenses.
Steve proclaimed:
> Ya, I talked to a guy last week and he found some that were "authorized" lol
>
> The old in candenscents were replaced about every 6months depending on the
> storms rumbling thru. But they had a fresnel type of lens cover that gave
> all around directional "beaconizing" lol
> It was the LED ones they were worried about because they don't emit
> 360...they're strongest from their end points...
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:ivmme.10583$Ri4.1725@okepread07...
>
>>Snow did pass the time by typing:
>>
>>>Think you'll find DOT will have objections to them, also 90% of our reg's
>>>come from the FAA handbook. Your local international airport Gestapo
>>>should
>>>be able to answer any questions you have,.(assuming you work at a
>>>smaller,
>>>not major airport)
>>
>>>>>Steve wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>are they DOT approved?
>>>>>>We have equipment at airfields and wanted to use them in our
>>>>>>obstruction
>>>>>>lights...but they were worried that the brilliance wouldn't be the
>>>>>>same!
>>
>>Just got back from a biz trip.. They make FAA aproved LED obstruction
>>lamps.
>>http://www.pr-tech.com/products/ligh...s_led_main.htm
>>
>>Realizing, that FAA regs don't apply outside the US....
>>
>>Most of the airfields I see are switching over to LED because the lamps
>>last
>>much longer, use less power, and are brighter/more directional than the
>>filement versions.
>>
>>--
>>DougW
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LED arrays for turn signals, brake lights available yet?
An LED with the proper lens shape can emit a pretty much flat beam.
However, the real trick is to simply group them. Or use the newer
variety with far higher brightness capability. Or just use laser style
and lenses.
Steve proclaimed:
> Ya, I talked to a guy last week and he found some that were "authorized" lol
>
> The old in candenscents were replaced about every 6months depending on the
> storms rumbling thru. But they had a fresnel type of lens cover that gave
> all around directional "beaconizing" lol
> It was the LED ones they were worried about because they don't emit
> 360...they're strongest from their end points...
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:ivmme.10583$Ri4.1725@okepread07...
>
>>Snow did pass the time by typing:
>>
>>>Think you'll find DOT will have objections to them, also 90% of our reg's
>>>come from the FAA handbook. Your local international airport Gestapo
>>>should
>>>be able to answer any questions you have,.(assuming you work at a
>>>smaller,
>>>not major airport)
>>
>>>>>Steve wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>are they DOT approved?
>>>>>>We have equipment at airfields and wanted to use them in our
>>>>>>obstruction
>>>>>>lights...but they were worried that the brilliance wouldn't be the
>>>>>>same!
>>
>>Just got back from a biz trip.. They make FAA aproved LED obstruction
>>lamps.
>>http://www.pr-tech.com/products/ligh...s_led_main.htm
>>
>>Realizing, that FAA regs don't apply outside the US....
>>
>>Most of the airfields I see are switching over to LED because the lamps
>>last
>>much longer, use less power, and are brighter/more directional than the
>>filement versions.
>>
>>--
>>DougW
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
However, the real trick is to simply group them. Or use the newer
variety with far higher brightness capability. Or just use laser style
and lenses.
Steve proclaimed:
> Ya, I talked to a guy last week and he found some that were "authorized" lol
>
> The old in candenscents were replaced about every 6months depending on the
> storms rumbling thru. But they had a fresnel type of lens cover that gave
> all around directional "beaconizing" lol
> It was the LED ones they were worried about because they don't emit
> 360...they're strongest from their end points...
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:ivmme.10583$Ri4.1725@okepread07...
>
>>Snow did pass the time by typing:
>>
>>>Think you'll find DOT will have objections to them, also 90% of our reg's
>>>come from the FAA handbook. Your local international airport Gestapo
>>>should
>>>be able to answer any questions you have,.(assuming you work at a
>>>smaller,
>>>not major airport)
>>
>>>>>Steve wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>are they DOT approved?
>>>>>>We have equipment at airfields and wanted to use them in our
>>>>>>obstruction
>>>>>>lights...but they were worried that the brilliance wouldn't be the
>>>>>>same!
>>
>>Just got back from a biz trip.. They make FAA aproved LED obstruction
>>lamps.
>>http://www.pr-tech.com/products/ligh...s_led_main.htm
>>
>>Realizing, that FAA regs don't apply outside the US....
>>
>>Most of the airfields I see are switching over to LED because the lamps
>>last
>>much longer, use less power, and are brighter/more directional than the
>>filement versions.
>>
>>--
>>DougW
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: LED arrays for turn signals, brake lights available yet?
An LED with the proper lens shape can emit a pretty much flat beam.
However, the real trick is to simply group them. Or use the newer
variety with far higher brightness capability. Or just use laser style
and lenses.
Steve proclaimed:
> Ya, I talked to a guy last week and he found some that were "authorized" lol
>
> The old in candenscents were replaced about every 6months depending on the
> storms rumbling thru. But they had a fresnel type of lens cover that gave
> all around directional "beaconizing" lol
> It was the LED ones they were worried about because they don't emit
> 360...they're strongest from their end points...
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:ivmme.10583$Ri4.1725@okepread07...
>
>>Snow did pass the time by typing:
>>
>>>Think you'll find DOT will have objections to them, also 90% of our reg's
>>>come from the FAA handbook. Your local international airport Gestapo
>>>should
>>>be able to answer any questions you have,.(assuming you work at a
>>>smaller,
>>>not major airport)
>>
>>>>>Steve wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>are they DOT approved?
>>>>>>We have equipment at airfields and wanted to use them in our
>>>>>>obstruction
>>>>>>lights...but they were worried that the brilliance wouldn't be the
>>>>>>same!
>>
>>Just got back from a biz trip.. They make FAA aproved LED obstruction
>>lamps.
>>http://www.pr-tech.com/products/ligh...s_led_main.htm
>>
>>Realizing, that FAA regs don't apply outside the US....
>>
>>Most of the airfields I see are switching over to LED because the lamps
>>last
>>much longer, use less power, and are brighter/more directional than the
>>filement versions.
>>
>>--
>>DougW
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
However, the real trick is to simply group them. Or use the newer
variety with far higher brightness capability. Or just use laser style
and lenses.
Steve proclaimed:
> Ya, I talked to a guy last week and he found some that were "authorized" lol
>
> The old in candenscents were replaced about every 6months depending on the
> storms rumbling thru. But they had a fresnel type of lens cover that gave
> all around directional "beaconizing" lol
> It was the LED ones they were worried about because they don't emit
> 360...they're strongest from their end points...
>
> "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
> news:ivmme.10583$Ri4.1725@okepread07...
>
>>Snow did pass the time by typing:
>>
>>>Think you'll find DOT will have objections to them, also 90% of our reg's
>>>come from the FAA handbook. Your local international airport Gestapo
>>>should
>>>be able to answer any questions you have,.(assuming you work at a
>>>smaller,
>>>not major airport)
>>
>>>>>Steve wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>are they DOT approved?
>>>>>>We have equipment at airfields and wanted to use them in our
>>>>>>obstruction
>>>>>>lights...but they were worried that the brilliance wouldn't be the
>>>>>>same!
>>
>>Just got back from a biz trip.. They make FAA aproved LED obstruction
>>lamps.
>>http://www.pr-tech.com/products/ligh...s_led_main.htm
>>
>>Realizing, that FAA regs don't apply outside the US....
>>
>>Most of the airfields I see are switching over to LED because the lamps
>>last
>>much longer, use less power, and are brighter/more directional than the
>>filement versions.
>>
>>--
>>DougW
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Morris4x4Center
Morris 4x4 Center
0
Apr 29, 2015 08:51 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)