DougW wrote:
> 1st Gear wrote:
>> On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:30:48 -0600, "DougW" in an all out fatal
>> attempt to prove worthiness wrote:
>>>> 1st Gear wrote:
>>>>
>>>> hey, look, it's a sock puppet!
>> Suck my ---- ******* friend, your in the right group!
>
> And a frothing, foul mouthed, illiterate sock puppet too.
>
> Do you know any other tricks?

Apparently not. It appears you have once again lost.
Frankly, I expected more from a neophyte, even a
simple retort. You are indeed a sad little fool.

--
DougW

 

L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Just what part do you think is a lie?

You seem to have missed the point... actually you never do get the point
so why am I surprised.

You see actually I was defending you... in an intentionally insulting
way by saying who would possibly make up all the boring outdated
hopelessly irrelevant minutia that you're so proud of.

Now to be sure you haven't contributed anything to this forum that
wasn't FRESHLY GOOGLED in who knows how long... But then we all know
that and most of the time we let you harmlessly pretend that you know
what you're talking about.

The trouble comes when you insist on being right even when you have no
leg to stand on, and clearly are wrong... Which unfortunately is VERY
OFTEN because very little of the message traffic here involves the 40
year old Jeeps that you know anything at all about.

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Just what part do you think is a lie?

You seem to have missed the point... actually you never do get the point
so why am I surprised.

You see actually I was defending you... in an intentionally insulting
way by saying who would possibly make up all the boring outdated
hopelessly irrelevant minutia that you're so proud of.

Now to be sure you haven't contributed anything to this forum that
wasn't FRESHLY GOOGLED in who knows how long... But then we all know
that and most of the time we let you harmlessly pretend that you know
what you're talking about.

The trouble comes when you insist on being right even when you have no
leg to stand on, and clearly are wrong... Which unfortunately is VERY
OFTEN because very little of the message traffic here involves the 40
year old Jeeps that you know anything at all about.

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Just what part do you think is a lie?

You seem to have missed the point... actually you never do get the point
so why am I surprised.

You see actually I was defending you... in an intentionally insulting
way by saying who would possibly make up all the boring outdated
hopelessly irrelevant minutia that you're so proud of.

Now to be sure you haven't contributed anything to this forum that
wasn't FRESHLY GOOGLED in who knows how long... But then we all know
that and most of the time we let you harmlessly pretend that you know
what you're talking about.

The trouble comes when you insist on being right even when you have no
leg to stand on, and clearly are wrong... Which unfortunately is VERY
OFTEN because very little of the message traffic here involves the 40
year old Jeeps that you know anything at all about.

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:gcOdnS_FEZbqe-_YnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@rcn.net...
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> > Just what part do you think is a lie?
>
> You seem to have missed the point... actually you never do get the
> point so why am I surprised.
>
> You see actually I was defending you... in an intentionally
> insulting way by saying who would possibly make up all the
> boring outdated hopelessly irrelevant minutia that you're so proud of.
>

http://www.filzi.de/mediac/400_0/med...ler-balkon.jpg

Enjoy,

Earle

 

"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:gcOdnS_FEZbqe-_YnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@rcn.net...
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> > Just what part do you think is a lie?
>
> You seem to have missed the point... actually you never do get the
> point so why am I surprised.
>
> You see actually I was defending you... in an intentionally
> insulting way by saying who would possibly make up all the
> boring outdated hopelessly irrelevant minutia that you're so proud of.
>

http://www.filzi.de/mediac/400_0/med...ler-balkon.jpg

Enjoy,

Earle

 

"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:gcOdnS_FEZbqe-_YnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@rcn.net...
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III wrote:
> > Just what part do you think is a lie?
>
> You seem to have missed the point... actually you never do get the
> point so why am I surprised.
>
> You see actually I was defending you... in an intentionally
> insulting way by saying who would possibly make up all the
> boring outdated hopelessly irrelevant minutia that you're so proud of.
>

http://www.filzi.de/mediac/400_0/med...ler-balkon.jpg

Enjoy,

Earle

 

This from someone that Mickey Moused a carburetor manifold onto a
4.0 liter head: http://www.----------.com/temp/bill_is_wrong.jpg I
wonder just what's really Mickey Mouse behind that paper.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> You seem to have missed the point... actually you never do get the point
> so why am I surprised.
>
> You see actually I was defending you... in an intentionally insulting
> way by saying who would possibly make up all the boring outdated
> hopelessly irrelevant minutia that you're so proud of.
>
> Now to be sure you haven't contributed anything to this forum that
> wasn't FRESHLY GOOGLED in who knows how long... But then we all know
> that and most of the time we let you harmlessly pretend that you know
> what you're talking about.
>
> The trouble comes when you insist on being right even when you have no
> leg to stand on, and clearly are wrong... Which unfortunately is VERY
> OFTEN because very little of the message traffic here involves the 40
> year old Jeeps that you know anything at all about.
>
> --
> Simon

 

This from someone that Mickey Moused a carburetor manifold onto a
4.0 liter head: http://www.----------.com/temp/bill_is_wrong.jpg I
wonder just what's really Mickey Mouse behind that paper.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> You seem to have missed the point... actually you never do get the point
> so why am I surprised.
>
> You see actually I was defending you... in an intentionally insulting
> way by saying who would possibly make up all the boring outdated
> hopelessly irrelevant minutia that you're so proud of.
>
> Now to be sure you haven't contributed anything to this forum that
> wasn't FRESHLY GOOGLED in who knows how long... But then we all know
> that and most of the time we let you harmlessly pretend that you know
> what you're talking about.
>
> The trouble comes when you insist on being right even when you have no
> leg to stand on, and clearly are wrong... Which unfortunately is VERY
> OFTEN because very little of the message traffic here involves the 40
> year old Jeeps that you know anything at all about.
>
> --
> Simon

 

This from someone that Mickey Moused a carburetor manifold onto a
4.0 liter head: http://www.----------.com/temp/bill_is_wrong.jpg I
wonder just what's really Mickey Mouse behind that paper.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Simon Juncal wrote:
>
> You seem to have missed the point... actually you never do get the point
> so why am I surprised.
>
> You see actually I was defending you... in an intentionally insulting
> way by saying who would possibly make up all the boring outdated
> hopelessly irrelevant minutia that you're so proud of.
>
> Now to be sure you haven't contributed anything to this forum that
> wasn't FRESHLY GOOGLED in who knows how long... But then we all know
> that and most of the time we let you harmlessly pretend that you know
> what you're talking about.
>
> The trouble comes when you insist on being right even when you have no
> leg to stand on, and clearly are wrong... Which unfortunately is VERY
> OFTEN because very little of the message traffic here involves the 40
> year old Jeeps that you know anything at all about.
>
> --
> Simon