Grand Cherokee Owners - Fight back!!
06-30-2004, 10:36 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Grand Cherokee Owners - Fight back!!
It would be in your Tornio's rear end, or my twenty years older
Thunderbird.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
Thunderbird.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
06-30-2004, 10:36 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Grand Cherokee Owners - Fight back!!
It would be in your Tornio's rear end, or my twenty years older
Thunderbird.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
Thunderbird.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
06-30-2004, 10:36 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Grand Cherokee Owners - Fight back!!
It would be in your Tornio's rear end, or my twenty years older
Thunderbird.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
Thunderbird.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
06-30-2004, 10:47 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Grand Cherokee Owners - Fight back!!
Yes, Matt.
There's some truth to that.
The third repair was done by another shop.
/they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
Chrysler specs them too tight.
This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
critical of them.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:9J6dnTN_JfKW6H7dRVn-iQ@comcast.com...
> >
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to
need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
>
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > *
> > Interesting.
> > Just saw this in rec.jeep
> >
> > In a six month period I had the bearings replaced three times and the
> third
> > time I had to get a new carrier, half shaft and posi clutch.
> > This was all before the odometer had reached 150,000 Km.
> > It cost me CDN $2400. (actually more including tax)
> >
> > The vehicle is a 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee Orvis edition.
> > It is presently for sale.
> >
> > I have all the receipts, but no pictures.
> >
> > By the way . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com/
> >
> > doesn't work.
> > It should read like this . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > **********
> >
> >
>
>
There's some truth to that.
The third repair was done by another shop.
/they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
Chrysler specs them too tight.
This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
critical of them.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:9J6dnTN_JfKW6H7dRVn-iQ@comcast.com...
> >
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to
need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
>
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > *
> > Interesting.
> > Just saw this in rec.jeep
> >
> > In a six month period I had the bearings replaced three times and the
> third
> > time I had to get a new carrier, half shaft and posi clutch.
> > This was all before the odometer had reached 150,000 Km.
> > It cost me CDN $2400. (actually more including tax)
> >
> > The vehicle is a 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee Orvis edition.
> > It is presently for sale.
> >
> > I have all the receipts, but no pictures.
> >
> > By the way . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com/
> >
> > doesn't work.
> > It should read like this . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > **********
> >
> >
>
>
06-30-2004, 10:47 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Grand Cherokee Owners - Fight back!!
Yes, Matt.
There's some truth to that.
The third repair was done by another shop.
/they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
Chrysler specs them too tight.
This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
critical of them.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:9J6dnTN_JfKW6H7dRVn-iQ@comcast.com...
> >
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to
need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
>
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > *
> > Interesting.
> > Just saw this in rec.jeep
> >
> > In a six month period I had the bearings replaced three times and the
> third
> > time I had to get a new carrier, half shaft and posi clutch.
> > This was all before the odometer had reached 150,000 Km.
> > It cost me CDN $2400. (actually more including tax)
> >
> > The vehicle is a 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee Orvis edition.
> > It is presently for sale.
> >
> > I have all the receipts, but no pictures.
> >
> > By the way . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com/
> >
> > doesn't work.
> > It should read like this . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > **********
> >
> >
>
>
There's some truth to that.
The third repair was done by another shop.
/they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
Chrysler specs them too tight.
This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
critical of them.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:9J6dnTN_JfKW6H7dRVn-iQ@comcast.com...
> >
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to
need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
>
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > *
> > Interesting.
> > Just saw this in rec.jeep
> >
> > In a six month period I had the bearings replaced three times and the
> third
> > time I had to get a new carrier, half shaft and posi clutch.
> > This was all before the odometer had reached 150,000 Km.
> > It cost me CDN $2400. (actually more including tax)
> >
> > The vehicle is a 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee Orvis edition.
> > It is presently for sale.
> >
> > I have all the receipts, but no pictures.
> >
> > By the way . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com/
> >
> > doesn't work.
> > It should read like this . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > **********
> >
> >
>
>
06-30-2004, 10:47 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Grand Cherokee Owners - Fight back!!
Yes, Matt.
There's some truth to that.
The third repair was done by another shop.
/they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
Chrysler specs them too tight.
This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
critical of them.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:9J6dnTN_JfKW6H7dRVn-iQ@comcast.com...
> >
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to
need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
>
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > *
> > Interesting.
> > Just saw this in rec.jeep
> >
> > In a six month period I had the bearings replaced three times and the
> third
> > time I had to get a new carrier, half shaft and posi clutch.
> > This was all before the odometer had reached 150,000 Km.
> > It cost me CDN $2400. (actually more including tax)
> >
> > The vehicle is a 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee Orvis edition.
> > It is presently for sale.
> >
> > I have all the receipts, but no pictures.
> >
> > By the way . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com/
> >
> > doesn't work.
> > It should read like this . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > **********
> >
> >
>
>
There's some truth to that.
The third repair was done by another shop.
/they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
Chrysler specs them too tight.
This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
critical of them.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:9J6dnTN_JfKW6H7dRVn-iQ@comcast.com...
> >
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to
need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
>
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > *
> > Interesting.
> > Just saw this in rec.jeep
> >
> > In a six month period I had the bearings replaced three times and the
> third
> > time I had to get a new carrier, half shaft and posi clutch.
> > This was all before the odometer had reached 150,000 Km.
> > It cost me CDN $2400. (actually more including tax)
> >
> > The vehicle is a 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee Orvis edition.
> > It is presently for sale.
> >
> > I have all the receipts, but no pictures.
> >
> > By the way . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com/
> >
> > doesn't work.
> > It should read like this . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > **********
> >
> >
>
>
06-30-2004, 10:47 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Grand Cherokee Owners - Fight back!!
Yes, Matt.
There's some truth to that.
The third repair was done by another shop.
/they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
Chrysler specs them too tight.
This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
critical of them.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:9J6dnTN_JfKW6H7dRVn-iQ@comcast.com...
> >
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to
need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
>
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > *
> > Interesting.
> > Just saw this in rec.jeep
> >
> > In a six month period I had the bearings replaced three times and the
> third
> > time I had to get a new carrier, half shaft and posi clutch.
> > This was all before the odometer had reached 150,000 Km.
> > It cost me CDN $2400. (actually more including tax)
> >
> > The vehicle is a 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee Orvis edition.
> > It is presently for sale.
> >
> > I have all the receipts, but no pictures.
> >
> > By the way . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com/
> >
> > doesn't work.
> > It should read like this . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > **********
> >
> >
>
>
There's some truth to that.
The third repair was done by another shop.
/they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
Chrysler specs them too tight.
This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
critical of them.
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:9J6dnTN_JfKW6H7dRVn-iQ@comcast.com...
> >
>
> Sounds to me you should have found a new mechanic...3 times in 6 months
> leads me to believe the repair wasn't done correctly. Not unheard of to
need
> new bearings at 90,000 miles.
>
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > *
> > Interesting.
> > Just saw this in rec.jeep
> >
> > In a six month period I had the bearings replaced three times and the
> third
> > time I had to get a new carrier, half shaft and posi clutch.
> > This was all before the odometer had reached 150,000 Km.
> > It cost me CDN $2400. (actually more including tax)
> >
> > The vehicle is a 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee Orvis edition.
> > It is presently for sale.
> >
> > I have all the receipts, but no pictures.
> >
> > By the way . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com/
> >
> > doesn't work.
> > It should read like this . . .
> >
> > grandcherokeedefects@yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
************************************************** **************************
> > **********
> >
> >
>
>
06-30-2004, 10:59 PM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Grand Cherokee Owners - Fight back!!
Yup, I had never heard of this practice before I read their service
manual: http://www.----------.com/------er.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
JP wrote:
>
> Yes, Matt.
> There's some truth to that.
> The third repair was done by another shop.
> /they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
> correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
> Chrysler specs them too tight.
> This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
> critical of them.
manual: http://www.----------.com/------er.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
JP wrote:
>
> Yes, Matt.
> There's some truth to that.
> The third repair was done by another shop.
> /they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
> correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
> Chrysler specs them too tight.
> This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
> critical of them.
06-30-2004, 10:59 PM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Grand Cherokee Owners - Fight back!!
Yup, I had never heard of this practice before I read their service
manual: http://www.----------.com/------er.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
JP wrote:
>
> Yes, Matt.
> There's some truth to that.
> The third repair was done by another shop.
> /they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
> correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
> Chrysler specs them too tight.
> This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
> critical of them.
manual: http://www.----------.com/------er.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
JP wrote:
>
> Yes, Matt.
> There's some truth to that.
> The third repair was done by another shop.
> /they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
> correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
> Chrysler specs them too tight.
> This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
> critical of them.
06-30-2004, 10:59 PM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Grand Cherokee Owners - Fight back!!
Yup, I had never heard of this practice before I read their service
manual: http://www.----------.com/------er.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
JP wrote:
>
> Yes, Matt.
> There's some truth to that.
> The third repair was done by another shop.
> /they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
> correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
> Chrysler specs them too tight.
> This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
> critical of them.
manual: http://www.----------.com/------er.pdf
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
JP wrote:
>
> Yes, Matt.
> There's some truth to that.
> The third repair was done by another shop.
> /they did tell me that very few mechanics are able to set up the Dana 44s
> correctly particularly if they use the specs from Chrysler.
> Chrysler specs them too tight.
> This particular shop does a lot of these rear ends and they were very
> critical of them.
