On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 15:05:49 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<LWBill------@------.net> wrote:

Feed Bastard Feed!

> I'm not intending to imply insult or judgment here but I am curious to
>know in order to be able to respond to your posts in an appropriate manner,
>so please forgive what appears to be, but in fact is not
>intended as, an insulting question: Are you stupid
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
>"Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
>news:gDfui.43569$TW6.41142@newsfe06.phx...
>> L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
>> > It is a traitor and should have been shot back in the seventies for
>> > draft evasion!
>>
>> You didn't answer my question, Bill. Arrest him for what, precisely?
>> Remember, you wrote:
>>
>> >Or let me know when you cross my American border, so I may arrest you!
>>

Recipe for a Psychopath:

Emotional & Interpersonal
Glib & Superficial
Egocentric & Grandiose
Lack of Remorse or Guilt
Lack of Empathy
Deceitful & Manipulative
Shallow Emotions
Social Deviance
Impulsive
Poor Behavior Controls
Need for Excitement
Lack of Responsibility
Early Behavior Problems
Adult Antisocial Behavior

This is your life,

L.W. "Cooyon Billy" Goatman------- III

 

L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> I'm not intending to imply insult or judgment here but I am curious to
> know in order to be able to respond to your posts in an appropriate manner,

That'd be a first for you.

> so please forgive what appears to be, but in fact is not
> intended as, an insulting question:

Realizing your mental limitations, I see nothing wrong in being generous.

>Are you stupid

Do you always find it this hard to answer simple questions, Bill? Maybe
if I rephrase it slightly, you might understand: What would you have
the power to arrest him for? What offence, EXACTLY, not some vague
accusation of "treason."

There, is that easier?

> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
> news:gDfui.43569$TW6.41142@newsfe06.phx...
>> L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>> It is a traitor and should have been shot back in the seventies for
>>> draft evasion!
>> You didn't answer my question, Bill. Arrest him for what, precisely?
>> Remember, you wrote:
>>
>> >Or let me know when you cross my American border, so I may arrest you!
>>
>
>
>

 

L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> I'm not intending to imply insult or judgment here but I am curious to
> know in order to be able to respond to your posts in an appropriate manner,

That'd be a first for you.

> so please forgive what appears to be, but in fact is not
> intended as, an insulting question:

Realizing your mental limitations, I see nothing wrong in being generous.

>Are you stupid

Do you always find it this hard to answer simple questions, Bill? Maybe
if I rephrase it slightly, you might understand: What would you have
the power to arrest him for? What offence, EXACTLY, not some vague
accusation of "treason."

There, is that easier?

> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
> news:gDfui.43569$TW6.41142@newsfe06.phx...
>> L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>> It is a traitor and should have been shot back in the seventies for
>>> draft evasion!
>> You didn't answer my question, Bill. Arrest him for what, precisely?
>> Remember, you wrote:
>>
>> >Or let me know when you cross my American border, so I may arrest you!
>>
>
>
>

 

L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> I'm not intending to imply insult or judgment here but I am curious to
> know in order to be able to respond to your posts in an appropriate manner,

That'd be a first for you.

> so please forgive what appears to be, but in fact is not
> intended as, an insulting question:

Realizing your mental limitations, I see nothing wrong in being generous.

>Are you stupid

Do you always find it this hard to answer simple questions, Bill? Maybe
if I rephrase it slightly, you might understand: What would you have
the power to arrest him for? What offence, EXACTLY, not some vague
accusation of "treason."

There, is that easier?

> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
> news:gDfui.43569$TW6.41142@newsfe06.phx...
>> L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>> It is a traitor and should have been shot back in the seventies for
>>> draft evasion!
>> You didn't answer my question, Bill. Arrest him for what, precisely?
>> Remember, you wrote:
>>
>> >Or let me know when you cross my American border, so I may arrest you!
>>
>
>
>

 

L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> I'm not intending to imply insult or judgment here but I am curious to
> know in order to be able to respond to your posts in an appropriate manner,

That'd be a first for you.

> so please forgive what appears to be, but in fact is not
> intended as, an insulting question:

Realizing your mental limitations, I see nothing wrong in being generous.

>Are you stupid

Do you always find it this hard to answer simple questions, Bill? Maybe
if I rephrase it slightly, you might understand: What would you have
the power to arrest him for? What offence, EXACTLY, not some vague
accusation of "treason."

There, is that easier?

> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>
> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
> news:gDfui.43569$TW6.41142@newsfe06.phx...
>> L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
>>> It is a traitor and should have been shot back in the seventies for
>>> draft evasion!
>> You didn't answer my question, Bill. Arrest him for what, precisely?
>> Remember, you wrote:
>>
>> >Or let me know when you cross my American border, so I may arrest you!
>>
>
>
>

 

Absent Without Leave, punishable by death, during war. And knowing this
coward works, it never took advantage of Jimmy Carter's draft evasion
amnesty. So it's still a criminal traitor, and I would like to be the one
that arrest SW. UNDERSTAND now lame brain!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
news:UN3vi.100030$zz2.79979@newsfe12.phx...
>
> That'd be a first for you.
>
> Realizing your mental limitations, I see nothing wrong in being generous.
>
> Do you always find it this hard to answer simple questions, Bill? Maybe
> if I rephrase it slightly, you might understand: What would you have
> the power to arrest him for? What offence, EXACTLY, not some vague
> accusation of "treason."
>
> There, is that easier?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

Absent Without Leave, punishable by death, during war. And knowing this
coward works, it never took advantage of Jimmy Carter's draft evasion
amnesty. So it's still a criminal traitor, and I would like to be the one
that arrest SW. UNDERSTAND now lame brain!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
news:UN3vi.100030$zz2.79979@newsfe12.phx...
>
> That'd be a first for you.
>
> Realizing your mental limitations, I see nothing wrong in being generous.
>
> Do you always find it this hard to answer simple questions, Bill? Maybe
> if I rephrase it slightly, you might understand: What would you have
> the power to arrest him for? What offence, EXACTLY, not some vague
> accusation of "treason."
>
> There, is that easier?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

Absent Without Leave, punishable by death, during war. And knowing this
coward works, it never took advantage of Jimmy Carter's draft evasion
amnesty. So it's still a criminal traitor, and I would like to be the one
that arrest SW. UNDERSTAND now lame brain!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
news:UN3vi.100030$zz2.79979@newsfe12.phx...
>
> That'd be a first for you.
>
> Realizing your mental limitations, I see nothing wrong in being generous.
>
> Do you always find it this hard to answer simple questions, Bill? Maybe
> if I rephrase it slightly, you might understand: What would you have
> the power to arrest him for? What offence, EXACTLY, not some vague
> accusation of "treason."
>
> There, is that easier?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

Absent Without Leave, punishable by death, during war. And knowing this
coward works, it never took advantage of Jimmy Carter's draft evasion
amnesty. So it's still a criminal traitor, and I would like to be the one
that arrest SW. UNDERSTAND now lame brain!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
news:UN3vi.100030$zz2.79979@newsfe12.phx...
>
> That'd be a first for you.
>
> Realizing your mental limitations, I see nothing wrong in being generous.
>
> Do you always find it this hard to answer simple questions, Bill? Maybe
> if I rephrase it slightly, you might understand: What would you have
> the power to arrest him for? What offence, EXACTLY, not some vague
> accusation of "treason."
>
> There, is that easier?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 15:18:11 -0700, L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:


> Absent Without Leave, punishable by death, during war.

Desertion is much more severe than simply AWOL (not that you'd know why).

The maximum U.S. penalty for desertion in wartime remains death, although
this punishment was last applied to Eddie Slovik in 1945


> And knowing this
> coward works, it never took advantage of Jimmy Carter's draft evasion
> amnesty.


Did not apply as I was not an evader.

Besides, amnesty comes from 'amnos', meaning to forget.

I have done nothing that needs 'forgetting'.


> So it's still a criminal traitor

Not according to any laws of any country.

> and I would like to be the one
> that arrest SW.

And I'm looking forward to watching you try, as they haul your pathetic
away.


> UNDERSTAND now lame brain!


No, you still don't.


http://www.airforcetimes.com/story.p...25-1930387.php

"Another report stated that since 2000, about 40,000 troops from all
branches of the military have deserted, also according to the Pentagon.
More than half of these served in the US Army."



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/5024104.stm

"The UK military has reported over 1000 deserters since the beginning of
the war in Iraq, with 566 deserting since 2005."



> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


Oh grow up.


And EOT.



>
>
> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message
> news:UN3vi.100030$zz2.79979@newsfe12.phx...
>>
>> That'd be a first for you.
>>
>> Realizing your mental limitations, I see nothing wrong in being generous.
>>
>> Do you always find it this hard to answer simple questions, Bill? Maybe
>> if I rephrase it slightly, you might understand: What would you have
>> the power to arrest him for? What offence, EXACTLY, not some vague
>> accusation of "treason."
>>
>> There, is that easier?