General Comment
Jeep in the past couple of years sure has changed their models and the next
couple sure do not look any different. I guess change is inevitable I just hope they just don't totally hose things up. I can't remember when so many changes have been made in the Jeep line. Usually Jeep would just tweak things but from what I have seen and read for the future this is just the beginning I just hope Jeep brings their concept pick-up truck into production that I saw at last years auto show. But, from their trends I think they are concentrating on the grocery getter line, trying to compete with Tahoe, Explorer and Hummer, while makeing major changes to the Wranglers. The next couple of years should be interesting. Coasty |
Re: General Comment
It makes whatever you have now all the more valuable, sentiment and
collector wise. Just think, I have one of the limited run of rectangular headlight short wheel base Jeeps! With overhead valve engine, and leaf springs on all four corners, you won't see that in your dealer show room again. I'll bet that vacuum thingy on the front axle is a real curiosity by now too! Earle "Coasty" <uscg_ret at comcast dot net> wrote in message news:wPOdnQR-7Isl707eRVn-vw@comcast.com... > Jeep in the past couple of years sure has changed their models and the next > couple sure do not look any different. I guess change is inevitable I just > hope they just don't totally hose things up. I can't remember when so many > changes have been made in the Jeep line. > > Usually Jeep would just tweak things but from what I have seen and read for > the future this is just the beginning I just hope Jeep brings their concept > pick-up truck into production that I saw at last years auto show. > > But, from their trends I think they are concentrating on the grocery getter > line, trying to compete with Tahoe, Explorer and Hummer, while makeing major > changes to the Wranglers. The next couple of years should be interesting. > > Coasty > > |
Re: General Comment
It makes whatever you have now all the more valuable, sentiment and
collector wise. Just think, I have one of the limited run of rectangular headlight short wheel base Jeeps! With overhead valve engine, and leaf springs on all four corners, you won't see that in your dealer show room again. I'll bet that vacuum thingy on the front axle is a real curiosity by now too! Earle "Coasty" <uscg_ret at comcast dot net> wrote in message news:wPOdnQR-7Isl707eRVn-vw@comcast.com... > Jeep in the past couple of years sure has changed their models and the next > couple sure do not look any different. I guess change is inevitable I just > hope they just don't totally hose things up. I can't remember when so many > changes have been made in the Jeep line. > > Usually Jeep would just tweak things but from what I have seen and read for > the future this is just the beginning I just hope Jeep brings their concept > pick-up truck into production that I saw at last years auto show. > > But, from their trends I think they are concentrating on the grocery getter > line, trying to compete with Tahoe, Explorer and Hummer, while makeing major > changes to the Wranglers. The next couple of years should be interesting. > > Coasty > > |
Re: General Comment
It makes whatever you have now all the more valuable, sentiment and
collector wise. Just think, I have one of the limited run of rectangular headlight short wheel base Jeeps! With overhead valve engine, and leaf springs on all four corners, you won't see that in your dealer show room again. I'll bet that vacuum thingy on the front axle is a real curiosity by now too! Earle "Coasty" <uscg_ret at comcast dot net> wrote in message news:wPOdnQR-7Isl707eRVn-vw@comcast.com... > Jeep in the past couple of years sure has changed their models and the next > couple sure do not look any different. I guess change is inevitable I just > hope they just don't totally hose things up. I can't remember when so many > changes have been made in the Jeep line. > > Usually Jeep would just tweak things but from what I have seen and read for > the future this is just the beginning I just hope Jeep brings their concept > pick-up truck into production that I saw at last years auto show. > > But, from their trends I think they are concentrating on the grocery getter > line, trying to compete with Tahoe, Explorer and Hummer, while makeing major > changes to the Wranglers. The next couple of years should be interesting. > > Coasty > > |
Re: General Comment
I asked my youngest daughter what Jeep she wanted when she was of legal age
to drive. First words were "not one of the new ones". She likes my CJ8, YJ and 89 GW. Sadly this very well ,may be the direction DC is taking Jeep. I do like the concept truck. If it is built we'll just have to wait and see. chris 83CJ8, 94YJ, 89GW, 92XJ, 90XJ,86XJ, DJ5, 91XJ -- "People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's easier to pick on rich old ladies than a biker gang" "Coasty" <uscg_ret at comcast dot net> wrote in message news:wPOdnQR-7Isl707eRVn-vw@comcast.com... > Jeep in the past couple of years sure has changed their models and the > next couple sure do not look any different. I guess change is inevitable > I just hope they just don't totally hose things up. I can't remember when > so many changes have been made in the Jeep line. > > Usually Jeep would just tweak things but from what I have seen and read > for the future this is just the beginning I just hope Jeep brings their > concept pick-up truck into production that I saw at last years auto show. > > But, from their trends I think they are concentrating on the grocery > getter line, trying to compete with Tahoe, Explorer and Hummer, while > makeing major changes to the Wranglers. The next couple of years should > be interesting. > > Coasty > |
Re: General Comment
I asked my youngest daughter what Jeep she wanted when she was of legal age
to drive. First words were "not one of the new ones". She likes my CJ8, YJ and 89 GW. Sadly this very well ,may be the direction DC is taking Jeep. I do like the concept truck. If it is built we'll just have to wait and see. chris 83CJ8, 94YJ, 89GW, 92XJ, 90XJ,86XJ, DJ5, 91XJ -- "People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's easier to pick on rich old ladies than a biker gang" "Coasty" <uscg_ret at comcast dot net> wrote in message news:wPOdnQR-7Isl707eRVn-vw@comcast.com... > Jeep in the past couple of years sure has changed their models and the > next couple sure do not look any different. I guess change is inevitable > I just hope they just don't totally hose things up. I can't remember when > so many changes have been made in the Jeep line. > > Usually Jeep would just tweak things but from what I have seen and read > for the future this is just the beginning I just hope Jeep brings their > concept pick-up truck into production that I saw at last years auto show. > > But, from their trends I think they are concentrating on the grocery > getter line, trying to compete with Tahoe, Explorer and Hummer, while > makeing major changes to the Wranglers. The next couple of years should > be interesting. > > Coasty > |
Re: General Comment
I asked my youngest daughter what Jeep she wanted when she was of legal age
to drive. First words were "not one of the new ones". She likes my CJ8, YJ and 89 GW. Sadly this very well ,may be the direction DC is taking Jeep. I do like the concept truck. If it is built we'll just have to wait and see. chris 83CJ8, 94YJ, 89GW, 92XJ, 90XJ,86XJ, DJ5, 91XJ -- "People are more violently opposed to fur than leather because it's easier to pick on rich old ladies than a biker gang" "Coasty" <uscg_ret at comcast dot net> wrote in message news:wPOdnQR-7Isl707eRVn-vw@comcast.com... > Jeep in the past couple of years sure has changed their models and the > next couple sure do not look any different. I guess change is inevitable > I just hope they just don't totally hose things up. I can't remember when > so many changes have been made in the Jeep line. > > Usually Jeep would just tweak things but from what I have seen and read > for the future this is just the beginning I just hope Jeep brings their > concept pick-up truck into production that I saw at last years auto show. > > But, from their trends I think they are concentrating on the grocery > getter line, trying to compete with Tahoe, Explorer and Hummer, while > makeing major changes to the Wranglers. The next couple of years should > be interesting. > > Coasty > |
Re: General Comment
So with the '07 Wrangler being drastically changed, how long will it take
for a "mint" '06 Rubi to become a collectors item? If I had unlimited wealth, I might just purchase one and store it for 10 years. Tom (dreaming again) "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message news:43d38890$0$3106$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.co m... > It makes whatever you have now all the more valuable, sentiment and > collector wise. Just think, I have one of the limited run of rectangular > headlight short wheel base Jeeps! With overhead valve engine, and leaf > springs on all four corners, you won't see that in your dealer show room > again. I'll bet that vacuum thingy on the front axle is a real curiosity by > now too! > > Earle |
Re: General Comment
So with the '07 Wrangler being drastically changed, how long will it take
for a "mint" '06 Rubi to become a collectors item? If I had unlimited wealth, I might just purchase one and store it for 10 years. Tom (dreaming again) "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message news:43d38890$0$3106$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.co m... > It makes whatever you have now all the more valuable, sentiment and > collector wise. Just think, I have one of the limited run of rectangular > headlight short wheel base Jeeps! With overhead valve engine, and leaf > springs on all four corners, you won't see that in your dealer show room > again. I'll bet that vacuum thingy on the front axle is a real curiosity by > now too! > > Earle |
Re: General Comment
So with the '07 Wrangler being drastically changed, how long will it take
for a "mint" '06 Rubi to become a collectors item? If I had unlimited wealth, I might just purchase one and store it for 10 years. Tom (dreaming again) "Earle Horton" <nurse--NOSPAM--busters@msn.com> wrote in message news:43d38890$0$3106$a82e2bb9@reader.athenanews.co m... > It makes whatever you have now all the more valuable, sentiment and > collector wise. Just think, I have one of the limited run of rectangular > headlight short wheel base Jeeps! With overhead valve engine, and leaf > springs on all four corners, you won't see that in your dealer show room > again. I'll bet that vacuum thingy on the front axle is a real curiosity by > now too! > > Earle |
Re: General Comment
Have you seen the Compass? Ugh!
"jduchock" <jduchock@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:FtNAf.2574$5O2.2365@bignews4.bellsouth.net... > I asked my youngest daughter what Jeep she wanted when she was of legal age > to drive. First words were "not one of the new ones". She likes my CJ8, YJ > and 89 GW. Sadly this very well ,may be the direction DC is taking Jeep. I > do like the concept truck. If it is built we'll just have to wait and see. > > chris > 83CJ8, 94YJ, 89GW, 92XJ, 90XJ,86XJ, DJ5, 91XJ > > -- > "People are more violently opposed to fur > than leather because it's easier to pick > on rich old ladies than a biker gang" |
Re: General Comment
Have you seen the Compass? Ugh!
"jduchock" <jduchock@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:FtNAf.2574$5O2.2365@bignews4.bellsouth.net... > I asked my youngest daughter what Jeep she wanted when she was of legal age > to drive. First words were "not one of the new ones". She likes my CJ8, YJ > and 89 GW. Sadly this very well ,may be the direction DC is taking Jeep. I > do like the concept truck. If it is built we'll just have to wait and see. > > chris > 83CJ8, 94YJ, 89GW, 92XJ, 90XJ,86XJ, DJ5, 91XJ > > -- > "People are more violently opposed to fur > than leather because it's easier to pick > on rich old ladies than a biker gang" |
Re: General Comment
Have you seen the Compass? Ugh!
"jduchock" <jduchock@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:FtNAf.2574$5O2.2365@bignews4.bellsouth.net... > I asked my youngest daughter what Jeep she wanted when she was of legal age > to drive. First words were "not one of the new ones". She likes my CJ8, YJ > and 89 GW. Sadly this very well ,may be the direction DC is taking Jeep. I > do like the concept truck. If it is built we'll just have to wait and see. > > chris > 83CJ8, 94YJ, 89GW, 92XJ, 90XJ,86XJ, DJ5, 91XJ > > -- > "People are more violently opposed to fur > than leather because it's easier to pick > on rich old ladies than a biker gang" |
Re: General Comment
Edward L. Dowdy wrote:
> Have you seen the Compass? Ugh! Yeah but you could say that about past Jeep/AMC's "have you seen the": Jeepster Commando Pacer Eagle Those are all some funny lookin, not-sure-what-they-were-thinkin' products (And I know some of you love the first two, to each their own right?). Of course that liniage of failed "tweener" Jeeps should tel DC all they need to know, but they'll repeate history... It didn't kill the real Jeep (sorry Bill) the first four times it's not going to now... -- Simon "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: General Comment
Edward L. Dowdy wrote:
> Have you seen the Compass? Ugh! Yeah but you could say that about past Jeep/AMC's "have you seen the": Jeepster Commando Pacer Eagle Those are all some funny lookin, not-sure-what-they-were-thinkin' products (And I know some of you love the first two, to each their own right?). Of course that liniage of failed "tweener" Jeeps should tel DC all they need to know, but they'll repeate history... It didn't kill the real Jeep (sorry Bill) the first four times it's not going to now... -- Simon "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: General Comment
Edward L. Dowdy wrote:
> Have you seen the Compass? Ugh! Yeah but you could say that about past Jeep/AMC's "have you seen the": Jeepster Commando Pacer Eagle Those are all some funny lookin, not-sure-what-they-were-thinkin' products (And I know some of you love the first two, to each their own right?). Of course that liniage of failed "tweener" Jeeps should tel DC all they need to know, but they'll repeate history... It didn't kill the real Jeep (sorry Bill) the first four times it's not going to now... -- Simon "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: General Comment
WRONG! Willys didn't call their Jeepster a Jeep:
http://www.seriouswheels.com/1940-19...r-Yellow-F.htm Kaiser didn't call their Jeepster Commando a Jeep: http://www.usedwillysparts.com/image...tercomando.jpg AMC didn't call the Eagle a Jeep: http://www.sheldonaubut.com/eagle/diary/brocure1b.jpg And the Pacer was of course just a other American Motor Corp. Rambler model. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Simon Juncal wrote: > > Edward L. Dowdy wrote: > > Have you seen the Compass? Ugh! > > Yeah but you could say that about past Jeep/AMC's "have you seen the": > Jeepster > Commando > Pacer > Eagle > > Those are all some funny lookin, not-sure-what-they-were-thinkin' > products (And I know some of you love the first two, to each their own > right?). Of course that liniage of failed "tweener" Jeeps should tel DC > all they need to know, but they'll repeate history... It didn't kill the > real Jeep (sorry Bill) the first four times it's not going to now... > > -- > Simon > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: General Comment
WRONG! Willys didn't call their Jeepster a Jeep:
http://www.seriouswheels.com/1940-19...r-Yellow-F.htm Kaiser didn't call their Jeepster Commando a Jeep: http://www.usedwillysparts.com/image...tercomando.jpg AMC didn't call the Eagle a Jeep: http://www.sheldonaubut.com/eagle/diary/brocure1b.jpg And the Pacer was of course just a other American Motor Corp. Rambler model. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Simon Juncal wrote: > > Edward L. Dowdy wrote: > > Have you seen the Compass? Ugh! > > Yeah but you could say that about past Jeep/AMC's "have you seen the": > Jeepster > Commando > Pacer > Eagle > > Those are all some funny lookin, not-sure-what-they-were-thinkin' > products (And I know some of you love the first two, to each their own > right?). Of course that liniage of failed "tweener" Jeeps should tel DC > all they need to know, but they'll repeate history... It didn't kill the > real Jeep (sorry Bill) the first four times it's not going to now... > > -- > Simon > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: General Comment
WRONG! Willys didn't call their Jeepster a Jeep:
http://www.seriouswheels.com/1940-19...r-Yellow-F.htm Kaiser didn't call their Jeepster Commando a Jeep: http://www.usedwillysparts.com/image...tercomando.jpg AMC didn't call the Eagle a Jeep: http://www.sheldonaubut.com/eagle/diary/brocure1b.jpg And the Pacer was of course just a other American Motor Corp. Rambler model. God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Simon Juncal wrote: > > Edward L. Dowdy wrote: > > Have you seen the Compass? Ugh! > > Yeah but you could say that about past Jeep/AMC's "have you seen the": > Jeepster > Commando > Pacer > Eagle > > Those are all some funny lookin, not-sure-what-they-were-thinkin' > products (And I know some of you love the first two, to each their own > right?). Of course that liniage of failed "tweener" Jeeps should tel DC > all they need to know, but they'll repeate history... It didn't kill the > real Jeep (sorry Bill) the first four times it's not going to now... > > -- > Simon > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: General Comment
My dad had one of the AWD Eagles when they first came out for a period of 3
years. He told me when he made the decision to trade it in (company car) when he added up the repair receipts and the repairs during years 2 & 3 added up to more than the car cost to purchase new. "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in message news:_aednbT4o4cA0EneRVn-sw@rcn.net... > Edward L. Dowdy wrote: >> Have you seen the Compass? Ugh! > > Yeah but you could say that about past Jeep/AMC's "have you seen the": > Jeepster > Commando > Pacer > Eagle > > Those are all some funny lookin, not-sure-what-they-were-thinkin' products > (And I know some of you love the first two, to each their own right?). Of > course that liniage of failed "tweener" Jeeps should tel DC all they need > to know, but they'll repeate history... It didn't kill the real Jeep > (sorry Bill) the first four times it's not going to now... > > -- > Simon > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: General Comment
My dad had one of the AWD Eagles when they first came out for a period of 3
years. He told me when he made the decision to trade it in (company car) when he added up the repair receipts and the repairs during years 2 & 3 added up to more than the car cost to purchase new. "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in message news:_aednbT4o4cA0EneRVn-sw@rcn.net... > Edward L. Dowdy wrote: >> Have you seen the Compass? Ugh! > > Yeah but you could say that about past Jeep/AMC's "have you seen the": > Jeepster > Commando > Pacer > Eagle > > Those are all some funny lookin, not-sure-what-they-were-thinkin' products > (And I know some of you love the first two, to each their own right?). Of > course that liniage of failed "tweener" Jeeps should tel DC all they need > to know, but they'll repeate history... It didn't kill the real Jeep > (sorry Bill) the first four times it's not going to now... > > -- > Simon > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: General Comment
My dad had one of the AWD Eagles when they first came out for a period of 3
years. He told me when he made the decision to trade it in (company car) when he added up the repair receipts and the repairs during years 2 & 3 added up to more than the car cost to purchase new. "Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in message news:_aednbT4o4cA0EneRVn-sw@rcn.net... > Edward L. Dowdy wrote: >> Have you seen the Compass? Ugh! > > Yeah but you could say that about past Jeep/AMC's "have you seen the": > Jeepster > Commando > Pacer > Eagle > > Those are all some funny lookin, not-sure-what-they-were-thinkin' products > (And I know some of you love the first two, to each their own right?). Of > course that liniage of failed "tweener" Jeeps should tel DC all they need > to know, but they'll repeate history... It didn't kill the real Jeep > (sorry Bill) the first four times it's not going to now... > > -- > Simon > "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein |
Re: General Comment
What gave up?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ billy ray wrote: > > My dad had one of the AWD Eagles when they first came out for a period of 3 > years. > > He told me when he made the decision to trade it in (company car) when he > added up the repair receipts and the repairs during years 2 & 3 added up to > more than the car cost to purchase new. |
Re: General Comment
What gave up?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ billy ray wrote: > > My dad had one of the AWD Eagles when they first came out for a period of 3 > years. > > He told me when he made the decision to trade it in (company car) when he > added up the repair receipts and the repairs during years 2 & 3 added up to > more than the car cost to purchase new. |
Re: General Comment
What gave up?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ billy ray wrote: > > My dad had one of the AWD Eagles when they first came out for a period of 3 > years. > > He told me when he made the decision to trade it in (company car) when he > added up the repair receipts and the repairs during years 2 & 3 added up to > more than the car cost to purchase new. |
Re: General Comment
That's pretty much what I was saying in the "NOT for dirt" thread. As for Jeep just tweaking things from time to time, I suspect that was less a marketing decision and more a result of poverty. Jeep in its many incarnations seldom had enough cash on hand to retool the lines. That's why you got CJ bodies with punched holes and screwed-on cover plates that went to nothing: They were originally for access to equipment that had been relocated production-years earlier. Coasty wrote: > Jeep in the past couple of years sure has changed their models and the next > couple sure do not look any different. I guess change is inevitable I just > hope they just don't totally hose things up. I can't remember when so many > changes have been made in the Jeep line. > > Usually Jeep would just tweak things but from what I have seen and read for > the future this is just the beginning I just hope Jeep brings their concept > pick-up truck into production that I saw at last years auto show. > > But, from their trends I think they are concentrating on the grocery getter > line, trying to compete with Tahoe, Explorer and Hummer, while makeing major > changes to the Wranglers. The next couple of years should be interesting. > > Coasty > > |
Re: General Comment
That's pretty much what I was saying in the "NOT for dirt" thread. As for Jeep just tweaking things from time to time, I suspect that was less a marketing decision and more a result of poverty. Jeep in its many incarnations seldom had enough cash on hand to retool the lines. That's why you got CJ bodies with punched holes and screwed-on cover plates that went to nothing: They were originally for access to equipment that had been relocated production-years earlier. Coasty wrote: > Jeep in the past couple of years sure has changed their models and the next > couple sure do not look any different. I guess change is inevitable I just > hope they just don't totally hose things up. I can't remember when so many > changes have been made in the Jeep line. > > Usually Jeep would just tweak things but from what I have seen and read for > the future this is just the beginning I just hope Jeep brings their concept > pick-up truck into production that I saw at last years auto show. > > But, from their trends I think they are concentrating on the grocery getter > line, trying to compete with Tahoe, Explorer and Hummer, while makeing major > changes to the Wranglers. The next couple of years should be interesting. > > Coasty > > |
Re: General Comment
That's pretty much what I was saying in the "NOT for dirt" thread. As for Jeep just tweaking things from time to time, I suspect that was less a marketing decision and more a result of poverty. Jeep in its many incarnations seldom had enough cash on hand to retool the lines. That's why you got CJ bodies with punched holes and screwed-on cover plates that went to nothing: They were originally for access to equipment that had been relocated production-years earlier. Coasty wrote: > Jeep in the past couple of years sure has changed their models and the next > couple sure do not look any different. I guess change is inevitable I just > hope they just don't totally hose things up. I can't remember when so many > changes have been made in the Jeep line. > > Usually Jeep would just tweak things but from what I have seen and read for > the future this is just the beginning I just hope Jeep brings their concept > pick-up truck into production that I saw at last years auto show. > > But, from their trends I think they are concentrating on the grocery getter > line, trying to compete with Tahoe, Explorer and Hummer, while makeing major > changes to the Wranglers. The next couple of years should be interesting. > > Coasty > > |
Re: General Comment
For serious and semi-serious trailing here out west, a narrow body is
usually advantageous and sometimes necessary. I notice the '07 will be wider. Seems to me that the serious rock-crawler people might shy away from the newer ones. Jeeps were meant to get back in to where others couldn't and I hate to see that change. On the other hand, I think my '04 Ruby may not depreciate as fast as it might have otherwise. Ralph |
Re: General Comment
For serious and semi-serious trailing here out west, a narrow body is
usually advantageous and sometimes necessary. I notice the '07 will be wider. Seems to me that the serious rock-crawler people might shy away from the newer ones. Jeeps were meant to get back in to where others couldn't and I hate to see that change. On the other hand, I think my '04 Ruby may not depreciate as fast as it might have otherwise. Ralph |
Re: General Comment
For serious and semi-serious trailing here out west, a narrow body is
usually advantageous and sometimes necessary. I notice the '07 will be wider. Seems to me that the serious rock-crawler people might shy away from the newer ones. Jeeps were meant to get back in to where others couldn't and I hate to see that change. On the other hand, I think my '04 Ruby may not depreciate as fast as it might have otherwise. Ralph |
Re: General Comment
I think the answer probably is that the lawyers want the vehicle made more
stable on-road to lessen the likelihood of rollovers. They (corporate lawyers) have no real interest in the lessening of the off-road utility. "Pumper Hinkle" <pumperhinkle@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:b_7Bf.2348$Dk.1804@newsread3.news.pas.earthli nk.net... > For serious and semi-serious trailing here out west, a narrow body is > usually advantageous and sometimes necessary. I notice the '07 will be > wider. Seems to me that the serious rock-crawler people might shy away > from the newer ones. > > Jeeps were meant to get back in to where others couldn't and I hate to see > that change. > > On the other hand, I think my '04 Ruby may not depreciate as fast as it > might have otherwise. > > Ralph > |
Re: General Comment
I think the answer probably is that the lawyers want the vehicle made more
stable on-road to lessen the likelihood of rollovers. They (corporate lawyers) have no real interest in the lessening of the off-road utility. "Pumper Hinkle" <pumperhinkle@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:b_7Bf.2348$Dk.1804@newsread3.news.pas.earthli nk.net... > For serious and semi-serious trailing here out west, a narrow body is > usually advantageous and sometimes necessary. I notice the '07 will be > wider. Seems to me that the serious rock-crawler people might shy away > from the newer ones. > > Jeeps were meant to get back in to where others couldn't and I hate to see > that change. > > On the other hand, I think my '04 Ruby may not depreciate as fast as it > might have otherwise. > > Ralph > |
Re: General Comment
I think the answer probably is that the lawyers want the vehicle made more
stable on-road to lessen the likelihood of rollovers. They (corporate lawyers) have no real interest in the lessening of the off-road utility. "Pumper Hinkle" <pumperhinkle@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:b_7Bf.2348$Dk.1804@newsread3.news.pas.earthli nk.net... > For serious and semi-serious trailing here out west, a narrow body is > usually advantageous and sometimes necessary. I notice the '07 will be > wider. Seems to me that the serious rock-crawler people might shy away > from the newer ones. > > Jeeps were meant to get back in to where others couldn't and I hate to see > that change. > > On the other hand, I think my '04 Ruby may not depreciate as fast as it > might have otherwise. > > Ralph > |
Re: General Comment
I was gone those years except for a couple trips home so I don't know the
history in depth. I did drive it once to the airport as was impressed at the road manners of the AWD. My Dad drove 30-35K miles a year and was good about scheduled maintenance so it wasn't the cost that bothered him as much as the unreliability I seem to recall him saying after a breakdown (No Start) and tow to the AMC dealership they would do "a tune up" and then he would be good again for a while when it would happen again. Did these things have a Crank Sensor? I'll send him an e-mail and ask what he recalls.. "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43D483F3.CEC5FFD1@cox.net... > What gave up? > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > billy ray wrote: >> >> My dad had one of the AWD Eagles when they first came out for a period of >> 3 >> years. >> >> He told me when he made the decision to trade it in (company car) when he >> added up the repair receipts and the repairs during years 2 & 3 added up >> to >> more than the car cost to purchase new. |
Re: General Comment
I was gone those years except for a couple trips home so I don't know the
history in depth. I did drive it once to the airport as was impressed at the road manners of the AWD. My Dad drove 30-35K miles a year and was good about scheduled maintenance so it wasn't the cost that bothered him as much as the unreliability I seem to recall him saying after a breakdown (No Start) and tow to the AMC dealership they would do "a tune up" and then he would be good again for a while when it would happen again. Did these things have a Crank Sensor? I'll send him an e-mail and ask what he recalls.. "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43D483F3.CEC5FFD1@cox.net... > What gave up? > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > billy ray wrote: >> >> My dad had one of the AWD Eagles when they first came out for a period of >> 3 >> years. >> >> He told me when he made the decision to trade it in (company car) when he >> added up the repair receipts and the repairs during years 2 & 3 added up >> to >> more than the car cost to purchase new. |
Re: General Comment
I was gone those years except for a couple trips home so I don't know the
history in depth. I did drive it once to the airport as was impressed at the road manners of the AWD. My Dad drove 30-35K miles a year and was good about scheduled maintenance so it wasn't the cost that bothered him as much as the unreliability I seem to recall him saying after a breakdown (No Start) and tow to the AMC dealership they would do "a tune up" and then he would be good again for a while when it would happen again. Did these things have a Crank Sensor? I'll send him an e-mail and ask what he recalls.. "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43D483F3.CEC5FFD1@cox.net... > What gave up? > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > billy ray wrote: >> >> My dad had one of the AWD Eagles when they first came out for a period of >> 3 >> years. >> >> He told me when he made the decision to trade it in (company car) when he >> added up the repair receipts and the repairs during years 2 & 3 added up >> to >> more than the car cost to purchase new. |
Re: General Comment
Yup. Probably most likely. Shame, though.
|
Re: General Comment
Yup. Probably most likely. Shame, though.
|
Re: General Comment
Yup. Probably most likely. Shame, though.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands