Guaranteed win for Bush in November
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Guaranteed win for Bush in November
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:WPxtc.46938$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> "Robert Schneider" <rss1174@SPAMMENOTearthlink.net> wrote in
> news:3Hxtc.14059$be.12988@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net:
>
> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
> > news:2hnmd9Fem3rqU1@uni-berlin.de...
> >
> >> Polls now mean almost nothing. Dukakis was ahead 14 points in the month
> >> of August only to lose by a landslide in November.
> >
> > Difference is that Bush is the one ------- up this time around.
>
> Yet Kerry is running about even with Bush in the polls. That isn't good
for
> Kerry.
But not in the states that matter. :)
http://online.wsj.com/public/resourc...eground04.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Guaranteed win for Bush in November
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:WPxtc.46938$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> "Robert Schneider" <rss1174@SPAMMENOTearthlink.net> wrote in
> news:3Hxtc.14059$be.12988@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net:
>
> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
> > news:2hnmd9Fem3rqU1@uni-berlin.de...
> >
> >> Polls now mean almost nothing. Dukakis was ahead 14 points in the month
> >> of August only to lose by a landslide in November.
> >
> > Difference is that Bush is the one ------- up this time around.
>
> Yet Kerry is running about even with Bush in the polls. That isn't good
for
> Kerry.
But not in the states that matter. :)
http://online.wsj.com/public/resourc...eground04.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Guaranteed win for Bush in November
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:WPxtc.46938$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> "Robert Schneider" <rss1174@SPAMMENOTearthlink.net> wrote in
> news:3Hxtc.14059$be.12988@newsread2.news.pas.earth link.net:
>
> > "Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
> > news:2hnmd9Fem3rqU1@uni-berlin.de...
> >
> >> Polls now mean almost nothing. Dukakis was ahead 14 points in the month
> >> of August only to lose by a landslide in November.
> >
> > Difference is that Bush is the one ------- up this time around.
>
> Yet Kerry is running about even with Bush in the polls. That isn't good
for
> Kerry.
But not in the states that matter. :)
http://online.wsj.com/public/resourc...eground04.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Guaranteed lass for Bush in November
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
>No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
>elected.
>
>Why, one would ask.
>
>The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
>approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
People know Bush to be an incompetant. Kerry just has to appear
competant and he's a shoo-in.
>I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
>vote for Kerry in a million years.
That's because you're a murderous bigot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
>I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
>No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
>elected.
>
>Why, one would ask.
>
>The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
>approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
People know Bush to be an incompetant. Kerry just has to appear
competant and he's a shoo-in.
>I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
>vote for Kerry in a million years.
That's because you're a murderous bigot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Guaranteed lass for Bush in November
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
>No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
>elected.
>
>Why, one would ask.
>
>The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
>approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
People know Bush to be an incompetant. Kerry just has to appear
competant and he's a shoo-in.
>I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
>vote for Kerry in a million years.
That's because you're a murderous bigot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
>I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
>No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
>elected.
>
>Why, one would ask.
>
>The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
>approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
People know Bush to be an incompetant. Kerry just has to appear
competant and he's a shoo-in.
>I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
>vote for Kerry in a million years.
That's because you're a murderous bigot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Guaranteed lass for Bush in November
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
>No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
>elected.
>
>Why, one would ask.
>
>The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
>approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
People know Bush to be an incompetant. Kerry just has to appear
competant and he's a shoo-in.
>I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
>vote for Kerry in a million years.
That's because you're a murderous bigot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
>I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
>No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
>elected.
>
>Why, one would ask.
>
>The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
>approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
People know Bush to be an incompetant. Kerry just has to appear
competant and he's a shoo-in.
>I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
>vote for Kerry in a million years.
That's because you're a murderous bigot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Guaranteed lass for Bush in November
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
>No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
>elected.
>
>Why, one would ask.
>
>The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
>approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
People know Bush to be an incompetant. Kerry just has to appear
competant and he's a shoo-in.
>I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
>vote for Kerry in a million years.
That's because you're a murderous bigot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
>I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
>No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
>elected.
>
>Why, one would ask.
>
>The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
>approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
People know Bush to be an incompetant. Kerry just has to appear
competant and he's a shoo-in.
>I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
>vote for Kerry in a million years.
That's because you're a murderous bigot.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@sonic.net
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Guaranteed win for Bush in November
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<2hnd8hFe5h83U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
> No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
> elected.
>
> Why, one would ask.
>
> The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
> approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
>
> I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
> vote for Kerry in a million years.
>
> It's the lesser of two evils.
>
> Bush will win.
*sigh*
All I can say is that both Bush and Kerry have a chance of winning the
presidential election come November 2004. Heck, if Ralph Nader can
get on enough state ballots, he has a chance too. Unfortunately for
Nader, the two party system is well entrenched in US politics with
registered Republicans and Democrats more likely to vote for their
respective candidates. The silent majority in the United States
really need to make the decision who they prefer to be their
president, the incumbent or the challenger. Hopefully, balloting this
round would be significantly less problematic than in 2000 and really
point to a clear winner rather than very slim majorities and "hanging
chads" *UGH*
FWIW, I'm not an American. Just an observer to this whole "wretched"
US election discussion on the internet as it is discussed in most
newsgroups and crossposted everywhere. Its downright difficult to
avoid it short of becoming a hermit in a secluded place with no
contact with the outside world =P
- leongsh..
a.a.#1860
email: berantle at maxis dot net dot my
> I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
> No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
> elected.
>
> Why, one would ask.
>
> The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
> approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
>
> I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
> vote for Kerry in a million years.
>
> It's the lesser of two evils.
>
> Bush will win.
*sigh*
All I can say is that both Bush and Kerry have a chance of winning the
presidential election come November 2004. Heck, if Ralph Nader can
get on enough state ballots, he has a chance too. Unfortunately for
Nader, the two party system is well entrenched in US politics with
registered Republicans and Democrats more likely to vote for their
respective candidates. The silent majority in the United States
really need to make the decision who they prefer to be their
president, the incumbent or the challenger. Hopefully, balloting this
round would be significantly less problematic than in 2000 and really
point to a clear winner rather than very slim majorities and "hanging
chads" *UGH*
FWIW, I'm not an American. Just an observer to this whole "wretched"
US election discussion on the internet as it is discussed in most
newsgroups and crossposted everywhere. Its downright difficult to
avoid it short of becoming a hermit in a secluded place with no
contact with the outside world =P
- leongsh..
a.a.#1860
email: berantle at maxis dot net dot my
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Guaranteed win for Bush in November
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<2hnd8hFe5h83U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
> No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
> elected.
>
> Why, one would ask.
>
> The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
> approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
>
> I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
> vote for Kerry in a million years.
>
> It's the lesser of two evils.
>
> Bush will win.
*sigh*
All I can say is that both Bush and Kerry have a chance of winning the
presidential election come November 2004. Heck, if Ralph Nader can
get on enough state ballots, he has a chance too. Unfortunately for
Nader, the two party system is well entrenched in US politics with
registered Republicans and Democrats more likely to vote for their
respective candidates. The silent majority in the United States
really need to make the decision who they prefer to be their
president, the incumbent or the challenger. Hopefully, balloting this
round would be significantly less problematic than in 2000 and really
point to a clear winner rather than very slim majorities and "hanging
chads" *UGH*
FWIW, I'm not an American. Just an observer to this whole "wretched"
US election discussion on the internet as it is discussed in most
newsgroups and crossposted everywhere. Its downright difficult to
avoid it short of becoming a hermit in a secluded place with no
contact with the outside world =P
- leongsh..
a.a.#1860
email: berantle at maxis dot net dot my
> I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
> No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
> elected.
>
> Why, one would ask.
>
> The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
> approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
>
> I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
> vote for Kerry in a million years.
>
> It's the lesser of two evils.
>
> Bush will win.
*sigh*
All I can say is that both Bush and Kerry have a chance of winning the
presidential election come November 2004. Heck, if Ralph Nader can
get on enough state ballots, he has a chance too. Unfortunately for
Nader, the two party system is well entrenched in US politics with
registered Republicans and Democrats more likely to vote for their
respective candidates. The silent majority in the United States
really need to make the decision who they prefer to be their
president, the incumbent or the challenger. Hopefully, balloting this
round would be significantly less problematic than in 2000 and really
point to a clear winner rather than very slim majorities and "hanging
chads" *UGH*
FWIW, I'm not an American. Just an observer to this whole "wretched"
US election discussion on the internet as it is discussed in most
newsgroups and crossposted everywhere. Its downright difficult to
avoid it short of becoming a hermit in a secluded place with no
contact with the outside world =P
- leongsh..
a.a.#1860
email: berantle at maxis dot net dot my
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Guaranteed win for Bush in November
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<2hnd8hFe5h83U1@uni-berlin.de>...
> I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
> No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
> elected.
>
> Why, one would ask.
>
> The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
> approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
>
> I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
> vote for Kerry in a million years.
>
> It's the lesser of two evils.
>
> Bush will win.
*sigh*
All I can say is that both Bush and Kerry have a chance of winning the
presidential election come November 2004. Heck, if Ralph Nader can
get on enough state ballots, he has a chance too. Unfortunately for
Nader, the two party system is well entrenched in US politics with
registered Republicans and Democrats more likely to vote for their
respective candidates. The silent majority in the United States
really need to make the decision who they prefer to be their
president, the incumbent or the challenger. Hopefully, balloting this
round would be significantly less problematic than in 2000 and really
point to a clear winner rather than very slim majorities and "hanging
chads" *UGH*
FWIW, I'm not an American. Just an observer to this whole "wretched"
US election discussion on the internet as it is discussed in most
newsgroups and crossposted everywhere. Its downright difficult to
avoid it short of becoming a hermit in a secluded place with no
contact with the outside world =P
- leongsh..
a.a.#1860
email: berantle at maxis dot net dot my
> I think that the most interesting comments I have heard is:
>
> No matter what the approval rating is, it has no bearing on Bush being
> elected.
>
> Why, one would ask.
>
> The prediction is that Bush will win, not because Americans don't
> approve of his job, but rather because they don't approve of Kerry.
>
> I don't care for some of the things that Bush has done, but I would not
> vote for Kerry in a million years.
>
> It's the lesser of two evils.
>
> Bush will win.
*sigh*
All I can say is that both Bush and Kerry have a chance of winning the
presidential election come November 2004. Heck, if Ralph Nader can
get on enough state ballots, he has a chance too. Unfortunately for
Nader, the two party system is well entrenched in US politics with
registered Republicans and Democrats more likely to vote for their
respective candidates. The silent majority in the United States
really need to make the decision who they prefer to be their
president, the incumbent or the challenger. Hopefully, balloting this
round would be significantly less problematic than in 2000 and really
point to a clear winner rather than very slim majorities and "hanging
chads" *UGH*
FWIW, I'm not an American. Just an observer to this whole "wretched"
US election discussion on the internet as it is discussed in most
newsgroups and crossposted everywhere. Its downright difficult to
avoid it short of becoming a hermit in a secluded place with no
contact with the outside world =P
- leongsh..
a.a.#1860
email: berantle at maxis dot net dot my
