|
Re: L.W. "Cooyon Billy" Goatman-Hughes III
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:17:24 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<LWBill------@------.net> wrote: >"24Bit®" <24Bit@Ur.Asylum.org> wrote in message >news:vs2e93h8m3umcs2fldc4rguj5hc47oc4sb@4ax.com.. . >><Wrote nothing as usual.> The Partial Psychopath In our experience, the dimension that correlates most closely with psychopathy and which has been identified or is implicit in all definitions of the illness is the concept of empathy, but empathy defined in a specific two-part way. Empathy is loosely thought to be the capacity to put yourself in another person's shoes. But this seems to be only one part of what constitutes empathy in relation to the psychopath. What is different about the psychopath is that he is unaffected or detached emotionally from the knowledge that he gains by putting himself in your shoes. Thus, although he is able to very quickly glean during the briefest encounter with another person a lot of very useful information about what makes that person tick, this knowledge is simply knowledge to be used or not as the psychopath chooses. What is missing in psychopaths is the compelling nature of the appropriate affective response to the knowledge gained from putting himself in another persons shoes, in the way that this happens in the normal person. This essential missing aspect of empathy, even in the severe psychopath, is not in my experience easily seen and one does not often get a second glimpse of it if one has been treated to a first one by mistake. A rather crude example might suffice. A young psychopath who had inflicted multiple stab wounds on an elderly woman, and was charged with attempted murder, appeared subdued and appropriately sad about the offence during the early stages of a first interview. His eyes were moist as he accurately described how the woman must have felt during and after the attack. But later in the same interview, after good rapport had been established, this boy blurted out, "I don't know what all the fuss is about. The old bag only had a dozen scratches." To my knowledge, in all his subsequent years in the psychiatric hospital, he stuck to all the right lines of remorse which he quickly learned were more appropriate and useful. The bright psychopath, the experienced psychopath, doesn't stumble like that very often. With luck and the right question about how the other person's feelings affected him there will be a barely perceptible pause, or a puzzled look, or even – rarely - the question, "How am I supposed to feel?" The second part of this two-part empathy for the normal person is the automatic, compelling, intuitive, appropriate response to what the other feels - not the acting out of a chosen script. The psychopath can follow the same script as a normal person, usually with all the subtle nuances of a skilled actor - if he chooses to do so. An untrained observer is very unlikely to note any difference from the real thing. Thus the second part of this two-part empathy in a psychopath is the choosing and acting of a script. Unlike the normal person, he can choose what script to follow. He is not compelled intuitively or automatically to react to the way he knows you feel. And unlike the normal person, he has been told, or learned by observing others, what he is supposed to feel. As he rapes you or strangles you he is not compelled to feel your pain, your terror, your helplessness. There is no automatic, compelling, intuitive connection between what he knows you feel and what he feels. There is no way he must feel. Thus there is none of this kind of restraining force on his behavior. Therein lies the danger of psychopathy. Are experiences in the first three years critical in developing this two-part type of empathy? Yes - if you accept that psychopathy can be created in the first three years. For about half a century, we have known one unfailing recipe for creating psychopaths -- move a child through a dozen foster homes in the first three years. There are probably other things - genetic, organic, or biochemical, that can sometimes predispose a person to psychopathy. But that should not lull us into forgetting the one never-failing recipe. More importantly, we should be mindful that less severe disruptions of attachment, like a dozen different caregivers in the first three years can create partial psychopaths. If we had an unfakable way to measure this two-part type of empathy we would be able to correlate such findings with clinical impressions of severity of psychopathy, whether we are speaking about psychopaths in prison, in politics, in business, or the day before they kill. To take the issue further, if a relative incapacity for this two-part type of empathy is a key ingredient in the makeup of psychopaths, what are the consequences for society if large numbers of individuals are functioning without it? Isn't a capacity to be affected by what is happening to others a necessary component in the makeup of a majority of persons in order for a group to function as a group? From a sociological perspective, isn't this one of the functional prerequisites of any social system? Is there a critical mass for this type of empathy for a society to survive? |
Re: L.W. "Cooyon Billy" Goatman-Hughes III
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:17:24 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<LWBill------@------.net> wrote: >"24Bit®" <24Bit@Ur.Asylum.org> wrote in message >news:vs2e93h8m3umcs2fldc4rguj5hc47oc4sb@4ax.com.. . >><Wrote nothing as usual.> The Partial Psychopath In our experience, the dimension that correlates most closely with psychopathy and which has been identified or is implicit in all definitions of the illness is the concept of empathy, but empathy defined in a specific two-part way. Empathy is loosely thought to be the capacity to put yourself in another person's shoes. But this seems to be only one part of what constitutes empathy in relation to the psychopath. What is different about the psychopath is that he is unaffected or detached emotionally from the knowledge that he gains by putting himself in your shoes. Thus, although he is able to very quickly glean during the briefest encounter with another person a lot of very useful information about what makes that person tick, this knowledge is simply knowledge to be used or not as the psychopath chooses. What is missing in psychopaths is the compelling nature of the appropriate affective response to the knowledge gained from putting himself in another persons shoes, in the way that this happens in the normal person. This essential missing aspect of empathy, even in the severe psychopath, is not in my experience easily seen and one does not often get a second glimpse of it if one has been treated to a first one by mistake. A rather crude example might suffice. A young psychopath who had inflicted multiple stab wounds on an elderly woman, and was charged with attempted murder, appeared subdued and appropriately sad about the offence during the early stages of a first interview. His eyes were moist as he accurately described how the woman must have felt during and after the attack. But later in the same interview, after good rapport had been established, this boy blurted out, "I don't know what all the fuss is about. The old bag only had a dozen scratches." To my knowledge, in all his subsequent years in the psychiatric hospital, he stuck to all the right lines of remorse which he quickly learned were more appropriate and useful. The bright psychopath, the experienced psychopath, doesn't stumble like that very often. With luck and the right question about how the other person's feelings affected him there will be a barely perceptible pause, or a puzzled look, or even – rarely - the question, "How am I supposed to feel?" The second part of this two-part empathy for the normal person is the automatic, compelling, intuitive, appropriate response to what the other feels - not the acting out of a chosen script. The psychopath can follow the same script as a normal person, usually with all the subtle nuances of a skilled actor - if he chooses to do so. An untrained observer is very unlikely to note any difference from the real thing. Thus the second part of this two-part empathy in a psychopath is the choosing and acting of a script. Unlike the normal person, he can choose what script to follow. He is not compelled intuitively or automatically to react to the way he knows you feel. And unlike the normal person, he has been told, or learned by observing others, what he is supposed to feel. As he rapes you or strangles you he is not compelled to feel your pain, your terror, your helplessness. There is no automatic, compelling, intuitive connection between what he knows you feel and what he feels. There is no way he must feel. Thus there is none of this kind of restraining force on his behavior. Therein lies the danger of psychopathy. Are experiences in the first three years critical in developing this two-part type of empathy? Yes - if you accept that psychopathy can be created in the first three years. For about half a century, we have known one unfailing recipe for creating psychopaths -- move a child through a dozen foster homes in the first three years. There are probably other things - genetic, organic, or biochemical, that can sometimes predispose a person to psychopathy. But that should not lull us into forgetting the one never-failing recipe. More importantly, we should be mindful that less severe disruptions of attachment, like a dozen different caregivers in the first three years can create partial psychopaths. If we had an unfakable way to measure this two-part type of empathy we would be able to correlate such findings with clinical impressions of severity of psychopathy, whether we are speaking about psychopaths in prison, in politics, in business, or the day before they kill. To take the issue further, if a relative incapacity for this two-part type of empathy is a key ingredient in the makeup of psychopaths, what are the consequences for society if large numbers of individuals are functioning without it? Isn't a capacity to be affected by what is happening to others a necessary component in the makeup of a majority of persons in order for a group to function as a group? From a sociological perspective, isn't this one of the functional prerequisites of any social system? Is there a critical mass for this type of empathy for a society to survive? |
Re: L.W. "Cooyon Billy" Goatman-Hughes III
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:17:24 -0700, "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III"
<LWBill------@------.net> wrote: >"24Bit®" <24Bit@Ur.Asylum.org> wrote in message >news:vs2e93h8m3umcs2fldc4rguj5hc47oc4sb@4ax.com.. . >><Wrote nothing as usual.> The Partial Psychopath In our experience, the dimension that correlates most closely with psychopathy and which has been identified or is implicit in all definitions of the illness is the concept of empathy, but empathy defined in a specific two-part way. Empathy is loosely thought to be the capacity to put yourself in another person's shoes. But this seems to be only one part of what constitutes empathy in relation to the psychopath. What is different about the psychopath is that he is unaffected or detached emotionally from the knowledge that he gains by putting himself in your shoes. Thus, although he is able to very quickly glean during the briefest encounter with another person a lot of very useful information about what makes that person tick, this knowledge is simply knowledge to be used or not as the psychopath chooses. What is missing in psychopaths is the compelling nature of the appropriate affective response to the knowledge gained from putting himself in another persons shoes, in the way that this happens in the normal person. This essential missing aspect of empathy, even in the severe psychopath, is not in my experience easily seen and one does not often get a second glimpse of it if one has been treated to a first one by mistake. A rather crude example might suffice. A young psychopath who had inflicted multiple stab wounds on an elderly woman, and was charged with attempted murder, appeared subdued and appropriately sad about the offence during the early stages of a first interview. His eyes were moist as he accurately described how the woman must have felt during and after the attack. But later in the same interview, after good rapport had been established, this boy blurted out, "I don't know what all the fuss is about. The old bag only had a dozen scratches." To my knowledge, in all his subsequent years in the psychiatric hospital, he stuck to all the right lines of remorse which he quickly learned were more appropriate and useful. The bright psychopath, the experienced psychopath, doesn't stumble like that very often. With luck and the right question about how the other person's feelings affected him there will be a barely perceptible pause, or a puzzled look, or even – rarely - the question, "How am I supposed to feel?" The second part of this two-part empathy for the normal person is the automatic, compelling, intuitive, appropriate response to what the other feels - not the acting out of a chosen script. The psychopath can follow the same script as a normal person, usually with all the subtle nuances of a skilled actor - if he chooses to do so. An untrained observer is very unlikely to note any difference from the real thing. Thus the second part of this two-part empathy in a psychopath is the choosing and acting of a script. Unlike the normal person, he can choose what script to follow. He is not compelled intuitively or automatically to react to the way he knows you feel. And unlike the normal person, he has been told, or learned by observing others, what he is supposed to feel. As he rapes you or strangles you he is not compelled to feel your pain, your terror, your helplessness. There is no automatic, compelling, intuitive connection between what he knows you feel and what he feels. There is no way he must feel. Thus there is none of this kind of restraining force on his behavior. Therein lies the danger of psychopathy. Are experiences in the first three years critical in developing this two-part type of empathy? Yes - if you accept that psychopathy can be created in the first three years. For about half a century, we have known one unfailing recipe for creating psychopaths -- move a child through a dozen foster homes in the first three years. There are probably other things - genetic, organic, or biochemical, that can sometimes predispose a person to psychopathy. But that should not lull us into forgetting the one never-failing recipe. More importantly, we should be mindful that less severe disruptions of attachment, like a dozen different caregivers in the first three years can create partial psychopaths. If we had an unfakable way to measure this two-part type of empathy we would be able to correlate such findings with clinical impressions of severity of psychopathy, whether we are speaking about psychopaths in prison, in politics, in business, or the day before they kill. To take the issue further, if a relative incapacity for this two-part type of empathy is a key ingredient in the makeup of psychopaths, what are the consequences for society if large numbers of individuals are functioning without it? Isn't a capacity to be affected by what is happening to others a necessary component in the makeup of a majority of persons in order for a group to function as a group? From a sociological perspective, isn't this one of the functional prerequisites of any social system? Is there a critical mass for this type of empathy for a society to survive? |
Re: L.W. "Cooyon Billy" Goatman-Hughes III
"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in
news:4696a460$0$16341$88260bb3@free.teranews.com: > This from the biggest loser of them all! Add me to yuor lits, Goat----er. > The jealous, really > jealous, I > can't believe how jealous this little draft dodging coward > schizophrenic psychopath liar hiding in Vancouver via > S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca > who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of its self. With an > obsession with perverts and goats, where it writes via remailers, and > cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme > jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness > and fine, Southern California surfing body, beard, and loving family. > Committing forgery over many of my posts, proving I'm a responsible > American man. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican > Chiwawa with its senseless barking, me too, me too. You're even more > senile than I first thought. And the poor thing, you're too girlie to > take responsibility for yourself again, by signing your statement like > a man. > That really thinks the group's members are so stupid not to know > it's > the same coward, posting over and over again using a schizophrenic > psychopath forged up names? > You're not worth any more time when a cut and paste this same > paragraphs it fits so well! > But, now worth a forwarding to: internet.help@shaw.ca, > security@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca, internet.abuse@sjrb.ca, > abuse@aioe.org, admin@cox.net for forgery. > Who said it also likes baby monkeys sucking their -----, like his > buddy > posted on an auto picture group at: > news:0u7g43dkje4pdkqi07hl66s8kpifo564k1@4ax.com > I thought this traitor's attacks were just over personal > disagreements, > but in reality these attacks stemming from my love of God and America > on Independents Week, I realized you are actually attacking my > country, and that's what you've been doing all along is declaring your > hatred for the United States of America, with each declaration of my > signature, but just too cowardly and stupid to be a ---------. It's > America, love it, or leave it, so keep the f*ck out! > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Nice rant, freak. The 'Nozz and AUK added for topicality. Keep ------- them goats, Billy. |
Re: L.W. "Cooyon Billy" Goatman-Hughes III
"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in
news:4696a460$0$16341$88260bb3@free.teranews.com: > This from the biggest loser of them all! Add me to yuor lits, Goat----er. > The jealous, really > jealous, I > can't believe how jealous this little draft dodging coward > schizophrenic psychopath liar hiding in Vancouver via > S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca > who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of its self. With an > obsession with perverts and goats, where it writes via remailers, and > cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme > jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness > and fine, Southern California surfing body, beard, and loving family. > Committing forgery over many of my posts, proving I'm a responsible > American man. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican > Chiwawa with its senseless barking, me too, me too. You're even more > senile than I first thought. And the poor thing, you're too girlie to > take responsibility for yourself again, by signing your statement like > a man. > That really thinks the group's members are so stupid not to know > it's > the same coward, posting over and over again using a schizophrenic > psychopath forged up names? > You're not worth any more time when a cut and paste this same > paragraphs it fits so well! > But, now worth a forwarding to: internet.help@shaw.ca, > security@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca, internet.abuse@sjrb.ca, > abuse@aioe.org, admin@cox.net for forgery. > Who said it also likes baby monkeys sucking their -----, like his > buddy > posted on an auto picture group at: > news:0u7g43dkje4pdkqi07hl66s8kpifo564k1@4ax.com > I thought this traitor's attacks were just over personal > disagreements, > but in reality these attacks stemming from my love of God and America > on Independents Week, I realized you are actually attacking my > country, and that's what you've been doing all along is declaring your > hatred for the United States of America, with each declaration of my > signature, but just too cowardly and stupid to be a ---------. It's > America, love it, or leave it, so keep the f*ck out! > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Nice rant, freak. The 'Nozz and AUK added for topicality. Keep ------- them goats, Billy. |
Re: L.W. "Cooyon Billy" Goatman-Hughes III
"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in
news:4696a460$0$16341$88260bb3@free.teranews.com: > This from the biggest loser of them all! Add me to yuor lits, Goat----er. > The jealous, really > jealous, I > can't believe how jealous this little draft dodging coward > schizophrenic psychopath liar hiding in Vancouver via > S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca > who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of its self. With an > obsession with perverts and goats, where it writes via remailers, and > cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme > jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness > and fine, Southern California surfing body, beard, and loving family. > Committing forgery over many of my posts, proving I'm a responsible > American man. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican > Chiwawa with its senseless barking, me too, me too. You're even more > senile than I first thought. And the poor thing, you're too girlie to > take responsibility for yourself again, by signing your statement like > a man. > That really thinks the group's members are so stupid not to know > it's > the same coward, posting over and over again using a schizophrenic > psychopath forged up names? > You're not worth any more time when a cut and paste this same > paragraphs it fits so well! > But, now worth a forwarding to: internet.help@shaw.ca, > security@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca, internet.abuse@sjrb.ca, > abuse@aioe.org, admin@cox.net for forgery. > Who said it also likes baby monkeys sucking their -----, like his > buddy > posted on an auto picture group at: > news:0u7g43dkje4pdkqi07hl66s8kpifo564k1@4ax.com > I thought this traitor's attacks were just over personal > disagreements, > but in reality these attacks stemming from my love of God and America > on Independents Week, I realized you are actually attacking my > country, and that's what you've been doing all along is declaring your > hatred for the United States of America, with each declaration of my > signature, but just too cowardly and stupid to be a ---------. It's > America, love it, or leave it, so keep the f*ck out! > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Nice rant, freak. The 'Nozz and AUK added for topicality. Keep ------- them goats, Billy. |
Re: L.W. "Cooyon Billy" Goatman-Hughes III
"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in
news:4696a460$0$16341$88260bb3@free.teranews.com: > This from the biggest loser of them all! Add me to yuor lits, Goat----er. > The jealous, really > jealous, I > can't believe how jealous this little draft dodging coward > schizophrenic psychopath liar hiding in Vancouver via > S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca > who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of its self. With an > obsession with perverts and goats, where it writes via remailers, and > cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme > jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness > and fine, Southern California surfing body, beard, and loving family. > Committing forgery over many of my posts, proving I'm a responsible > American man. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican > Chiwawa with its senseless barking, me too, me too. You're even more > senile than I first thought. And the poor thing, you're too girlie to > take responsibility for yourself again, by signing your statement like > a man. > That really thinks the group's members are so stupid not to know > it's > the same coward, posting over and over again using a schizophrenic > psychopath forged up names? > You're not worth any more time when a cut and paste this same > paragraphs it fits so well! > But, now worth a forwarding to: internet.help@shaw.ca, > security@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca, internet.abuse@sjrb.ca, > abuse@aioe.org, admin@cox.net for forgery. > Who said it also likes baby monkeys sucking their -----, like his > buddy > posted on an auto picture group at: > news:0u7g43dkje4pdkqi07hl66s8kpifo564k1@4ax.com > I thought this traitor's attacks were just over personal > disagreements, > but in reality these attacks stemming from my love of God and America > on Independents Week, I realized you are actually attacking my > country, and that's what you've been doing all along is declaring your > hatred for the United States of America, with each declaration of my > signature, but just too cowardly and stupid to be a ---------. It's > America, love it, or leave it, so keep the f*ck out! > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Nice rant, freak. The 'Nozz and AUK added for topicality. Keep ------- them goats, Billy. |
Re: L.W. "Cooyon Billy" Goatman-Hughes III
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:50:16 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet
<cujo@insurgent.org> wrote: >"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in >news:4696a460$0$16341$88260bb3@free.teranews.co m: > >> This from the biggest loser of them all! > >Add me to yuor lits, Goat----er. > >> The jealous, really >> jealous, I >> can't believe how jealous this little draft dodging coward >> schizophrenic psychopath liar hiding in Vancouver via >> S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca >> who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of its self. With an >> obsession with perverts and goats, where it writes via remailers, and >> cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme >> jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness >> and fine, Southern California surfing body, beard, and loving family. >> Committing forgery over many of my posts, proving I'm a responsible >> American man. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican >> Chiwawa with its senseless barking, me too, me too. You're even more >> senile than I first thought. And the poor thing, you're too girlie to >> take responsibility for yourself again, by signing your statement like >> a man. >> That really thinks the group's members are so stupid not to know >> it's >> the same coward, posting over and over again using a schizophrenic >> psychopath forged up names? >> You're not worth any more time when a cut and paste this same >> paragraphs it fits so well! >> But, now worth a forwarding to: internet.help@shaw.ca, >> security@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca, internet.abuse@sjrb.ca, >> abuse@aioe.org, admin@cox.net for forgery. >> Who said it also likes baby monkeys sucking their -----, like his >> buddy >> posted on an auto picture group at: >> news:0u7g43dkje4pdkqi07hl66s8kpifo564k1@4ax.com >> I thought this traitor's attacks were just over personal >> disagreements, >> but in reality these attacks stemming from my love of God and America >> on Independents Week, I realized you are actually attacking my >> country, and that's what you've been doing all along is declaring your >> hatred for the United States of America, with each declaration of my >> signature, but just too cowardly and stupid to be a ---------. It's >> America, love it, or leave it, so keep the f*ck out! >> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > >Nice rant, freak. > >The 'Nozz and AUK added for topicality. > >Keep ------- them goats, Billy. Another goat----er? He and Bartlo could start a Yahoo group. Jade |
Re: L.W. "Cooyon Billy" Goatman-Hughes III
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:50:16 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet
<cujo@insurgent.org> wrote: >"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in >news:4696a460$0$16341$88260bb3@free.teranews.co m: > >> This from the biggest loser of them all! > >Add me to yuor lits, Goat----er. > >> The jealous, really >> jealous, I >> can't believe how jealous this little draft dodging coward >> schizophrenic psychopath liar hiding in Vancouver via >> S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca >> who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of its self. With an >> obsession with perverts and goats, where it writes via remailers, and >> cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme >> jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness >> and fine, Southern California surfing body, beard, and loving family. >> Committing forgery over many of my posts, proving I'm a responsible >> American man. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican >> Chiwawa with its senseless barking, me too, me too. You're even more >> senile than I first thought. And the poor thing, you're too girlie to >> take responsibility for yourself again, by signing your statement like >> a man. >> That really thinks the group's members are so stupid not to know >> it's >> the same coward, posting over and over again using a schizophrenic >> psychopath forged up names? >> You're not worth any more time when a cut and paste this same >> paragraphs it fits so well! >> But, now worth a forwarding to: internet.help@shaw.ca, >> security@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca, internet.abuse@sjrb.ca, >> abuse@aioe.org, admin@cox.net for forgery. >> Who said it also likes baby monkeys sucking their -----, like his >> buddy >> posted on an auto picture group at: >> news:0u7g43dkje4pdkqi07hl66s8kpifo564k1@4ax.com >> I thought this traitor's attacks were just over personal >> disagreements, >> but in reality these attacks stemming from my love of God and America >> on Independents Week, I realized you are actually attacking my >> country, and that's what you've been doing all along is declaring your >> hatred for the United States of America, with each declaration of my >> signature, but just too cowardly and stupid to be a ---------. It's >> America, love it, or leave it, so keep the f*ck out! >> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > >Nice rant, freak. > >The 'Nozz and AUK added for topicality. > >Keep ------- them goats, Billy. Another goat----er? He and Bartlo could start a Yahoo group. Jade |
Re: L.W. "Cooyon Billy" Goatman-Hughes III
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:50:16 +0000 (UTC), Cujo DeSockpuppet
<cujo@insurgent.org> wrote: >"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote in >news:4696a460$0$16341$88260bb3@free.teranews.co m: > >> This from the biggest loser of them all! > >Add me to yuor lits, Goat----er. > >> The jealous, really >> jealous, I >> can't believe how jealous this little draft dodging coward >> schizophrenic psychopath liar hiding in Vancouver via >> S0106000ea6ba70e7.vn.shawcable.net 24.86.24.251 intrepidator@shaw.ca >> who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of its self. With an >> obsession with perverts and goats, where it writes via remailers, and >> cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme >> jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness >> and fine, Southern California surfing body, beard, and loving family. >> Committing forgery over many of my posts, proving I'm a responsible >> American man. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican >> Chiwawa with its senseless barking, me too, me too. You're even more >> senile than I first thought. And the poor thing, you're too girlie to >> take responsibility for yourself again, by signing your statement like >> a man. >> That really thinks the group's members are so stupid not to know >> it's >> the same coward, posting over and over again using a schizophrenic >> psychopath forged up names? >> You're not worth any more time when a cut and paste this same >> paragraphs it fits so well! >> But, now worth a forwarding to: internet.help@shaw.ca, >> security@shaw.ca, abuse@shaw.ca, internet.abuse@sjrb.ca, >> abuse@aioe.org, admin@cox.net for forgery. >> Who said it also likes baby monkeys sucking their -----, like his >> buddy >> posted on an auto picture group at: >> news:0u7g43dkje4pdkqi07hl66s8kpifo564k1@4ax.com >> I thought this traitor's attacks were just over personal >> disagreements, >> but in reality these attacks stemming from my love of God and America >> on Independents Week, I realized you are actually attacking my >> country, and that's what you've been doing all along is declaring your >> hatred for the United States of America, with each declaration of my >> signature, but just too cowardly and stupid to be a ---------. It's >> America, love it, or leave it, so keep the f*ck out! >> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > >Nice rant, freak. > >The 'Nozz and AUK added for topicality. > >Keep ------- them goats, Billy. Another goat----er? He and Bartlo could start a Yahoo group. Jade |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands