Walter Bushell wrote:
> In article <JGvgc.13693$zj3.1652@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink .net>,
> "Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>>
>> Politics per usual.
>>
>> I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
>> Steven Wright
>
> Worked for Henry Kissinger.

I know... So..?

--

I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
Steven Wright

 

Walter Bushell wrote:
> In article <JGvgc.13693$zj3.1652@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink .net>,
> "Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>>
>> Politics per usual.
>>
>> I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
>> Steven Wright
>
> Worked for Henry Kissinger.

I know... So..?

--

I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
Steven Wright

 

Walter Bushell wrote:
> In article <JGvgc.13693$zj3.1652@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink .net>,
> "Light Templar" <I@DONTACCEPTEMAIL.FAM> wrote:
>
> <Snip>
>>
>> Politics per usual.
>>
>> I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
>> Steven Wright
>
> Worked for Henry Kissinger.

I know... So..?

--

I'd kill for a Nobel Peace Prize.
Steven Wright

 

Dan Saettele wrote:

>wbarwell <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message news:<40806bb2$0$17097$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.co m>...
>
>
>>Tina Laitinen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
>>>news:<c5opd4$1a39$1@news.wplus.net>...
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.madville.com/link.php?id=67909&t=15
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Trolllll..... Trolllll in the newsgroup, its a republican Trolllll....
>>>troollllll!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>Every time somebody votes republican, the
>>baby Jesus cries and Satan laughs.
>>
>>
>
>I suppose Jesus supports Kerry's stance on abortion, too. For some
>reason, I think Jesus might have considered murder of innocent
>children more important than bankruptcy (and it's possible that Bush
>may bankrupt the country, but Kerry would bankrupt the citizens with
>ridiculous taxes).
>


Did Jesus tell his followers to overthrow the government and force those
who did not hold his followers beliefs to do as he told his followers?

Or did he give them a code to live by, and ask them to teach those who
did not hold his belief of his code? This doesn't seem the same as
forcing those who did not believe in his teachings to live by the rules
those who did believe did.

 

Dan Saettele wrote:

>wbarwell <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message news:<40806bb2$0$17097$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.co m>...
>
>
>>Tina Laitinen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
>>>news:<c5opd4$1a39$1@news.wplus.net>...
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.madville.com/link.php?id=67909&t=15
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Trolllll..... Trolllll in the newsgroup, its a republican Trolllll....
>>>troollllll!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>Every time somebody votes republican, the
>>baby Jesus cries and Satan laughs.
>>
>>
>
>I suppose Jesus supports Kerry's stance on abortion, too. For some
>reason, I think Jesus might have considered murder of innocent
>children more important than bankruptcy (and it's possible that Bush
>may bankrupt the country, but Kerry would bankrupt the citizens with
>ridiculous taxes).
>


Did Jesus tell his followers to overthrow the government and force those
who did not hold his followers beliefs to do as he told his followers?

Or did he give them a code to live by, and ask them to teach those who
did not hold his belief of his code? This doesn't seem the same as
forcing those who did not believe in his teachings to live by the rules
those who did believe did.

 

Dan Saettele wrote:

>wbarwell <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message news:<40806bb2$0$17097$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.co m>...
>
>
>>Tina Laitinen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
>>>news:<c5opd4$1a39$1@news.wplus.net>...
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.madville.com/link.php?id=67909&t=15
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Trolllll..... Trolllll in the newsgroup, its a republican Trolllll....
>>>troollllll!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>Every time somebody votes republican, the
>>baby Jesus cries and Satan laughs.
>>
>>
>
>I suppose Jesus supports Kerry's stance on abortion, too. For some
>reason, I think Jesus might have considered murder of innocent
>children more important than bankruptcy (and it's possible that Bush
>may bankrupt the country, but Kerry would bankrupt the citizens with
>ridiculous taxes).
>


Did Jesus tell his followers to overthrow the government and force those
who did not hold his followers beliefs to do as he told his followers?

Or did he give them a code to live by, and ask them to teach those who
did not hold his belief of his code? This doesn't seem the same as
forcing those who did not believe in his teachings to live by the rules
those who did believe did.

 

Dan Saettele wrote:

>wbarwell <wbarwell@munnnged.mylinuxisp.com> wrote in message news:<40806bb2$0$17097$811e409b@news.mylinuxisp.co m>...
>
>
>>Tina Laitinen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
>>>news:<c5opd4$1a39$1@news.wplus.net>...
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.madville.com/link.php?id=67909&t=15
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Trolllll..... Trolllll in the newsgroup, its a republican Trolllll....
>>>troollllll!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>Every time somebody votes republican, the
>>baby Jesus cries and Satan laughs.
>>
>>
>
>I suppose Jesus supports Kerry's stance on abortion, too. For some
>reason, I think Jesus might have considered murder of innocent
>children more important than bankruptcy (and it's possible that Bush
>may bankrupt the country, but Kerry would bankrupt the citizens with
>ridiculous taxes).
>


Did Jesus tell his followers to overthrow the government and force those
who did not hold his followers beliefs to do as he told his followers?

Or did he give them a code to live by, and ask them to teach those who
did not hold his belief of his code? This doesn't seem the same as
forcing those who did not believe in his teachings to live by the rules
those who did believe did.

 

In article <timberwoof-83A8AE.00011118042004@typhoon.sonic.net>,
Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote:

> In article <ba696799.0404172100.55514e55@posting.google.com >,
> keithj43@yahoo.com (keith) wrote:
>
> > It's ridiculous to suggest that Kerry would raise taxes except to roll
> > back the tax cuts Bush targeted toward his wealthy supporters. On the
> > other hand, Bush has increased the deficit to historic highs; he has
> > taken the unprecedented step of cutting taxes during war-time, when we
> > need *more* money, not less.
>
> Look, it's all dribble-down economics. If you reduce the tax burden on
> the rich, then they will be encouraged to make and keep more money for
> themselves. After all, if they create more jobs, then that would mean
> that their employees would have to pay more taxes, and that would be
> evil. So what ends up happening is that through unemployment everyone
> ends up paying fewer taxes.

All those "Luckie Duckies".

 

In article <timberwoof-83A8AE.00011118042004@typhoon.sonic.net>,
Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote:

> In article <ba696799.0404172100.55514e55@posting.google.com >,
> keithj43@yahoo.com (keith) wrote:
>
> > It's ridiculous to suggest that Kerry would raise taxes except to roll
> > back the tax cuts Bush targeted toward his wealthy supporters. On the
> > other hand, Bush has increased the deficit to historic highs; he has
> > taken the unprecedented step of cutting taxes during war-time, when we
> > need *more* money, not less.
>
> Look, it's all dribble-down economics. If you reduce the tax burden on
> the rich, then they will be encouraged to make and keep more money for
> themselves. After all, if they create more jobs, then that would mean
> that their employees would have to pay more taxes, and that would be
> evil. So what ends up happening is that through unemployment everyone
> ends up paying fewer taxes.

All those "Luckie Duckies".

 

In article <timberwoof-83A8AE.00011118042004@typhoon.sonic.net>,
Timberwoof <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote:

> In article <ba696799.0404172100.55514e55@posting.google.com >,
> keithj43@yahoo.com (keith) wrote:
>
> > It's ridiculous to suggest that Kerry would raise taxes except to roll
> > back the tax cuts Bush targeted toward his wealthy supporters. On the
> > other hand, Bush has increased the deficit to historic highs; he has
> > taken the unprecedented step of cutting taxes during war-time, when we
> > need *more* money, not less.
>
> Look, it's all dribble-down economics. If you reduce the tax burden on
> the rich, then they will be encouraged to make and keep more money for
> themselves. After all, if they create more jobs, then that would mean
> that their employees would have to pay more taxes, and that would be
> evil. So what ends up happening is that through unemployment everyone
> ends up paying fewer taxes.

All those "Luckie Duckies".