Cassandra Incognito

L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Sounds like F*ck's got you running scared.

Like I said, given the quality of the posters making that judgement, I
can live with that.

>Do you think he would send me
> that info? :-)

Send you what info, Bill?

> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
> news:lA6Ai.90864$dI1.88830@newsfe08.phx...
>> In which case he can be called out on it, as has been done.
>>
>>
>> Bill did. Oh, that's right, you inserted yourself into a thread in
>> which you profess ignorance of the thread's primary subject.
>>
>> Are you always this clueless?
>>
>> Given the quality of the two posters making that judgment, I can live
>> with that. And so far as I know, my taunts are totally anonymous,
>> unlike yours.
>>
>> Have a lot of experience with that, do you?
>>
>
>
>

Bob Officer

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:41:06 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Cassandra
Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote:

>L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
>> To make them responsible,
>
>How would you having their names and addresses make them responsible?

Lewdellen would go real life on them, maybe make a personal visit to
their home.

You know Billy brags about being part of an unlawful militia
organization.

Do you remember the outlaw organization called "Posse Comitatus"? of
the late 60's and early 70's. Dozens if not 1000's of people were
arrested taken, to trial and convicted of felonies and misdemenors on
the state and federal level.

>>like I am using my God given name makes me
>> think before I use elementary school yard language like you.
>
>Don't pretend you're not swearing because you stick asterisks in the
>middle of your swear words, coward.

God didn't name Lewdelleen, his parents did. the use of the term "God
given Name", makes Billy a delusional kook and worthy of the Raisin
Award doesn't it?

>>Of course a
>> little litigation wouldn't hurt.
>
>Litigation over what? Do you want a Balsa Gavel as well as your other
>kook award(s)?

Sure he does. the minute he were to file, the CHP and local sheriffs
department would get dragged into discovery process.

>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:bL6Ai.90866$dI1.77161@newsfe08.phx...
>>> Why do you want their names and addresses, Bill? What use would they be
>>> to you?

--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005

Bob Officer

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:41:06 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Cassandra
Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote:

>L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
>> To make them responsible,
>
>How would you having their names and addresses make them responsible?

Lewdellen would go real life on them, maybe make a personal visit to
their home.

You know Billy brags about being part of an unlawful militia
organization.

Do you remember the outlaw organization called "Posse Comitatus"? of
the late 60's and early 70's. Dozens if not 1000's of people were
arrested taken, to trial and convicted of felonies and misdemenors on
the state and federal level.

>>like I am using my God given name makes me
>> think before I use elementary school yard language like you.
>
>Don't pretend you're not swearing because you stick asterisks in the
>middle of your swear words, coward.

God didn't name Lewdelleen, his parents did. the use of the term "God
given Name", makes Billy a delusional kook and worthy of the Raisin
Award doesn't it?

>>Of course a
>> little litigation wouldn't hurt.
>
>Litigation over what? Do you want a Balsa Gavel as well as your other
>kook award(s)?

Sure he does. the minute he were to file, the CHP and local sheriffs
department would get dragged into discovery process.

>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:bL6Ai.90866$dI1.77161@newsfe08.phx...
>>> Why do you want their names and addresses, Bill? What use would they be
>>> to you?

--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005

Bob Officer

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:41:06 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Cassandra
Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote:

>L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
>> To make them responsible,
>
>How would you having their names and addresses make them responsible?

Lewdellen would go real life on them, maybe make a personal visit to
their home.

You know Billy brags about being part of an unlawful militia
organization.

Do you remember the outlaw organization called "Posse Comitatus"? of
the late 60's and early 70's. Dozens if not 1000's of people were
arrested taken, to trial and convicted of felonies and misdemenors on
the state and federal level.

>>like I am using my God given name makes me
>> think before I use elementary school yard language like you.
>
>Don't pretend you're not swearing because you stick asterisks in the
>middle of your swear words, coward.

God didn't name Lewdelleen, his parents did. the use of the term "God
given Name", makes Billy a delusional kook and worthy of the Raisin
Award doesn't it?

>>Of course a
>> little litigation wouldn't hurt.
>
>Litigation over what? Do you want a Balsa Gavel as well as your other
>kook award(s)?

Sure he does. the minute he were to file, the CHP and local sheriffs
department would get dragged into discovery process.

>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:bL6Ai.90866$dI1.77161@newsfe08.phx...
>>> Why do you want their names and addresses, Bill? What use would they be
>>> to you?

--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005

Bob Officer

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:41:06 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Cassandra
Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote:

>L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
>> To make them responsible,
>
>How would you having their names and addresses make them responsible?

Lewdellen would go real life on them, maybe make a personal visit to
their home.

You know Billy brags about being part of an unlawful militia
organization.

Do you remember the outlaw organization called "Posse Comitatus"? of
the late 60's and early 70's. Dozens if not 1000's of people were
arrested taken, to trial and convicted of felonies and misdemenors on
the state and federal level.

>>like I am using my God given name makes me
>> think before I use elementary school yard language like you.
>
>Don't pretend you're not swearing because you stick asterisks in the
>middle of your swear words, coward.

God didn't name Lewdelleen, his parents did. the use of the term "God
given Name", makes Billy a delusional kook and worthy of the Raisin
Award doesn't it?

>>Of course a
>> little litigation wouldn't hurt.
>
>Litigation over what? Do you want a Balsa Gavel as well as your other
>kook award(s)?

Sure he does. the minute he were to file, the CHP and local sheriffs
department would get dragged into discovery process.

>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:bL6Ai.90866$dI1.77161@newsfe08.phx...
>>> Why do you want their names and addresses, Bill? What use would they be
>>> to you?

--
Bob Officer
COOSN-266-06-01986
Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005

Pink Freud

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:39:52 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:

> Posse Comitatus

[posse=having power + comitatus=the county]

For those who don't know, here's the new take on the old set of laws.

Double=plus uncomforting.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act


Homeland Security


TITLE 6 CHAPTER 1 SUBCHAPTER VIII Part H Sec. 466. Congress finds the
following:

1. Section 1385 of title 18 (commonly known as the Posse Comitatus Act)
prohibits the use of the Armed Forces as a Posse comitatus to execute
the laws except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized
by the Constitution or Act of Congress.

2. Enacted in 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act was expressly intended to
prevent United States Marshals,
on their own initiative, from calling on the Army for assistance in
enforcing Federal law.

3. Some believe the Posse Comitatus Act has
served the Nation well in limiting the use of the Armed Forces to
enforce the law. Whether this is a good thing or not is subject to
debate.

4. The Posse Comitatus Act was not intended to be a complete
barrier to the use of the Armed Forces for a range of domestic
purposes, including law enforcement functions, when the use of the
Armed Forces is authorized by Act of Congress or the President
determines that the use of the Armed Forces is required to fulfill the
President's obligations under the Constitution provide for the common
defense or to respond promptly to insurrection, or other serious
emergency.

5. Existing laws, including Title 10, Chapter 15 (commonly
known as The Insurrection Act), and The Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Title 42, Chapter 68), grant the
President broad powers that may be invoked in the event of domestic
emergencies, including an attack against the Nation using weapons of
mass destruction, and these laws specifically authorize the President
to use the Armed Forces to help restore public order.

6. The Posse
Comitatus Act could be replaced, nullified or modified by a simple act
of Congress.


In early 2006, the 109th Congress passed a controversial bill which grants
the President the right to commandeer Federal or even State National Guard
Troops and use them inside the United States. This bill, entitled the John
Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR),
contains a provision, (Section 1076) which allows the President to:

"...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal
service, to...

restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a
result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health
emergency, --------- attack or incident, or other condition in any State
or possession of the United States..., where the President determines
that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the
constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of
maintaining public order; suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic
violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy..." [3] Senator Patrick
Leahy and others have condemned Section 1076 because it effectively
nullifies the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.
331-335) and gives the President the legal ability to define under what
conditions martial law may be declared. [4]


Note: H.R.5122 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on
April 6, 2006, as H.R.5122 by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA). On May 5, 2006,
Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) introduced another version of the bill, H.Res.806,
followed by H.Res.811 on May 11, 2006, and H.Res.1062 on September 29,
2006. In the U.S. Senate, Sen. John Warner introduced S.2507 on April 4,
2006, followed by S.2766 on May 9, 2006, and S.2766 on May 9, 2006.
Section 1076 appears only in the final signed version of the bill (Public
Law No: 109-364, October 17, 2006): Title X--General Provisions, Sec.
1076, Use of Armed Forces in major public emergencies. The Congressional
Record (Page H8151 and Page H8152 shows Section 1076 as amended September
29, 2006, in the U.S. House of Representatives as a change to Section 333
of title 10, United States Code. On Agreeing to the Conference Report -
FINAL VOTE RESULTS


-- 30 --

Pink Freud

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:39:52 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:

> Posse Comitatus

[posse=having power + comitatus=the county]

For those who don't know, here's the new take on the old set of laws.

Double=plus uncomforting.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act


Homeland Security


TITLE 6 CHAPTER 1 SUBCHAPTER VIII Part H Sec. 466. Congress finds the
following:

1. Section 1385 of title 18 (commonly known as the Posse Comitatus Act)
prohibits the use of the Armed Forces as a Posse comitatus to execute
the laws except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized
by the Constitution or Act of Congress.

2. Enacted in 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act was expressly intended to
prevent United States Marshals,
on their own initiative, from calling on the Army for assistance in
enforcing Federal law.

3. Some believe the Posse Comitatus Act has
served the Nation well in limiting the use of the Armed Forces to
enforce the law. Whether this is a good thing or not is subject to
debate.

4. The Posse Comitatus Act was not intended to be a complete
barrier to the use of the Armed Forces for a range of domestic
purposes, including law enforcement functions, when the use of the
Armed Forces is authorized by Act of Congress or the President
determines that the use of the Armed Forces is required to fulfill the
President's obligations under the Constitution provide for the common
defense or to respond promptly to insurrection, or other serious
emergency.

5. Existing laws, including Title 10, Chapter 15 (commonly
known as The Insurrection Act), and The Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Title 42, Chapter 68), grant the
President broad powers that may be invoked in the event of domestic
emergencies, including an attack against the Nation using weapons of
mass destruction, and these laws specifically authorize the President
to use the Armed Forces to help restore public order.

6. The Posse
Comitatus Act could be replaced, nullified or modified by a simple act
of Congress.


In early 2006, the 109th Congress passed a controversial bill which grants
the President the right to commandeer Federal or even State National Guard
Troops and use them inside the United States. This bill, entitled the John
Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR),
contains a provision, (Section 1076) which allows the President to:

"...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal
service, to...

restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a
result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health
emergency, --------- attack or incident, or other condition in any State
or possession of the United States..., where the President determines
that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the
constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of
maintaining public order; suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic
violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy..." [3] Senator Patrick
Leahy and others have condemned Section 1076 because it effectively
nullifies the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.
331-335) and gives the President the legal ability to define under what
conditions martial law may be declared. [4]


Note: H.R.5122 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on
April 6, 2006, as H.R.5122 by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA). On May 5, 2006,
Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) introduced another version of the bill, H.Res.806,
followed by H.Res.811 on May 11, 2006, and H.Res.1062 on September 29,
2006. In the U.S. Senate, Sen. John Warner introduced S.2507 on April 4,
2006, followed by S.2766 on May 9, 2006, and S.2766 on May 9, 2006.
Section 1076 appears only in the final signed version of the bill (Public
Law No: 109-364, October 17, 2006): Title X--General Provisions, Sec.
1076, Use of Armed Forces in major public emergencies. The Congressional
Record (Page H8151 and Page H8152 shows Section 1076 as amended September
29, 2006, in the U.S. House of Representatives as a change to Section 333
of title 10, United States Code. On Agreeing to the Conference Report -
FINAL VOTE RESULTS


-- 30 --

Pink Freud

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:39:52 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:

> Posse Comitatus

[posse=having power + comitatus=the county]

For those who don't know, here's the new take on the old set of laws.

Double=plus uncomforting.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act


Homeland Security


TITLE 6 CHAPTER 1 SUBCHAPTER VIII Part H Sec. 466. Congress finds the
following:

1. Section 1385 of title 18 (commonly known as the Posse Comitatus Act)
prohibits the use of the Armed Forces as a Posse comitatus to execute
the laws except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized
by the Constitution or Act of Congress.

2. Enacted in 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act was expressly intended to
prevent United States Marshals,
on their own initiative, from calling on the Army for assistance in
enforcing Federal law.

3. Some believe the Posse Comitatus Act has
served the Nation well in limiting the use of the Armed Forces to
enforce the law. Whether this is a good thing or not is subject to
debate.

4. The Posse Comitatus Act was not intended to be a complete
barrier to the use of the Armed Forces for a range of domestic
purposes, including law enforcement functions, when the use of the
Armed Forces is authorized by Act of Congress or the President
determines that the use of the Armed Forces is required to fulfill the
President's obligations under the Constitution provide for the common
defense or to respond promptly to insurrection, or other serious
emergency.

5. Existing laws, including Title 10, Chapter 15 (commonly
known as The Insurrection Act), and The Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Title 42, Chapter 68), grant the
President broad powers that may be invoked in the event of domestic
emergencies, including an attack against the Nation using weapons of
mass destruction, and these laws specifically authorize the President
to use the Armed Forces to help restore public order.

6. The Posse
Comitatus Act could be replaced, nullified or modified by a simple act
of Congress.


In early 2006, the 109th Congress passed a controversial bill which grants
the President the right to commandeer Federal or even State National Guard
Troops and use them inside the United States. This bill, entitled the John
Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR),
contains a provision, (Section 1076) which allows the President to:

"...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal
service, to...

restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a
result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health
emergency, --------- attack or incident, or other condition in any State
or possession of the United States..., where the President determines
that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the
constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of
maintaining public order; suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic
violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy..." [3] Senator Patrick
Leahy and others have condemned Section 1076 because it effectively
nullifies the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.
331-335) and gives the President the legal ability to define under what
conditions martial law may be declared. [4]


Note: H.R.5122 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on
April 6, 2006, as H.R.5122 by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA). On May 5, 2006,
Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) introduced another version of the bill, H.Res.806,
followed by H.Res.811 on May 11, 2006, and H.Res.1062 on September 29,
2006. In the U.S. Senate, Sen. John Warner introduced S.2507 on April 4,
2006, followed by S.2766 on May 9, 2006, and S.2766 on May 9, 2006.
Section 1076 appears only in the final signed version of the bill (Public
Law No: 109-364, October 17, 2006): Title X--General Provisions, Sec.
1076, Use of Armed Forces in major public emergencies. The Congressional
Record (Page H8151 and Page H8152 shows Section 1076 as amended September
29, 2006, in the U.S. House of Representatives as a change to Section 333
of title 10, United States Code. On Agreeing to the Conference Report -
FINAL VOTE RESULTS


-- 30 --

Pink Freud

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:39:52 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:

> Posse Comitatus

[posse=having power + comitatus=the county]

For those who don't know, here's the new take on the old set of laws.

Double=plus uncomforting.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act


Homeland Security


TITLE 6 CHAPTER 1 SUBCHAPTER VIII Part H Sec. 466. Congress finds the
following:

1. Section 1385 of title 18 (commonly known as the Posse Comitatus Act)
prohibits the use of the Armed Forces as a Posse comitatus to execute
the laws except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized
by the Constitution or Act of Congress.

2. Enacted in 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act was expressly intended to
prevent United States Marshals,
on their own initiative, from calling on the Army for assistance in
enforcing Federal law.

3. Some believe the Posse Comitatus Act has
served the Nation well in limiting the use of the Armed Forces to
enforce the law. Whether this is a good thing or not is subject to
debate.

4. The Posse Comitatus Act was not intended to be a complete
barrier to the use of the Armed Forces for a range of domestic
purposes, including law enforcement functions, when the use of the
Armed Forces is authorized by Act of Congress or the President
determines that the use of the Armed Forces is required to fulfill the
President's obligations under the Constitution provide for the common
defense or to respond promptly to insurrection, or other serious
emergency.

5. Existing laws, including Title 10, Chapter 15 (commonly
known as The Insurrection Act), and The Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Title 42, Chapter 68), grant the
President broad powers that may be invoked in the event of domestic
emergencies, including an attack against the Nation using weapons of
mass destruction, and these laws specifically authorize the President
to use the Armed Forces to help restore public order.

6. The Posse
Comitatus Act could be replaced, nullified or modified by a simple act
of Congress.


In early 2006, the 109th Congress passed a controversial bill which grants
the President the right to commandeer Federal or even State National Guard
Troops and use them inside the United States. This bill, entitled the John
Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR),
contains a provision, (Section 1076) which allows the President to:

"...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal
service, to...

restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a
result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health
emergency, --------- attack or incident, or other condition in any State
or possession of the United States..., where the President determines
that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the
constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of
maintaining public order; suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic
violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy..." [3] Senator Patrick
Leahy and others have condemned Section 1076 because it effectively
nullifies the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.
331-335) and gives the President the legal ability to define under what
conditions martial law may be declared. [4]


Note: H.R.5122 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on
April 6, 2006, as H.R.5122 by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA). On May 5, 2006,
Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) introduced another version of the bill, H.Res.806,
followed by H.Res.811 on May 11, 2006, and H.Res.1062 on September 29,
2006. In the U.S. Senate, Sen. John Warner introduced S.2507 on April 4,
2006, followed by S.2766 on May 9, 2006, and S.2766 on May 9, 2006.
Section 1076 appears only in the final signed version of the bill (Public
Law No: 109-364, October 17, 2006): Title X--General Provisions, Sec.
1076, Use of Armed Forces in major public emergencies. The Congressional
Record (Page H8151 and Page H8152 shows Section 1076 as amended September
29, 2006, in the U.S. House of Representatives as a change to Section 333
of title 10, United States Code. On Agreeing to the Conference Report -
FINAL VOTE RESULTS


-- 30 --

L.W. \(Bill\) Hughes III

This is that little coward too afraid to use it's name and address,
who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of it's self. With an
obsession with goats, and other *******, and writes via remailers, and cross
posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme jealous ranting
over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness and super Southern
California body. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican Chiwawa
with its senseless barking it's rabid head off, me too, me too. What a pity!
Why don't you call my friends at the San Diego Sheriffs Department at
858-974-2020 as you said you would, but haven't! YOU NEED HELP!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message
news:85d6d31mqf532s4q0hd7hhf0u9bdc2c4r4@4ax.com...
>
> Lewdellen would go real life on them, maybe make a personal visit to
> their home.
>
> You know Billy brags about being part of an unlawful militia
> organization.
>
> Do you remember the outlaw organization called "Posse Comitatus"? of
> the late 60's and early 70's. Dozens if not 1000's of people were
> arrested taken, to trial and convicted of felonies and misdemenors on
> the state and federal level.
>
>
> God didn't name Lewdelleen, his parents did. the use of the term "God
> given Name", makes Billy a delusional kook and worthy of the Raisin
> Award doesn't it?
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com