Jeep to the rescue
09-19-2005, 08:38 AM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep to the rescue
Billy Ray wrote:
> The best part is the invistigation is not to explore this as a possible new
> property and life savings method but to see if the rescuers can be charged
> with any possible wrongdoing.
I agree with you with the news reporter's odd view of the situation.
The interesting thing about aviation, is that a pilot can pretty much
break any rule in an emergency.
> The best part is the invistigation is not to explore this as a possible new
> property and life savings method but to see if the rescuers can be charged
> with any possible wrongdoing.
I agree with you with the news reporter's odd view of the situation.
The interesting thing about aviation, is that a pilot can pretty much
break any rule in an emergency.
09-19-2005, 08:38 AM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep to the rescue
Billy Ray wrote:
> The best part is the invistigation is not to explore this as a possible new
> property and life savings method but to see if the rescuers can be charged
> with any possible wrongdoing.
I agree with you with the news reporter's odd view of the situation.
The interesting thing about aviation, is that a pilot can pretty much
break any rule in an emergency.
> The best part is the invistigation is not to explore this as a possible new
> property and life savings method but to see if the rescuers can be charged
> with any possible wrongdoing.
I agree with you with the news reporter's odd view of the situation.
The interesting thing about aviation, is that a pilot can pretty much
break any rule in an emergency.
09-21-2005, 09:29 AM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep to the rescue
> > The best part is the invistigation is not to explore this as a possible
new
> > property and life savings method but to see if the rescuers can be
charged
> > with any possible wrongdoing.
Err, not really. Given the dangers of flight (risks to those in and in the
path of a plane), that it's heavily regulated is a GOOD thing.
> I agree with you with the news reporter's odd view of the situation.
Odd how? It was pretty bland.
new
> > property and life savings method but to see if the rescuers can be
charged
> > with any possible wrongdoing.
Err, not really. Given the dangers of flight (risks to those in and in the
path of a plane), that it's heavily regulated is a GOOD thing.
> I agree with you with the news reporter's odd view of the situation.
Odd how? It was pretty bland.
09-21-2005, 09:29 AM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep to the rescue
> > The best part is the invistigation is not to explore this as a possible
new
> > property and life savings method but to see if the rescuers can be
charged
> > with any possible wrongdoing.
Err, not really. Given the dangers of flight (risks to those in and in the
path of a plane), that it's heavily regulated is a GOOD thing.
> I agree with you with the news reporter's odd view of the situation.
Odd how? It was pretty bland.
new
> > property and life savings method but to see if the rescuers can be
charged
> > with any possible wrongdoing.
Err, not really. Given the dangers of flight (risks to those in and in the
path of a plane), that it's heavily regulated is a GOOD thing.
> I agree with you with the news reporter's odd view of the situation.
Odd how? It was pretty bland.
09-21-2005, 09:29 AM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Jeep to the rescue
> > The best part is the invistigation is not to explore this as a possible
new
> > property and life savings method but to see if the rescuers can be
charged
> > with any possible wrongdoing.
Err, not really. Given the dangers of flight (risks to those in and in the
path of a plane), that it's heavily regulated is a GOOD thing.
> I agree with you with the news reporter's odd view of the situation.
Odd how? It was pretty bland.
new
> > property and life savings method but to see if the rescuers can be
charged
> > with any possible wrongdoing.
Err, not really. Given the dangers of flight (risks to those in and in the
path of a plane), that it's heavily regulated is a GOOD thing.
> I agree with you with the news reporter's odd view of the situation.
Odd how? It was pretty bland.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)