Diesel TJ?
05-11-2005, 11:02 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel TJ?
ßill L. W. ------ III wrote:
> Yes, that would be like the 1947 Detroit 4, 6, and V8 71, 71 being
> the cubic inches per cylinder.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
A 6-71 is something like a two thousand pound engine, I would guess a
4-71 would be twelve to fourteen hundred pounds at the least, and as
tall as the engine in a tractor trailer (it was). If I remember right
they were two cycle engines, which meant that they were the equivalent
of double their displacement,at least in GM sales literature, and the
weight was up there. So I doubt this Volvo was anything like this
big-unless he had a one-foor body lift to clear it.
I wonder if it's even legal to put one in a truck today-I'd guess not,
they were pretty smoky and drooled like a bulldog too.
("Plenumstration", they called it....)
05-11-2005, 11:02 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel TJ?
ßill L. W. ------ III wrote:
> Yes, that would be like the 1947 Detroit 4, 6, and V8 71, 71 being
> the cubic inches per cylinder.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
A 6-71 is something like a two thousand pound engine, I would guess a
4-71 would be twelve to fourteen hundred pounds at the least, and as
tall as the engine in a tractor trailer (it was). If I remember right
they were two cycle engines, which meant that they were the equivalent
of double their displacement,at least in GM sales literature, and the
weight was up there. So I doubt this Volvo was anything like this
big-unless he had a one-foor body lift to clear it.
I wonder if it's even legal to put one in a truck today-I'd guess not,
they were pretty smoky and drooled like a bulldog too.
("Plenumstration", they called it....)
05-11-2005, 11:02 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel TJ?
ßill L. W. ------ III wrote:
> Yes, that would be like the 1947 Detroit 4, 6, and V8 71, 71 being
> the cubic inches per cylinder.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
A 6-71 is something like a two thousand pound engine, I would guess a
4-71 would be twelve to fourteen hundred pounds at the least, and as
tall as the engine in a tractor trailer (it was). If I remember right
they were two cycle engines, which meant that they were the equivalent
of double their displacement,at least in GM sales literature, and the
weight was up there. So I doubt this Volvo was anything like this
big-unless he had a one-foor body lift to clear it.
I wonder if it's even legal to put one in a truck today-I'd guess not,
they were pretty smoky and drooled like a bulldog too.
("Plenumstration", they called it....)
05-11-2005, 11:44 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel TJ?
All diesels smoke, the difference you see is their exhaust is being
filtered since the eighties:
http://www.benzworld.org/news/news.asp?id=233
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> A 6-71 is something like a two thousand pound engine, I would guess a
> 4-71 would be twelve to fourteen hundred pounds at the least, and as
> tall as the engine in a tractor trailer (it was). If I remember right
> they were two cycle engines, which meant that they were the equivalent
> of double their displacement,at least in GM sales literature, and the
> weight was up there. So I doubt this Volvo was anything like this
> big-unless he had a one-foor body lift to clear it.
>
> I wonder if it's even legal to put one in a truck today-I'd guess not,
> they were pretty smoky and drooled like a bulldog too.
> ("Plenumstration", they called it....)
filtered since the eighties:
http://www.benzworld.org/news/news.asp?id=233
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> A 6-71 is something like a two thousand pound engine, I would guess a
> 4-71 would be twelve to fourteen hundred pounds at the least, and as
> tall as the engine in a tractor trailer (it was). If I remember right
> they were two cycle engines, which meant that they were the equivalent
> of double their displacement,at least in GM sales literature, and the
> weight was up there. So I doubt this Volvo was anything like this
> big-unless he had a one-foor body lift to clear it.
>
> I wonder if it's even legal to put one in a truck today-I'd guess not,
> they were pretty smoky and drooled like a bulldog too.
> ("Plenumstration", they called it....)
05-11-2005, 11:44 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel TJ?
All diesels smoke, the difference you see is their exhaust is being
filtered since the eighties:
http://www.benzworld.org/news/news.asp?id=233
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> A 6-71 is something like a two thousand pound engine, I would guess a
> 4-71 would be twelve to fourteen hundred pounds at the least, and as
> tall as the engine in a tractor trailer (it was). If I remember right
> they were two cycle engines, which meant that they were the equivalent
> of double their displacement,at least in GM sales literature, and the
> weight was up there. So I doubt this Volvo was anything like this
> big-unless he had a one-foor body lift to clear it.
>
> I wonder if it's even legal to put one in a truck today-I'd guess not,
> they were pretty smoky and drooled like a bulldog too.
> ("Plenumstration", they called it....)
filtered since the eighties:
http://www.benzworld.org/news/news.asp?id=233
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> A 6-71 is something like a two thousand pound engine, I would guess a
> 4-71 would be twelve to fourteen hundred pounds at the least, and as
> tall as the engine in a tractor trailer (it was). If I remember right
> they were two cycle engines, which meant that they were the equivalent
> of double their displacement,at least in GM sales literature, and the
> weight was up there. So I doubt this Volvo was anything like this
> big-unless he had a one-foor body lift to clear it.
>
> I wonder if it's even legal to put one in a truck today-I'd guess not,
> they were pretty smoky and drooled like a bulldog too.
> ("Plenumstration", they called it....)
05-11-2005, 11:44 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel TJ?
All diesels smoke, the difference you see is their exhaust is being
filtered since the eighties:
http://www.benzworld.org/news/news.asp?id=233
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> A 6-71 is something like a two thousand pound engine, I would guess a
> 4-71 would be twelve to fourteen hundred pounds at the least, and as
> tall as the engine in a tractor trailer (it was). If I remember right
> they were two cycle engines, which meant that they were the equivalent
> of double their displacement,at least in GM sales literature, and the
> weight was up there. So I doubt this Volvo was anything like this
> big-unless he had a one-foor body lift to clear it.
>
> I wonder if it's even legal to put one in a truck today-I'd guess not,
> they were pretty smoky and drooled like a bulldog too.
> ("Plenumstration", they called it....)
filtered since the eighties:
http://www.benzworld.org/news/news.asp?id=233
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> A 6-71 is something like a two thousand pound engine, I would guess a
> 4-71 would be twelve to fourteen hundred pounds at the least, and as
> tall as the engine in a tractor trailer (it was). If I remember right
> they were two cycle engines, which meant that they were the equivalent
> of double their displacement,at least in GM sales literature, and the
> weight was up there. So I doubt this Volvo was anything like this
> big-unless he had a one-foor body lift to clear it.
>
> I wonder if it's even legal to put one in a truck today-I'd guess not,
> they were pretty smoky and drooled like a bulldog too.
> ("Plenumstration", they called it....)
05-11-2005, 11:44 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel TJ?
All diesels smoke, the difference you see is their exhaust is being
filtered since the eighties:
http://www.benzworld.org/news/news.asp?id=233
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> A 6-71 is something like a two thousand pound engine, I would guess a
> 4-71 would be twelve to fourteen hundred pounds at the least, and as
> tall as the engine in a tractor trailer (it was). If I remember right
> they were two cycle engines, which meant that they were the equivalent
> of double their displacement,at least in GM sales literature, and the
> weight was up there. So I doubt this Volvo was anything like this
> big-unless he had a one-foor body lift to clear it.
>
> I wonder if it's even legal to put one in a truck today-I'd guess not,
> they were pretty smoky and drooled like a bulldog too.
> ("Plenumstration", they called it....)
filtered since the eighties:
http://www.benzworld.org/news/news.asp?id=233
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
calcerise@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> A 6-71 is something like a two thousand pound engine, I would guess a
> 4-71 would be twelve to fourteen hundred pounds at the least, and as
> tall as the engine in a tractor trailer (it was). If I remember right
> they were two cycle engines, which meant that they were the equivalent
> of double their displacement,at least in GM sales literature, and the
> weight was up there. So I doubt this Volvo was anything like this
> big-unless he had a one-foor body lift to clear it.
>
> I wonder if it's even legal to put one in a truck today-I'd guess not,
> they were pretty smoky and drooled like a bulldog too.
> ("Plenumstration", they called it....)
05-12-2005, 12:19 AM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel TJ?
No filter could handle what the old two cycle Detroits put out. I
remember the garbage trucks in Denver had them, at 5000 feet, the whole
truck top would be covered with an inch of soot. It was really bad
when you got behind some of the school buses, which had the four cycle,
mechanical V8 Detroit, which smoked less, but the tailpipe was at door
level to cars. They would pull off and if you were in the right lane
and they were in the left and you had your window open you were in
trouble.
remember the garbage trucks in Denver had them, at 5000 feet, the whole
truck top would be covered with an inch of soot. It was really bad
when you got behind some of the school buses, which had the four cycle,
mechanical V8 Detroit, which smoked less, but the tailpipe was at door
level to cars. They would pull off and if you were in the right lane
and they were in the left and you had your window open you were in
trouble.
05-12-2005, 12:19 AM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel TJ?
No filter could handle what the old two cycle Detroits put out. I
remember the garbage trucks in Denver had them, at 5000 feet, the whole
truck top would be covered with an inch of soot. It was really bad
when you got behind some of the school buses, which had the four cycle,
mechanical V8 Detroit, which smoked less, but the tailpipe was at door
level to cars. They would pull off and if you were in the right lane
and they were in the left and you had your window open you were in
trouble.
remember the garbage trucks in Denver had them, at 5000 feet, the whole
truck top would be covered with an inch of soot. It was really bad
when you got behind some of the school buses, which had the four cycle,
mechanical V8 Detroit, which smoked less, but the tailpipe was at door
level to cars. They would pull off and if you were in the right lane
and they were in the left and you had your window open you were in
trouble.
05-12-2005, 12:19 AM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Diesel TJ?
No filter could handle what the old two cycle Detroits put out. I
remember the garbage trucks in Denver had them, at 5000 feet, the whole
truck top would be covered with an inch of soot. It was really bad
when you got behind some of the school buses, which had the four cycle,
mechanical V8 Detroit, which smoked less, but the tailpipe was at door
level to cars. They would pull off and if you were in the right lane
and they were in the left and you had your window open you were in
trouble.
remember the garbage trucks in Denver had them, at 5000 feet, the whole
truck top would be covered with an inch of soot. It was really bad
when you got behind some of the school buses, which had the four cycle,
mechanical V8 Detroit, which smoked less, but the tailpipe was at door
level to cars. They would pull off and if you were in the right lane
and they were in the left and you had your window open you were in
trouble.