Drove a 2007 Wrangler X today :-)
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Drove a 2007 Wrangler X today :-)
The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
consider it for the KJ...
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>
> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
> didn't get a road test.
>
> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>
> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>
consider it for the KJ...
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>
> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
> didn't get a road test.
>
> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>
> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Drove a 2007 Wrangler X today :-)
The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
consider it for the KJ...
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>
> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
> didn't get a road test.
>
> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>
> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>
consider it for the KJ...
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>
> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
> didn't get a road test.
>
> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>
> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Drove a 2007 Wrangler X today :-)
The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
consider it for the KJ...
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>
> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
> didn't get a road test.
>
> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>
> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>
consider it for the KJ...
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>
> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
> didn't get a road test.
>
> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>
> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Drove a 2007 Wrangler X today :-)
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:35:31 -0500, "Matt Macchiarolo"
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
>consider it for the KJ...
>
>http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
>"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>>
>> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>> didn't get a road test.
>>
>> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
The JK is programmed for a 2.8L 4 Cyl. CRD - same motor as the Diesel
KJ.
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0649-1, 11/18/2006
Tested on: 11/19/2006 3:45:43 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
>consider it for the KJ...
>
>http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
>"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>>
>> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>> didn't get a road test.
>>
>> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
The JK is programmed for a 2.8L 4 Cyl. CRD - same motor as the Diesel
KJ.
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0649-1, 11/18/2006
Tested on: 11/19/2006 3:45:43 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Drove a 2007 Wrangler X today :-)
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:35:31 -0500, "Matt Macchiarolo"
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
>consider it for the KJ...
>
>http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
>"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>>
>> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>> didn't get a road test.
>>
>> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
The JK is programmed for a 2.8L 4 Cyl. CRD - same motor as the Diesel
KJ.
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0649-1, 11/18/2006
Tested on: 11/19/2006 3:45:43 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
>consider it for the KJ...
>
>http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
>"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>>
>> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>> didn't get a road test.
>>
>> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
The JK is programmed for a 2.8L 4 Cyl. CRD - same motor as the Diesel
KJ.
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0649-1, 11/18/2006
Tested on: 11/19/2006 3:45:43 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Drove a 2007 Wrangler X today :-)
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 11:35:31 -0500, "Matt Macchiarolo"
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
>consider it for the KJ...
>
>http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
>"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>>
>> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>> didn't get a road test.
>>
>> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
The JK is programmed for a 2.8L 4 Cyl. CRD - same motor as the Diesel
KJ.
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0649-1, 11/18/2006
Tested on: 11/19/2006 3:45:43 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
>consider it for the KJ...
>
>http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
>"Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>>
>> Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>> Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>> tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>> I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>> didn't get a road test.
>>
>> I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>> emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>> Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>> pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
The JK is programmed for a 2.8L 4 Cyl. CRD - same motor as the Diesel
KJ.
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 0649-1, 11/18/2006
Tested on: 11/19/2006 3:45:43 PM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Drove a 2007 Wrangler X today :-)
Too bad you can't get that V10 Audi Diesel coming soon to a mall-trail
crossover Audi near you. Possibly even California if the urea system
and all works out. Too bad you can't keep the exhaust clean with a more
organic urea injection system--a tube from the drivers seat.
Matt Macchiarolo proclaimed:
> The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
> consider it for the KJ...
>
> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
> "Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
>>Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>>Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>>tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>>I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>>didn't get a road test.
>>
>>I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>>emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>>Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>>pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
>
>
crossover Audi near you. Possibly even California if the urea system
and all works out. Too bad you can't keep the exhaust clean with a more
organic urea injection system--a tube from the drivers seat.
Matt Macchiarolo proclaimed:
> The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
> consider it for the KJ...
>
> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
> "Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
>>Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>>Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>>tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>>I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>>didn't get a road test.
>>
>>I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>>emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>>Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>>pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Drove a 2007 Wrangler X today :-)
Too bad you can't get that V10 Audi Diesel coming soon to a mall-trail
crossover Audi near you. Possibly even California if the urea system
and all works out. Too bad you can't keep the exhaust clean with a more
organic urea injection system--a tube from the drivers seat.
Matt Macchiarolo proclaimed:
> The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
> consider it for the KJ...
>
> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
> "Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
>>Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>>Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>>tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>>I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>>didn't get a road test.
>>
>>I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>>emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>>Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>>pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
>
>
crossover Audi near you. Possibly even California if the urea system
and all works out. Too bad you can't keep the exhaust clean with a more
organic urea injection system--a tube from the drivers seat.
Matt Macchiarolo proclaimed:
> The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
> consider it for the KJ...
>
> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
> "Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
>>Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>>Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>>tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>>I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>>didn't get a road test.
>>
>>I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>>emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>>Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>>pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Drove a 2007 Wrangler X today :-)
Too bad you can't get that V10 Audi Diesel coming soon to a mall-trail
crossover Audi near you. Possibly even California if the urea system
and all works out. Too bad you can't keep the exhaust clean with a more
organic urea injection system--a tube from the drivers seat.
Matt Macchiarolo proclaimed:
> The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
> consider it for the KJ...
>
> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
> "Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
>>Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>>Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>>tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>>I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>>didn't get a road test.
>>
>>I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>>emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>>Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>>pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
>
>
crossover Audi near you. Possibly even California if the urea system
and all works out. Too bad you can't keep the exhaust clean with a more
organic urea injection system--a tube from the drivers seat.
Matt Macchiarolo proclaimed:
> The 07 grand cherokee will have a new 3.0L diesel, I wonder if they might
> consider it for the KJ...
>
> http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=115598
>
> "Red Jeep" <no@way.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns988061D2195E8314568729@69.28.186.121...
>
>>Much of what DC did with the JK had to do with meeting safety standards.
>>Swapping the I6 for a V6 made for more front crumple room. Moving the gas
>>tank from the rear gave more rear crumple room.
>>
>>I drove the V6 '07 at Camp Jeep and it seemed adequate on the trail;
>>didn't get a road test.
>>
>>I would prefer a diesel engine in a JK, but with the stricter diesel
>>emissions in '07 I doubt we'll see it in production soon.
>>
>>Wait for the aftermarket to ramp up with JK parts. I think we'll be
>>pleasantly surprised at what the JK can do.
>>
>
>
>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)