HOW TO TIGHTEN UP MY CJ FRONT END. TIE ROD, BRACE BOX, WHEEL BEARINGS, STILL A DANCER
#71
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: HOW TO TIGHTEN UP MY CJ FRONT END. TIE ROD, BRACE BOX, WHEELBEARINGS, STILL A DANCER
Geez! No wonder you took the damper off, it's got a shield on it,
meaning you tried an ordinary 30/70 shock that's not design to run
sideways:
http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/users/1594c...rjzaCBWmkX1rTq
YOU ARE DANGEROUS!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/spook0022000/my_photos
>
> There you go, happy now? I must apologize for the lack of F-150
> pictures. What pictures I may have had of that particular vehicle have
> not survived the passage of time, relocations, divorce, or sale.
> Please excuse me for the inconvenience.
>
> What next? Should I drop my pants so we can compare the family tackle?
meaning you tried an ordinary 30/70 shock that's not design to run
sideways:
http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/users/1594c...rjzaCBWmkX1rTq
YOU ARE DANGEROUS!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/spook0022000/my_photos
>
> There you go, happy now? I must apologize for the lack of F-150
> pictures. What pictures I may have had of that particular vehicle have
> not survived the passage of time, relocations, divorce, or sale.
> Please excuse me for the inconvenience.
>
> What next? Should I drop my pants so we can compare the family tackle?
#72
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: HOW TO TIGHTEN UP MY CJ FRONT END. TIE ROD, BRACE BOX, WHEELBEARINGS, STILL A DANCER
Geez! No wonder you took the damper off, it's got a shield on it,
meaning you tried an ordinary 30/70 shock that's not design to run
sideways:
http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/users/1594c...rjzaCBWmkX1rTq
YOU ARE DANGEROUS!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/spook0022000/my_photos
>
> There you go, happy now? I must apologize for the lack of F-150
> pictures. What pictures I may have had of that particular vehicle have
> not survived the passage of time, relocations, divorce, or sale.
> Please excuse me for the inconvenience.
>
> What next? Should I drop my pants so we can compare the family tackle?
meaning you tried an ordinary 30/70 shock that's not design to run
sideways:
http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/users/1594c...rjzaCBWmkX1rTq
YOU ARE DANGEROUS!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/spook0022000/my_photos
>
> There you go, happy now? I must apologize for the lack of F-150
> pictures. What pictures I may have had of that particular vehicle have
> not survived the passage of time, relocations, divorce, or sale.
> Please excuse me for the inconvenience.
>
> What next? Should I drop my pants so we can compare the family tackle?
#73
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: HOW TO TIGHTEN UP MY CJ FRONT END. TIE ROD, BRACE BOX, WHEELBEARINGS, STILL A DANCER
Geez! No wonder you took the damper off, it's got a shield on it,
meaning you tried an ordinary 30/70 shock that's not design to run
sideways:
http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/users/1594c...rjzaCBWmkX1rTq
YOU ARE DANGEROUS!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/spook0022000/my_photos
>
> There you go, happy now? I must apologize for the lack of F-150
> pictures. What pictures I may have had of that particular vehicle have
> not survived the passage of time, relocations, divorce, or sale.
> Please excuse me for the inconvenience.
>
> What next? Should I drop my pants so we can compare the family tackle?
meaning you tried an ordinary 30/70 shock that's not design to run
sideways:
http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/users/1594c...rjzaCBWmkX1rTq
YOU ARE DANGEROUS!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/spook0022000/my_photos
>
> There you go, happy now? I must apologize for the lack of F-150
> pictures. What pictures I may have had of that particular vehicle have
> not survived the passage of time, relocations, divorce, or sale.
> Please excuse me for the inconvenience.
>
> What next? Should I drop my pants so we can compare the family tackle?
#74
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: HOW TO TIGHTEN UP MY CJ FRONT END. TIE ROD, BRACE BOX, WHEELBEARINGS, STILL A DANCER
You're the one's that's babbling about their not using the correct
shock absorber to dampen the tie rod. You probably think Ford, GM, and
Daimler bad engineers for using them, too?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Oh please, is that the best you can come up with? How about at least
> making a case for your argument because so far you've said absolutely
> nothing, other than sling around insults. Nothing you've said has had
> any real content what-so-ever. Maybe you should get into politics
> because you're doing a great job of talking without saying anything of
> any use.
>
> I drove that truck for approximately 2 years minus its' stabilizer and
> never noticed it's lack at all. I've driven my CJ for about the same
> amount of time, every damn day, and I've noticed it's lack just about
> as much. Maybe if you could at least attempt to back up your blather
> with some facts as to why I'm a driving time bomb I'd be more apt to
> lend some credence to what you're saying. So far I've stated three
> vehicular examples that have existed just fine sans stabilizer and all
> you've done is, well, not much of anything except babble on in an
> insulting manner.
shock absorber to dampen the tie rod. You probably think Ford, GM, and
Daimler bad engineers for using them, too?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Oh please, is that the best you can come up with? How about at least
> making a case for your argument because so far you've said absolutely
> nothing, other than sling around insults. Nothing you've said has had
> any real content what-so-ever. Maybe you should get into politics
> because you're doing a great job of talking without saying anything of
> any use.
>
> I drove that truck for approximately 2 years minus its' stabilizer and
> never noticed it's lack at all. I've driven my CJ for about the same
> amount of time, every damn day, and I've noticed it's lack just about
> as much. Maybe if you could at least attempt to back up your blather
> with some facts as to why I'm a driving time bomb I'd be more apt to
> lend some credence to what you're saying. So far I've stated three
> vehicular examples that have existed just fine sans stabilizer and all
> you've done is, well, not much of anything except babble on in an
> insulting manner.
#75
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: HOW TO TIGHTEN UP MY CJ FRONT END. TIE ROD, BRACE BOX, WHEELBEARINGS, STILL A DANCER
You're the one's that's babbling about their not using the correct
shock absorber to dampen the tie rod. You probably think Ford, GM, and
Daimler bad engineers for using them, too?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Oh please, is that the best you can come up with? How about at least
> making a case for your argument because so far you've said absolutely
> nothing, other than sling around insults. Nothing you've said has had
> any real content what-so-ever. Maybe you should get into politics
> because you're doing a great job of talking without saying anything of
> any use.
>
> I drove that truck for approximately 2 years minus its' stabilizer and
> never noticed it's lack at all. I've driven my CJ for about the same
> amount of time, every damn day, and I've noticed it's lack just about
> as much. Maybe if you could at least attempt to back up your blather
> with some facts as to why I'm a driving time bomb I'd be more apt to
> lend some credence to what you're saying. So far I've stated three
> vehicular examples that have existed just fine sans stabilizer and all
> you've done is, well, not much of anything except babble on in an
> insulting manner.
shock absorber to dampen the tie rod. You probably think Ford, GM, and
Daimler bad engineers for using them, too?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Oh please, is that the best you can come up with? How about at least
> making a case for your argument because so far you've said absolutely
> nothing, other than sling around insults. Nothing you've said has had
> any real content what-so-ever. Maybe you should get into politics
> because you're doing a great job of talking without saying anything of
> any use.
>
> I drove that truck for approximately 2 years minus its' stabilizer and
> never noticed it's lack at all. I've driven my CJ for about the same
> amount of time, every damn day, and I've noticed it's lack just about
> as much. Maybe if you could at least attempt to back up your blather
> with some facts as to why I'm a driving time bomb I'd be more apt to
> lend some credence to what you're saying. So far I've stated three
> vehicular examples that have existed just fine sans stabilizer and all
> you've done is, well, not much of anything except babble on in an
> insulting manner.
#76
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: HOW TO TIGHTEN UP MY CJ FRONT END. TIE ROD, BRACE BOX, WHEELBEARINGS, STILL A DANCER
You're the one's that's babbling about their not using the correct
shock absorber to dampen the tie rod. You probably think Ford, GM, and
Daimler bad engineers for using them, too?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Oh please, is that the best you can come up with? How about at least
> making a case for your argument because so far you've said absolutely
> nothing, other than sling around insults. Nothing you've said has had
> any real content what-so-ever. Maybe you should get into politics
> because you're doing a great job of talking without saying anything of
> any use.
>
> I drove that truck for approximately 2 years minus its' stabilizer and
> never noticed it's lack at all. I've driven my CJ for about the same
> amount of time, every damn day, and I've noticed it's lack just about
> as much. Maybe if you could at least attempt to back up your blather
> with some facts as to why I'm a driving time bomb I'd be more apt to
> lend some credence to what you're saying. So far I've stated three
> vehicular examples that have existed just fine sans stabilizer and all
> you've done is, well, not much of anything except babble on in an
> insulting manner.
shock absorber to dampen the tie rod. You probably think Ford, GM, and
Daimler bad engineers for using them, too?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Oh please, is that the best you can come up with? How about at least
> making a case for your argument because so far you've said absolutely
> nothing, other than sling around insults. Nothing you've said has had
> any real content what-so-ever. Maybe you should get into politics
> because you're doing a great job of talking without saying anything of
> any use.
>
> I drove that truck for approximately 2 years minus its' stabilizer and
> never noticed it's lack at all. I've driven my CJ for about the same
> amount of time, every damn day, and I've noticed it's lack just about
> as much. Maybe if you could at least attempt to back up your blather
> with some facts as to why I'm a driving time bomb I'd be more apt to
> lend some credence to what you're saying. So far I've stated three
> vehicular examples that have existed just fine sans stabilizer and all
> you've done is, well, not much of anything except babble on in an
> insulting manner.
#77
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: HOW TO TIGHTEN UP MY CJ FRONT END. TIE ROD, BRACE BOX, WHEELBEARINGS, STILL A DANCER
You're the one's that's babbling about their not using the correct
shock absorber to dampen the tie rod. You probably think Ford, GM, and
Daimler bad engineers for using them, too?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Oh please, is that the best you can come up with? How about at least
> making a case for your argument because so far you've said absolutely
> nothing, other than sling around insults. Nothing you've said has had
> any real content what-so-ever. Maybe you should get into politics
> because you're doing a great job of talking without saying anything of
> any use.
>
> I drove that truck for approximately 2 years minus its' stabilizer and
> never noticed it's lack at all. I've driven my CJ for about the same
> amount of time, every damn day, and I've noticed it's lack just about
> as much. Maybe if you could at least attempt to back up your blather
> with some facts as to why I'm a driving time bomb I'd be more apt to
> lend some credence to what you're saying. So far I've stated three
> vehicular examples that have existed just fine sans stabilizer and all
> you've done is, well, not much of anything except babble on in an
> insulting manner.
shock absorber to dampen the tie rod. You probably think Ford, GM, and
Daimler bad engineers for using them, too?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
tgreening@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> Oh please, is that the best you can come up with? How about at least
> making a case for your argument because so far you've said absolutely
> nothing, other than sling around insults. Nothing you've said has had
> any real content what-so-ever. Maybe you should get into politics
> because you're doing a great job of talking without saying anything of
> any use.
>
> I drove that truck for approximately 2 years minus its' stabilizer and
> never noticed it's lack at all. I've driven my CJ for about the same
> amount of time, every damn day, and I've noticed it's lack just about
> as much. Maybe if you could at least attempt to back up your blather
> with some facts as to why I'm a driving time bomb I'd be more apt to
> lend some credence to what you're saying. So far I've stated three
> vehicular examples that have existed just fine sans stabilizer and all
> you've done is, well, not much of anything except babble on in an
> insulting manner.
#78
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: HOW TO TIGHTEN UP MY CJ FRONT END. TIE ROD, BRACE BOX, WHEEL BEARINGS, STILL A DANCER
There you go running your mouth about MY gear when you don't know Jack
or his partner about it. I have NO idea what you are babbling about
when you say "shield", and the only reason it was removed was because I
smashed it flat at Tellico, as I stated earlier. And just so you can
add a "little" bit of info to your decidely lacking supply, that IS in
fact a standard off the shelf stearing stabilizer purchased from 4WDH
and not a shock being run horizontally. Try again Bill, try again.
or his partner about it. I have NO idea what you are babbling about
when you say "shield", and the only reason it was removed was because I
smashed it flat at Tellico, as I stated earlier. And just so you can
add a "little" bit of info to your decidely lacking supply, that IS in
fact a standard off the shelf stearing stabilizer purchased from 4WDH
and not a shock being run horizontally. Try again Bill, try again.
#79
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: HOW TO TIGHTEN UP MY CJ FRONT END. TIE ROD, BRACE BOX, WHEEL BEARINGS, STILL A DANCER
There you go running your mouth about MY gear when you don't know Jack
or his partner about it. I have NO idea what you are babbling about
when you say "shield", and the only reason it was removed was because I
smashed it flat at Tellico, as I stated earlier. And just so you can
add a "little" bit of info to your decidely lacking supply, that IS in
fact a standard off the shelf stearing stabilizer purchased from 4WDH
and not a shock being run horizontally. Try again Bill, try again.
or his partner about it. I have NO idea what you are babbling about
when you say "shield", and the only reason it was removed was because I
smashed it flat at Tellico, as I stated earlier. And just so you can
add a "little" bit of info to your decidely lacking supply, that IS in
fact a standard off the shelf stearing stabilizer purchased from 4WDH
and not a shock being run horizontally. Try again Bill, try again.
#80
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: HOW TO TIGHTEN UP MY CJ FRONT END. TIE ROD, BRACE BOX, WHEEL BEARINGS, STILL A DANCER
There you go running your mouth about MY gear when you don't know Jack
or his partner about it. I have NO idea what you are babbling about
when you say "shield", and the only reason it was removed was because I
smashed it flat at Tellico, as I stated earlier. And just so you can
add a "little" bit of info to your decidely lacking supply, that IS in
fact a standard off the shelf stearing stabilizer purchased from 4WDH
and not a shock being run horizontally. Try again Bill, try again.
or his partner about it. I have NO idea what you are babbling about
when you say "shield", and the only reason it was removed was because I
smashed it flat at Tellico, as I stated earlier. And just so you can
add a "little" bit of info to your decidely lacking supply, that IS in
fact a standard off the shelf stearing stabilizer purchased from 4WDH
and not a shock being run horizontally. Try again Bill, try again.