Democrats and integrity
04-07-2004, 10:05 PM
#91
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Democrats and integrity
On 4/7/04 3:05 PM, in article c51jcs$13q0$4@news.wplus.net, "Xomicron"
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>
>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>
> This *is* my group.
Reply to this one please
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>
>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>
> This *is* my group.
Reply to this one please
04-07-2004, 10:05 PM
#92
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Democrats and integrity
On 4/7/04 3:05 PM, in article c51jcs$13q0$4@news.wplus.net, "Xomicron"
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>
>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>
> This *is* my group.
Reply to this one please
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>
>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>
> This *is* my group.
Reply to this one please
04-07-2004, 10:05 PM
#93
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Democrats and integrity
On 4/7/04 3:05 PM, in article c51jcs$13q0$4@news.wplus.net, "Xomicron"
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>
>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>
> This *is* my group.
Reply to this one please
<xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>
>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>
> This *is* my group.
Reply to this one please
04-07-2004, 10:11 PM
#94
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Democrats and integrity
On 4/7/04 7:18 PM, in article 2j2970dqdtpcahsuh3pgcp1j3jl6gs9218@4ax.com,
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:07:11 +0000, Marguerita
> <marguerita@hottermail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Apr 2004 01:03:34 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> NO ONE EVER SAID that Republicans are perfectly good,
>>> or that democrats are perfectly evil. Some democrats
>>> are good people, and some Republicans are absolutely
>>> off their rockers! Sometimes I think independents or
>>> libertarians are craziest of all, since they are pro-
>>> bably more intelligent on average--yet they advocate
>>> sensationalism & extremism more than any other group,
>>> which shows that intelligence isn't enough. It takes
>>> wisdom to complete mans process of human development.
>>>
>>> And when we look at the "bell curve" distribution of
>>> Republicans, most everyone favors business, commerce,
>>> and ethical thought, word & deed...deeds most of all.
>>> Money isn't evil, but a mans motivations can be evil.
>>> Democrats don't like President GW Bush, because Bush
>>> loves Jesus, meaning God's righteousness.
>>
>> Not quite true. Most people seem to hate Bush because he is a lying,
>> greedy and astonishingly stupid warmonger with no morals. It has
>> nothing to do with his religious beliefs. After all, don't all UK and
>> US leaders say that they believe in God to ensure that they don't
>> offend Christian voters?
>
> No. US leaders do. It doesn't matter in the UK. Anybody who makes a
> fuss of their religion isn't all there in UK eyes. Although the
> Conservative press made a fuss about Michael Foot being atheist and
> quietly forgot to say anything when it was John Major's turn.
Response to this one
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:07:11 +0000, Marguerita
> <marguerita@hottermail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Apr 2004 01:03:34 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> NO ONE EVER SAID that Republicans are perfectly good,
>>> or that democrats are perfectly evil. Some democrats
>>> are good people, and some Republicans are absolutely
>>> off their rockers! Sometimes I think independents or
>>> libertarians are craziest of all, since they are pro-
>>> bably more intelligent on average--yet they advocate
>>> sensationalism & extremism more than any other group,
>>> which shows that intelligence isn't enough. It takes
>>> wisdom to complete mans process of human development.
>>>
>>> And when we look at the "bell curve" distribution of
>>> Republicans, most everyone favors business, commerce,
>>> and ethical thought, word & deed...deeds most of all.
>>> Money isn't evil, but a mans motivations can be evil.
>>> Democrats don't like President GW Bush, because Bush
>>> loves Jesus, meaning God's righteousness.
>>
>> Not quite true. Most people seem to hate Bush because he is a lying,
>> greedy and astonishingly stupid warmonger with no morals. It has
>> nothing to do with his religious beliefs. After all, don't all UK and
>> US leaders say that they believe in God to ensure that they don't
>> offend Christian voters?
>
> No. US leaders do. It doesn't matter in the UK. Anybody who makes a
> fuss of their religion isn't all there in UK eyes. Although the
> Conservative press made a fuss about Michael Foot being atheist and
> quietly forgot to say anything when it was John Major's turn.
Response to this one
04-07-2004, 10:11 PM
#95
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Democrats and integrity
On 4/7/04 7:18 PM, in article 2j2970dqdtpcahsuh3pgcp1j3jl6gs9218@4ax.com,
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:07:11 +0000, Marguerita
> <marguerita@hottermail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Apr 2004 01:03:34 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> NO ONE EVER SAID that Republicans are perfectly good,
>>> or that democrats are perfectly evil. Some democrats
>>> are good people, and some Republicans are absolutely
>>> off their rockers! Sometimes I think independents or
>>> libertarians are craziest of all, since they are pro-
>>> bably more intelligent on average--yet they advocate
>>> sensationalism & extremism more than any other group,
>>> which shows that intelligence isn't enough. It takes
>>> wisdom to complete mans process of human development.
>>>
>>> And when we look at the "bell curve" distribution of
>>> Republicans, most everyone favors business, commerce,
>>> and ethical thought, word & deed...deeds most of all.
>>> Money isn't evil, but a mans motivations can be evil.
>>> Democrats don't like President GW Bush, because Bush
>>> loves Jesus, meaning God's righteousness.
>>
>> Not quite true. Most people seem to hate Bush because he is a lying,
>> greedy and astonishingly stupid warmonger with no morals. It has
>> nothing to do with his religious beliefs. After all, don't all UK and
>> US leaders say that they believe in God to ensure that they don't
>> offend Christian voters?
>
> No. US leaders do. It doesn't matter in the UK. Anybody who makes a
> fuss of their religion isn't all there in UK eyes. Although the
> Conservative press made a fuss about Michael Foot being atheist and
> quietly forgot to say anything when it was John Major's turn.
Response to this one
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:07:11 +0000, Marguerita
> <marguerita@hottermail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Apr 2004 01:03:34 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> NO ONE EVER SAID that Republicans are perfectly good,
>>> or that democrats are perfectly evil. Some democrats
>>> are good people, and some Republicans are absolutely
>>> off their rockers! Sometimes I think independents or
>>> libertarians are craziest of all, since they are pro-
>>> bably more intelligent on average--yet they advocate
>>> sensationalism & extremism more than any other group,
>>> which shows that intelligence isn't enough. It takes
>>> wisdom to complete mans process of human development.
>>>
>>> And when we look at the "bell curve" distribution of
>>> Republicans, most everyone favors business, commerce,
>>> and ethical thought, word & deed...deeds most of all.
>>> Money isn't evil, but a mans motivations can be evil.
>>> Democrats don't like President GW Bush, because Bush
>>> loves Jesus, meaning God's righteousness.
>>
>> Not quite true. Most people seem to hate Bush because he is a lying,
>> greedy and astonishingly stupid warmonger with no morals. It has
>> nothing to do with his religious beliefs. After all, don't all UK and
>> US leaders say that they believe in God to ensure that they don't
>> offend Christian voters?
>
> No. US leaders do. It doesn't matter in the UK. Anybody who makes a
> fuss of their religion isn't all there in UK eyes. Although the
> Conservative press made a fuss about Michael Foot being atheist and
> quietly forgot to say anything when it was John Major's turn.
Response to this one
04-07-2004, 10:11 PM
#96
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Democrats and integrity
On 4/7/04 7:18 PM, in article 2j2970dqdtpcahsuh3pgcp1j3jl6gs9218@4ax.com,
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:07:11 +0000, Marguerita
> <marguerita@hottermail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Apr 2004 01:03:34 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> NO ONE EVER SAID that Republicans are perfectly good,
>>> or that democrats are perfectly evil. Some democrats
>>> are good people, and some Republicans are absolutely
>>> off their rockers! Sometimes I think independents or
>>> libertarians are craziest of all, since they are pro-
>>> bably more intelligent on average--yet they advocate
>>> sensationalism & extremism more than any other group,
>>> which shows that intelligence isn't enough. It takes
>>> wisdom to complete mans process of human development.
>>>
>>> And when we look at the "bell curve" distribution of
>>> Republicans, most everyone favors business, commerce,
>>> and ethical thought, word & deed...deeds most of all.
>>> Money isn't evil, but a mans motivations can be evil.
>>> Democrats don't like President GW Bush, because Bush
>>> loves Jesus, meaning God's righteousness.
>>
>> Not quite true. Most people seem to hate Bush because he is a lying,
>> greedy and astonishingly stupid warmonger with no morals. It has
>> nothing to do with his religious beliefs. After all, don't all UK and
>> US leaders say that they believe in God to ensure that they don't
>> offend Christian voters?
>
> No. US leaders do. It doesn't matter in the UK. Anybody who makes a
> fuss of their religion isn't all there in UK eyes. Although the
> Conservative press made a fuss about Michael Foot being atheist and
> quietly forgot to say anything when it was John Major's turn.
Response to this one
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:07:11 +0000, Marguerita
> <marguerita@hottermail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Apr 2004 01:03:34 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> NO ONE EVER SAID that Republicans are perfectly good,
>>> or that democrats are perfectly evil. Some democrats
>>> are good people, and some Republicans are absolutely
>>> off their rockers! Sometimes I think independents or
>>> libertarians are craziest of all, since they are pro-
>>> bably more intelligent on average--yet they advocate
>>> sensationalism & extremism more than any other group,
>>> which shows that intelligence isn't enough. It takes
>>> wisdom to complete mans process of human development.
>>>
>>> And when we look at the "bell curve" distribution of
>>> Republicans, most everyone favors business, commerce,
>>> and ethical thought, word & deed...deeds most of all.
>>> Money isn't evil, but a mans motivations can be evil.
>>> Democrats don't like President GW Bush, because Bush
>>> loves Jesus, meaning God's righteousness.
>>
>> Not quite true. Most people seem to hate Bush because he is a lying,
>> greedy and astonishingly stupid warmonger with no morals. It has
>> nothing to do with his religious beliefs. After all, don't all UK and
>> US leaders say that they believe in God to ensure that they don't
>> offend Christian voters?
>
> No. US leaders do. It doesn't matter in the UK. Anybody who makes a
> fuss of their religion isn't all there in UK eyes. Although the
> Conservative press made a fuss about Michael Foot being atheist and
> quietly forgot to say anything when it was John Major's turn.
Response to this one
04-07-2004, 10:11 PM
#97
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Democrats and integrity
On 4/7/04 7:18 PM, in article 2j2970dqdtpcahsuh3pgcp1j3jl6gs9218@4ax.com,
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:07:11 +0000, Marguerita
> <marguerita@hottermail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Apr 2004 01:03:34 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> NO ONE EVER SAID that Republicans are perfectly good,
>>> or that democrats are perfectly evil. Some democrats
>>> are good people, and some Republicans are absolutely
>>> off their rockers! Sometimes I think independents or
>>> libertarians are craziest of all, since they are pro-
>>> bably more intelligent on average--yet they advocate
>>> sensationalism & extremism more than any other group,
>>> which shows that intelligence isn't enough. It takes
>>> wisdom to complete mans process of human development.
>>>
>>> And when we look at the "bell curve" distribution of
>>> Republicans, most everyone favors business, commerce,
>>> and ethical thought, word & deed...deeds most of all.
>>> Money isn't evil, but a mans motivations can be evil.
>>> Democrats don't like President GW Bush, because Bush
>>> loves Jesus, meaning God's righteousness.
>>
>> Not quite true. Most people seem to hate Bush because he is a lying,
>> greedy and astonishingly stupid warmonger with no morals. It has
>> nothing to do with his religious beliefs. After all, don't all UK and
>> US leaders say that they believe in God to ensure that they don't
>> offend Christian voters?
>
> No. US leaders do. It doesn't matter in the UK. Anybody who makes a
> fuss of their religion isn't all there in UK eyes. Although the
> Conservative press made a fuss about Michael Foot being atheist and
> quietly forgot to say anything when it was John Major's turn.
Response to this one
"Christopher A. Lee" <calee@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:07:11 +0000, Marguerita
> <marguerita@hottermail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On 7 Apr 2004 01:03:34 GMT, Xomicron <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> NO ONE EVER SAID that Republicans are perfectly good,
>>> or that democrats are perfectly evil. Some democrats
>>> are good people, and some Republicans are absolutely
>>> off their rockers! Sometimes I think independents or
>>> libertarians are craziest of all, since they are pro-
>>> bably more intelligent on average--yet they advocate
>>> sensationalism & extremism more than any other group,
>>> which shows that intelligence isn't enough. It takes
>>> wisdom to complete mans process of human development.
>>>
>>> And when we look at the "bell curve" distribution of
>>> Republicans, most everyone favors business, commerce,
>>> and ethical thought, word & deed...deeds most of all.
>>> Money isn't evil, but a mans motivations can be evil.
>>> Democrats don't like President GW Bush, because Bush
>>> loves Jesus, meaning God's righteousness.
>>
>> Not quite true. Most people seem to hate Bush because he is a lying,
>> greedy and astonishingly stupid warmonger with no morals. It has
>> nothing to do with his religious beliefs. After all, don't all UK and
>> US leaders say that they believe in God to ensure that they don't
>> offend Christian voters?
>
> No. US leaders do. It doesn't matter in the UK. Anybody who makes a
> fuss of their religion isn't all there in UK eyes. Although the
> Conservative press made a fuss about Michael Foot being atheist and
> quietly forgot to say anything when it was John Major's turn.
Response to this one
04-07-2004, 10:13 PM
#98
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Democrats and integrity
Janet did pass the time by typing:
> On 4/7/04 3:05 PM, in article c51jcs$13q0$4@news.wplus.net, "Xomicron"
> <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
>> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>>
>>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>>
>> This *is* my group.
>
> Reply to this one please
But what If I don't want to?
> On 4/7/04 3:05 PM, in article c51jcs$13q0$4@news.wplus.net, "Xomicron"
> <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
>> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>>
>>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>>
>> This *is* my group.
>
> Reply to this one please
But what If I don't want to?
04-07-2004, 10:13 PM
#99
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Democrats and integrity
Janet did pass the time by typing:
> On 4/7/04 3:05 PM, in article c51jcs$13q0$4@news.wplus.net, "Xomicron"
> <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
>> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>>
>>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>>
>> This *is* my group.
>
> Reply to this one please
But what If I don't want to?
> On 4/7/04 3:05 PM, in article c51jcs$13q0$4@news.wplus.net, "Xomicron"
> <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
>> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>>
>>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>>
>> This *is* my group.
>
> Reply to this one please
But what If I don't want to?
04-07-2004, 10:13 PM
#100
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Democrats and integrity
Janet did pass the time by typing:
> On 4/7/04 3:05 PM, in article c51jcs$13q0$4@news.wplus.net, "Xomicron"
> <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
>> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>>
>>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>>
>> This *is* my group.
>
> Reply to this one please
But what If I don't want to?
> On 4/7/04 3:05 PM, in article c51jcs$13q0$4@news.wplus.net, "Xomicron"
> <xomicron@wp.pl> wrote:
>
>> Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
>> news:40744453.9BF5E958@sympatico.ca:
>>
>>> Keep your replies in your own group please, stop cross posting this BS.
>>
>> This *is* my group.
>
> Reply to this one please
But what If I don't want to?