good thing to clean out engine
02-22-2007, 02:00 AM
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: good thing to clean out engine
If you can't find one at the junkyard, they're really not that expensive
to pick up at an auto parts store. Or, just buy the correct size hose
and cut them to the correct size yourself, it's even cheaper that way.
This is a '93, correct? I want to say 5/8" should do the trick,
although I believe i have a short length of larger hose that acts as a
coupling between the elbow and the hose.
Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there,
just with no hose attached?
abomb69 wrote:
> I am talking about both of the tubes, one going to the intake and the other
> going to the air box, I suppose I just need to take a visit to the local
> scrapyard and see if I cant find one that is still complete.
> If I can even find one at all!
>
> "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message
> news:JZOdnXeF-Lxhh0DYnZ2dnUVZ_oCmnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> You're talking about the bigger one though? In that case you're sucking
>> raw
>> air into the intake, for one, and you're sucking raw air into the valve
>> cover if the small line to the intake manifold is still working, for two.
>> This isn't the worst thing that could happen, but it's not real good
>> either.
>>
>> Earle
>>
>
>
to pick up at an auto parts store. Or, just buy the correct size hose
and cut them to the correct size yourself, it's even cheaper that way.
This is a '93, correct? I want to say 5/8" should do the trick,
although I believe i have a short length of larger hose that acts as a
coupling between the elbow and the hose.
Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there,
just with no hose attached?
abomb69 wrote:
> I am talking about both of the tubes, one going to the intake and the other
> going to the air box, I suppose I just need to take a visit to the local
> scrapyard and see if I cant find one that is still complete.
> If I can even find one at all!
>
> "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message
> news:JZOdnXeF-Lxhh0DYnZ2dnUVZ_oCmnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> You're talking about the bigger one though? In that case you're sucking
>> raw
>> air into the intake, for one, and you're sucking raw air into the valve
>> cover if the small line to the intake manifold is still working, for two.
>> This isn't the worst thing that could happen, but it's not real good
>> either.
>>
>> Earle
>>
>
>
02-22-2007, 10:29 AM
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: good thing to clean out engine
What this guy said before, is that standard size hose doesn't fit. The
smaller intake hose shouldn't be a problem, but it sounds like the big one
is going to need some engineering. Maybe he just didn't try a parts store
with a big enough inventory.
Earle
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
> If you can't find one at the junkyard, they're really not that expensive
> to pick up at an auto parts store. Or, just buy the correct size hose
> and cut them to the correct size yourself, it's even cheaper that way.
> This is a '93, correct? I want to say 5/8" should do the trick,
> although I believe i have a short length of larger hose that acts as a
> coupling between the elbow and the hose.
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there,
> just with no hose attached?
>
> abomb69 wrote:
> > I am talking about both of the tubes, one going to the intake and the
other
> > going to the air box, I suppose I just need to take a visit to the local
> > scrapyard and see if I cant find one that is still complete.
> > If I can even find one at all!
> >
> > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message
> > news:JZOdnXeF-Lxhh0DYnZ2dnUVZ_oCmnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> You're talking about the bigger one though? In that case you're
sucking
> >> raw
> >> air into the intake, for one, and you're sucking raw air into the valve
> >> cover if the small line to the intake manifold is still working, for
two.
> >> This isn't the worst thing that could happen, but it's not real good
> >> either.
> >>
> >> Earle
> >>
> >
> >
smaller intake hose shouldn't be a problem, but it sounds like the big one
is going to need some engineering. Maybe he just didn't try a parts store
with a big enough inventory.
Earle
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
> If you can't find one at the junkyard, they're really not that expensive
> to pick up at an auto parts store. Or, just buy the correct size hose
> and cut them to the correct size yourself, it's even cheaper that way.
> This is a '93, correct? I want to say 5/8" should do the trick,
> although I believe i have a short length of larger hose that acts as a
> coupling between the elbow and the hose.
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there,
> just with no hose attached?
>
> abomb69 wrote:
> > I am talking about both of the tubes, one going to the intake and the
other
> > going to the air box, I suppose I just need to take a visit to the local
> > scrapyard and see if I cant find one that is still complete.
> > If I can even find one at all!
> >
> > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message
> > news:JZOdnXeF-Lxhh0DYnZ2dnUVZ_oCmnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> You're talking about the bigger one though? In that case you're
sucking
> >> raw
> >> air into the intake, for one, and you're sucking raw air into the valve
> >> cover if the small line to the intake manifold is still working, for
two.
> >> This isn't the worst thing that could happen, but it's not real good
> >> either.
> >>
> >> Earle
> >>
> >
> >
02-22-2007, 10:29 AM
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: good thing to clean out engine
What this guy said before, is that standard size hose doesn't fit. The
smaller intake hose shouldn't be a problem, but it sounds like the big one
is going to need some engineering. Maybe he just didn't try a parts store
with a big enough inventory.
Earle
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
> If you can't find one at the junkyard, they're really not that expensive
> to pick up at an auto parts store. Or, just buy the correct size hose
> and cut them to the correct size yourself, it's even cheaper that way.
> This is a '93, correct? I want to say 5/8" should do the trick,
> although I believe i have a short length of larger hose that acts as a
> coupling between the elbow and the hose.
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there,
> just with no hose attached?
>
> abomb69 wrote:
> > I am talking about both of the tubes, one going to the intake and the
other
> > going to the air box, I suppose I just need to take a visit to the local
> > scrapyard and see if I cant find one that is still complete.
> > If I can even find one at all!
> >
> > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message
> > news:JZOdnXeF-Lxhh0DYnZ2dnUVZ_oCmnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> You're talking about the bigger one though? In that case you're
sucking
> >> raw
> >> air into the intake, for one, and you're sucking raw air into the valve
> >> cover if the small line to the intake manifold is still working, for
two.
> >> This isn't the worst thing that could happen, but it's not real good
> >> either.
> >>
> >> Earle
> >>
> >
> >
smaller intake hose shouldn't be a problem, but it sounds like the big one
is going to need some engineering. Maybe he just didn't try a parts store
with a big enough inventory.
Earle
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
> If you can't find one at the junkyard, they're really not that expensive
> to pick up at an auto parts store. Or, just buy the correct size hose
> and cut them to the correct size yourself, it's even cheaper that way.
> This is a '93, correct? I want to say 5/8" should do the trick,
> although I believe i have a short length of larger hose that acts as a
> coupling between the elbow and the hose.
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there,
> just with no hose attached?
>
> abomb69 wrote:
> > I am talking about both of the tubes, one going to the intake and the
other
> > going to the air box, I suppose I just need to take a visit to the local
> > scrapyard and see if I cant find one that is still complete.
> > If I can even find one at all!
> >
> > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message
> > news:JZOdnXeF-Lxhh0DYnZ2dnUVZ_oCmnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> You're talking about the bigger one though? In that case you're
sucking
> >> raw
> >> air into the intake, for one, and you're sucking raw air into the valve
> >> cover if the small line to the intake manifold is still working, for
two.
> >> This isn't the worst thing that could happen, but it's not real good
> >> either.
> >>
> >> Earle
> >>
> >
> >
02-22-2007, 10:29 AM
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: good thing to clean out engine
What this guy said before, is that standard size hose doesn't fit. The
smaller intake hose shouldn't be a problem, but it sounds like the big one
is going to need some engineering. Maybe he just didn't try a parts store
with a big enough inventory.
Earle
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
> If you can't find one at the junkyard, they're really not that expensive
> to pick up at an auto parts store. Or, just buy the correct size hose
> and cut them to the correct size yourself, it's even cheaper that way.
> This is a '93, correct? I want to say 5/8" should do the trick,
> although I believe i have a short length of larger hose that acts as a
> coupling between the elbow and the hose.
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there,
> just with no hose attached?
>
> abomb69 wrote:
> > I am talking about both of the tubes, one going to the intake and the
other
> > going to the air box, I suppose I just need to take a visit to the local
> > scrapyard and see if I cant find one that is still complete.
> > If I can even find one at all!
> >
> > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message
> > news:JZOdnXeF-Lxhh0DYnZ2dnUVZ_oCmnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> You're talking about the bigger one though? In that case you're
sucking
> >> raw
> >> air into the intake, for one, and you're sucking raw air into the valve
> >> cover if the small line to the intake manifold is still working, for
two.
> >> This isn't the worst thing that could happen, but it's not real good
> >> either.
> >>
> >> Earle
> >>
> >
> >
smaller intake hose shouldn't be a problem, but it sounds like the big one
is going to need some engineering. Maybe he just didn't try a parts store
with a big enough inventory.
Earle
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
> If you can't find one at the junkyard, they're really not that expensive
> to pick up at an auto parts store. Or, just buy the correct size hose
> and cut them to the correct size yourself, it's even cheaper that way.
> This is a '93, correct? I want to say 5/8" should do the trick,
> although I believe i have a short length of larger hose that acts as a
> coupling between the elbow and the hose.
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there,
> just with no hose attached?
>
> abomb69 wrote:
> > I am talking about both of the tubes, one going to the intake and the
other
> > going to the air box, I suppose I just need to take a visit to the local
> > scrapyard and see if I cant find one that is still complete.
> > If I can even find one at all!
> >
> > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message
> > news:JZOdnXeF-Lxhh0DYnZ2dnUVZ_oCmnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> You're talking about the bigger one though? In that case you're
sucking
> >> raw
> >> air into the intake, for one, and you're sucking raw air into the valve
> >> cover if the small line to the intake manifold is still working, for
two.
> >> This isn't the worst thing that could happen, but it's not real good
> >> either.
> >>
> >> Earle
> >>
> >
> >
02-22-2007, 10:55 AM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: good thing to clean out engine
The idiot at autozone sold me 7/8 heater hose and said that should cover it.
Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
> with no hose attached?
>
Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
> with no hose attached?
>
02-22-2007, 10:55 AM
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: good thing to clean out engine
The idiot at autozone sold me 7/8 heater hose and said that should cover it.
Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
> with no hose attached?
>
Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
> with no hose attached?
>
02-22-2007, 10:55 AM
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: good thing to clean out engine
The idiot at autozone sold me 7/8 heater hose and said that should cover it.
Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
> with no hose attached?
>
Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
"The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>
> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
> with no hose attached?
>
02-22-2007, 11:54 AM
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: good thing to clean out engine
Did my post get lost?
I gave you a link to the part numbers for new hoses if you want them or
do the junk yard crawl.
http://jeep.off-road.com/jeep/articl....jsp?id=257985
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
abomb69 wrote:
> The idiot at autozone sold me 7/8 heater hose and said that should cover it.
>
> Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
>
> "The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
>> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
>> with no hose attached?
>>
>
>
I gave you a link to the part numbers for new hoses if you want them or
do the junk yard crawl.
http://jeep.off-road.com/jeep/articl....jsp?id=257985
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
abomb69 wrote:
> The idiot at autozone sold me 7/8 heater hose and said that should cover it.
>
> Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
>
> "The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
>> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
>> with no hose attached?
>>
>
>
02-22-2007, 11:54 AM
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: good thing to clean out engine
Did my post get lost?
I gave you a link to the part numbers for new hoses if you want them or
do the junk yard crawl.
http://jeep.off-road.com/jeep/articl....jsp?id=257985
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
abomb69 wrote:
> The idiot at autozone sold me 7/8 heater hose and said that should cover it.
>
> Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
>
> "The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
>> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
>> with no hose attached?
>>
>
>
I gave you a link to the part numbers for new hoses if you want them or
do the junk yard crawl.
http://jeep.off-road.com/jeep/articl....jsp?id=257985
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
abomb69 wrote:
> The idiot at autozone sold me 7/8 heater hose and said that should cover it.
>
> Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
>
> "The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
>> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
>> with no hose attached?
>>
>
>
02-22-2007, 11:54 AM
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: good thing to clean out engine
Did my post get lost?
I gave you a link to the part numbers for new hoses if you want them or
do the junk yard crawl.
http://jeep.off-road.com/jeep/articl....jsp?id=257985
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
abomb69 wrote:
> The idiot at autozone sold me 7/8 heater hose and said that should cover it.
>
> Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
>
> "The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
>> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
>> with no hose attached?
>>
>
>
I gave you a link to the part numbers for new hoses if you want them or
do the junk yard crawl.
http://jeep.off-road.com/jeep/articl....jsp?id=257985
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
abomb69 wrote:
> The idiot at autozone sold me 7/8 heater hose and said that should cover it.
>
> Yes, I do at least have the elbows still...
>
> "The Merg" <greg.mergner@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote in message
> news:erjf2j$vlr$1@aioe.org...
>> Just wondering, since you don't have the hoses, do you just have empty
>> holes in the top of your valve cover? Or are the elbows still there, just
>> with no hose attached?
>>
>
>
