The great lie that is evolution
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in
news:c9bdnm.15j0.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx:
> <------- WHAING GREAT BITCHTHWACK>
>
> You didn't read it, did you, ----tard? Don't say you did, because DNA
> was dealt with and dismissed, with fully verifiable supporting argument,
> and to a level of proof acceptable in courts of law.
>
> You may now ---- right off and die, you dumb ----.
Is this the extent of your lame argument?
news:c9bdnm.15j0.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx:
> <------- WHAING GREAT BITCHTHWACK>
>
> You didn't read it, did you, ----tard? Don't say you did, because DNA
> was dealt with and dismissed, with fully verifiable supporting argument,
> and to a level of proof acceptable in courts of law.
>
> You may now ---- right off and die, you dumb ----.
Is this the extent of your lame argument?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in message
news:c9bguc.1814.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx...
> "1" <1@home.com> wrote in message news:lM2uc.10655$%T.3453@okepread05...
>
> > > Then counter argue, ----tard, otherwise you have nothing other than
> > > empty-minded blubberings. Nothing surprising there, really.
> > >
> > >
> > Nope- I just like hearing you squeal.
> > A little louder. Im almost there
>
> Where is the squealing in the stament you refer to?
>
Oh yeah... that's it... louder this time...
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in message
news:c9bguc.1814.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx...
> "1" <1@home.com> wrote in message news:lM2uc.10655$%T.3453@okepread05...
>
> > > Then counter argue, ----tard, otherwise you have nothing other than
> > > empty-minded blubberings. Nothing surprising there, really.
> > >
> > >
> > Nope- I just like hearing you squeal.
> > A little louder. Im almost there
>
> Where is the squealing in the stament you refer to?
>
Oh yeah... that's it... louder this time...
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in message
news:c9bguc.1814.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx...
> "1" <1@home.com> wrote in message news:lM2uc.10655$%T.3453@okepread05...
>
> > > Then counter argue, ----tard, otherwise you have nothing other than
> > > empty-minded blubberings. Nothing surprising there, really.
> > >
> > >
> > Nope- I just like hearing you squeal.
> > A little louder. Im almost there
>
> Where is the squealing in the stament you refer to?
>
Oh yeah... that's it... louder this time...
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in message
news:c9bguc.1814.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx...
> "1" <1@home.com> wrote in message news:lM2uc.10655$%T.3453@okepread05...
>
> > > Then counter argue, ----tard, otherwise you have nothing other than
> > > empty-minded blubberings. Nothing surprising there, really.
> > >
> > >
> > Nope- I just like hearing you squeal.
> > A little louder. Im almost there
>
> Where is the squealing in the stament you refer to?
>
Oh yeah... that's it... louder this time...
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
"Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
news:1085760579.14129.2@ersa.uk.clara.net...
> Xomicron wrote:
>
> > I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
man
> > has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> > beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> > changes in the first place.
> >
> > Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> > scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> > the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
support
> > our position.
> >
> > Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> > suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
> >
> > Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> > convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
>
> So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?
>
> --
> Graham Kennedy
>
Im guessing it's not Genesis (TNG), The Chase (TNG) or Threshold (VOY) to
name 3. Or er....nearly all the episodes of Enterprise that involve the
Xindi
Kathryn
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
"Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
news:1085760579.14129.2@ersa.uk.clara.net...
> Xomicron wrote:
>
> > I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
man
> > has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> > beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> > changes in the first place.
> >
> > Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> > scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> > the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
support
> > our position.
> >
> > Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> > suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
> >
> > Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> > convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
>
> So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?
>
> --
> Graham Kennedy
>
Im guessing it's not Genesis (TNG), The Chase (TNG) or Threshold (VOY) to
name 3. Or er....nearly all the episodes of Enterprise that involve the
Xindi
Kathryn
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
"Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
news:1085760579.14129.2@ersa.uk.clara.net...
> Xomicron wrote:
>
> > I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
man
> > has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> > beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> > changes in the first place.
> >
> > Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> > scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> > the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
support
> > our position.
> >
> > Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> > suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
> >
> > Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> > convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
>
> So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?
>
> --
> Graham Kennedy
>
Im guessing it's not Genesis (TNG), The Chase (TNG) or Threshold (VOY) to
name 3. Or er....nearly all the episodes of Enterprise that involve the
Xindi
Kathryn
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
"Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
news:1085760579.14129.2@ersa.uk.clara.net...
> Xomicron wrote:
>
> > I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
man
> > has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
> > beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
> > changes in the first place.
> >
> > Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
> > scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
> > the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
support
> > our position.
> >
> > Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
> > suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
> >
> > Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
> > convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
>
> So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?
>
> --
> Graham Kennedy
>
Im guessing it's not Genesis (TNG), The Chase (TNG) or Threshold (VOY) to
name 3. Or er....nearly all the episodes of Enterprise that involve the
Xindi
Kathryn
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The great lie that is evolution
Kathryn wrote:
> "Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
> news:1085760579.14129.2@ersa.uk.clara.net...
>
>>Xomicron wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>
> man
>
>>>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>>>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>>>changes in the first place.
>>>
>>>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>
> support
>
>>>our position.
>>>
>>>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>>>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>>>
>>>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>>>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
>>
>>So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?
>>
>>--
>>Graham Kennedy
>>
>
>
> Im guessing it's not Genesis (TNG), The Chase (TNG) or Threshold (VOY) to
> name 3. Or er....nearly all the episodes of Enterprise that involve the
> Xindi
<snicker>
Yeah, I would guess so.
Although when you think about it, given the amount of messing about
that evolution gets in Trek maybe he *would* like it after all!
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
> "Graham Kennedy" <graham@ditl.org> wrote in message
> news:1085760579.14129.2@ersa.uk.clara.net...
>
>>Xomicron wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I am waiting for evolutionists to support their assertion that modern
>
> man
>
>>>has somehow been able to observe changes that have taken place in living
>>>beings regardless that modern man is supposedly a result of those
>>>changes in the first place.
>>>
>>>Only an uninformed fanatic says that evolution can be proved
>>>scientifically. Christians believe in creationism because we believe in
>>>the veracity of the Bible but we also have scientific evidence to
>
> support
>
>>>our position.
>>>
>>>Evolutionists don't "know" anything about man's origins. They guess,
>>>suppose, etc. but they don't "know."
>>>
>>>Honest scientists have become weary and embarrassed at the confusing,
>>>convoluted and contradictory claptrap that often passes as science.
>>
>>So what's your favourite Star Trek episode?
>>
>>--
>>Graham Kennedy
>>
>
>
> Im guessing it's not Genesis (TNG), The Chase (TNG) or Threshold (VOY) to
> name 3. Or er....nearly all the episodes of Enterprise that involve the
> Xindi
<snicker>
Yeah, I would guess so.
Although when you think about it, given the amount of messing about
that evolution gets in Trek maybe he *would* like it after all!
--
Graham Kennedy
Creator and Author,
Daystrom Institute Technical Library
http://www.ditl.org
