Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#4141
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Professor Google tells me that Mad mag is still around:
http://www2.warnerbros.com/web/madmagazine/home.jsp
Gosh, Alfred E Newman is still around, how funny to make his reacquaintance
after decades...and I don't live in the US...
:-)
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote in message
news:Ta2rb.16715$9M3.5202@newsread2.news.atl.earth link.net...
>
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:SOiqb.11748$9M3.11131@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > Hello??? LLLLLOYD are you published in your field of expertise?? I am,
> are
> > you?????
>
> Is MAD Magazine still in publication? He might still have a chance. ;-)
>
>
http://www2.warnerbros.com/web/madmagazine/home.jsp
Gosh, Alfred E Newman is still around, how funny to make his reacquaintance
after decades...and I don't live in the US...
:-)
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote in message
news:Ta2rb.16715$9M3.5202@newsread2.news.atl.earth link.net...
>
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:SOiqb.11748$9M3.11131@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > Hello??? LLLLLOYD are you published in your field of expertise?? I am,
> are
> > you?????
>
> Is MAD Magazine still in publication? He might still have a chance. ;-)
>
>
#4142
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
>The earth has been undergoing massive changes in climate for some time, and
I don't expect that to stop simply because we started recording it better. <
Or because mom sells her SUV....
I don't expect that to stop simply because we started recording it better. <
Or because mom sells her SUV....
#4143
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
>The earth has been undergoing massive changes in climate for some time, and
I don't expect that to stop simply because we started recording it better. <
Or because mom sells her SUV....
I don't expect that to stop simply because we started recording it better. <
Or because mom sells her SUV....
#4144
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
>The earth has been undergoing massive changes in climate for some time, and
I don't expect that to stop simply because we started recording it better. <
Or because mom sells her SUV....
I don't expect that to stop simply because we started recording it better. <
Or because mom sells her SUV....
#4145
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Gosh, Alfred E Newman is still around, how funny to make his
reacquaintance after decades...and I don't live in the US... <
Where have you been, Dori? Hell, he was President between '92 and '00!!
reacquaintance after decades...and I don't live in the US... <
Where have you been, Dori? Hell, he was President between '92 and '00!!
#4146
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Gosh, Alfred E Newman is still around, how funny to make his
reacquaintance after decades...and I don't live in the US... <
Where have you been, Dori? Hell, he was President between '92 and '00!!
reacquaintance after decades...and I don't live in the US... <
Where have you been, Dori? Hell, he was President between '92 and '00!!
#4147
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Gosh, Alfred E Newman is still around, how funny to make his
reacquaintance after decades...and I don't live in the US... <
Where have you been, Dori? Hell, he was President between '92 and '00!!
reacquaintance after decades...and I don't live in the US... <
Where have you been, Dori? Hell, he was President between '92 and '00!!
#4148
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Agreed, it's a choice we get to make of how much government we want. The
problem I have with the left is when they lose legislatively, they often go
to the courts.... to "progressive" judges.... to implement their agenda. So
instead of legislative choice, we get an obligation of government.
The more the government is saddled with the responsibility for people's
welfare, the bigger government will be and the more taxes must be collected
to support it.
With the exception of abortion, the Democrats are the anti-choice party. At
least that is what they've become as they steer farther and farther to the
left to please and patronize their supporting interest groups. We all know
who they are.... labor unions, wacko-environmentalist goups, "victim"
groups, etc.
"Dori Schmetterling" <ng@nospam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3fafa21d$0$3347$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com. ..
> And there is the nub of the problem: where to draw the line. I think that
> this is much of the stuff of daily politics.
>
> DAS
> --
> ---
> NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
> ---
> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:ml7rb.14$pE3.13@twister.socal.rr.com...
> > You list precisely the limited government I support, which must
establish
> a
> > secure and stable environment for free people to flourish. Roads,
> security,
> > safety, rule of law, etc.
> >
> > If this is what government limited its self to, our taxes would be 10%
> > across the board.
> >
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > news:3FABE038.F9718C82@mindspring.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill Funk wrote:
> > >
> > > > If those jobs are in the government, they are non-productive.
> > > > They don't produce anything that can be sold, serviced, bought and
> > > > used.
> > >
> > > Workers bulding and maintaining roads are non-productive? Soldiers,
> > sailors and
> > > airmen defending our country are not providing a service? Agriculture
> > inspectors
> > > checking beef are not providing a service. Policeman fighting crime
> aren't
> > > providing a service? The National Weather Service is non-productive?
> > >
> > > Ed
> >
>
>
problem I have with the left is when they lose legislatively, they often go
to the courts.... to "progressive" judges.... to implement their agenda. So
instead of legislative choice, we get an obligation of government.
The more the government is saddled with the responsibility for people's
welfare, the bigger government will be and the more taxes must be collected
to support it.
With the exception of abortion, the Democrats are the anti-choice party. At
least that is what they've become as they steer farther and farther to the
left to please and patronize their supporting interest groups. We all know
who they are.... labor unions, wacko-environmentalist goups, "victim"
groups, etc.
"Dori Schmetterling" <ng@nospam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3fafa21d$0$3347$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com. ..
> And there is the nub of the problem: where to draw the line. I think that
> this is much of the stuff of daily politics.
>
> DAS
> --
> ---
> NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
> ---
> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:ml7rb.14$pE3.13@twister.socal.rr.com...
> > You list precisely the limited government I support, which must
establish
> a
> > secure and stable environment for free people to flourish. Roads,
> security,
> > safety, rule of law, etc.
> >
> > If this is what government limited its self to, our taxes would be 10%
> > across the board.
> >
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > news:3FABE038.F9718C82@mindspring.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill Funk wrote:
> > >
> > > > If those jobs are in the government, they are non-productive.
> > > > They don't produce anything that can be sold, serviced, bought and
> > > > used.
> > >
> > > Workers bulding and maintaining roads are non-productive? Soldiers,
> > sailors and
> > > airmen defending our country are not providing a service? Agriculture
> > inspectors
> > > checking beef are not providing a service. Policeman fighting crime
> aren't
> > > providing a service? The National Weather Service is non-productive?
> > >
> > > Ed
> >
>
>
#4149
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Agreed, it's a choice we get to make of how much government we want. The
problem I have with the left is when they lose legislatively, they often go
to the courts.... to "progressive" judges.... to implement their agenda. So
instead of legislative choice, we get an obligation of government.
The more the government is saddled with the responsibility for people's
welfare, the bigger government will be and the more taxes must be collected
to support it.
With the exception of abortion, the Democrats are the anti-choice party. At
least that is what they've become as they steer farther and farther to the
left to please and patronize their supporting interest groups. We all know
who they are.... labor unions, wacko-environmentalist goups, "victim"
groups, etc.
"Dori Schmetterling" <ng@nospam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3fafa21d$0$3347$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com. ..
> And there is the nub of the problem: where to draw the line. I think that
> this is much of the stuff of daily politics.
>
> DAS
> --
> ---
> NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
> ---
> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:ml7rb.14$pE3.13@twister.socal.rr.com...
> > You list precisely the limited government I support, which must
establish
> a
> > secure and stable environment for free people to flourish. Roads,
> security,
> > safety, rule of law, etc.
> >
> > If this is what government limited its self to, our taxes would be 10%
> > across the board.
> >
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > news:3FABE038.F9718C82@mindspring.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill Funk wrote:
> > >
> > > > If those jobs are in the government, they are non-productive.
> > > > They don't produce anything that can be sold, serviced, bought and
> > > > used.
> > >
> > > Workers bulding and maintaining roads are non-productive? Soldiers,
> > sailors and
> > > airmen defending our country are not providing a service? Agriculture
> > inspectors
> > > checking beef are not providing a service. Policeman fighting crime
> aren't
> > > providing a service? The National Weather Service is non-productive?
> > >
> > > Ed
> >
>
>
problem I have with the left is when they lose legislatively, they often go
to the courts.... to "progressive" judges.... to implement their agenda. So
instead of legislative choice, we get an obligation of government.
The more the government is saddled with the responsibility for people's
welfare, the bigger government will be and the more taxes must be collected
to support it.
With the exception of abortion, the Democrats are the anti-choice party. At
least that is what they've become as they steer farther and farther to the
left to please and patronize their supporting interest groups. We all know
who they are.... labor unions, wacko-environmentalist goups, "victim"
groups, etc.
"Dori Schmetterling" <ng@nospam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3fafa21d$0$3347$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com. ..
> And there is the nub of the problem: where to draw the line. I think that
> this is much of the stuff of daily politics.
>
> DAS
> --
> ---
> NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
> ---
> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:ml7rb.14$pE3.13@twister.socal.rr.com...
> > You list precisely the limited government I support, which must
establish
> a
> > secure and stable environment for free people to flourish. Roads,
> security,
> > safety, rule of law, etc.
> >
> > If this is what government limited its self to, our taxes would be 10%
> > across the board.
> >
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > news:3FABE038.F9718C82@mindspring.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill Funk wrote:
> > >
> > > > If those jobs are in the government, they are non-productive.
> > > > They don't produce anything that can be sold, serviced, bought and
> > > > used.
> > >
> > > Workers bulding and maintaining roads are non-productive? Soldiers,
> > sailors and
> > > airmen defending our country are not providing a service? Agriculture
> > inspectors
> > > checking beef are not providing a service. Policeman fighting crime
> aren't
> > > providing a service? The National Weather Service is non-productive?
> > >
> > > Ed
> >
>
>
#4150
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Agreed, it's a choice we get to make of how much government we want. The
problem I have with the left is when they lose legislatively, they often go
to the courts.... to "progressive" judges.... to implement their agenda. So
instead of legislative choice, we get an obligation of government.
The more the government is saddled with the responsibility for people's
welfare, the bigger government will be and the more taxes must be collected
to support it.
With the exception of abortion, the Democrats are the anti-choice party. At
least that is what they've become as they steer farther and farther to the
left to please and patronize their supporting interest groups. We all know
who they are.... labor unions, wacko-environmentalist goups, "victim"
groups, etc.
"Dori Schmetterling" <ng@nospam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3fafa21d$0$3347$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com. ..
> And there is the nub of the problem: where to draw the line. I think that
> this is much of the stuff of daily politics.
>
> DAS
> --
> ---
> NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
> ---
> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:ml7rb.14$pE3.13@twister.socal.rr.com...
> > You list precisely the limited government I support, which must
establish
> a
> > secure and stable environment for free people to flourish. Roads,
> security,
> > safety, rule of law, etc.
> >
> > If this is what government limited its self to, our taxes would be 10%
> > across the board.
> >
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > news:3FABE038.F9718C82@mindspring.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill Funk wrote:
> > >
> > > > If those jobs are in the government, they are non-productive.
> > > > They don't produce anything that can be sold, serviced, bought and
> > > > used.
> > >
> > > Workers bulding and maintaining roads are non-productive? Soldiers,
> > sailors and
> > > airmen defending our country are not providing a service? Agriculture
> > inspectors
> > > checking beef are not providing a service. Policeman fighting crime
> aren't
> > > providing a service? The National Weather Service is non-productive?
> > >
> > > Ed
> >
>
>
problem I have with the left is when they lose legislatively, they often go
to the courts.... to "progressive" judges.... to implement their agenda. So
instead of legislative choice, we get an obligation of government.
The more the government is saddled with the responsibility for people's
welfare, the bigger government will be and the more taxes must be collected
to support it.
With the exception of abortion, the Democrats are the anti-choice party. At
least that is what they've become as they steer farther and farther to the
left to please and patronize their supporting interest groups. We all know
who they are.... labor unions, wacko-environmentalist goups, "victim"
groups, etc.
"Dori Schmetterling" <ng@nospam.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3fafa21d$0$3347$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com. ..
> And there is the nub of the problem: where to draw the line. I think that
> this is much of the stuff of daily politics.
>
> DAS
> --
> ---
> NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
> ---
> "David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:ml7rb.14$pE3.13@twister.socal.rr.com...
> > You list precisely the limited government I support, which must
establish
> a
> > secure and stable environment for free people to flourish. Roads,
> security,
> > safety, rule of law, etc.
> >
> > If this is what government limited its self to, our taxes would be 10%
> > across the board.
> >
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > news:3FABE038.F9718C82@mindspring.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > Bill Funk wrote:
> > >
> > > > If those jobs are in the government, they are non-productive.
> > > > They don't produce anything that can be sold, serviced, bought and
> > > > used.
> > >
> > > Workers bulding and maintaining roads are non-productive? Soldiers,
> > sailors and
> > > airmen defending our country are not providing a service? Agriculture
> > inspectors
> > > checking beef are not providing a service. Policeman fighting crime
> aren't
> > > providing a service? The National Weather Service is non-productive?
> > >
> > > Ed
> >
>
>