travis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:16:43 -0500, Mike Romain
> <romainm@sympatico.ca> shared the following:
>
> >travis wrote:
> >>
> > What is it that was the last straw
> >> for Nathan again? Wasn't it when this dude tried to cause him
> >> financial hardship by saying he wasn't a good person to deal with?
> >> What was the reataliation again? Trying to cause him to lose his job?
> >> Yeah. That isn't cool in my book. I know "he started it." I just
> >> don't admire the way the whole thing was finished.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Travis
> >
> >You really need to read posts more carefully.
> >
> >You are totally mixing up players and stories here.
>
> I believe you. I haven't been around here too long, but thought it
> was Nathan who had been involved in something like that. Maybe it was
> Nathan, but it was someone else who was talking trash about him? I
> dunno and I'm not really interested in the details. I just agree with
> "Guido The Killer Pimp" when he says "Never, ever f*ck with another
> man's livelyhood." ;-)
>
> --
> Travis

I agree, you know fools are out of control when they go after a person's
living or enjoyment of a hobby.

Lloyd has been a constant source of OT crossposts and when he gets
called on it he gets nasty. Nathan wasn't the only one who called Lloyd
on his BS, I was in there too and also recently lodged a complaint. But
I don't have anything DC could sue me for.

It also is a total coincidence that the lawyer for Chrysler that came
after Nathan's website works right beside Lloyd and came into this
picture about the same time Lloyd was getting slammed big time. Total
coincidence....

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

 

travis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:16:43 -0500, Mike Romain
> <romainm@sympatico.ca> shared the following:
>
> >travis wrote:
> >>
> > What is it that was the last straw
> >> for Nathan again? Wasn't it when this dude tried to cause him
> >> financial hardship by saying he wasn't a good person to deal with?
> >> What was the reataliation again? Trying to cause him to lose his job?
> >> Yeah. That isn't cool in my book. I know "he started it." I just
> >> don't admire the way the whole thing was finished.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Travis
> >
> >You really need to read posts more carefully.
> >
> >You are totally mixing up players and stories here.
>
> I believe you. I haven't been around here too long, but thought it
> was Nathan who had been involved in something like that. Maybe it was
> Nathan, but it was someone else who was talking trash about him? I
> dunno and I'm not really interested in the details. I just agree with
> "Guido The Killer Pimp" when he says "Never, ever f*ck with another
> man's livelyhood." ;-)
>
> --
> Travis

I agree, you know fools are out of control when they go after a person's
living or enjoyment of a hobby.

Lloyd has been a constant source of OT crossposts and when he gets
called on it he gets nasty. Nathan wasn't the only one who called Lloyd
on his BS, I was in there too and also recently lodged a complaint. But
I don't have anything DC could sue me for.

It also is a total coincidence that the lawyer for Chrysler that came
after Nathan's website works right beside Lloyd and came into this
picture about the same time Lloyd was getting slammed big time. Total
coincidence....

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's

 

travis wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:16:43 -0500, Mike Romain
> <romainm@sympatico.ca> shared the following:
>
> >travis wrote:
> >>
> > What is it that was the last straw
> >> for Nathan again? Wasn't it when this dude tried to cause him
> >> financial hardship by saying he wasn't a good person to deal with?
> >> What was the reataliation again? Trying to cause him to lose his job?
> >> Yeah. That isn't cool in my book. I know "he started it." I just
> >> don't admire the way the whole thing was finished.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Travis
> >
> >You really need to read posts more carefully.
> >
> >You are totally mixing up players and stories here.
>
> I believe you. I haven't been around here too long, but thought it
> was Nathan who had been involved in something like that. Maybe it was
> Nathan, but it was someone else who was talking trash about him? I
> dunno and I'm not really interested in the details. I just agree with
> "Guido The Killer Pimp" when he says "Never, ever f*ck with another
> man's livelyhood." ;-)
>
> --
> Travis

I agree, you know fools are out of control when they go after a person's
living or enjoyment of a hobby.

Lloyd has been a constant source of OT crossposts and when he gets
called on it he gets nasty. Nathan wasn't the only one who called Lloyd
on his BS, I was in there too and also recently lodged a complaint. But
I don't have anything DC could sue me for.

It also is a total coincidence that the lawyer for Chrysler that came
after Nathan's website works right beside Lloyd and came into this
picture about the same time Lloyd was getting slammed big time. Total
coincidence....

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's