Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <1jl5pvgg99lqtsan080pnt0knucn06rufi@4ax.com>,
whineryy@yifan.net says...
> Chris Phillipo <Xcphillipo@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >I thought you said there was no size advantage. At least you're
> >consistent in your inconsistencies.
>
> Then you thought wrong. I never said any such thing. There is an
> advantage when you strike a lighter vehicle and a disadvantage when
> striking a heavier vehicle. I've never said anything to contradict that.
>
> But then, if you can't attack the message, attack the messenger. That's
> all you have left, since the facts are opposite all your claims.
>
> Marc
> For email, remove the first "y" of "whineryy"
>
I hope your foot-in-mouth disease is not contagious:
__________________
From: Marc <whineryy@yifan.net>
"Robert A. Matern" <MaternRA@SENDME.npt.nuwc.navy.NOSPAM.mil> wrote:
Robert Said:
>The large
>vehicle ALWAYS enjoys the advantage in any collision with a smaller
vehicle.
MARC said: That is simply false.
You talk in circles Marc, you claim to have driven every SUV anyone
names here, you ignore statistics you yourself have quoted, you are full
of ---- and now kill filed. I'm sure you will continue to reply to me,
most sociopaths do. Have a good day.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
whineryy@yifan.net says...
> Chris Phillipo <Xcphillipo@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >I thought you said there was no size advantage. At least you're
> >consistent in your inconsistencies.
>
> Then you thought wrong. I never said any such thing. There is an
> advantage when you strike a lighter vehicle and a disadvantage when
> striking a heavier vehicle. I've never said anything to contradict that.
>
> But then, if you can't attack the message, attack the messenger. That's
> all you have left, since the facts are opposite all your claims.
>
> Marc
> For email, remove the first "y" of "whineryy"
>
I hope your foot-in-mouth disease is not contagious:
__________________
From: Marc <whineryy@yifan.net>
"Robert A. Matern" <MaternRA@SENDME.npt.nuwc.navy.NOSPAM.mil> wrote:
Robert Said:
>The large
>vehicle ALWAYS enjoys the advantage in any collision with a smaller
vehicle.
MARC said: That is simply false.
You talk in circles Marc, you claim to have driven every SUV anyone
names here, you ignore statistics you yourself have quoted, you are full
of ---- and now kill filed. I'm sure you will continue to reply to me,
most sociopaths do. Have a good day.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <1jl5pvgg99lqtsan080pnt0knucn06rufi@4ax.com>,
whineryy@yifan.net says...
> Chris Phillipo <Xcphillipo@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >I thought you said there was no size advantage. At least you're
> >consistent in your inconsistencies.
>
> Then you thought wrong. I never said any such thing. There is an
> advantage when you strike a lighter vehicle and a disadvantage when
> striking a heavier vehicle. I've never said anything to contradict that.
>
> But then, if you can't attack the message, attack the messenger. That's
> all you have left, since the facts are opposite all your claims.
>
> Marc
> For email, remove the first "y" of "whineryy"
>
I hope your foot-in-mouth disease is not contagious:
__________________
From: Marc <whineryy@yifan.net>
"Robert A. Matern" <MaternRA@SENDME.npt.nuwc.navy.NOSPAM.mil> wrote:
Robert Said:
>The large
>vehicle ALWAYS enjoys the advantage in any collision with a smaller
vehicle.
MARC said: That is simply false.
You talk in circles Marc, you claim to have driven every SUV anyone
names here, you ignore statistics you yourself have quoted, you are full
of ---- and now kill filed. I'm sure you will continue to reply to me,
most sociopaths do. Have a good day.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
whineryy@yifan.net says...
> Chris Phillipo <Xcphillipo@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >I thought you said there was no size advantage. At least you're
> >consistent in your inconsistencies.
>
> Then you thought wrong. I never said any such thing. There is an
> advantage when you strike a lighter vehicle and a disadvantage when
> striking a heavier vehicle. I've never said anything to contradict that.
>
> But then, if you can't attack the message, attack the messenger. That's
> all you have left, since the facts are opposite all your claims.
>
> Marc
> For email, remove the first "y" of "whineryy"
>
I hope your foot-in-mouth disease is not contagious:
__________________
From: Marc <whineryy@yifan.net>
"Robert A. Matern" <MaternRA@SENDME.npt.nuwc.navy.NOSPAM.mil> wrote:
Robert Said:
>The large
>vehicle ALWAYS enjoys the advantage in any collision with a smaller
vehicle.
MARC said: That is simply false.
You talk in circles Marc, you claim to have driven every SUV anyone
names here, you ignore statistics you yourself have quoted, you are full
of ---- and now kill filed. I'm sure you will continue to reply to me,
most sociopaths do. Have a good day.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <1jl5pvgg99lqtsan080pnt0knucn06rufi@4ax.com>,
whineryy@yifan.net says...
> Chris Phillipo <Xcphillipo@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >I thought you said there was no size advantage. At least you're
> >consistent in your inconsistencies.
>
> Then you thought wrong. I never said any such thing. There is an
> advantage when you strike a lighter vehicle and a disadvantage when
> striking a heavier vehicle. I've never said anything to contradict that.
>
> But then, if you can't attack the message, attack the messenger. That's
> all you have left, since the facts are opposite all your claims.
>
> Marc
> For email, remove the first "y" of "whineryy"
>
I hope your foot-in-mouth disease is not contagious:
__________________
From: Marc <whineryy@yifan.net>
"Robert A. Matern" <MaternRA@SENDME.npt.nuwc.navy.NOSPAM.mil> wrote:
Robert Said:
>The large
>vehicle ALWAYS enjoys the advantage in any collision with a smaller
vehicle.
MARC said: That is simply false.
You talk in circles Marc, you claim to have driven every SUV anyone
names here, you ignore statistics you yourself have quoted, you are full
of ---- and now kill filed. I'm sure you will continue to reply to me,
most sociopaths do. Have a good day.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
whineryy@yifan.net says...
> Chris Phillipo <Xcphillipo@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:
>
> >I thought you said there was no size advantage. At least you're
> >consistent in your inconsistencies.
>
> Then you thought wrong. I never said any such thing. There is an
> advantage when you strike a lighter vehicle and a disadvantage when
> striking a heavier vehicle. I've never said anything to contradict that.
>
> But then, if you can't attack the message, attack the messenger. That's
> all you have left, since the facts are opposite all your claims.
>
> Marc
> For email, remove the first "y" of "whineryy"
>
I hope your foot-in-mouth disease is not contagious:
__________________
From: Marc <whineryy@yifan.net>
"Robert A. Matern" <MaternRA@SENDME.npt.nuwc.navy.NOSPAM.mil> wrote:
Robert Said:
>The large
>vehicle ALWAYS enjoys the advantage in any collision with a smaller
vehicle.
MARC said: That is simply false.
You talk in circles Marc, you claim to have driven every SUV anyone
names here, you ignore statistics you yourself have quoted, you are full
of ---- and now kill filed. I'm sure you will continue to reply to me,
most sociopaths do. Have a good day.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <3F92E639.DEFF1E4@lisahorton.net>, Lisa@lisahorton.net
says...
> At least around here, the large SUV is THE vehicle of choice for the bad
> drivers. Unfortunate for those who are not bad drivers but do have
> SUV's.
>
> Lisa
>
Care to support that with an sort of evidence Lisa or is this just
opinion?
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
says...
> At least around here, the large SUV is THE vehicle of choice for the bad
> drivers. Unfortunate for those who are not bad drivers but do have
> SUV's.
>
> Lisa
>
Care to support that with an sort of evidence Lisa or is this just
opinion?
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <3F92E639.DEFF1E4@lisahorton.net>, Lisa@lisahorton.net
says...
> At least around here, the large SUV is THE vehicle of choice for the bad
> drivers. Unfortunate for those who are not bad drivers but do have
> SUV's.
>
> Lisa
>
Care to support that with an sort of evidence Lisa or is this just
opinion?
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
says...
> At least around here, the large SUV is THE vehicle of choice for the bad
> drivers. Unfortunate for those who are not bad drivers but do have
> SUV's.
>
> Lisa
>
Care to support that with an sort of evidence Lisa or is this just
opinion?
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <3F92E639.DEFF1E4@lisahorton.net>, Lisa@lisahorton.net
says...
> At least around here, the large SUV is THE vehicle of choice for the bad
> drivers. Unfortunate for those who are not bad drivers but do have
> SUV's.
>
> Lisa
>
Care to support that with an sort of evidence Lisa or is this just
opinion?
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
says...
> At least around here, the large SUV is THE vehicle of choice for the bad
> drivers. Unfortunate for those who are not bad drivers but do have
> SUV's.
>
> Lisa
>
Care to support that with an sort of evidence Lisa or is this just
opinion?
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <qLBkb.74$Oq2.1029332@news-text.cableinet.net>,
jeep@_nospam_milne.info says...
> works for us, and our roadways are a hell of a lot more crowded than yours..
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
I would hardly call over 20,000 road deaths a year, "working". But then
again people have come to accept that sort of number as low and
acceptable, as long as their kid isn't number 19,856.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
jeep@_nospam_milne.info says...
> works for us, and our roadways are a hell of a lot more crowded than yours..
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
I would hardly call over 20,000 road deaths a year, "working". But then
again people have come to accept that sort of number as low and
acceptable, as long as their kid isn't number 19,856.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <qLBkb.74$Oq2.1029332@news-text.cableinet.net>,
jeep@_nospam_milne.info says...
> works for us, and our roadways are a hell of a lot more crowded than yours..
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
I would hardly call over 20,000 road deaths a year, "working". But then
again people have come to accept that sort of number as low and
acceptable, as long as their kid isn't number 19,856.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
jeep@_nospam_milne.info says...
> works for us, and our roadways are a hell of a lot more crowded than yours..
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
I would hardly call over 20,000 road deaths a year, "working". But then
again people have come to accept that sort of number as low and
acceptable, as long as their kid isn't number 19,856.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <qLBkb.74$Oq2.1029332@news-text.cableinet.net>,
jeep@_nospam_milne.info says...
> works for us, and our roadways are a hell of a lot more crowded than yours..
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
I would hardly call over 20,000 road deaths a year, "working". But then
again people have come to accept that sort of number as low and
acceptable, as long as their kid isn't number 19,856.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
jeep@_nospam_milne.info says...
> works for us, and our roadways are a hell of a lot more crowded than yours..
>
> Dave Milne, Scotland
> '99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
>
I would hardly call over 20,000 road deaths a year, "working". But then
again people have come to accept that sort of number as low and
acceptable, as long as their kid isn't number 19,856.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
We have about 3,400 deaths per year for 60,000,000 people. That is 5 ten
thousandths of one percent.
Big deal.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Chris Phillipo" <Xcphillipo@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:MPG.19fcc664c225db67989e35@news.eastlink.ca.. .
: In article <qLBkb.74$Oq2.1029332@news-text.cableinet.net>,
: jeep@_nospam_milne.info says...
: > works for us, and our roadways are a hell of a lot more crowded than
yours..
: >
: > Dave Milne, Scotland
: > '99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
: >
:
: I would hardly call over 20,000 road deaths a year, "working". But then
: again people have come to accept that sort of number as low and
: acceptable, as long as their kid isn't number 19,856.
: --
: ____________________
: Remove "X" from email address to reply.
thousandths of one percent.
Big deal.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
"Chris Phillipo" <Xcphillipo@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:MPG.19fcc664c225db67989e35@news.eastlink.ca.. .
: In article <qLBkb.74$Oq2.1029332@news-text.cableinet.net>,
: jeep@_nospam_milne.info says...
: > works for us, and our roadways are a hell of a lot more crowded than
yours..
: >
: > Dave Milne, Scotland
: > '99 TJ 4.0 Sahara
: >
:
: I would hardly call over 20,000 road deaths a year, "working". But then
: again people have come to accept that sort of number as low and
: acceptable, as long as their kid isn't number 19,856.
: --
: ____________________
: Remove "X" from email address to reply.
