|
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:52:34 -0400, Nate Nagel <njnagel@hornytoad.net> > wrote: > > >>P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote: >> >> >>>On 17 Oct 2003 08:52:47 -0700, dianelos@tecapro.com (Dianelos >>>Georgoudis) wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>If you care about your personal safety then, clearly, the best >>>>strategy is not to use a SUV but to use a mid-size or large > > passenger > >>>>car. >>> >>> >>>I care not only about my safety, but the safety of my family, so I >>>bought a very safe SUV. >>> >>>Go figure. >>> >> >>Obviously, then you *expect* to wreck, as you've apparently traded >>handling for crash safety. > > > Nah, despite your wish that things were that simplistic, it's not the > case. yes, actually, it is. > > My SUV is quite safe and handles quite well. > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > >>What are you doing reading rec.autos.DRIVING then? > > > Oh, part of it is the amusement derived from reading funny posts like > yours I suppose. > > >>I got no problem with SUVs, as long as they are used for their > > intended > >>purpose(s) - i.e. hauling stuff, towing, off-roading. But for > > commuting > >>or store running, it's just freaking retarded. > > > Fortunately Nate doesn't make up the rules. > > What a great country, eh? > To paraphrase, I'll fight to the death to defend your right to make an ass out of yourself in public. That won't stop me from laughing at you though. nate -- remove "horny" from my email address to reply. |
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 17:52:34 -0400, Nate Nagel <njnagel@hornytoad.net> > wrote: > > >>P e t e F a g e r l i n wrote: >> >> >>>On 17 Oct 2003 08:52:47 -0700, dianelos@tecapro.com (Dianelos >>>Georgoudis) wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>If you care about your personal safety then, clearly, the best >>>>strategy is not to use a SUV but to use a mid-size or large > > passenger > >>>>car. >>> >>> >>>I care not only about my safety, but the safety of my family, so I >>>bought a very safe SUV. >>> >>>Go figure. >>> >> >>Obviously, then you *expect* to wreck, as you've apparently traded >>handling for crash safety. > > > Nah, despite your wish that things were that simplistic, it's not the > case. yes, actually, it is. > > My SUV is quite safe and handles quite well. > BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! > >>What are you doing reading rec.autos.DRIVING then? > > > Oh, part of it is the amusement derived from reading funny posts like > yours I suppose. > > >>I got no problem with SUVs, as long as they are used for their > > intended > >>purpose(s) - i.e. hauling stuff, towing, off-roading. But for > > commuting > >>or store running, it's just freaking retarded. > > > Fortunately Nate doesn't make up the rules. > > What a great country, eh? > To paraphrase, I'll fight to the death to defend your right to make an ass out of yourself in public. That won't stop me from laughing at you though. nate -- remove "horny" from my email address to reply. |
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Agreed, at least these ecoterrorist didn't distort this as much.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Dave Milne wrote: > > Driver fatalities of 5 per *billion* miles ? Even if you do 20K miles for 60 > years, that's still a 0.6% chance... > an acceptable risk in a chicken ---- society. Cancer on the other hand ... > > Dave Milne, Scotland > '99 TJ 4.0 Sahara |
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Agreed, at least these ecoterrorist didn't distort this as much.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Dave Milne wrote: > > Driver fatalities of 5 per *billion* miles ? Even if you do 20K miles for 60 > years, that's still a 0.6% chance... > an acceptable risk in a chicken ---- society. Cancer on the other hand ... > > Dave Milne, Scotland > '99 TJ 4.0 Sahara |
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Agreed, at least these ecoterrorist didn't distort this as much.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Dave Milne wrote: > > Driver fatalities of 5 per *billion* miles ? Even if you do 20K miles for 60 > years, that's still a 0.6% chance... > an acceptable risk in a chicken ---- society. Cancer on the other hand ... > > Dave Milne, Scotland > '99 TJ 4.0 Sahara |
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
|
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
|
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
|
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Robert A. Matern" wrote: > > ...Politically motivated propaganda isn't just bad science, it's USELESS as > well. Actually, if you're sending up trial balloons to see how gullible, stupid, or ready for the next legislative step in your political agenda the public is, it could prove useful to a particular political movement, party, presidential candidate, etc. Bill Putney (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with "x") -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Robert A. Matern" wrote: > > ...Politically motivated propaganda isn't just bad science, it's USELESS as > well. Actually, if you're sending up trial balloons to see how gullible, stupid, or ready for the next legislative step in your political agenda the public is, it could prove useful to a particular political movement, party, presidential candidate, etc. Bill Putney (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my address with "x") -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:47 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands