Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#2541
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4u8$nk9$9@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vpr958bc1cor0a@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:pmhnb.42839$Fm2.17324@attbi_s04...
> >> In article <vpr85smbfn0e8f@corp.supernews.com>, The Ancient One wrote:
> >> >
> >> > "Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:K3hnb.43148$Tr4.88475@attbi_s03...
> >> >> In article <vpr6s32q4afc2d@corp.supernews.com>, The Ancient One
wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >> > news:bnjesk$b81$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >> >> In article <vpog8qgknohjbc@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >news:bngqj4$8h4$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >> >> >a bunch of meaningless BS.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >I see you still won't tell us what peer reviewed journals you
read
> >> > Lloyd,
> >> >> >> >nor where you have been published.
> >> >> >> >You're no scientist, your a wannabe. Shutup and stop pretending
to
> >be
> >> >> >> >something you will never be, you are embarrrassing the real
> >scientist
> >> >> > with
> >> >> >> >your shameful behavior.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Tell us your scientific credentials, oh cowardly one. Your
degree,
> >> > your
> >> >> > field
> >> >> >> of work. I won't hold my breath though.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I asked you first, oh lying one.
> >> >>
> >> >> More than you wanted to know about Dr. Parker:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.oxford.emory.edu/Director...cfm?UserID=130
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Error Occurred While Processing Request
> >> >
> >> > Didn't work :-(
> >>
> >> Just shove his name into a google search, grab the link to emory...
It's
> >the
> >> first one.
> >>
> >
> >Got it, thanks.
> >He must have used a lot of crib sheets in collage, he sure didn't learn
> >much.
> >
> >
> Still waiting for what science field your Ph.D. is in....
Still waiting to hear what peer reviewed journals you read, and what and
where you have been published in peer reviewed journals. Until you answer my
question I have no reason to answer yours.
#2542
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4u8$nk9$9@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vpr958bc1cor0a@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:pmhnb.42839$Fm2.17324@attbi_s04...
> >> In article <vpr85smbfn0e8f@corp.supernews.com>, The Ancient One wrote:
> >> >
> >> > "Brent P" <tetraethyllead@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:K3hnb.43148$Tr4.88475@attbi_s03...
> >> >> In article <vpr6s32q4afc2d@corp.supernews.com>, The Ancient One
wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >> > news:bnjesk$b81$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >> >> In article <vpog8qgknohjbc@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> >> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >> >> >news:bngqj4$8h4$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >> >> >a bunch of meaningless BS.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >I see you still won't tell us what peer reviewed journals you
read
> >> > Lloyd,
> >> >> >> >nor where you have been published.
> >> >> >> >You're no scientist, your a wannabe. Shutup and stop pretending
to
> >be
> >> >> >> >something you will never be, you are embarrrassing the real
> >scientist
> >> >> > with
> >> >> >> >your shameful behavior.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Tell us your scientific credentials, oh cowardly one. Your
degree,
> >> > your
> >> >> > field
> >> >> >> of work. I won't hold my breath though.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I asked you first, oh lying one.
> >> >>
> >> >> More than you wanted to know about Dr. Parker:
> >> >>
> >> >> http://www.oxford.emory.edu/Director...cfm?UserID=130
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Error Occurred While Processing Request
> >> >
> >> > Didn't work :-(
> >>
> >> Just shove his name into a google search, grab the link to emory...
It's
> >the
> >> first one.
> >>
> >
> >Got it, thanks.
> >He must have used a lot of crib sheets in collage, he sure didn't learn
> >much.
> >
> >
> Still waiting for what science field your Ph.D. is in....
Still waiting to hear what peer reviewed journals you read, and what and
where you have been published in peer reviewed journals. Until you answer my
question I have no reason to answer yours.
#2543
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4m7$nk9$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <uAcnb.8112$FI2.2516@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjfa3$b81$9@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <5q2nb.4730$X22.88@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.ne t>,
> >> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >news:bngqj4$8h4$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >>
> >> >> Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some
science.<CLICK>Try
> >> >learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try
> >learning
> >> >some science.<CLICK>...........
> >> >
> >> >Will somebody please kick the jukebox, somebody's playing that broken
> >Parker
> >> >record on there again. ;-D
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Would someone please tell the 6th-grade drop-outs here to stop arguing
> >science
> >> with scientists? As Pogo said, I refuse to engage in a battle of wits
> >with an
> >> unarmed opponent.
> >
> >Better a 6th grade drop out than an elitist know-it-all that blindly
follows
> >anything that comes out of the DNC, CR, or any UN based org. who replies
to
> >any differing opinion with "Learn some science.", "idiot", "****", "right
> >winger", etc.......
> >You sound like a broken record after a while Lloyd. Try having an open
mind
> >it might be a new experiance for you.
> >
> >
> Does that mean embracing creationism? That evil spirits cause disease?
That
> the earth is 6000 years old?
>
> Open minds are fine until the data is in. Then it's foolish.
Open minds are always searching for data that will prove them wrong. You
reject any data that will prove you wrong. You are closed-minded.
#2544
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4m7$nk9$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <uAcnb.8112$FI2.2516@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjfa3$b81$9@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <5q2nb.4730$X22.88@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.ne t>,
> >> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >news:bngqj4$8h4$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >>
> >> >> Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some
science.<CLICK>Try
> >> >learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try
> >learning
> >> >some science.<CLICK>...........
> >> >
> >> >Will somebody please kick the jukebox, somebody's playing that broken
> >Parker
> >> >record on there again. ;-D
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Would someone please tell the 6th-grade drop-outs here to stop arguing
> >science
> >> with scientists? As Pogo said, I refuse to engage in a battle of wits
> >with an
> >> unarmed opponent.
> >
> >Better a 6th grade drop out than an elitist know-it-all that blindly
follows
> >anything that comes out of the DNC, CR, or any UN based org. who replies
to
> >any differing opinion with "Learn some science.", "idiot", "****", "right
> >winger", etc.......
> >You sound like a broken record after a while Lloyd. Try having an open
mind
> >it might be a new experiance for you.
> >
> >
> Does that mean embracing creationism? That evil spirits cause disease?
That
> the earth is 6000 years old?
>
> Open minds are fine until the data is in. Then it's foolish.
Open minds are always searching for data that will prove them wrong. You
reject any data that will prove you wrong. You are closed-minded.
#2545
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4m7$nk9$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <uAcnb.8112$FI2.2516@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjfa3$b81$9@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <5q2nb.4730$X22.88@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.ne t>,
> >> "FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >news:bngqj4$8h4$3@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >>
> >> >> Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some
science.<CLICK>Try
> >> >learning some science.<CLICK>Try learning some science.<CLICK>Try
> >learning
> >> >some science.<CLICK>...........
> >> >
> >> >Will somebody please kick the jukebox, somebody's playing that broken
> >Parker
> >> >record on there again. ;-D
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> Would someone please tell the 6th-grade drop-outs here to stop arguing
> >science
> >> with scientists? As Pogo said, I refuse to engage in a battle of wits
> >with an
> >> unarmed opponent.
> >
> >Better a 6th grade drop out than an elitist know-it-all that blindly
follows
> >anything that comes out of the DNC, CR, or any UN based org. who replies
to
> >any differing opinion with "Learn some science.", "idiot", "****", "right
> >winger", etc.......
> >You sound like a broken record after a while Lloyd. Try having an open
mind
> >it might be a new experiance for you.
> >
> >
> Does that mean embracing creationism? That evil spirits cause disease?
That
> the earth is 6000 years old?
>
> Open minds are fine until the data is in. Then it's foolish.
Open minds are always searching for data that will prove them wrong. You
reject any data that will prove you wrong. You are closed-minded.
#2546
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4se$nk9$7@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vpr7k4sc7eeb07@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjf84$b81$7@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <Gs%mb.38952$e01.85589@attbi_s02>,
> >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >> >In article <bngqba$8h4$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>>Then, obviously, that can't be the cause of global warming, can it?
> >> >>>Since global warming happened with the lower CO2 levels,
> >> >>
> >> >> No, it started the same time CO2 started rising.
> >> >
> >> >It also started at the same time man started flying with heavier than
> >> >air machines. A real scienist knows better than to make statements
like
> >> >the one above as "proof" as I demonstrate with another thing that
started
> >> >at the same time and has increased since.
> >>
> >> If you look at the data (I know that's a foreign concept to you),
global
> >> warming began around the middle of the 19th century, as human
combustion
> >> activities started picking up.
> >
> >Actually it began around 11,000 years ago, when the last ice age ended.
> >
> >
> Wrong. Why do the scientific ignorant rage?
So it is as cold now as it was 11,000 years ago? Why do you pretend to know
anything about science? You are not a scientist, you are an Associate
chemistry professor. You may know a little chemistry, that does not make you
any more an expert on global warming than it qualifies you for flipping
burgers. Stay in your field of study lloyd, you know nothing outside it.
#2547
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4se$nk9$7@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vpr7k4sc7eeb07@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjf84$b81$7@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <Gs%mb.38952$e01.85589@attbi_s02>,
> >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >> >In article <bngqba$8h4$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>>Then, obviously, that can't be the cause of global warming, can it?
> >> >>>Since global warming happened with the lower CO2 levels,
> >> >>
> >> >> No, it started the same time CO2 started rising.
> >> >
> >> >It also started at the same time man started flying with heavier than
> >> >air machines. A real scienist knows better than to make statements
like
> >> >the one above as "proof" as I demonstrate with another thing that
started
> >> >at the same time and has increased since.
> >>
> >> If you look at the data (I know that's a foreign concept to you),
global
> >> warming began around the middle of the 19th century, as human
combustion
> >> activities started picking up.
> >
> >Actually it began around 11,000 years ago, when the last ice age ended.
> >
> >
> Wrong. Why do the scientific ignorant rage?
So it is as cold now as it was 11,000 years ago? Why do you pretend to know
anything about science? You are not a scientist, you are an Associate
chemistry professor. You may know a little chemistry, that does not make you
any more an expert on global warming than it qualifies you for flipping
burgers. Stay in your field of study lloyd, you know nothing outside it.
#2548
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm4se$nk9$7@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vpr7k4sc7eeb07@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bnjf84$b81$7@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <Gs%mb.38952$e01.85589@attbi_s02>,
> >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >> >In article <bngqba$8h4$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>>Then, obviously, that can't be the cause of global warming, can it?
> >> >>>Since global warming happened with the lower CO2 levels,
> >> >>
> >> >> No, it started the same time CO2 started rising.
> >> >
> >> >It also started at the same time man started flying with heavier than
> >> >air machines. A real scienist knows better than to make statements
like
> >> >the one above as "proof" as I demonstrate with another thing that
started
> >> >at the same time and has increased since.
> >>
> >> If you look at the data (I know that's a foreign concept to you),
global
> >> warming began around the middle of the 19th century, as human
combustion
> >> activities started picking up.
> >
> >Actually it began around 11,000 years ago, when the last ice age ended.
> >
> >
> Wrong. Why do the scientific ignorant rage?
So it is as cold now as it was 11,000 years ago? Why do you pretend to know
anything about science? You are not a scientist, you are an Associate
chemistry professor. You may know a little chemistry, that does not make you
any more an expert on global warming than it qualifies you for flipping
burgers. Stay in your field of study lloyd, you know nothing outside it.
#2549
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm464$nk9$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bnjhqm0m1g@enews2.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >I'm still waiting for these CO2 zealots to 1) prove their theories,
>
> Are you saying the National Academy of Sciences, NASA, EPA, NOAA, etc.,
have
> jumped onto something that's not proven? Isn't it more likely you either
have
> not read the science or refuse to believe it?
>
>
> > 2)
> >assuming they are correct, propose a single workable solution besides
> >getting mom to sell her SUV. The entire theory is a full of holes as
their
> >proponents heads.
>
> The only solution is to cut greenhouse gas emissions. That means driving
> less, driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, using coal less, using more
> renewable energy sources, planting more trees, not clear-cutting
forests...
>
More greenhouse gases have been put into the atmosphere from So. Calif.
fires in 3 days than will ever be put into the air by SUV's.
#2550
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bnm464$nk9$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bnjhqm0m1g@enews2.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote:
> >I'm still waiting for these CO2 zealots to 1) prove their theories,
>
> Are you saying the National Academy of Sciences, NASA, EPA, NOAA, etc.,
have
> jumped onto something that's not proven? Isn't it more likely you either
have
> not read the science or refuse to believe it?
>
>
> > 2)
> >assuming they are correct, propose a single workable solution besides
> >getting mom to sell her SUV. The entire theory is a full of holes as
their
> >proponents heads.
>
> The only solution is to cut greenhouse gas emissions. That means driving
> less, driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, using coal less, using more
> renewable energy sources, planting more trees, not clear-cutting
forests...
>
More greenhouse gases have been put into the atmosphere from So. Calif.
fires in 3 days than will ever be put into the air by SUV's.