The great lie that is evolution
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <c98dol.1684.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx>,
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote:
> "Shiva" <shiva87@hotmail.com> wrote
>
> > Science tries
> > to prove things through experiments that can be repeated.
>
> Oh well. There go quantum and string theories.
Well, yes. And no. "String Theories" are mostly hypotheses. They have
made some predictions, but these are difficult to prove yet. But the
status of string theory as hypothesis has no bearing on the status of
evolutionary theory as fact.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote:
> "Shiva" <shiva87@hotmail.com> wrote
>
> > Science tries
> > to prove things through experiments that can be repeated.
>
> Oh well. There go quantum and string theories.
Well, yes. And no. "String Theories" are mostly hypotheses. They have
made some predictions, but these are difficult to prove yet. But the
status of string theory as hypothesis has no bearing on the status of
evolutionary theory as fact.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <c98dol.1684.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx>,
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote:
> "Shiva" <shiva87@hotmail.com> wrote
>
> > Science tries
> > to prove things through experiments that can be repeated.
>
> Oh well. There go quantum and string theories.
Well, yes. And no. "String Theories" are mostly hypotheses. They have
made some predictions, but these are difficult to prove yet. But the
status of string theory as hypothesis has no bearing on the status of
evolutionary theory as fact.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote:
> "Shiva" <shiva87@hotmail.com> wrote
>
> > Science tries
> > to prove things through experiments that can be repeated.
>
> Oh well. There go quantum and string theories.
Well, yes. And no. "String Theories" are mostly hypotheses. They have
made some predictions, but these are difficult to prove yet. But the
status of string theory as hypothesis has no bearing on the status of
evolutionary theory as fact.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <c98dol.1684.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx>,
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote:
> "Shiva" <shiva87@hotmail.com> wrote
>
> > Science tries
> > to prove things through experiments that can be repeated.
>
> Oh well. There go quantum and string theories.
Well, yes. And no. "String Theories" are mostly hypotheses. They have
made some predictions, but these are difficult to prove yet. But the
status of string theory as hypothesis has no bearing on the status of
evolutionary theory as fact.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote:
> "Shiva" <shiva87@hotmail.com> wrote
>
> > Science tries
> > to prove things through experiments that can be repeated.
>
> Oh well. There go quantum and string theories.
Well, yes. And no. "String Theories" are mostly hypotheses. They have
made some predictions, but these are difficult to prove yet. But the
status of string theory as hypothesis has no bearing on the status of
evolutionary theory as fact.
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <egItc.32971$Ol3.19026@twister.tampabay.rr.com>,
Godzilla <abuse@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Shiva wrote:
>
> > Science is objective,
>
> Or so the scientists want you to believe...
Is Xomicron objective in his critique of evolutionary theory? Are you
objective in your critique of science in general?
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Godzilla <abuse@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Shiva wrote:
>
> > Science is objective,
>
> Or so the scientists want you to believe...
Is Xomicron objective in his critique of evolutionary theory? Are you
objective in your critique of science in general?
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <egItc.32971$Ol3.19026@twister.tampabay.rr.com>,
Godzilla <abuse@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Shiva wrote:
>
> > Science is objective,
>
> Or so the scientists want you to believe...
Is Xomicron objective in his critique of evolutionary theory? Are you
objective in your critique of science in general?
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Godzilla <abuse@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Shiva wrote:
>
> > Science is objective,
>
> Or so the scientists want you to believe...
Is Xomicron objective in his critique of evolutionary theory? Are you
objective in your critique of science in general?
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <egItc.32971$Ol3.19026@twister.tampabay.rr.com>,
Godzilla <abuse@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Shiva wrote:
>
> > Science is objective,
>
> Or so the scientists want you to believe...
Is Xomicron objective in his critique of evolutionary theory? Are you
objective in your critique of science in general?
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Godzilla <abuse@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Shiva wrote:
>
> > Science is objective,
>
> Or so the scientists want you to believe...
Is Xomicron objective in his critique of evolutionary theory? Are you
objective in your critique of science in general?
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
In article <egItc.32971$Ol3.19026@twister.tampabay.rr.com>,
Godzilla <abuse@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Shiva wrote:
>
> > Science is objective,
>
> Or so the scientists want you to believe...
Is Xomicron objective in his critique of evolutionary theory? Are you
objective in your critique of science in general?
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Godzilla <abuse@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> Shiva wrote:
>
> > Science is objective,
>
> Or so the scientists want you to believe...
Is Xomicron objective in his critique of evolutionary theory? Are you
objective in your critique of science in general?
--
Timberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com>
http://www.timberwoof.com
Baloney Detection Kit: http://www.xenu.net/archive/baloney_detection.html
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Timberwoof" <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote:
Please be so kind as stare your total ----wittery right in the face...
> theory as fact.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You ----tard.
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
That figures.
--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo Linux kernel 2.6.5 <-- rolled my own
Please be so kind as stare your total ----wittery right in the face...
> theory as fact.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You ----tard.
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
That figures.
--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo Linux kernel 2.6.5 <-- rolled my own
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Timberwoof" <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote:
Please be so kind as stare your total ----wittery right in the face...
> theory as fact.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You ----tard.
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
That figures.
--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo Linux kernel 2.6.5 <-- rolled my own
Please be so kind as stare your total ----wittery right in the face...
> theory as fact.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You ----tard.
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
That figures.
--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo Linux kernel 2.6.5 <-- rolled my own
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Timberwoof" <timberwoof@stimpberawoofm.com> wrote:
Please be so kind as stare your total ----wittery right in the face...
> theory as fact.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You ----tard.
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
That figures.
--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo Linux kernel 2.6.5 <-- rolled my own
Please be so kind as stare your total ----wittery right in the face...
> theory as fact.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! You ----tard.
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Mac OS X)
That figures.
--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo Linux kernel 2.6.5 <-- rolled my own


