Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> Many of us consider it "sufficently proven" already. :-p <
Or, sufficiently unproven to the point of nauseum. Indeed, we can hevily
impact the problem through an immediate reduction in the greenhous gas
emissions emmanating from the mouths of Socialist elitists ....
Or, sufficiently unproven to the point of nauseum. Indeed, we can hevily
impact the problem through an immediate reduction in the greenhous gas
emissions emmanating from the mouths of Socialist elitists ....
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> Many of us consider it "sufficently proven" already. :-p <
Or, sufficiently unproven to the point of nauseum. Indeed, we can hevily
impact the problem through an immediate reduction in the greenhous gas
emissions emmanating from the mouths of Socialist elitists ....
Or, sufficiently unproven to the point of nauseum. Indeed, we can hevily
impact the problem through an immediate reduction in the greenhous gas
emissions emmanating from the mouths of Socialist elitists ....
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> Aw for the love of....
> Yes, the "80/20" rule is there, simply because countless people in the
UN-developed nations live in abject poverty and their only atmospheric
emissions come from campfires and composting excrement. <<
And, Lord knows, we've already composited enough excrement with THIS thread!
(The noise you hear is the greens piling up more anti-society $#!t!)
> Yes, the "80/20" rule is there, simply because countless people in the
UN-developed nations live in abject poverty and their only atmospheric
emissions come from campfires and composting excrement. <<
And, Lord knows, we've already composited enough excrement with THIS thread!
(The noise you hear is the greens piling up more anti-society $#!t!)
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> Aw for the love of....
> Yes, the "80/20" rule is there, simply because countless people in the
UN-developed nations live in abject poverty and their only atmospheric
emissions come from campfires and composting excrement. <<
And, Lord knows, we've already composited enough excrement with THIS thread!
(The noise you hear is the greens piling up more anti-society $#!t!)
> Yes, the "80/20" rule is there, simply because countless people in the
UN-developed nations live in abject poverty and their only atmospheric
emissions come from campfires and composting excrement. <<
And, Lord knows, we've already composited enough excrement with THIS thread!
(The noise you hear is the greens piling up more anti-society $#!t!)
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> Aw for the love of....
> Yes, the "80/20" rule is there, simply because countless people in the
UN-developed nations live in abject poverty and their only atmospheric
emissions come from campfires and composting excrement. <<
And, Lord knows, we've already composited enough excrement with THIS thread!
(The noise you hear is the greens piling up more anti-society $#!t!)
> Yes, the "80/20" rule is there, simply because countless people in the
UN-developed nations live in abject poverty and their only atmospheric
emissions come from campfires and composting excrement. <<
And, Lord knows, we've already composited enough excrement with THIS thread!
(The noise you hear is the greens piling up more anti-society $#!t!)
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycan be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On 9 Nov 2003, st3ph3nm wrote:
> Kyoto may be short-sighted, but at the moment, we've got the old 80/20
> rule happening. IE, 80% of the problem being caused by 20% of the
> people.
Doing the wrong thing is scarcely ever a better move than doing nothing.
DS
> Kyoto may be short-sighted, but at the moment, we've got the old 80/20
> rule happening. IE, 80% of the problem being caused by 20% of the
> people.
Doing the wrong thing is scarcely ever a better move than doing nothing.
DS
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycan be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On 9 Nov 2003, st3ph3nm wrote:
> Kyoto may be short-sighted, but at the moment, we've got the old 80/20
> rule happening. IE, 80% of the problem being caused by 20% of the
> people.
Doing the wrong thing is scarcely ever a better move than doing nothing.
DS
> Kyoto may be short-sighted, but at the moment, we've got the old 80/20
> rule happening. IE, 80% of the problem being caused by 20% of the
> people.
Doing the wrong thing is scarcely ever a better move than doing nothing.
DS
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycan be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On 9 Nov 2003, st3ph3nm wrote:
> Kyoto may be short-sighted, but at the moment, we've got the old 80/20
> rule happening. IE, 80% of the problem being caused by 20% of the
> people.
Doing the wrong thing is scarcely ever a better move than doing nothing.
DS
> Kyoto may be short-sighted, but at the moment, we've got the old 80/20
> rule happening. IE, 80% of the problem being caused by 20% of the
> people.
Doing the wrong thing is scarcely ever a better move than doing nothing.
DS
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <boojm7$dmh$8@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> That's why I've directed people to groups like NASA, EPA, IPCC, NOAA, American
> Geophysical Union, National Academy of Sciences, etc. But noooooooooo, there
> right-wing idealogues just keep spouting propaganda from right-wing web sites.
And the NOAA proved at least one of your statements wrong.
> That's why I've directed people to groups like NASA, EPA, IPCC, NOAA, American
> Geophysical Union, National Academy of Sciences, etc. But noooooooooo, there
> right-wing idealogues just keep spouting propaganda from right-wing web sites.
And the NOAA proved at least one of your statements wrong.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <boojm7$dmh$8@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> That's why I've directed people to groups like NASA, EPA, IPCC, NOAA, American
> Geophysical Union, National Academy of Sciences, etc. But noooooooooo, there
> right-wing idealogues just keep spouting propaganda from right-wing web sites.
And the NOAA proved at least one of your statements wrong.
> That's why I've directed people to groups like NASA, EPA, IPCC, NOAA, American
> Geophysical Union, National Academy of Sciences, etc. But noooooooooo, there
> right-wing idealogues just keep spouting propaganda from right-wing web sites.
And the NOAA proved at least one of your statements wrong.