J. Clarke

J. Clarke wrote:
> call a king "Prince" is pleasing, because it diminishes his rank.

and a bunch of other crap. Trouble is that J. Clarke didn't write it,
some ------- forging headers wrote it.

Complaint filed.

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

Socks

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:07:36 GMT, Socks <socks09@shaw.ca> wrote:

>of God, if they are not Jesus Christ. He has adopted our
>sins, and has us into union, for virtues are His own, and sins are foreign
>to Him; while virtues are foreign to us, and our sins are our own.
>
>Let us change the rule which we have hitherto chosen for judging what is
>good. We had our own will as our rule. Let us now take the will of God; all
>that He wills is good and right to us, all that He does not will is bad.
>
>All that God does not permit is forbidden. Sins are forbidden by the general
>declaration that God has made, that He did not allow them. Other things
>which He has left without general prohibition, and which for that reason are
>said to be permitted, are nevertheless not always permitted. For when God
>removed some one of them from us, and when, by the event, which is a
>manifestation of the will of God, it appears that God does not will that we
>should have a thing, that is then forbidden to us as sin; since the will of
>God is that we should not have one more than another. There is this sole
>difference between these two things, that it is certain that God will never
>allow sin, while it is not certain that He will never allow the other. But
>so long as God does not permit it, we ought to regard it as sin; so long as
>the absence of God's will, which alone is all goodness and all justice,
>renders it unjust and wrong.
>
>669. To change the type, because of our weakness.
>
>670. Types.--The Jews had grown old in these earthly thoughts, that God
>loved their father Abraham, his flesh and what sprung from it; that on
>account of this He had multiplied them and distinguished them from all other
>nations, without allowing them to intermingle; that, when they were
>languishing in Egypt, He brought them out with all these great signs in
>their favour; that He fed them with manna in the desert, and led them into a
>very rich land; that He gave them kings
>
I DON'T KNOW WHO THE ---- WROTE THE ABOVE --------...
BUT IT WAS MOST CERTAINLY NOT ME.
I AM AN ATHEIST.
THAT MEANS I DON'T BELEIVE IN JESUS, GOD OR ANY OF THAT OTHER "HOLY
----" THAT DOES ALONG WITH IT.
I DON'T BUY INTO THE MASSES RELEGIOUS GARBAGE.
WARS ARE STARTED BECAUSE OF RELIGION, MOSTLY DUE TO GREED.

SO WHO EVERPOSTED THE ABOVE CRAP... ROTT IN HELL! :)

Socks

On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 22:07:36 GMT, Socks <socks09@shaw.ca> wrote:

>of God, if they are not Jesus Christ. He has adopted our
>sins, and has us into union, for virtues are His own, and sins are foreign
>to Him; while virtues are foreign to us, and our sins are our own.
>
>Let us change the rule which we have hitherto chosen for judging what is
>good. We had our own will as our rule. Let us now take the will of God; all
>that He wills is good and right to us, all that He does not will is bad.
>
>All that God does not permit is forbidden. Sins are forbidden by the general
>declaration that God has made, that He did not allow them. Other things
>which He has left without general prohibition, and which for that reason are
>said to be permitted, are nevertheless not always permitted. For when God
>removed some one of them from us, and when, by the event, which is a
>manifestation of the will of God, it appears that God does not will that we
>should have a thing, that is then forbidden to us as sin; since the will of
>God is that we should not have one more than another. There is this sole
>difference between these two things, that it is certain that God will never
>allow sin, while it is not certain that He will never allow the other. But
>so long as God does not permit it, we ought to regard it as sin; so long as
>the absence of God's will, which alone is all goodness and all justice,
>renders it unjust and wrong.
>
>669. To change the type, because of our weakness.
>
>670. Types.--The Jews had grown old in these earthly thoughts, that God
>loved their father Abraham, his flesh and what sprung from it; that on
>account of this He had multiplied them and distinguished them from all other
>nations, without allowing them to intermingle; that, when they were
>languishing in Egypt, He brought them out with all these great signs in
>their favour; that He fed them with manna in the desert, and led them into a
>very rich land; that He gave them kings
>

I DON'T KNOW WHO THE ---- WROTE THE ABOVE --------...
BUT IT WAS MOST CERTAINLY NOT ME.
I AM AN ATHEIST.
THAT MEANS I DON'T BELEIVE IN JESUS, GOD OR ANY OF THAT OTHER "HOLY
----" THAT GOES ALONG WITH IT.
I DON'T BUY INTO THE MASSES RELEGIOUS GARBAGE.
WARS ARE STARTED BECAUSE OF RELIGION, MOSTLY DUE TO GREED.
HAVE YOU EVER NOTICED THAT WHOEVER PAYS THE MOST AT DONATION TIME
AT A CONGREATION IN CHURCH GETS TO SIT THE CLOSEST TO THE PREACHER
MAN?

I THOUGHT THAT ALL CREATURES WERE CREATED EAQUAL IN THE EYES OF GOD!

OH SURE.

SO WHO EVER POSTED THIS ------- BULL ---- CAN ROTT IN YOUR OWN HELL.

OH... I FORGOT...

LICK ME WHERE I ----.
AND WHEN YOU ARE DONE, LET **** ALL OVER YOUR FACE SO YOU CAN CLEAN
UP.