|
Re: DC
Hi Matt,
Thanks again. Sedona, is the place most Kalifornians would like to retire to, if they have enough money: http://www.sedona.net/ God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list): > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Special Forces" > To: Matt Macchiarolo > Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM > Subject: Rubicon > > > Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and > > won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my > > lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes, > > including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now > > owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been > > dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4) > > Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the > > agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed > > that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler > > again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell > > yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a > > happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by > > the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the > > range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a > > discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may > > quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald > > http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com |
Re: DC
Thanks on both accounts. I must have remember the judges rulings you cited without realizing that DC could take it further if they choose to, albeit they would have lost (according to all accounts). Next time I go through Sedona I should look him up. Man, I just couldn't imagine living there, with all the "artsy fartsy" clowns and the cali transplants that want to rule that place. To each their own. --James "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:R9ednRy7m67eTsTfRVn-vw@comcast.com... >I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list): > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Special Forces" > To: Matt Macchiarolo > Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM > Subject: Rubicon > > >> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and >> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my >> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes, >> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now >> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been >> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4) >> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the >> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed >> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler >> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell >> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a >> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by >> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the >> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a >> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may >> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald >> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com > > > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message > news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com... >> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C >> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to >> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory >> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you >> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not >> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a >> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement. >> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public >> record... >> >> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome... >> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84 >> |
Re: DC
Thanks on both accounts. I must have remember the judges rulings you cited without realizing that DC could take it further if they choose to, albeit they would have lost (according to all accounts). Next time I go through Sedona I should look him up. Man, I just couldn't imagine living there, with all the "artsy fartsy" clowns and the cali transplants that want to rule that place. To each their own. --James "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:R9ednRy7m67eTsTfRVn-vw@comcast.com... >I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list): > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Special Forces" > To: Matt Macchiarolo > Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM > Subject: Rubicon > > >> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and >> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my >> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes, >> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now >> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been >> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4) >> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the >> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed >> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler >> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell >> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a >> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by >> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the >> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a >> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may >> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald >> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com > > > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message > news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com... >> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C >> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to >> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory >> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you >> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not >> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a >> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement. >> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public >> record... >> >> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome... >> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84 >> |
Re: DC
Thanks on both accounts. I must have remember the judges rulings you cited without realizing that DC could take it further if they choose to, albeit they would have lost (according to all accounts). Next time I go through Sedona I should look him up. Man, I just couldn't imagine living there, with all the "artsy fartsy" clowns and the cali transplants that want to rule that place. To each their own. --James "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:R9ednRy7m67eTsTfRVn-vw@comcast.com... >I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list): > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Special Forces" > To: Matt Macchiarolo > Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM > Subject: Rubicon > > >> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and >> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my >> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes, >> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now >> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been >> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4) >> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the >> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed >> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler >> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell >> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a >> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by >> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the >> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a >> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may >> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald >> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com > > > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message > news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com... >> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C >> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to >> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory >> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you >> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not >> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a >> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement. >> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public >> record... >> >> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome... >> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84 >> |
Re: DC
Thanks on both accounts. I must have remember the judges rulings you cited without realizing that DC could take it further if they choose to, albeit they would have lost (according to all accounts). Next time I go through Sedona I should look him up. Man, I just couldn't imagine living there, with all the "artsy fartsy" clowns and the cali transplants that want to rule that place. To each their own. --James "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:R9ednRy7m67eTsTfRVn-vw@comcast.com... >I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list): > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Special Forces" > To: Matt Macchiarolo > Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM > Subject: Rubicon > > >> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and >> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my >> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes, >> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now >> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been >> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4) >> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the >> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed >> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler >> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell >> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a >> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by >> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the >> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a >> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may >> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald >> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com > > > "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message > news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com... >> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C >> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to >> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory >> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you >> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not >> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a >> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement. >> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public >> record... >> >> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome... >> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84 >> |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands