Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

http://jeepgrandcherokeelimited.blog...commander.html
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened a
preliminary investigation that could lead to the recall or 136,444
Jeep Commanders because the engine stalls unexpectedly.

Federal safety regulators have received 26 vehicle owner complaints
"alleging incidents of engine stall while driving in a model year 2006
through 2007 Jeep Commander," according to NHTSA documents.

Some of the consumers complaining to NHTSA told of repeated stalls at
times with "simultaneous loss of some or all lighting systems
including headlamps."

Two stalls resulted in accidents, according to NHTSA.

DaimlerChrylser told the agency that engineers at the automaker have
formed a task force to investigate the stalling problem with Jeep
commanders.

NHTSA has opened its own engineering analysis to "assess the
frequency, scope and potential safety consequences of the alleged
defect."

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
does the problem apply to any engine?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
does the problem apply to any engine?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
does the problem apply to any engine?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
does the problem apply to any engine?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

They don't have a straight six.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9925CF567D98Exs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184.. .
>
> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
> does the problem apply to any engine?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

They don't have a straight six.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9925CF567D98Exs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184.. .
>
> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
> does the problem apply to any engine?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

They don't have a straight six.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9925CF567D98Exs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184.. .
>
> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
> does the problem apply to any engine?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

They don't have a straight six.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9925CF567D98Exs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184.. .
>
> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
> does the problem apply to any engine?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

No but the come with 4.7 or 5.7 V8`s.
> They don't have a straight six.
>> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
>> does the problem apply to any engine?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

No but the come with 4.7 or 5.7 V8`s.
> They don't have a straight six.
>> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
>> does the problem apply to any engine?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

No but the come with 4.7 or 5.7 V8`s.
> They don't have a straight six.
>> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
>> does the problem apply to any engine?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

No but the come with 4.7 or 5.7 V8`s.
> They don't have a straight six.
>> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
>> does the problem apply to any engine?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"RICHARD" <puter413@Tyayhoo.com> wrote:

>>> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
>>> does the problem apply to any engine?

Top posting corrected:

>> They don't have a straight six.

> No but they come with 4.7 or 5.7 V8`s.

And the 3.7 V6, so the original question is still unanswered.

Does anyone know?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"RICHARD" <puter413@Tyayhoo.com> wrote:

>>> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
>>> does the problem apply to any engine?

Top posting corrected:

>> They don't have a straight six.

> No but they come with 4.7 or 5.7 V8`s.

And the 3.7 V6, so the original question is still unanswered.

Does anyone know?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"RICHARD" <puter413@Tyayhoo.com> wrote:

>>> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
>>> does the problem apply to any engine?

Top posting corrected:

>> They don't have a straight six.

> No but they come with 4.7 or 5.7 V8`s.

And the 3.7 V6, so the original question is still unanswered.

Does anyone know?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"RICHARD" <puter413@Tyayhoo.com> wrote:

>>> I didn't see any mention of which engine, did I miss that somhow or
>>> does the problem apply to any engine?

Top posting corrected:

>> They don't have a straight six.

> No but they come with 4.7 or 5.7 V8`s.

And the 3.7 V6, so the original question is still unanswered.

Does anyone know?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

Did you write anything?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns992A7FD9330F4xs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

Did you write anything?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns992A7FD9330F4xs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

Did you write anything?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns992A7FD9330F4xs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

Did you write anything?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/


"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns992A7FD9330F4xs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

> Did you write anything?


Did you?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

> Did you write anything?


Did you?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

> Did you write anything?


Did you?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

> Did you write anything?


Did you?

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Did you write anything?

Yes, I did you rude, top posting, troll.

Don't bother to reply, you've been in my bozo bin for months.

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Did you write anything?

Yes, I did you rude, top posting, troll.

Don't bother to reply, you've been in my bozo bin for months.

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Did you write anything?

Yes, I did you rude, top posting, troll.

Don't bother to reply, you've been in my bozo bin for months.

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote:

> Did you write anything?

Yes, I did you rude, top posting, troll.

Don't bother to reply, you've been in my bozo bin for months.

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

Bill,

He wrote something, but didn't add anything. Subtle difference.

Dave

"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns992AA411D2F14xs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184.. .
> "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > Did you write anything?
>
> Yes, I did you rude, top posting, troll.
>
> Don't bother to reply, you've been in my bozo bin for months.
>
>
>

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

Bill,

He wrote something, but didn't add anything. Subtle difference.

Dave

"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns992AA411D2F14xs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184.. .
> "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > Did you write anything?
>
> Yes, I did you rude, top posting, troll.
>
> Don't bother to reply, you've been in my bozo bin for months.
>
>
>

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

Bill,

He wrote something, but didn't add anything. Subtle difference.

Dave

"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns992AA411D2F14xs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184.. .
> "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > Did you write anything?
>
> Yes, I did you rude, top posting, troll.
>
> Don't bother to reply, you've been in my bozo bin for months.
>
>
>

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

Bill,

He wrote something, but didn't add anything. Subtle difference.

Dave

"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns992AA411D2F14xs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184.. .
> "L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote:
>
> > Did you write anything?
>
> Yes, I did you rude, top posting, troll.
>
> Don't bother to reply, you've been in my bozo bin for months.
>
>
>

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote:

> Bill,
>
> He wrote something, but didn't add anything. Subtle difference.

Untrue, it's usually wise to read a post before responding, that way
you won't look so foolish.

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote:

> Bill,
>
> He wrote something, but didn't add anything. Subtle difference.

Untrue, it's usually wise to read a post before responding, that way
you won't look so foolish.

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote:

> Bill,
>
> He wrote something, but didn't add anything. Subtle difference.

Untrue, it's usually wise to read a post before responding, that way
you won't look so foolish.

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

"Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote:

> Bill,
>
> He wrote something, but didn't add anything. Subtle difference.

Untrue, it's usually wise to read a post before responding, that way
you won't look so foolish.

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

If you want to think I'm a fool, be my guest. My father taught me not to
argue with morons, and I won't make an exception in your case.

Dave

"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns992E666411436xs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184.. .
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote:
>
> > Bill,
> >
> > He wrote something, but didn't add anything. Subtle difference.
>
> Untrue, it's usually wise to read a post before responding, that way
> you won't look so foolish.
>

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

If you want to think I'm a fool, be my guest. My father taught me not to
argue with morons, and I won't make an exception in your case.

Dave

"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns992E666411436xs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184.. .
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote:
>
> > Bill,
> >
> > He wrote something, but didn't add anything. Subtle difference.
>
> Untrue, it's usually wise to read a post before responding, that way
> you won't look so foolish.
>

Re: Feds Probe Jeep Commander
 

If you want to think I'm a fool, be my guest. My father taught me not to
argue with morons, and I won't make an exception in your case.

Dave

"XS11E" <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns992E666411436xs11eyahoocom@69.28.173.184.. .
> "Dave Milne" <jeep@_removethisbit_milne.info> wrote:
>
> > Bill,
> >
> > He wrote something, but didn't add anything. Subtle difference.
>
> Untrue, it's usually wise to read a post before responding, that way
> you won't look so foolish.
>