jeep class action lawsuit
05-13-2004, 09:59 AM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: jeep class action lawsuit
I can see it now: "The manifold cracks aren't a fault. They're meant
to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a perception that
their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new car. Or,
for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion that the
vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This feature
can often improve resale value when the buyer is a back-country hick."
"Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I meant to make! Dammit!"
You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's likely
the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon for a
future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The lawyers
will get actual money, though...
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler over the infamous
> piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
> won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but just a
> characteristic some found objectionable.
>
> "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
> > In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> > casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
> >
> > | greetings
> > | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> > | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> > | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> > | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> > | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> > |
> > | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> > | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> > |
> > | good luck
> > | casca
> >
> > Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
> >
> >
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Joe Pribe
> > NC
> > jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
> > jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
> > ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
> >
> >
> >
to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a perception that
their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new car. Or,
for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion that the
vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This feature
can often improve resale value when the buyer is a back-country hick."
"Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I meant to make! Dammit!"
You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's likely
the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon for a
future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The lawyers
will get actual money, though...
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler over the infamous
> piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
> won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but just a
> characteristic some found objectionable.
>
> "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
> > In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> > casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
> >
> > | greetings
> > | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> > | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> > | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> > | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> > | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> > |
> > | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> > | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> > |
> > | good luck
> > | casca
> >
> > Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
> >
> >
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Joe Pribe
> > NC
> > jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
> > jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
> > ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
> >
> >
> >
05-13-2004, 09:59 AM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: jeep class action lawsuit
I can see it now: "The manifold cracks aren't a fault. They're meant
to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a perception that
their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new car. Or,
for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion that the
vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This feature
can often improve resale value when the buyer is a back-country hick."
"Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I meant to make! Dammit!"
You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's likely
the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon for a
future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The lawyers
will get actual money, though...
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler over the infamous
> piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
> won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but just a
> characteristic some found objectionable.
>
> "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
> > In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> > casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
> >
> > | greetings
> > | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> > | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> > | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> > | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> > | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> > |
> > | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> > | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> > |
> > | good luck
> > | casca
> >
> > Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
> >
> >
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Joe Pribe
> > NC
> > jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
> > jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
> > ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
> >
> >
> >
to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a perception that
their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new car. Or,
for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion that the
vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This feature
can often improve resale value when the buyer is a back-country hick."
"Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I meant to make! Dammit!"
You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's likely
the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon for a
future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The lawyers
will get actual money, though...
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler over the infamous
> piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
> won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but just a
> characteristic some found objectionable.
>
> "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
> > In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> > casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
> >
> > | greetings
> > | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> > | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> > | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> > | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> > | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> > |
> > | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> > | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> > |
> > | good luck
> > | casca
> >
> > Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
> >
> >
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Joe Pribe
> > NC
> > jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
> > jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
> > ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
> >
> >
> >
05-13-2004, 09:59 AM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: jeep class action lawsuit
I can see it now: "The manifold cracks aren't a fault. They're meant
to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a perception that
their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new car. Or,
for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion that the
vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This feature
can often improve resale value when the buyer is a back-country hick."
"Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I meant to make! Dammit!"
You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's likely
the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon for a
future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The lawyers
will get actual money, though...
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler over the infamous
> piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
> won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but just a
> characteristic some found objectionable.
>
> "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
> > In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> > casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
> >
> > | greetings
> > | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> > | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> > | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> > | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> > | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> > |
> > | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> > | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> > |
> > | good luck
> > | casca
> >
> > Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
> >
> >
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Joe Pribe
> > NC
> > jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
> > jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
> > ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
> >
> >
> >
to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a perception that
their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new car. Or,
for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion that the
vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This feature
can often improve resale value when the buyer is a back-country hick."
"Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I meant to make! Dammit!"
You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's likely
the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon for a
future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The lawyers
will get actual money, though...
"Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler over the infamous
> piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
> won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but just a
> characteristic some found objectionable.
>
> "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
> > In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> > casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
> >
> > | greetings
> > | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> > | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> > | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> > | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> > | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> > |
> > | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> > | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> > |
> > | good luck
> > | casca
> >
> > Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
> >
> >
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Joe Pribe
> > NC
> > jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
> > jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
> > ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
> >
> >
> >
05-14-2004, 04:36 AM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: jeep class action lawsuit
In news:47b769ae.0405130559.2365df4c@posting.google.c om,
Bob from <magicclaw@mac.com> was injured because:
| I can see it now: "The manifold cracks aren't a fault. They're
| meant
| to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a
| perception that
| their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new
| car. Or,
| for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion
| that the
| vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This
| feature
| can often improve resale value when the buyer is a
| back-country hick." "Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I
| meant to make! Dammit!"
|
| You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's
| likely
| the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon
| for a
| future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The
| lawyers
| will get actual money, though...
|
|
| "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
| news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
|| I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler
|| over the infamous piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L
|| 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
|| won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but
|| just a characteristic some found objectionable.
||
|| "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
|| news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
||| In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
||| casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
|||
|||| greetings
|||| have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
|||| handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
|||| manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
|||| that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
|||| interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
||||
|||| recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
|||| npearson@millerfaucher.com
||||
|||| good luck
|||| casca
|||
||| Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
|||
|||
||
http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
|||
||| --
||| --
||| Joe Pribe
||| NC
||| jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
||| jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
||| ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Sounds like a class action against M$ in NC...you'll get a $15 coupon
good towards any $300 software title.
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Bob from <magicclaw@mac.com> was injured because:
| I can see it now: "The manifold cracks aren't a fault. They're
| meant
| to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a
| perception that
| their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new
| car. Or,
| for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion
| that the
| vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This
| feature
| can often improve resale value when the buyer is a
| back-country hick." "Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I
| meant to make! Dammit!"
|
| You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's
| likely
| the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon
| for a
| future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The
| lawyers
| will get actual money, though...
|
|
| "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
| news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
|| I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler
|| over the infamous piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L
|| 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
|| won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but
|| just a characteristic some found objectionable.
||
|| "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
|| news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
||| In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
||| casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
|||
|||| greetings
|||| have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
|||| handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
|||| manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
|||| that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
|||| interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
||||
|||| recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
|||| npearson@millerfaucher.com
||||
|||| good luck
|||| casca
|||
||| Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
|||
|||
||
http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
|||
||| --
||| --
||| Joe Pribe
||| NC
||| jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
||| jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
||| ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Sounds like a class action against M$ in NC...you'll get a $15 coupon
good towards any $300 software title.
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
05-14-2004, 04:36 AM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: jeep class action lawsuit
In news:47b769ae.0405130559.2365df4c@posting.google.c om,
Bob from <magicclaw@mac.com> was injured because:
| I can see it now: "The manifold cracks aren't a fault. They're
| meant
| to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a
| perception that
| their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new
| car. Or,
| for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion
| that the
| vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This
| feature
| can often improve resale value when the buyer is a
| back-country hick." "Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I
| meant to make! Dammit!"
|
| You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's
| likely
| the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon
| for a
| future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The
| lawyers
| will get actual money, though...
|
|
| "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
| news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
|| I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler
|| over the infamous piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L
|| 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
|| won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but
|| just a characteristic some found objectionable.
||
|| "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
|| news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
||| In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
||| casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
|||
|||| greetings
|||| have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
|||| handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
|||| manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
|||| that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
|||| interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
||||
|||| recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
|||| npearson@millerfaucher.com
||||
|||| good luck
|||| casca
|||
||| Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
|||
|||
||
http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
|||
||| --
||| --
||| Joe Pribe
||| NC
||| jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
||| jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
||| ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Sounds like a class action against M$ in NC...you'll get a $15 coupon
good towards any $300 software title.
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Bob from <magicclaw@mac.com> was injured because:
| I can see it now: "The manifold cracks aren't a fault. They're
| meant
| to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a
| perception that
| their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new
| car. Or,
| for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion
| that the
| vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This
| feature
| can often improve resale value when the buyer is a
| back-country hick." "Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I
| meant to make! Dammit!"
|
| You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's
| likely
| the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon
| for a
| future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The
| lawyers
| will get actual money, though...
|
|
| "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
| news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
|| I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler
|| over the infamous piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L
|| 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
|| won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but
|| just a characteristic some found objectionable.
||
|| "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
|| news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
||| In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
||| casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
|||
|||| greetings
|||| have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
|||| handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
|||| manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
|||| that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
|||| interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
||||
|||| recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
|||| npearson@millerfaucher.com
||||
|||| good luck
|||| casca
|||
||| Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
|||
|||
||
http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
|||
||| --
||| --
||| Joe Pribe
||| NC
||| jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
||| jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
||| ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Sounds like a class action against M$ in NC...you'll get a $15 coupon
good towards any $300 software title.
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
05-14-2004, 04:36 AM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: jeep class action lawsuit
In news:47b769ae.0405130559.2365df4c@posting.google.c om,
Bob from <magicclaw@mac.com> was injured because:
| I can see it now: "The manifold cracks aren't a fault. They're
| meant
| to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a
| perception that
| their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new
| car. Or,
| for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion
| that the
| vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This
| feature
| can often improve resale value when the buyer is a
| back-country hick." "Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I
| meant to make! Dammit!"
|
| You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's
| likely
| the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon
| for a
| future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The
| lawyers
| will get actual money, though...
|
|
| "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
| news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
|| I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler
|| over the infamous piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L
|| 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
|| won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but
|| just a characteristic some found objectionable.
||
|| "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
|| news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
||| In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
||| casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
|||
|||| greetings
|||| have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
|||| handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
|||| manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
|||| that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
|||| interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
||||
|||| recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
|||| npearson@millerfaucher.com
||||
|||| good luck
|||| casca
|||
||| Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
|||
|||
||
http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
|||
||| --
||| --
||| Joe Pribe
||| NC
||| jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
||| jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
||| ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Sounds like a class action against M$ in NC...you'll get a $15 coupon
good towards any $300 software title.
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Bob from <magicclaw@mac.com> was injured because:
| I can see it now: "The manifold cracks aren't a fault. They're
| meant
| to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a
| perception that
| their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new
| car. Or,
| for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion
| that the
| vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This
| feature
| can often improve resale value when the buyer is a
| back-country hick." "Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I
| meant to make! Dammit!"
|
| You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's
| likely
| the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon
| for a
| future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The
| lawyers
| will get actual money, though...
|
|
| "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
| news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
|| I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler
|| over the infamous piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L
|| 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
|| won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but
|| just a characteristic some found objectionable.
||
|| "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
|| news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
||| In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
||| casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
|||
|||| greetings
|||| have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
|||| handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
|||| manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
|||| that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
|||| interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
||||
|||| recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
|||| npearson@millerfaucher.com
||||
|||| good luck
|||| casca
|||
||| Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
|||
|||
||
http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
|||
||| --
||| --
||| Joe Pribe
||| NC
||| jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
||| jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
||| ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Sounds like a class action against M$ in NC...you'll get a $15 coupon
good towards any $300 software title.
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
05-14-2004, 04:36 AM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: jeep class action lawsuit
In news:47b769ae.0405130559.2365df4c@posting.google.c om,
Bob from <magicclaw@mac.com> was injured because:
| I can see it now: "The manifold cracks aren't a fault. They're
| meant
| to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a
| perception that
| their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new
| car. Or,
| for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion
| that the
| vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This
| feature
| can often improve resale value when the buyer is a
| back-country hick." "Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I
| meant to make! Dammit!"
|
| You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's
| likely
| the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon
| for a
| future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The
| lawyers
| will get actual money, though...
|
|
| "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
| news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
|| I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler
|| over the infamous piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L
|| 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
|| won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but
|| just a characteristic some found objectionable.
||
|| "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
|| news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
||| In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
||| casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
|||
|||| greetings
|||| have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
|||| handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
|||| manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
|||| that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
|||| interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
||||
|||| recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
|||| npearson@millerfaucher.com
||||
|||| good luck
|||| casca
|||
||| Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
|||
|||
||
http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
|||
||| --
||| --
||| Joe Pribe
||| NC
||| jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
||| jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
||| ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Sounds like a class action against M$ in NC...you'll get a $15 coupon
good towards any $300 software title.
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Bob from <magicclaw@mac.com> was injured because:
| I can see it now: "The manifold cracks aren't a fault. They're
| meant
| to occur to increase engine noise and give the user a
| perception that
| their engine is about to blow up and its time to buy a new
| car. Or,
| for our less worrisome users, it will provide the illusion
| that the
| vehicle's engine is becoming even more powerful with age. This
| feature
| can often improve resale value when the buyer is a
| back-country hick." "Oh, wait...these aren't the arguments I
| meant to make! Dammit!"
|
| You know, even if they do win the lawsuit...I would bet it's
| likely
| the extent of any compensation to the class would be a "coupon
| for a
| future DC vehicle/parts purchase" of maybe $20 per person. The
| lawyers
| will get actual money, though...
|
|
| "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.remove@frontier.net> wrote in message
| news:<c7uste023dl@enews2.newsguy.com>...
|| I think this is the same law firm that went after Chrysler
|| over the infamous piston slap issue on the '92 - '95 4.0L
|| 6cyl. I'm fairly sure the case was
|| won by Chrysler, who claimed the noise was not a "fault", but
|| just a characteristic some found objectionable.
||
|| "Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
|| news:aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr.c om...
||| In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
||| casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
|||
|||| greetings
|||| have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
|||| handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
|||| manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
|||| that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
|||| interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
||||
|||| recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
|||| npearson@millerfaucher.com
||||
|||| good luck
|||| casca
|||
||| Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
|||
|||
||
http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
|||
||| --
||| --
||| Joe Pribe
||| NC
||| jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
||| jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
||| ---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Sounds like a class action against M$ in NC...you'll get a $15 coupon
good towards any $300 software title.
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com <you know the drill
jegp 'at' hotmail.com < at is really @
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
05-18-2004, 02:22 AM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: jeep class action lawsuit
I second that. Make sure to give her a pinch for me.
Mike
"Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:<aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr. com>...
> In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
>
> | greetings
> | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> |
> | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> |
> | good luck
> | casca
>
> Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
>
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
>
> --
Mike
"Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:<aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr. com>...
> In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
>
> | greetings
> | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> |
> | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> |
> | good luck
> | casca
>
> Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
>
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
>
> --
05-18-2004, 02:22 AM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: jeep class action lawsuit
I second that. Make sure to give her a pinch for me.
Mike
"Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:<aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr. com>...
> In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
>
> | greetings
> | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> |
> | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> |
> | good luck
> | casca
>
> Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
>
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
>
> --
Mike
"Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:<aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr. com>...
> In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
>
> | greetings
> | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> |
> | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> |
> | good luck
> | casca
>
> Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
>
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
>
> --
05-18-2004, 02:22 AM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: jeep class action lawsuit
I second that. Make sure to give her a pinch for me.
Mike
"Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:<aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr. com>...
> In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
>
> | greetings
> | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> |
> | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> |
> | good luck
> | casca
>
> Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
>
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
>
> --
Mike
"Joseph P" <jpribe@nc.rr.com> wrote in message news:<aVBoc.28444$V_.1164979@twister.southeast.rr. com>...
> In news:10a4nd4d8nhjke4@corp.supernews.com,
> casca from <casca@megsinet.net> was injured because:
>
> | greetings
> | have recently as of today, talked to one of the lawyers
> | handling the class action lawsuit for the jeep exhaust
> | manifold lawsuit. She is looking to interview jeep owner's
> | that have had to replace a manifold. She is especially
> | interested in JEEP OWNER'S FROM ILLINOIS.
> |
> | recommend that anyone interested may contact her by email at
> | npearson@millerfaucher.com
> |
> | good luck
> | casca
>
> Sure wish she was in NC....she is kinda cute...
>
> http://www.millerfaucher.com/pages/a...&AttorneyID=28
>
> --