Kathryn wrote:

> "Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
> news:1085760579.14129.2@ersa.uk.clara.net...
>
>>Xomicron wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>
> man
>
>>>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>>>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>>>changes in the first place.
>>>
>>>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>
> support
>
>>>our position.
>>>
>>>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>>>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>>>
>>>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>>>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
>>
>>So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?
>>
>>--
>>Graham Kennedy
>>
>
>
> Im guessing it's not Genesis (TNG), The Chase (TNG) or Threshold (VOY) to
> name 3. Or er....nearly all the episodes of Enterprise that involve the
> Xindi

<snicker>

Yeah, I would guess so.

Although when you think about it, given the amount of messing about
that evolution gets in Trek maybe he *would* like it after all!

--
Graham Kennedy

Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org

 

Kathryn wrote:

> "Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
> news:1085760579.14129.2@ersa.uk.clara.net...
>
>>Xomicron wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>
> man
>
>>>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>>>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>>>changes in the first place.
>>>
>>>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>
> support
>
>>>our position.
>>>
>>>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>>>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>>>
>>>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>>>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
>>
>>So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?
>>
>>--
>>Graham Kennedy
>>
>
>
> Im guessing it's not Genesis (TNG), The Chase (TNG) or Threshold (VOY) to
> name 3. Or er....nearly all the episodes of Enterprise that involve the
> Xindi

<snicker>

Yeah, I would guess so.

Although when you think about it, given the amount of messing about
that evolution gets in Trek maybe he *would* like it after all!

--
Graham Kennedy

Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org

 

Kathryn wrote:

> "Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
> news:1085760579.14129.2@ersa.uk.clara.net...
>
>>Xomicron wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>
> man
>
>>>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>>>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>>>changes in the first place.
>>>
>>>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>
> support
>
>>>our position.
>>>
>>>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>>>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>>>
>>>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>>>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
>>
>>So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?
>>
>>--
>>Graham Kennedy
>>
>
>
> Im guessing it's not Genesis (TNG), The Chase (TNG) or Threshold (VOY) to
> name 3. Or er....nearly all the episodes of Enterprise that involve the
> Xindi

<snicker>

Yeah, I would guess so.

Although when you think about it, given the amount of messing about
that evolution gets in Trek maybe he *would* like it after all!

--
Graham Kennedy

Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org

 

Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

I replied to this post, 24 hours ago. As my reply has not appeared, I
am writing again. Apologies if my first reply turns up.

Evolution is as fundamental to biology as the periodic table is to
chemistry. We don't need fossils, DNA evidence is enough.

So you believe in the 100% veracity of the Bible?. Let us forget the
obvious nonsense of the spare rib and Noah's Ark and go the the NT.

Matthew was a Greek Christian and clearly not very erudite in his
understanding of the ancient Hebrew poems which he regarded as
prophesies. The result is that he has Jesus riding into Jerusalem on
two asses, an *** and a colt of a she-***.

He is quoting from Zachariah 9.9. It was common at the time for the
poets to repeat the last line of the verse with greater emphasis with
more detail.

The poet wrote:riding upon an ***, even upon a colt the foal of a
she-***.

Matthew,(an ignorant Greek) in his eagerness to follw the poet
(prophet) slavishly has Jesus riding into Jerusalem on two asses.

"Behold your King is coming to you, gentle, and mounted upon a she-***
and upon a colt, the foal of a beast of burden.

Bernard

 

Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

I replied to this post, 24 hours ago. As my reply has not appeared, I
am writing again. Apologies if my first reply turns up.

Evolution is as fundamental to biology as the periodic table is to
chemistry. We don't need fossils, DNA evidence is enough.

So you believe in the 100% veracity of the Bible?. Let us forget the
obvious nonsense of the spare rib and Noah's Ark and go the the NT.

Matthew was a Greek Christian and clearly not very erudite in his
understanding of the ancient Hebrew poems which he regarded as
prophesies. The result is that he has Jesus riding into Jerusalem on
two asses, an *** and a colt of a she-***.

He is quoting from Zachariah 9.9. It was common at the time for the
poets to repeat the last line of the verse with greater emphasis with
more detail.

The poet wrote:riding upon an ***, even upon a colt the foal of a
she-***.

Matthew,(an ignorant Greek) in his eagerness to follw the poet
(prophet) slavishly has Jesus riding into Jerusalem on two asses.

"Behold your King is coming to you, gentle, and mounted upon a she-***
and upon a colt, the foal of a beast of burden.

Bernard

 

Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

I replied to this post, 24 hours ago. As my reply has not appeared, I
am writing again. Apologies if my first reply turns up.

Evolution is as fundamental to biology as the periodic table is to
chemistry. We don't need fossils, DNA evidence is enough.

So you believe in the 100% veracity of the Bible?. Let us forget the
obvious nonsense of the spare rib and Noah's Ark and go the the NT.

Matthew was a Greek Christian and clearly not very erudite in his
understanding of the ancient Hebrew poems which he regarded as
prophesies. The result is that he has Jesus riding into Jerusalem on
two asses, an *** and a colt of a she-***.

He is quoting from Zachariah 9.9. It was common at the time for the
poets to repeat the last line of the verse with greater emphasis with
more detail.

The poet wrote:riding upon an ***, even upon a colt the foal of a
she-***.

Matthew,(an ignorant Greek) in his eagerness to follw the poet
(prophet) slavishly has Jesus riding into Jerusalem on two asses.

"Behold your King is coming to you, gentle, and mounted upon a she-***
and upon a colt, the foal of a beast of burden.

Bernard

 

Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

I replied to this post, 24 hours ago. As my reply has not appeared, I
am writing again. Apologies if my first reply turns up.

Evolution is as fundamental to biology as the periodic table is to
chemistry. We don't need fossils, DNA evidence is enough.

So you believe in the 100% veracity of the Bible?. Let us forget the
obvious nonsense of the spare rib and Noah's Ark and go the the NT.

Matthew was a Greek Christian and clearly not very erudite in his
understanding of the ancient Hebrew poems which he regarded as
prophesies. The result is that he has Jesus riding into Jerusalem on
two asses, an *** and a colt of a she-***.

He is quoting from Zachariah 9.9. It was common at the time for the
poets to repeat the last line of the verse with greater emphasis with
more detail.

The poet wrote:riding upon an ***, even upon a colt the foal of a
she-***.

Matthew,(an ignorant Greek) in his eagerness to follw the poet
(prophet) slavishly has Jesus riding into Jerusalem on two asses.

"Behold your King is coming to you, gentle, and mounted upon a she-***
and upon a colt, the foal of a beast of burden.

Bernard

 

Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

God created evolution.......so simple one-cell organisms could lead to
modern day humans, and that was God's intention all along.

That's evolution and creationism combined, which I believe in.

Oh, see the movie "Saved!", it's all about people like you.

 

Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

God created evolution.......so simple one-cell organisms could lead to
modern day humans, and that was God's intention all along.

That's evolution and creationism combined, which I believe in.

Oh, see the movie "Saved!", it's all about people like you.

 

Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote in message news:<5Hxtc.46930$kc2.711218@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
> I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern man
> has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> changes in the first place.
>
> Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to support
> our position.
>
> Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>
> Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.

God created evolution.......so simple one-cell organisms could lead to
modern day humans, and that was God's intention all along.

That's evolution and creationism combined, which I believe in.

Oh, see the movie "Saved!", it's all about people like you.