"Clap Trap" <nowhere@the.net> wrote in message
news:b0752$4251a014$18d60a3d$22207@KNOLOGY.NET...
> Where can I find such a jet kit? I've got a rich running Weber too.
> Runs good, but smells rich and drinks too much gas. I've tweaked it as
> much as I can - I'd like to try new jets, but haven't been able to find
> any.

Try these guys:

http://www.redlineweber.com/

If they can't sell to you direct, try 4 Wheel Hardware or Quadratec.



>
> SoK66 wrote:
>> I put one of these on a 76 CJ 232 to which I adapted a 258 2bbl manifold.
>> I
>> got the Redline Weber jet kit and incresed the air correction jet one
>> size
>> in each barrel to reduce over-rich mixture and get rid of the stumble.
>> Runs
>> like a top.
>>
>> "Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
>> news:54ee912fc5a547e784b2b7088802072e@CarKB.com...
>>
>>>Hey y-all another questions. I just installed the k 551 32/36 dgev
>>>weber.
>>>all is grand except.......those instruction were crap. anyway. I've got
>>>89
>>>YJ 258/4.2L. It seems to be running rich. is this a normal set up?
>>>Anyone do this and need to rejet, and if so, what jets did you end up
>>>running with. I live in Seattle, wa, USA! I get a bog when I hammer it
>>>and the secondaries kick in, unless I go into the secondaries a little
>>>less
>>>harshly. Would appreciate any help on fine tuning this thing. I've
>>>disabled all of the emissions crap on this thing.
>>>Also, I replaced the carb because I had a vacuum leak on the stock carb
>>>and
>>>it wouldn't sit down and idle very well. The repair shop said I had a bad
>>>vacuum leak. Well, when I was ripping out all of the hoses, I found the
>>>two vacuum leaks, one hose was completely burned through.big hose, too.
>>>I
>>>decided to keep on going since I already bought the weber. But now I
>>>have
>>>a perfectly good stock carb, if anyone is intrested let me
>>>know....Robb6435@aol.com
>>>
>>>--
>>>Message posted via http://www.carkb.com
>>
>>
>>

 

"Clap Trap" <nowhere@the.net> wrote in message
news:b0752$4251a014$18d60a3d$22207@KNOLOGY.NET...
> Where can I find such a jet kit? I've got a rich running Weber too.
> Runs good, but smells rich and drinks too much gas. I've tweaked it as
> much as I can - I'd like to try new jets, but haven't been able to find
> any.

Try these guys:

http://www.redlineweber.com/

If they can't sell to you direct, try 4 Wheel Hardware or Quadratec.



>
> SoK66 wrote:
>> I put one of these on a 76 CJ 232 to which I adapted a 258 2bbl manifold.
>> I
>> got the Redline Weber jet kit and incresed the air correction jet one
>> size
>> in each barrel to reduce over-rich mixture and get rid of the stumble.
>> Runs
>> like a top.
>>
>> "Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
>> news:54ee912fc5a547e784b2b7088802072e@CarKB.com...
>>
>>>Hey y-all another questions. I just installed the k 551 32/36 dgev
>>>weber.
>>>all is grand except.......those instruction were crap. anyway. I've got
>>>89
>>>YJ 258/4.2L. It seems to be running rich. is this a normal set up?
>>>Anyone do this and need to rejet, and if so, what jets did you end up
>>>running with. I live in Seattle, wa, USA! I get a bog when I hammer it
>>>and the secondaries kick in, unless I go into the secondaries a little
>>>less
>>>harshly. Would appreciate any help on fine tuning this thing. I've
>>>disabled all of the emissions crap on this thing.
>>>Also, I replaced the carb because I had a vacuum leak on the stock carb
>>>and
>>>it wouldn't sit down and idle very well. The repair shop said I had a bad
>>>vacuum leak. Well, when I was ripping out all of the hoses, I found the
>>>two vacuum leaks, one hose was completely burned through.big hose, too.
>>>I
>>>decided to keep on going since I already bought the weber. But now I
>>>have
>>>a perfectly good stock carb, if anyone is intrested let me
>>>know....Robb6435@aol.com
>>>
>>>--
>>>Message posted via http://www.carkb.com
>>
>>
>>

 

"Clap Trap" <nowhere@the.net> wrote in message
news:b0752$4251a014$18d60a3d$22207@KNOLOGY.NET...
> Where can I find such a jet kit? I've got a rich running Weber too.
> Runs good, but smells rich and drinks too much gas. I've tweaked it as
> much as I can - I'd like to try new jets, but haven't been able to find
> any.

Try these guys:

http://www.redlineweber.com/

If they can't sell to you direct, try 4 Wheel Hardware or Quadratec.



>
> SoK66 wrote:
>> I put one of these on a 76 CJ 232 to which I adapted a 258 2bbl manifold.
>> I
>> got the Redline Weber jet kit and incresed the air correction jet one
>> size
>> in each barrel to reduce over-rich mixture and get rid of the stumble.
>> Runs
>> like a top.
>>
>> "Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
>> news:54ee912fc5a547e784b2b7088802072e@CarKB.com...
>>
>>>Hey y-all another questions. I just installed the k 551 32/36 dgev
>>>weber.
>>>all is grand except.......those instruction were crap. anyway. I've got
>>>89
>>>YJ 258/4.2L. It seems to be running rich. is this a normal set up?
>>>Anyone do this and need to rejet, and if so, what jets did you end up
>>>running with. I live in Seattle, wa, USA! I get a bog when I hammer it
>>>and the secondaries kick in, unless I go into the secondaries a little
>>>less
>>>harshly. Would appreciate any help on fine tuning this thing. I've
>>>disabled all of the emissions crap on this thing.
>>>Also, I replaced the carb because I had a vacuum leak on the stock carb
>>>and
>>>it wouldn't sit down and idle very well. The repair shop said I had a bad
>>>vacuum leak. Well, when I was ripping out all of the hoses, I found the
>>>two vacuum leaks, one hose was completely burned through.big hose, too.
>>>I
>>>decided to keep on going since I already bought the weber. But now I
>>>have
>>>a perfectly good stock carb, if anyone is intrested let me
>>>know....Robb6435@aol.com
>>>
>>>--
>>>Message posted via http://www.carkb.com
>>
>>
>>

 

I did not take the computer out of the loop. I did leave the vac. advance
at the manifold and will try moving it. I'll try the computer thingie as
well. Also, I haven't road tested it much yet, but the comment about it
using alot of fuel seems to be accurate. Bill, you suggest reconnecting
the charcoal cannister? I didn't think I would be losing that much for
vapor, but.....
I didn't pay much attention to the cannister hose routing when I disabled
it because I planned on abandoning it. Any suggestions for me on how and
where to route the three hoses? Also, the vapor line at the top of the
carb, should that go to the vapor canister? I did disconnect the EGR valve
vacuum line and plugged it.

--
Message posted via http://www.carkb.com

 

I did not take the computer out of the loop. I did leave the vac. advance
at the manifold and will try moving it. I'll try the computer thingie as
well. Also, I haven't road tested it much yet, but the comment about it
using alot of fuel seems to be accurate. Bill, you suggest reconnecting
the charcoal cannister? I didn't think I would be losing that much for
vapor, but.....
I didn't pay much attention to the cannister hose routing when I disabled
it because I planned on abandoning it. Any suggestions for me on how and
where to route the three hoses? Also, the vapor line at the top of the
carb, should that go to the vapor canister? I did disconnect the EGR valve
vacuum line and plugged it.

--
Message posted via http://www.carkb.com

 

I did not take the computer out of the loop. I did leave the vac. advance
at the manifold and will try moving it. I'll try the computer thingie as
well. Also, I haven't road tested it much yet, but the comment about it
using alot of fuel seems to be accurate. Bill, you suggest reconnecting
the charcoal cannister? I didn't think I would be losing that much for
vapor, but.....
I didn't pay much attention to the cannister hose routing when I disabled
it because I planned on abandoning it. Any suggestions for me on how and
where to route the three hoses? Also, the vapor line at the top of the
carb, should that go to the vapor canister? I did disconnect the EGR valve
vacuum line and plugged it.

--
Message posted via http://www.carkb.com

 

I did not take the computer out of the loop. I did leave the vac. advance
at the manifold and will try moving it. I'll try the computer thingie as
well. Also, I haven't road tested it much yet, but the comment about it
using alot of fuel seems to be accurate. Bill, you suggest reconnecting
the charcoal cannister? I didn't think I would be losing that much for
vapor, but.....
I didn't pay much attention to the cannister hose routing when I disabled
it because I planned on abandoning it. Any suggestions for me on how and
where to route the three hoses? Also, the vapor line at the top of the
carb, should that go to the vapor canister? I did disconnect the EGR valve
vacuum line and plugged it.

--
Message posted via http://www.carkb.com

 

"Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
news:b3558d23d6c549969503e57901e64de5@CarKB.com...
>I did not take the computer out of the loop. I did leave the vac. advance
> at the manifold and will try moving it. I'll try the computer thingie as
> well. Also, I haven't road tested it much yet, but the comment about it
> using alot of fuel seems to be accurate. Bill, you suggest reconnecting
> the charcoal cannister? I didn't think I would be losing that much for
> vapor, but.....
> I didn't pay much attention to the cannister hose routing when I disabled
> it because I planned on abandoning it. Any suggestions for me on how and
> where to route the three hoses? Also, the vapor line at the top of the
> carb, should that go to the vapor canister? I did disconnect the EGR
> valve
> vacuum line and plugged it.>

The Weber has two vacuum ports, one for the ign advance, the other (further
up the throttle plate travel) can be used for the emissions equipment, incl
the canister. The kit comes with some fittings you can adapt for the PVC
system, too.

 

"Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
news:b3558d23d6c549969503e57901e64de5@CarKB.com...
>I did not take the computer out of the loop. I did leave the vac. advance
> at the manifold and will try moving it. I'll try the computer thingie as
> well. Also, I haven't road tested it much yet, but the comment about it
> using alot of fuel seems to be accurate. Bill, you suggest reconnecting
> the charcoal cannister? I didn't think I would be losing that much for
> vapor, but.....
> I didn't pay much attention to the cannister hose routing when I disabled
> it because I planned on abandoning it. Any suggestions for me on how and
> where to route the three hoses? Also, the vapor line at the top of the
> carb, should that go to the vapor canister? I did disconnect the EGR
> valve
> vacuum line and plugged it.>

The Weber has two vacuum ports, one for the ign advance, the other (further
up the throttle plate travel) can be used for the emissions equipment, incl
the canister. The kit comes with some fittings you can adapt for the PVC
system, too.

 

"Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
news:b3558d23d6c549969503e57901e64de5@CarKB.com...
>I did not take the computer out of the loop. I did leave the vac. advance
> at the manifold and will try moving it. I'll try the computer thingie as
> well. Also, I haven't road tested it much yet, but the comment about it
> using alot of fuel seems to be accurate. Bill, you suggest reconnecting
> the charcoal cannister? I didn't think I would be losing that much for
> vapor, but.....
> I didn't pay much attention to the cannister hose routing when I disabled
> it because I planned on abandoning it. Any suggestions for me on how and
> where to route the three hoses? Also, the vapor line at the top of the
> carb, should that go to the vapor canister? I did disconnect the EGR
> valve
> vacuum line and plugged it.>

The Weber has two vacuum ports, one for the ign advance, the other (further
up the throttle plate travel) can be used for the emissions equipment, incl
the canister. The kit comes with some fittings you can adapt for the PVC
system, too.