Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#4031
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Do you seriously think that Al Sharpton was offended by Dean? <
Of course not, it was a typical Sharpton canard. No one should have been
offended by Dean's candid remark, and it had nothing to do with the South.
He was just expressing the reality of the Democrat's predicament. They have
allowed themselves to become a party that only represents urban, minority &
radical green special interests. Unless they can return to the center they
can not win over the majority, regardless of geography. The more people like
Sharpton keep referring to the South has the home of racists & rednecks, the
longer it will take for Democrats to return to relevance. As it is,
Lieberman is the only one of the bunch with even a slight chance of winning
in '04.
Of course not, it was a typical Sharpton canard. No one should have been
offended by Dean's candid remark, and it had nothing to do with the South.
He was just expressing the reality of the Democrat's predicament. They have
allowed themselves to become a party that only represents urban, minority &
radical green special interests. Unless they can return to the center they
can not win over the majority, regardless of geography. The more people like
Sharpton keep referring to the South has the home of racists & rednecks, the
longer it will take for Democrats to return to relevance. As it is,
Lieberman is the only one of the bunch with even a slight chance of winning
in '04.
#4032
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Do you seriously think that Al Sharpton was offended by Dean? <
Of course not, it was a typical Sharpton canard. No one should have been
offended by Dean's candid remark, and it had nothing to do with the South.
He was just expressing the reality of the Democrat's predicament. They have
allowed themselves to become a party that only represents urban, minority &
radical green special interests. Unless they can return to the center they
can not win over the majority, regardless of geography. The more people like
Sharpton keep referring to the South has the home of racists & rednecks, the
longer it will take for Democrats to return to relevance. As it is,
Lieberman is the only one of the bunch with even a slight chance of winning
in '04.
Of course not, it was a typical Sharpton canard. No one should have been
offended by Dean's candid remark, and it had nothing to do with the South.
He was just expressing the reality of the Democrat's predicament. They have
allowed themselves to become a party that only represents urban, minority &
radical green special interests. Unless they can return to the center they
can not win over the majority, regardless of geography. The more people like
Sharpton keep referring to the South has the home of racists & rednecks, the
longer it will take for Democrats to return to relevance. As it is,
Lieberman is the only one of the bunch with even a slight chance of winning
in '04.
#4033
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Do you seriously think that Al Sharpton was offended by Dean? <
Of course not, it was a typical Sharpton canard. No one should have been
offended by Dean's candid remark, and it had nothing to do with the South.
He was just expressing the reality of the Democrat's predicament. They have
allowed themselves to become a party that only represents urban, minority &
radical green special interests. Unless they can return to the center they
can not win over the majority, regardless of geography. The more people like
Sharpton keep referring to the South has the home of racists & rednecks, the
longer it will take for Democrats to return to relevance. As it is,
Lieberman is the only one of the bunch with even a slight chance of winning
in '04.
Of course not, it was a typical Sharpton canard. No one should have been
offended by Dean's candid remark, and it had nothing to do with the South.
He was just expressing the reality of the Democrat's predicament. They have
allowed themselves to become a party that only represents urban, minority &
radical green special interests. Unless they can return to the center they
can not win over the majority, regardless of geography. The more people like
Sharpton keep referring to the South has the home of racists & rednecks, the
longer it will take for Democrats to return to relevance. As it is,
Lieberman is the only one of the bunch with even a slight chance of winning
in '04.
#4034
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who spend
their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go to
rec.driving.autos for such information. <
See ya!
potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who spend
their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go to
rec.driving.autos for such information. <
See ya!
#4035
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who spend
their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go to
rec.driving.autos for such information. <
See ya!
potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who spend
their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go to
rec.driving.autos for such information. <
See ya!
#4036
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who spend
their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go to
rec.driving.autos for such information. <
See ya!
potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who spend
their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go to
rec.driving.autos for such information. <
See ya!
#4037
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
When you go to these scientists "who spend their lives investigating the
environment," please remember where the money comes from that allows them to
investigate the environment. Do not overlook the fact that these scientists
also receive their paychecks and funding for their research based on the
results of that research. It's a huge confict of interest. If they find
there is no problem with the environment, then they are basically saying
there's no more need for them to have a job. If, on the other hand, they
say there's a huge problem with the environment, they can then say that they
need more money to investigate this problem and therefore keep themselves
"useful" until that money runs out. They just have to make sure the new
research points to further problems. <
Now there someone goes again, drawing logical, insightful conclusions out of
this issue. We Green Socialists have to do something about these common
people being able to read and think if we're ever going to get this Earth
cleaned up.
>
> "Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:srhi-9C750E.09391409112003@comcast.ash.giganews.com...
> > In article <3FAAAB43.B4072C31@mindspring.com>,
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > To sum it up - even if global warming is true, I believe the cure is
> worse
> > > than the disease. And furthermore, I think that even if it is true,
the
> > > case is being dramatically overstated.
> >
> > If I want my car's carb fixed, I will go to the best mechanic I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want my heart fixed, I will go to the best cardiologist I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
> > potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
> > spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
> > to rec.driving.autos for such information.
>
>
environment," please remember where the money comes from that allows them to
investigate the environment. Do not overlook the fact that these scientists
also receive their paychecks and funding for their research based on the
results of that research. It's a huge confict of interest. If they find
there is no problem with the environment, then they are basically saying
there's no more need for them to have a job. If, on the other hand, they
say there's a huge problem with the environment, they can then say that they
need more money to investigate this problem and therefore keep themselves
"useful" until that money runs out. They just have to make sure the new
research points to further problems. <
Now there someone goes again, drawing logical, insightful conclusions out of
this issue. We Green Socialists have to do something about these common
people being able to read and think if we're ever going to get this Earth
cleaned up.
>
> "Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:srhi-9C750E.09391409112003@comcast.ash.giganews.com...
> > In article <3FAAAB43.B4072C31@mindspring.com>,
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > To sum it up - even if global warming is true, I believe the cure is
> worse
> > > than the disease. And furthermore, I think that even if it is true,
the
> > > case is being dramatically overstated.
> >
> > If I want my car's carb fixed, I will go to the best mechanic I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want my heart fixed, I will go to the best cardiologist I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
> > potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
> > spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
> > to rec.driving.autos for such information.
>
>
#4038
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
When you go to these scientists "who spend their lives investigating the
environment," please remember where the money comes from that allows them to
investigate the environment. Do not overlook the fact that these scientists
also receive their paychecks and funding for their research based on the
results of that research. It's a huge confict of interest. If they find
there is no problem with the environment, then they are basically saying
there's no more need for them to have a job. If, on the other hand, they
say there's a huge problem with the environment, they can then say that they
need more money to investigate this problem and therefore keep themselves
"useful" until that money runs out. They just have to make sure the new
research points to further problems. <
Now there someone goes again, drawing logical, insightful conclusions out of
this issue. We Green Socialists have to do something about these common
people being able to read and think if we're ever going to get this Earth
cleaned up.
>
> "Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:srhi-9C750E.09391409112003@comcast.ash.giganews.com...
> > In article <3FAAAB43.B4072C31@mindspring.com>,
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > To sum it up - even if global warming is true, I believe the cure is
> worse
> > > than the disease. And furthermore, I think that even if it is true,
the
> > > case is being dramatically overstated.
> >
> > If I want my car's carb fixed, I will go to the best mechanic I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want my heart fixed, I will go to the best cardiologist I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
> > potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
> > spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
> > to rec.driving.autos for such information.
>
>
environment," please remember where the money comes from that allows them to
investigate the environment. Do not overlook the fact that these scientists
also receive their paychecks and funding for their research based on the
results of that research. It's a huge confict of interest. If they find
there is no problem with the environment, then they are basically saying
there's no more need for them to have a job. If, on the other hand, they
say there's a huge problem with the environment, they can then say that they
need more money to investigate this problem and therefore keep themselves
"useful" until that money runs out. They just have to make sure the new
research points to further problems. <
Now there someone goes again, drawing logical, insightful conclusions out of
this issue. We Green Socialists have to do something about these common
people being able to read and think if we're ever going to get this Earth
cleaned up.
>
> "Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:srhi-9C750E.09391409112003@comcast.ash.giganews.com...
> > In article <3FAAAB43.B4072C31@mindspring.com>,
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > To sum it up - even if global warming is true, I believe the cure is
> worse
> > > than the disease. And furthermore, I think that even if it is true,
the
> > > case is being dramatically overstated.
> >
> > If I want my car's carb fixed, I will go to the best mechanic I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want my heart fixed, I will go to the best cardiologist I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
> > potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
> > spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
> > to rec.driving.autos for such information.
>
>
#4039
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
When you go to these scientists "who spend their lives investigating the
environment," please remember where the money comes from that allows them to
investigate the environment. Do not overlook the fact that these scientists
also receive their paychecks and funding for their research based on the
results of that research. It's a huge confict of interest. If they find
there is no problem with the environment, then they are basically saying
there's no more need for them to have a job. If, on the other hand, they
say there's a huge problem with the environment, they can then say that they
need more money to investigate this problem and therefore keep themselves
"useful" until that money runs out. They just have to make sure the new
research points to further problems. <
Now there someone goes again, drawing logical, insightful conclusions out of
this issue. We Green Socialists have to do something about these common
people being able to read and think if we're ever going to get this Earth
cleaned up.
>
> "Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:srhi-9C750E.09391409112003@comcast.ash.giganews.com...
> > In article <3FAAAB43.B4072C31@mindspring.com>,
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > To sum it up - even if global warming is true, I believe the cure is
> worse
> > > than the disease. And furthermore, I think that even if it is true,
the
> > > case is being dramatically overstated.
> >
> > If I want my car's carb fixed, I will go to the best mechanic I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want my heart fixed, I will go to the best cardiologist I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
> > potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
> > spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
> > to rec.driving.autos for such information.
>
>
environment," please remember where the money comes from that allows them to
investigate the environment. Do not overlook the fact that these scientists
also receive their paychecks and funding for their research based on the
results of that research. It's a huge confict of interest. If they find
there is no problem with the environment, then they are basically saying
there's no more need for them to have a job. If, on the other hand, they
say there's a huge problem with the environment, they can then say that they
need more money to investigate this problem and therefore keep themselves
"useful" until that money runs out. They just have to make sure the new
research points to further problems. <
Now there someone goes again, drawing logical, insightful conclusions out of
this issue. We Green Socialists have to do something about these common
people being able to read and think if we're ever going to get this Earth
cleaned up.
>
> "Me" <srhi@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:srhi-9C750E.09391409112003@comcast.ash.giganews.com...
> > In article <3FAAAB43.B4072C31@mindspring.com>,
> > "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > To sum it up - even if global warming is true, I believe the cure is
> worse
> > > than the disease. And furthermore, I think that even if it is true,
the
> > > case is being dramatically overstated.
> >
> > If I want my car's carb fixed, I will go to the best mechanic I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want my heart fixed, I will go to the best cardiologist I can find
> > to do the job.
> >
> > If I want information about a problem with the environment that has the
> > potential to wipe out life on this planet, I will go to scientists who
> > spend their lives investigating the environment. I will certainly not go
> > to rec.driving.autos for such information.
>
>
#4040
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
> Well...no. There is no "unbiased research" sitting on a dark shelf
somewhere waiting to be sought out. It's up to the reader to look at a broad
enough range of research to get an idea of the variety of hypotheses and
experimental results and do the homework of finding out who paid for each
study, then make up his own mind.>
It's a lot easier just believeing everything spouted by a Leftist green gas
(bag) theorist on CNN, like all the rest of your friends....
somewhere waiting to be sought out. It's up to the reader to look at a broad
enough range of research to get an idea of the variety of hypotheses and
experimental results and do the homework of finding out who paid for each
study, then make up his own mind.>
It's a lot easier just believeing everything spouted by a Leftist green gas
(bag) theorist on CNN, like all the rest of your friends....