Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Bravo! Couldn't have put that better myself. Read and try to open your
mind just a bit Lloyd maybe you'll learn something.>
Indeed, Lloyd will become conservative and green-fable-questioning when 1)
he works his @$$ off, gets a well-deserved promotion and finds out 55% went
to taxes, and 2) when the forest around his house is neglecetd by law and
the resulting inferno burns his house to the ground. He'll then learn he's
too wealthy to qualify for Federal assistance because he makes more than
$30k a year.
mind just a bit Lloyd maybe you'll learn something.>
Indeed, Lloyd will become conservative and green-fable-questioning when 1)
he works his @$$ off, gets a well-deserved promotion and finds out 55% went
to taxes, and 2) when the forest around his house is neglecetd by law and
the resulting inferno burns his house to the ground. He'll then learn he's
too wealthy to qualify for Federal assistance because he makes more than
$30k a year.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Bravo! Couldn't have put that better myself. Read and try to open your
mind just a bit Lloyd maybe you'll learn something.>
Indeed, Lloyd will become conservative and green-fable-questioning when 1)
he works his @$$ off, gets a well-deserved promotion and finds out 55% went
to taxes, and 2) when the forest around his house is neglecetd by law and
the resulting inferno burns his house to the ground. He'll then learn he's
too wealthy to qualify for Federal assistance because he makes more than
$30k a year.
mind just a bit Lloyd maybe you'll learn something.>
Indeed, Lloyd will become conservative and green-fable-questioning when 1)
he works his @$$ off, gets a well-deserved promotion and finds out 55% went
to taxes, and 2) when the forest around his house is neglecetd by law and
the resulting inferno burns his house to the ground. He'll then learn he's
too wealthy to qualify for Federal assistance because he makes more than
$30k a year.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Great post, David.
> Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government as
> able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
where
> government is limited precisely because of it's belief in God given,
> individual, indivisible, inalienable rights that government as no
> jurisdiction over. Fascism and Socialism both reject that notion as
> government is the vehicle to compel their values on people.
>
> Democrats are in a constant dance on the edge of socialism. Their values
> include rejecting the unfairness of their being a large disparity between
> rich and poor, which isn't a bad value.... but their answer is to use
> government to compel "charity" or the "transfer of wealth" through taxes.
> The effort includes finding "rights" to justify this, like rights to
> employment, rights to minimum wages, rights of healthcare, rights to
> shelter, right to education, ad infinitum, which rights have to be "found"
> in the constitution via "activist", "progressive" judges.
>
>
> Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government as
> able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
where
> government is limited precisely because of it's belief in God given,
> individual, indivisible, inalienable rights that government as no
> jurisdiction over. Fascism and Socialism both reject that notion as
> government is the vehicle to compel their values on people.
>
> Democrats are in a constant dance on the edge of socialism. Their values
> include rejecting the unfairness of their being a large disparity between
> rich and poor, which isn't a bad value.... but their answer is to use
> government to compel "charity" or the "transfer of wealth" through taxes.
> The effort includes finding "rights" to justify this, like rights to
> employment, rights to minimum wages, rights of healthcare, rights to
> shelter, right to education, ad infinitum, which rights have to be "found"
> in the constitution via "activist", "progressive" judges.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Great post, David.
> Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government as
> able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
where
> government is limited precisely because of it's belief in God given,
> individual, indivisible, inalienable rights that government as no
> jurisdiction over. Fascism and Socialism both reject that notion as
> government is the vehicle to compel their values on people.
>
> Democrats are in a constant dance on the edge of socialism. Their values
> include rejecting the unfairness of their being a large disparity between
> rich and poor, which isn't a bad value.... but their answer is to use
> government to compel "charity" or the "transfer of wealth" through taxes.
> The effort includes finding "rights" to justify this, like rights to
> employment, rights to minimum wages, rights of healthcare, rights to
> shelter, right to education, ad infinitum, which rights have to be "found"
> in the constitution via "activist", "progressive" judges.
>
>
> Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government as
> able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
where
> government is limited precisely because of it's belief in God given,
> individual, indivisible, inalienable rights that government as no
> jurisdiction over. Fascism and Socialism both reject that notion as
> government is the vehicle to compel their values on people.
>
> Democrats are in a constant dance on the edge of socialism. Their values
> include rejecting the unfairness of their being a large disparity between
> rich and poor, which isn't a bad value.... but their answer is to use
> government to compel "charity" or the "transfer of wealth" through taxes.
> The effort includes finding "rights" to justify this, like rights to
> employment, rights to minimum wages, rights of healthcare, rights to
> shelter, right to education, ad infinitum, which rights have to be "found"
> in the constitution via "activist", "progressive" judges.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Great post, David.
> Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government as
> able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
where
> government is limited precisely because of it's belief in God given,
> individual, indivisible, inalienable rights that government as no
> jurisdiction over. Fascism and Socialism both reject that notion as
> government is the vehicle to compel their values on people.
>
> Democrats are in a constant dance on the edge of socialism. Their values
> include rejecting the unfairness of their being a large disparity between
> rich and poor, which isn't a bad value.... but their answer is to use
> government to compel "charity" or the "transfer of wealth" through taxes.
> The effort includes finding "rights" to justify this, like rights to
> employment, rights to minimum wages, rights of healthcare, rights to
> shelter, right to education, ad infinitum, which rights have to be "found"
> in the constitution via "activist", "progressive" judges.
>
>
> Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government as
> able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
where
> government is limited precisely because of it's belief in God given,
> individual, indivisible, inalienable rights that government as no
> jurisdiction over. Fascism and Socialism both reject that notion as
> government is the vehicle to compel their values on people.
>
> Democrats are in a constant dance on the edge of socialism. Their values
> include rejecting the unfairness of their being a large disparity between
> rich and poor, which isn't a bad value.... but their answer is to use
> government to compel "charity" or the "transfer of wealth" through taxes.
> The effort includes finding "rights" to justify this, like rights to
> employment, rights to minimum wages, rights of healthcare, rights to
> shelter, right to education, ad infinitum, which rights have to be "found"
> in the constitution via "activist", "progressive" judges.
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
LOL!!!
Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
decades.
air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
LOL!!!
Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
decades.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
LOL!!!
Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
decades.
air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
LOL!!!
Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
decades.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
LOL!!!
Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
decades.
air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
LOL!!!
Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
decades.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> You forget, it's the source and location of the CO2 that matters in the
political arguement. Not that it simply takes from a carbon sink and
releases CO2 to the atmosphere. A forest fire produces good CO2. An
automobile in the USA produces bad CO2. A factory in China produces good
CO2. A factory in the USA produces bad CO2. A tractor on a farm in the USA
> produces bad CO2. A coal fired electric plant in china produces good CO2.
And on and on.
BrentP nails the issue once again!
political arguement. Not that it simply takes from a carbon sink and
releases CO2 to the atmosphere. A forest fire produces good CO2. An
automobile in the USA produces bad CO2. A factory in China produces good
CO2. A factory in the USA produces bad CO2. A tractor on a farm in the USA
> produces bad CO2. A coal fired electric plant in china produces good CO2.
And on and on.
BrentP nails the issue once again!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> You forget, it's the source and location of the CO2 that matters in the
political arguement. Not that it simply takes from a carbon sink and
releases CO2 to the atmosphere. A forest fire produces good CO2. An
automobile in the USA produces bad CO2. A factory in China produces good
CO2. A factory in the USA produces bad CO2. A tractor on a farm in the USA
> produces bad CO2. A coal fired electric plant in china produces good CO2.
And on and on.
BrentP nails the issue once again!
political arguement. Not that it simply takes from a carbon sink and
releases CO2 to the atmosphere. A forest fire produces good CO2. An
automobile in the USA produces bad CO2. A factory in China produces good
CO2. A factory in the USA produces bad CO2. A tractor on a farm in the USA
> produces bad CO2. A coal fired electric plant in china produces good CO2.
And on and on.
BrentP nails the issue once again!
