Detroit Vs Japan
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Detroit Vs Japan
What reliability problems were there? People bashing American
products say that, but are never capable of giving us an example.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Ruel Smith wrote:
>
> I was referring to AMC not being known for reliability, though I'm aware of
> how great those 242/258 inline sixes are.
>
> It was a bad day when that clutch let go...
>
> --
>
> Registered Linux user #378193
products say that, but are never capable of giving us an example.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Ruel Smith wrote:
>
> I was referring to AMC not being known for reliability, though I'm aware of
> how great those 242/258 inline sixes are.
>
> It was a bad day when that clutch let go...
>
> --
>
> Registered Linux user #378193
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Detroit Vs Japan
There were a lot of them. There still are.
GM made the Vega, the Monza, the X-bodies, the 60 degree V6's, in fact
they did not build a single decent small car for a roughly twenty year
period.It wasn't until the Saturn GM had a small car it could look to
with any self-respect at all. Chrysler built and still builds an
entire generation of minivans with marginal transmissions and the
horrible Neon.
For what it's worth, for the weight and money, if new car buyers
bought strictly according to reliability and cost per mile, Detroit's
passenger car line would be in even worse shape than it is. And their
big truck lines are selling mostly on the basis of macho and status
rather than as work trucks-most people do not need that big a truck.
Somewhere between a Ford Ranger and a Dodge Dakota is the right size.
If they would offer a Dakota size pickup with the 4 cylinder Cummins
and a full tilt fiberglass hood like a Freightliner, it would probably
be the best selling _work_ truck for fleet use in the country-that's
who's buying Rangers. If you need a "full size pickup" for actual
work, you probably need a _medium duty truck_ and not a pickup, like
the small Internationals, the Isuzu Chevy forward cabs, or similar.
And another thing, the toughest industrial engines are Toyotas. Based
on my company's record with forklifts, I would buy no other brand of
lift truck. Hyster and Clark simply cannot compete on downtime and
overall operating expense.
GM made the Vega, the Monza, the X-bodies, the 60 degree V6's, in fact
they did not build a single decent small car for a roughly twenty year
period.It wasn't until the Saturn GM had a small car it could look to
with any self-respect at all. Chrysler built and still builds an
entire generation of minivans with marginal transmissions and the
horrible Neon.
For what it's worth, for the weight and money, if new car buyers
bought strictly according to reliability and cost per mile, Detroit's
passenger car line would be in even worse shape than it is. And their
big truck lines are selling mostly on the basis of macho and status
rather than as work trucks-most people do not need that big a truck.
Somewhere between a Ford Ranger and a Dodge Dakota is the right size.
If they would offer a Dakota size pickup with the 4 cylinder Cummins
and a full tilt fiberglass hood like a Freightliner, it would probably
be the best selling _work_ truck for fleet use in the country-that's
who's buying Rangers. If you need a "full size pickup" for actual
work, you probably need a _medium duty truck_ and not a pickup, like
the small Internationals, the Isuzu Chevy forward cabs, or similar.
And another thing, the toughest industrial engines are Toyotas. Based
on my company's record with forklifts, I would buy no other brand of
lift truck. Hyster and Clark simply cannot compete on downtime and
overall operating expense.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Detroit Vs Japan
There were a lot of them. There still are.
GM made the Vega, the Monza, the X-bodies, the 60 degree V6's, in fact
they did not build a single decent small car for a roughly twenty year
period.It wasn't until the Saturn GM had a small car it could look to
with any self-respect at all. Chrysler built and still builds an
entire generation of minivans with marginal transmissions and the
horrible Neon.
For what it's worth, for the weight and money, if new car buyers
bought strictly according to reliability and cost per mile, Detroit's
passenger car line would be in even worse shape than it is. And their
big truck lines are selling mostly on the basis of macho and status
rather than as work trucks-most people do not need that big a truck.
Somewhere between a Ford Ranger and a Dodge Dakota is the right size.
If they would offer a Dakota size pickup with the 4 cylinder Cummins
and a full tilt fiberglass hood like a Freightliner, it would probably
be the best selling _work_ truck for fleet use in the country-that's
who's buying Rangers. If you need a "full size pickup" for actual
work, you probably need a _medium duty truck_ and not a pickup, like
the small Internationals, the Isuzu Chevy forward cabs, or similar.
And another thing, the toughest industrial engines are Toyotas. Based
on my company's record with forklifts, I would buy no other brand of
lift truck. Hyster and Clark simply cannot compete on downtime and
overall operating expense.
GM made the Vega, the Monza, the X-bodies, the 60 degree V6's, in fact
they did not build a single decent small car for a roughly twenty year
period.It wasn't until the Saturn GM had a small car it could look to
with any self-respect at all. Chrysler built and still builds an
entire generation of minivans with marginal transmissions and the
horrible Neon.
For what it's worth, for the weight and money, if new car buyers
bought strictly according to reliability and cost per mile, Detroit's
passenger car line would be in even worse shape than it is. And their
big truck lines are selling mostly on the basis of macho and status
rather than as work trucks-most people do not need that big a truck.
Somewhere between a Ford Ranger and a Dodge Dakota is the right size.
If they would offer a Dakota size pickup with the 4 cylinder Cummins
and a full tilt fiberglass hood like a Freightliner, it would probably
be the best selling _work_ truck for fleet use in the country-that's
who's buying Rangers. If you need a "full size pickup" for actual
work, you probably need a _medium duty truck_ and not a pickup, like
the small Internationals, the Isuzu Chevy forward cabs, or similar.
And another thing, the toughest industrial engines are Toyotas. Based
on my company's record with forklifts, I would buy no other brand of
lift truck. Hyster and Clark simply cannot compete on downtime and
overall operating expense.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Detroit Vs Japan
There were a lot of them. There still are.
GM made the Vega, the Monza, the X-bodies, the 60 degree V6's, in fact
they did not build a single decent small car for a roughly twenty year
period.It wasn't until the Saturn GM had a small car it could look to
with any self-respect at all. Chrysler built and still builds an
entire generation of minivans with marginal transmissions and the
horrible Neon.
For what it's worth, for the weight and money, if new car buyers
bought strictly according to reliability and cost per mile, Detroit's
passenger car line would be in even worse shape than it is. And their
big truck lines are selling mostly on the basis of macho and status
rather than as work trucks-most people do not need that big a truck.
Somewhere between a Ford Ranger and a Dodge Dakota is the right size.
If they would offer a Dakota size pickup with the 4 cylinder Cummins
and a full tilt fiberglass hood like a Freightliner, it would probably
be the best selling _work_ truck for fleet use in the country-that's
who's buying Rangers. If you need a "full size pickup" for actual
work, you probably need a _medium duty truck_ and not a pickup, like
the small Internationals, the Isuzu Chevy forward cabs, or similar.
And another thing, the toughest industrial engines are Toyotas. Based
on my company's record with forklifts, I would buy no other brand of
lift truck. Hyster and Clark simply cannot compete on downtime and
overall operating expense.
GM made the Vega, the Monza, the X-bodies, the 60 degree V6's, in fact
they did not build a single decent small car for a roughly twenty year
period.It wasn't until the Saturn GM had a small car it could look to
with any self-respect at all. Chrysler built and still builds an
entire generation of minivans with marginal transmissions and the
horrible Neon.
For what it's worth, for the weight and money, if new car buyers
bought strictly according to reliability and cost per mile, Detroit's
passenger car line would be in even worse shape than it is. And their
big truck lines are selling mostly on the basis of macho and status
rather than as work trucks-most people do not need that big a truck.
Somewhere between a Ford Ranger and a Dodge Dakota is the right size.
If they would offer a Dakota size pickup with the 4 cylinder Cummins
and a full tilt fiberglass hood like a Freightliner, it would probably
be the best selling _work_ truck for fleet use in the country-that's
who's buying Rangers. If you need a "full size pickup" for actual
work, you probably need a _medium duty truck_ and not a pickup, like
the small Internationals, the Isuzu Chevy forward cabs, or similar.
And another thing, the toughest industrial engines are Toyotas. Based
on my company's record with forklifts, I would buy no other brand of
lift truck. Hyster and Clark simply cannot compete on downtime and
overall operating expense.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Detroit Vs Japan
There were a lot of them. There still are.
GM made the Vega, the Monza, the X-bodies, the 60 degree V6's, in fact
they did not build a single decent small car for a roughly twenty year
period.It wasn't until the Saturn GM had a small car it could look to
with any self-respect at all. Chrysler built and still builds an
entire generation of minivans with marginal transmissions and the
horrible Neon.
For what it's worth, for the weight and money, if new car buyers
bought strictly according to reliability and cost per mile, Detroit's
passenger car line would be in even worse shape than it is. And their
big truck lines are selling mostly on the basis of macho and status
rather than as work trucks-most people do not need that big a truck.
Somewhere between a Ford Ranger and a Dodge Dakota is the right size.
If they would offer a Dakota size pickup with the 4 cylinder Cummins
and a full tilt fiberglass hood like a Freightliner, it would probably
be the best selling _work_ truck for fleet use in the country-that's
who's buying Rangers. If you need a "full size pickup" for actual
work, you probably need a _medium duty truck_ and not a pickup, like
the small Internationals, the Isuzu Chevy forward cabs, or similar.
And another thing, the toughest industrial engines are Toyotas. Based
on my company's record with forklifts, I would buy no other brand of
lift truck. Hyster and Clark simply cannot compete on downtime and
overall operating expense.
GM made the Vega, the Monza, the X-bodies, the 60 degree V6's, in fact
they did not build a single decent small car for a roughly twenty year
period.It wasn't until the Saturn GM had a small car it could look to
with any self-respect at all. Chrysler built and still builds an
entire generation of minivans with marginal transmissions and the
horrible Neon.
For what it's worth, for the weight and money, if new car buyers
bought strictly according to reliability and cost per mile, Detroit's
passenger car line would be in even worse shape than it is. And their
big truck lines are selling mostly on the basis of macho and status
rather than as work trucks-most people do not need that big a truck.
Somewhere between a Ford Ranger and a Dodge Dakota is the right size.
If they would offer a Dakota size pickup with the 4 cylinder Cummins
and a full tilt fiberglass hood like a Freightliner, it would probably
be the best selling _work_ truck for fleet use in the country-that's
who's buying Rangers. If you need a "full size pickup" for actual
work, you probably need a _medium duty truck_ and not a pickup, like
the small Internationals, the Isuzu Chevy forward cabs, or similar.
And another thing, the toughest industrial engines are Toyotas. Based
on my company's record with forklifts, I would buy no other brand of
lift truck. Hyster and Clark simply cannot compete on downtime and
overall operating expense.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Detroit Vs Japan
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42962D6A.3B7398FC@***.net...
> Witches are something Salem dreamed up.
Salem was before the Bible?
>Most of my ancestors were
> pagan, anyway.
Actually, most of your ancestors were probably
single-celled organisms...
>I just want to use the Bible card to thump the near and
> far east. I believe Bush has permission to use the bomb. Let's do it!
You're not religious... you're evil!
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Detroit Vs Japan
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42962D6A.3B7398FC@***.net...
> Witches are something Salem dreamed up.
Salem was before the Bible?
>Most of my ancestors were
> pagan, anyway.
Actually, most of your ancestors were probably
single-celled organisms...
>I just want to use the Bible card to thump the near and
> far east. I believe Bush has permission to use the bomb. Let's do it!
You're not religious... you're evil!
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Detroit Vs Japan
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42962D6A.3B7398FC@***.net...
> Witches are something Salem dreamed up.
Salem was before the Bible?
>Most of my ancestors were
> pagan, anyway.
Actually, most of your ancestors were probably
single-celled organisms...
>I just want to use the Bible card to thump the near and
> far east. I believe Bush has permission to use the bomb. Let's do it!
You're not religious... you're evil!
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Detroit Vs Japan
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42962D6A.3B7398FC@***.net...
> Witches are something Salem dreamed up.
Salem was before the Bible?
>Most of my ancestors were
> pagan, anyway.
Actually, most of your ancestors were probably
single-celled organisms...
>I just want to use the Bible card to thump the near and
> far east. I believe Bush has permission to use the bomb. Let's do it!
You're not religious... you're evil!
__
Steve
..
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Detroit Vs Japan
"Scotty" <ssargent@onewest.net> wrote in message
news:1117158647.660339.267030@z14g2000cwz.googlegr oups.com...
Not a troll, Bill. If you would read what was written you would
plainly see that I did not say a coal mining company used a Toyota.
What I did say was that several real men and women who make their
living off the mineral industries that support our community choose to
spend their hard earned money on Japanese trucks. The local coal
mining company uses Ford and GM products. Maybe you should be a little
more attentive and a little slower to jump to conclusions and insult
people. You notice that I didn't call you an ******** right out of the
gate. Sometimes you can be the most helpful person on this group, but
other times you seem short on ears and long on mouth. By the way, I am
happy you have had good luck with your Ford.
I can *guarantee* that the aforementioned Ford is not a '93 Taurus...
__
Steve
..