DC is at it again, Jeep Treo?
10-27-2003, 03:02 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC is at it again, Jeep Treo?
Hey twaldron - care to comment??? I eagerly await the moment when you
factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
> I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
> DC doesn't go with this!
>
>
> http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>
> Kevin in Iowa
>
> 99XJ
> http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
> I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
> DC doesn't go with this!
>
>
> http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>
> Kevin in Iowa
>
> 99XJ
> http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
10-27-2003, 03:02 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC is at it again, Jeep Treo?
Hey twaldron - care to comment??? I eagerly await the moment when you
factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
> I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
> DC doesn't go with this!
>
>
> http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>
> Kevin in Iowa
>
> 99XJ
> http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
> I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
> DC doesn't go with this!
>
>
> http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>
> Kevin in Iowa
>
> 99XJ
> http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
10-27-2003, 03:02 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC is at it again, Jeep Treo?
Hey twaldron - care to comment??? I eagerly await the moment when you
factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
> I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
> DC doesn't go with this!
>
>
> http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>
> Kevin in Iowa
>
> 99XJ
> http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
> I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
> DC doesn't go with this!
>
>
> http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>
> Kevin in Iowa
>
> 99XJ
> http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
10-27-2003, 03:14 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC is at it again, Jeep Treo?
Listen. I'm going to say this one more time because you are extremely
slow. Then you are PLONKED so any further comments you make to me, will
show how moronic you are. Your stupidity will be rated by the number of
replies you make to me while you are PLONKED. I usually have a soft spot
for the retarded, but you've changed my mind.
My comment was in reference to your idiotic statement that CJs were
easier to modify than YJs and YJs were easier to modify than TJs. I said
your statement was patently FALSE. There was no mention of Libertys,
Treos, ******, or your Ford Taurus.
What the ---- is wrong with you that you don't get it?????
Things were very peaceful while you were off manhandling goats for the
past week. Why do you bother even coming back??
Joshua Nelson wrote:
> Hey twaldron - care to comment??? I eagerly await the moment when you
> factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
> just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
>
> khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
>
>>I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
>>DC doesn't go with this!
>>
>>
>>http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>>
>>Kevin in Iowa
>>
>>99XJ
>>http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
slow. Then you are PLONKED so any further comments you make to me, will
show how moronic you are. Your stupidity will be rated by the number of
replies you make to me while you are PLONKED. I usually have a soft spot
for the retarded, but you've changed my mind.
My comment was in reference to your idiotic statement that CJs were
easier to modify than YJs and YJs were easier to modify than TJs. I said
your statement was patently FALSE. There was no mention of Libertys,
Treos, ******, or your Ford Taurus.
What the ---- is wrong with you that you don't get it?????
Things were very peaceful while you were off manhandling goats for the
past week. Why do you bother even coming back??
Joshua Nelson wrote:
> Hey twaldron - care to comment??? I eagerly await the moment when you
> factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
> just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
>
> khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
>
>>I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
>>DC doesn't go with this!
>>
>>
>>http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>>
>>Kevin in Iowa
>>
>>99XJ
>>http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
10-27-2003, 03:14 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC is at it again, Jeep Treo?
Listen. I'm going to say this one more time because you are extremely
slow. Then you are PLONKED so any further comments you make to me, will
show how moronic you are. Your stupidity will be rated by the number of
replies you make to me while you are PLONKED. I usually have a soft spot
for the retarded, but you've changed my mind.
My comment was in reference to your idiotic statement that CJs were
easier to modify than YJs and YJs were easier to modify than TJs. I said
your statement was patently FALSE. There was no mention of Libertys,
Treos, ******, or your Ford Taurus.
What the ---- is wrong with you that you don't get it?????
Things were very peaceful while you were off manhandling goats for the
past week. Why do you bother even coming back??
Joshua Nelson wrote:
> Hey twaldron - care to comment??? I eagerly await the moment when you
> factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
> just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
>
> khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
>
>>I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
>>DC doesn't go with this!
>>
>>
>>http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>>
>>Kevin in Iowa
>>
>>99XJ
>>http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
slow. Then you are PLONKED so any further comments you make to me, will
show how moronic you are. Your stupidity will be rated by the number of
replies you make to me while you are PLONKED. I usually have a soft spot
for the retarded, but you've changed my mind.
My comment was in reference to your idiotic statement that CJs were
easier to modify than YJs and YJs were easier to modify than TJs. I said
your statement was patently FALSE. There was no mention of Libertys,
Treos, ******, or your Ford Taurus.
What the ---- is wrong with you that you don't get it?????
Things were very peaceful while you were off manhandling goats for the
past week. Why do you bother even coming back??
Joshua Nelson wrote:
> Hey twaldron - care to comment??? I eagerly await the moment when you
> factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
> just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
>
> khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
>
>>I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
>>DC doesn't go with this!
>>
>>
>>http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>>
>>Kevin in Iowa
>>
>>99XJ
>>http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
10-27-2003, 03:14 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC is at it again, Jeep Treo?
Listen. I'm going to say this one more time because you are extremely
slow. Then you are PLONKED so any further comments you make to me, will
show how moronic you are. Your stupidity will be rated by the number of
replies you make to me while you are PLONKED. I usually have a soft spot
for the retarded, but you've changed my mind.
My comment was in reference to your idiotic statement that CJs were
easier to modify than YJs and YJs were easier to modify than TJs. I said
your statement was patently FALSE. There was no mention of Libertys,
Treos, ******, or your Ford Taurus.
What the ---- is wrong with you that you don't get it?????
Things were very peaceful while you were off manhandling goats for the
past week. Why do you bother even coming back??
Joshua Nelson wrote:
> Hey twaldron - care to comment??? I eagerly await the moment when you
> factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
> just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
>
> khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
>
>>I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
>>DC doesn't go with this!
>>
>>
>>http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>>
>>Kevin in Iowa
>>
>>99XJ
>>http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
slow. Then you are PLONKED so any further comments you make to me, will
show how moronic you are. Your stupidity will be rated by the number of
replies you make to me while you are PLONKED. I usually have a soft spot
for the retarded, but you've changed my mind.
My comment was in reference to your idiotic statement that CJs were
easier to modify than YJs and YJs were easier to modify than TJs. I said
your statement was patently FALSE. There was no mention of Libertys,
Treos, ******, or your Ford Taurus.
What the ---- is wrong with you that you don't get it?????
Things were very peaceful while you were off manhandling goats for the
past week. Why do you bother even coming back??
Joshua Nelson wrote:
> Hey twaldron - care to comment??? I eagerly await the moment when you
> factor this development into your argument that late model Jeeps are
> just as off-road capable as the old CJs.
>
> khowel1@aol.comnospam (Kevin in Iowa) wrote in message news:<20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com>...
>
>>I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
>>DC doesn't go with this!
>>
>>
>>http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
>>
>>Kevin in Iowa
>>
>>99XJ
>>http://7slotgrille.com/jeepers/lwb/kevinxj/index.html
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: probably from g. p. (abbreviation of general purpose)
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
10-27-2003, 06:03 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC is at it again, Jeep Treo?
Snow wrote:
> What the %$#@ is that?!!! Someone please shoot that thing before it
> multiplies..
>
> Snow...
>
>
> "Kevin in Iowa" <khowel1@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
> news:20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com...
>
>>I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
>>DC doesn't go with this!
>>
>>
>>http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
OMFG that is just wrong
--
Ben Jerew
ASE Master Technician
New Country Lexus of Latham, NY
Amateur Off-Roader
10-27-2003, 06:03 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC is at it again, Jeep Treo?
Snow wrote:
> What the %$#@ is that?!!! Someone please shoot that thing before it
> multiplies..
>
> Snow...
>
>
> "Kevin in Iowa" <khowel1@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
> news:20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com...
>
>>I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
>>DC doesn't go with this!
>>
>>
>>http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
OMFG that is just wrong
--
Ben Jerew
ASE Master Technician
New Country Lexus of Latham, NY
Amateur Off-Roader
10-27-2003, 06:03 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC is at it again, Jeep Treo?
Snow wrote:
> What the %$#@ is that?!!! Someone please shoot that thing before it
> multiplies..
>
> Snow...
>
>
> "Kevin in Iowa" <khowel1@aol.comnospam> wrote in message
> news:20031025222701.26043.00000116@mb-m05.aol.com...
>
>>I found this awful looking thing at the Tokyo auto show, I HOPE that
>>DC doesn't go with this!
>>
>>
>>http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame...ar.mv&num=1777
OMFG that is just wrong
--
Ben Jerew
ASE Master Technician
New Country Lexus of Latham, NY
Amateur Off-Roader
10-28-2003, 09:53 AM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC is at it again, Jeep Treo?
Hello twaldron. You might be surprised to learn that the entire
usenet archives dating to 1981 are preserved by Google and are
searchable by anyone on the internet.
Therefore, no matter how much you rant and rave and try to change the
subject now, the whole world can easily access the original thread
and see that I referred to the Liberty in the first place, and that
you have consistently tried to derail that discussion into a big,
nasty fight.
Instead of using profanity, writing stories about eating poo, posting
mysterious photographs under fake indentities, and other weirdly
obsessive behavior, why don't you just admit that you made a small
mistake and get on with your life? I don't see what the big deal is;
we're all human.
twaldron <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message news:<W0fnb.108$UX7.46@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com> ...
>
> My comment was in reference to your idiotic statement that CJs were
> easier to modify than YJs and YJs were easier to modify than TJs. I said
> your statement was patently FALSE. There was no mention of Libertys,
> Treos, ******, or your Ford Taurus.
>
> What the ---- is wrong with you that you don't get it?????
>
> Things were very peaceful while you were off manhandling goats for the
> past week. Why do you bother even coming back??
>
usenet archives dating to 1981 are preserved by Google and are
searchable by anyone on the internet.
Therefore, no matter how much you rant and rave and try to change the
subject now, the whole world can easily access the original thread
and see that I referred to the Liberty in the first place, and that
you have consistently tried to derail that discussion into a big,
nasty fight.
Instead of using profanity, writing stories about eating poo, posting
mysterious photographs under fake indentities, and other weirdly
obsessive behavior, why don't you just admit that you made a small
mistake and get on with your life? I don't see what the big deal is;
we're all human.
twaldron <twaldron@sbcOBVIOUSglobal.net> wrote in message news:<W0fnb.108$UX7.46@newssvr22.news.prodigy.com> ...
>
> My comment was in reference to your idiotic statement that CJs were
> easier to modify than YJs and YJs were easier to modify than TJs. I said
> your statement was patently FALSE. There was no mention of Libertys,
> Treos, ******, or your Ford Taurus.
>
> What the ---- is wrong with you that you don't get it?????
>
> Things were very peaceful while you were off manhandling goats for the
> past week. Why do you bother even coming back??
>