Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#5611
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Wed, 03 Dec 03 10:54:53 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>In article <2c7qsvgrtldnv0d50g0u57c2j0cadcc7if@4ax.com>,
> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 02 Dec 03 15:37:02 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article <Us5zb.282500$275.1000782@attbi_s53>,
>>> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>>>>In article <bqinb6$him$8@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less on
>>>health
>>>>> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it? Terrible for
>insurance
>>>>> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is.
>>>>
>>>>How would we spend "less on health care" ? Instead of paying for health
>>>>insurance we would pay *AT LEAST* that much in additional taxes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Why is it, then, that every western European nation, plus Canada and Japan,
>>>spend less per capita on health care than the US yet still cover everybody?
>>
>>Lloyd, you might want to do a Google search on the keywords:
>>canadian health care problems
>>This would let you see reality instead of the utopia your liberal
>>friends promise.
>>
>
>Oh great, he wants me to absorb his right-wing propaganda.
>
>Try this:
>
>http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.e.../HealthCare/Co
>nsumerReports-Sep92.html.gz#Does%20Canada%20Have%20The%20Answer?
So now a simple google search is "right-wing propaganda"? Every one
of 2,280,000 pages is right wing? No wonder people have such a low
opinion of you.
wrote:
>In article <2c7qsvgrtldnv0d50g0u57c2j0cadcc7if@4ax.com>,
> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
>>On Tue, 02 Dec 03 15:37:02 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article <Us5zb.282500$275.1000782@attbi_s53>,
>>> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>>>>In article <bqinb6$him$8@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less on
>>>health
>>>>> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it? Terrible for
>insurance
>>>>> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is.
>>>>
>>>>How would we spend "less on health care" ? Instead of paying for health
>>>>insurance we would pay *AT LEAST* that much in additional taxes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Why is it, then, that every western European nation, plus Canada and Japan,
>>>spend less per capita on health care than the US yet still cover everybody?
>>
>>Lloyd, you might want to do a Google search on the keywords:
>>canadian health care problems
>>This would let you see reality instead of the utopia your liberal
>>friends promise.
>>
>
>Oh great, he wants me to absorb his right-wing propaganda.
>
>Try this:
>
>http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.e.../HealthCare/Co
>nsumerReports-Sep92.html.gz#Does%20Canada%20Have%20The%20Answer?
So now a simple google search is "right-wing propaganda"? Every one
of 2,280,000 pages is right wing? No wonder people have such a low
opinion of you.
#5612
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <3FCE0F53.10617B9D@mindspring.com>,
> "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >
> >> >Since when to conservatives as an aggregate tell people what kind of ---
> to
> >> >have??? You're posting from an alternate reality again.
> >> >
> >> Sodomy laws?
> >
> >Have any new ones been enacted recently? I thought almost all such laws were
> >enacted many years ago and were definitely middle of the road sort of laws at
> the
> >time.
> >
> >Ed
> >
> Which states kept them until just recently, and fought for them in the
> courts? Texas, Georgia, conservative states. Which USSC justices wanted to
> uphold them? Thomas, Scalia, the conservative justices.
And? Why is it that some groups (psudeo-liberals is my term for them) always what
to create laws they like out of thin air through judicial action and ignore
legitimate ,if distasteful, laws because they don't like them. There is a process
for adding and removing laws. If insisting that these procedures be followed
makes me a conservative, then I guess I am guilty. Unfortunately, most of the
people I know who claim to be conservatives don't agree with many of my ideas, so
I guess I am lost in the wilderness.
Ed
#5613
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <3FCE0F53.10617B9D@mindspring.com>,
> "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >
> >> >Since when to conservatives as an aggregate tell people what kind of ---
> to
> >> >have??? You're posting from an alternate reality again.
> >> >
> >> Sodomy laws?
> >
> >Have any new ones been enacted recently? I thought almost all such laws were
> >enacted many years ago and were definitely middle of the road sort of laws at
> the
> >time.
> >
> >Ed
> >
> Which states kept them until just recently, and fought for them in the
> courts? Texas, Georgia, conservative states. Which USSC justices wanted to
> uphold them? Thomas, Scalia, the conservative justices.
And? Why is it that some groups (psudeo-liberals is my term for them) always what
to create laws they like out of thin air through judicial action and ignore
legitimate ,if distasteful, laws because they don't like them. There is a process
for adding and removing laws. If insisting that these procedures be followed
makes me a conservative, then I guess I am guilty. Unfortunately, most of the
people I know who claim to be conservatives don't agree with many of my ideas, so
I guess I am lost in the wilderness.
Ed
#5614
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <3FCE0F53.10617B9D@mindspring.com>,
> "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >
> >> >Since when to conservatives as an aggregate tell people what kind of ---
> to
> >> >have??? You're posting from an alternate reality again.
> >> >
> >> Sodomy laws?
> >
> >Have any new ones been enacted recently? I thought almost all such laws were
> >enacted many years ago and were definitely middle of the road sort of laws at
> the
> >time.
> >
> >Ed
> >
> Which states kept them until just recently, and fought for them in the
> courts? Texas, Georgia, conservative states. Which USSC justices wanted to
> uphold them? Thomas, Scalia, the conservative justices.
And? Why is it that some groups (psudeo-liberals is my term for them) always what
to create laws they like out of thin air through judicial action and ignore
legitimate ,if distasteful, laws because they don't like them. There is a process
for adding and removing laws. If insisting that these procedures be followed
makes me a conservative, then I guess I am guilty. Unfortunately, most of the
people I know who claim to be conservatives don't agree with many of my ideas, so
I guess I am lost in the wilderness.
Ed
#5615
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> But we know that the warming TODAY is due to CO2. It doesn't matter that
> warmings in the past may have had other causes. That's like arguing that
> since exercise raised your body temp. yesterday, a virus cannot be the cause
> of your fever today.
"We" don't know that. "You" may believe what you wish.
Ed
#5616
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> But we know that the warming TODAY is due to CO2. It doesn't matter that
> warmings in the past may have had other causes. That's like arguing that
> since exercise raised your body temp. yesterday, a virus cannot be the cause
> of your fever today.
"We" don't know that. "You" may believe what you wish.
Ed
#5617
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> But we know that the warming TODAY is due to CO2. It doesn't matter that
> warmings in the past may have had other causes. That's like arguing that
> since exercise raised your body temp. yesterday, a virus cannot be the cause
> of your fever today.
"We" don't know that. "You" may believe what you wish.
Ed
#5618
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> >The "new class of civil union" would cover that just fine.
> >
>
> Didn't "separate but equal" get discredited in the 1950s?
This statement is the sort of crap uttered by psudeo-liberals that I find
particularly offensive. Trying to redine the word "marriage" to cover same ---
unions is not discrimination.
Ed
#5619
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> >The "new class of civil union" would cover that just fine.
> >
>
> Didn't "separate but equal" get discredited in the 1950s?
This statement is the sort of crap uttered by psudeo-liberals that I find
particularly offensive. Trying to redine the word "marriage" to cover same ---
unions is not discrimination.
Ed
#5620
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> >The "new class of civil union" would cover that just fine.
> >
>
> Didn't "separate but equal" get discredited in the 1950s?
This statement is the sort of crap uttered by psudeo-liberals that I find
particularly offensive. Trying to redine the word "marriage" to cover same ---
unions is not discrimination.
Ed