The great lie that is evolution
05-27-2004, 11:31 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.
Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
References to this latest news? I think that in your desire to find
material suitable for trolling, you misread or misinterpreted the latest
news.
Since all of this has been discussed before ad nauseum, let me just
point people to http://talkorigins.org/ where this topic is covered in
greater depth than we're likely to get here.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
05-27-2004, 11:48 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
On Fri, 28 May 2004 03:19:31 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
05-27-2004, 11:48 PM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
On Fri, 28 May 2004 03:19:31 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
05-27-2004, 11:48 PM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
On Fri, 28 May 2004 03:19:31 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
05-27-2004, 11:48 PM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
On Fri, 28 May 2004 03:19:31 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
>Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
>news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com :
>
>> On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>>> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
>>> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
>>> those changes in the first place.
>>>
>>> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>>> support our position.
>>
>> Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
>> that support creationism.
>
>Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
>chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
>class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
>midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
Ah. So, you won't be showing any of that evidence, right?
--
Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to
evade the need to think and evaluate evidence.
Faith is belief in spite of, even perhaps because of,
the lack of evidence.
- Richard Dawkins
05-27-2004, 11:53 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)
Peter
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)
Peter
05-27-2004, 11:53 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)
Peter
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)
Peter
05-27-2004, 11:53 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)
Peter
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)
Peter
05-27-2004, 11:53 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
In article <7dytc.46945$kc2.711314@nnrp1.uunet.ca>,
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)
Peter
Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Adam H. <adam@mailinator.com> wrote in
> news:b6adb0ttj09t14v0fd0v0u4t2i4ps518t5@4ax.com:
>
> > On Fri, 28 May 2004 02:43:13 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> >
> >> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
> >> man has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in
> >> living beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of
> >> those changes in the first place.
> >>
> >> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> >> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> >> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
> >> support our position.
> >
> > Then show it. Let's see this 'scientific' evidence you claim to have
> > that support creationism.
>
> Latest news shows that the past evolutionism claims of genetic similarity
> chimps and humans are buckling faster than a evolutionist in a science
> class. My guess is that the spin-doctors at evolutionism are burning the
> midnight oil in vain search of some way to damage control this latest hit.
My God, are you really this dumb???
Thats how science works - it's self correcting (though it can take a
long time) unlike blind faith - which will never be self correcting (
and leads eventually to the sort of crap we're getting from Islam)
Peter
05-27-2004, 11:53 PM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Please stop cross posting to groups that have no interest inyour drivel,
which happens to be almost all of the groups you posted to.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
which happens to be almost all of the groups you posted to.
"Xomicron" <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message
news:5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.