DC
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC
Thanks Matt.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to try
> to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory serves,
> D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you mention it I
> am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not able to discuss
> the amount of money he got tells me that there was a settlement and a
> non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement. You'd think if he won
> a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to try
> to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory serves,
> D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you mention it I
> am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not able to discuss
> the amount of money he got tells me that there was a settlement and a
> non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement. You'd think if he won
> a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC
Thanks Matt.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to try
> to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory serves,
> D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you mention it I
> am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not able to discuss
> the amount of money he got tells me that there was a settlement and a
> non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement. You'd think if he won
> a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to try
> to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory serves,
> D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you mention it I
> am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not able to discuss
> the amount of money he got tells me that there was a settlement and a
> non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement. You'd think if he won
> a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC
Thanks Matt.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to try
> to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory serves,
> D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you mention it I
> am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not able to discuss
> the amount of money he got tells me that there was a settlement and a
> non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement. You'd think if he won
> a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to try
> to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory serves,
> D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you mention it I
> am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not able to discuss
> the amount of money he got tells me that there was a settlement and a
> non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement. You'd think if he won
> a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC
I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list):
----- Original Message -----
From: "Special Forces"
To: Matt Macchiarolo
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
Subject: Rubicon
> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com...
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to
> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory
> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you
> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not
> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a
> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement.
> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public
> record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
>
> "RocknCJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:ZWe6e.515$xE2.79@fed1read04...
>>
>> I think you are incorrect.
>> What I remember:
>> Dennis tried to settle with DC, DC forced the issue and filed a suit,
>> Dennis filed a counter suit, it went to court and Dennis won.
>>
>> I tried to look up the story that was at:
>> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...stories02.html and it is
>> no longer there.
>>
>> He may have made some other deal after the suit for the names and such.
>> Given DC's track record and knowing what I know about there their lawyers
>> on staff, I find it is almost unbelievable that DC would settle out of
>> court, besides the fact I don't remember it that way.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> news:n6udnbBQbNuz0MTfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
>>> If memory serves, Dennis didn't win any judgement in the case, he
>>> settled out of course and came away with a very nice settlement, and
>>> relocated his operation to Arizona.
>>>
>>
>
>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Special Forces"
To: Matt Macchiarolo
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
Subject: Rubicon
> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com...
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to
> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory
> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you
> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not
> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a
> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement.
> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public
> record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
>
> "RocknCJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:ZWe6e.515$xE2.79@fed1read04...
>>
>> I think you are incorrect.
>> What I remember:
>> Dennis tried to settle with DC, DC forced the issue and filed a suit,
>> Dennis filed a counter suit, it went to court and Dennis won.
>>
>> I tried to look up the story that was at:
>> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...stories02.html and it is
>> no longer there.
>>
>> He may have made some other deal after the suit for the names and such.
>> Given DC's track record and knowing what I know about there their lawyers
>> on staff, I find it is almost unbelievable that DC would settle out of
>> court, besides the fact I don't remember it that way.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> news:n6udnbBQbNuz0MTfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
>>> If memory serves, Dennis didn't win any judgement in the case, he
>>> settled out of course and came away with a very nice settlement, and
>>> relocated his operation to Arizona.
>>>
>>
>
>
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC
I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list):
----- Original Message -----
From: "Special Forces"
To: Matt Macchiarolo
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
Subject: Rubicon
> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com...
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to
> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory
> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you
> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not
> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a
> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement.
> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public
> record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
>
> "RocknCJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:ZWe6e.515$xE2.79@fed1read04...
>>
>> I think you are incorrect.
>> What I remember:
>> Dennis tried to settle with DC, DC forced the issue and filed a suit,
>> Dennis filed a counter suit, it went to court and Dennis won.
>>
>> I tried to look up the story that was at:
>> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...stories02.html and it is
>> no longer there.
>>
>> He may have made some other deal after the suit for the names and such.
>> Given DC's track record and knowing what I know about there their lawyers
>> on staff, I find it is almost unbelievable that DC would settle out of
>> court, besides the fact I don't remember it that way.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> news:n6udnbBQbNuz0MTfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
>>> If memory serves, Dennis didn't win any judgement in the case, he
>>> settled out of course and came away with a very nice settlement, and
>>> relocated his operation to Arizona.
>>>
>>
>
>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Special Forces"
To: Matt Macchiarolo
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
Subject: Rubicon
> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com...
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to
> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory
> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you
> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not
> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a
> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement.
> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public
> record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
>
> "RocknCJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:ZWe6e.515$xE2.79@fed1read04...
>>
>> I think you are incorrect.
>> What I remember:
>> Dennis tried to settle with DC, DC forced the issue and filed a suit,
>> Dennis filed a counter suit, it went to court and Dennis won.
>>
>> I tried to look up the story that was at:
>> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...stories02.html and it is
>> no longer there.
>>
>> He may have made some other deal after the suit for the names and such.
>> Given DC's track record and knowing what I know about there their lawyers
>> on staff, I find it is almost unbelievable that DC would settle out of
>> court, besides the fact I don't remember it that way.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> news:n6udnbBQbNuz0MTfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
>>> If memory serves, Dennis didn't win any judgement in the case, he
>>> settled out of course and came away with a very nice settlement, and
>>> relocated his operation to Arizona.
>>>
>>
>
>
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC
I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list):
----- Original Message -----
From: "Special Forces"
To: Matt Macchiarolo
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
Subject: Rubicon
> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com...
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to
> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory
> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you
> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not
> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a
> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement.
> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public
> record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
>
> "RocknCJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:ZWe6e.515$xE2.79@fed1read04...
>>
>> I think you are incorrect.
>> What I remember:
>> Dennis tried to settle with DC, DC forced the issue and filed a suit,
>> Dennis filed a counter suit, it went to court and Dennis won.
>>
>> I tried to look up the story that was at:
>> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...stories02.html and it is
>> no longer there.
>>
>> He may have made some other deal after the suit for the names and such.
>> Given DC's track record and knowing what I know about there their lawyers
>> on staff, I find it is almost unbelievable that DC would settle out of
>> court, besides the fact I don't remember it that way.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> news:n6udnbBQbNuz0MTfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
>>> If memory serves, Dennis didn't win any judgement in the case, he
>>> settled out of course and came away with a very nice settlement, and
>>> relocated his operation to Arizona.
>>>
>>
>
>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Special Forces"
To: Matt Macchiarolo
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
Subject: Rubicon
> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com...
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to
> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory
> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you
> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not
> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a
> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement.
> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public
> record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
>
> "RocknCJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:ZWe6e.515$xE2.79@fed1read04...
>>
>> I think you are incorrect.
>> What I remember:
>> Dennis tried to settle with DC, DC forced the issue and filed a suit,
>> Dennis filed a counter suit, it went to court and Dennis won.
>>
>> I tried to look up the story that was at:
>> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...stories02.html and it is
>> no longer there.
>>
>> He may have made some other deal after the suit for the names and such.
>> Given DC's track record and knowing what I know about there their lawyers
>> on staff, I find it is almost unbelievable that DC would settle out of
>> court, besides the fact I don't remember it that way.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> news:n6udnbBQbNuz0MTfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
>>> If memory serves, Dennis didn't win any judgement in the case, he
>>> settled out of course and came away with a very nice settlement, and
>>> relocated his operation to Arizona.
>>>
>>
>
>
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC
I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list):
----- Original Message -----
From: "Special Forces"
To: Matt Macchiarolo
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
Subject: Rubicon
> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com...
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to
> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory
> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you
> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not
> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a
> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement.
> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public
> record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
>
> "RocknCJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:ZWe6e.515$xE2.79@fed1read04...
>>
>> I think you are incorrect.
>> What I remember:
>> Dennis tried to settle with DC, DC forced the issue and filed a suit,
>> Dennis filed a counter suit, it went to court and Dennis won.
>>
>> I tried to look up the story that was at:
>> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...stories02.html and it is
>> no longer there.
>>
>> He may have made some other deal after the suit for the names and such.
>> Given DC's track record and knowing what I know about there their lawyers
>> on staff, I find it is almost unbelievable that DC would settle out of
>> court, besides the fact I don't remember it that way.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> news:n6udnbBQbNuz0MTfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
>>> If memory serves, Dennis didn't win any judgement in the case, he
>>> settled out of course and came away with a very nice settlement, and
>>> relocated his operation to Arizona.
>>>
>>
>
>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Special Forces"
To: Matt Macchiarolo
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
Subject: Rubicon
> Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:p8OdnTj-MoBOUsTfRVn-iw@comcast.com...
> Actually Dennis owned the tradermark, and filed the initial suit and D-C
> countersued. D-C tried all sorts of courtroom procedures and motions to
> try to get past the fact they had no legal leg to stand on. If memory
> serves, D-C settled once all avenues were exhausted, but now that you
> mention it I am not sure the fact that he did at one time say he's not
> able to discuss the amount of money he got tells me that there was a
> settlement and a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the settlement.
> You'd think if he won a jury trial, the sum would be a matter of public
> record...
>
> I did find a reference by Dennis to the outcome...
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...79f3d8b74ecf84
>
> "RocknCJ" <jetowle@***.net> wrote in message
> news:ZWe6e.515$xE2.79@fed1read04...
>>
>> I think you are incorrect.
>> What I remember:
>> Dennis tried to settle with DC, DC forced the issue and filed a suit,
>> Dennis filed a counter suit, it went to court and Dennis won.
>>
>> I tried to look up the story that was at:
>> http://www.presspublications.com/pag...stories02.html and it is
>> no longer there.
>>
>> He may have made some other deal after the suit for the names and such.
>> Given DC's track record and knowing what I know about there their lawyers
>> on staff, I find it is almost unbelievable that DC would settle out of
>> court, besides the fact I don't remember it that way.
>>
>> --James
>>
>> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
>> news:n6udnbBQbNuz0MTfRVn-vg@comcast.com...
>>> If memory serves, Dennis didn't win any judgement in the case, he
>>> settled out of course and came away with a very nice settlement, and
>>> relocated his operation to Arizona.
>>>
>>
>
>
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC
Hi Matt,
Thanks again.
Sedona, is the place most Kalifornians would like to retire to, if
they have enough money: http://www.sedona.net/
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list):
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Special Forces"
> To: Matt Macchiarolo
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
> Subject: Rubicon
>
> > Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> > won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> > lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> > including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> > owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> > dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> > Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> > agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> > that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> > again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> > yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> > happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> > the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> > range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> > discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> > quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> > http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
Thanks again.
Sedona, is the place most Kalifornians would like to retire to, if
they have enough money: http://www.sedona.net/
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list):
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Special Forces"
> To: Matt Macchiarolo
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
> Subject: Rubicon
>
> > Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> > won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> > lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> > including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> > owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> > dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> > Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> > agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> > that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> > again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> > yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> > happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> > the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> > range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> > discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> > quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> > http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC
Hi Matt,
Thanks again.
Sedona, is the place most Kalifornians would like to retire to, if
they have enough money: http://www.sedona.net/
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list):
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Special Forces"
> To: Matt Macchiarolo
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
> Subject: Rubicon
>
> > Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> > won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> > lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> > including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> > owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> > dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> > Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> > agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> > that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> > again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> > yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> > happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> > the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> > range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> > discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> > quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> > http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
Thanks again.
Sedona, is the place most Kalifornians would like to retire to, if
they have enough money: http://www.sedona.net/
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list):
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Special Forces"
> To: Matt Macchiarolo
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
> Subject: Rubicon
>
> > Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> > won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> > lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> > including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> > owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> > dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> > Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> > agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> > that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> > again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> > yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> > happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> > the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> > range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> > discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> > quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> > http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: DC
Hi Matt,
Thanks again.
Sedona, is the place most Kalifornians would like to retire to, if
they have enough money: http://www.sedona.net/
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list):
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Special Forces"
> To: Matt Macchiarolo
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
> Subject: Rubicon
>
> > Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> > won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> > lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> > including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> > owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> > dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> > Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> > agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> > that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> > again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> > yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> > happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> > the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> > range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> > discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> > quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> > http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com
Thanks again.
Sedona, is the place most Kalifornians would like to retire to, if
they have enough money: http://www.sedona.net/
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> I found an email reply from Dennis (from an inquiry about his price list):
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Special Forces"
> To: Matt Macchiarolo
> Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 12:50 PM
> Subject: Rubicon
>
> > Hi Matt --- I am moving my operation to Arizona after Thanksgiving and
> > won't have a new price list up until after then. --- Concerning my
> > lawsuit against D.C., I am allowed to say: (1) The parties' disputes,
> > including the lawsuit, have been settled. (2) My Rubicon marks are now
> > owned by DaimlerChrysler. (3) All of the claims in the lawsuit have been
> > dismissed with prejudice; meaning that they can't be brought again. (4)
> > Nothing further can be said about the agreement or the terms of the
> > agreement. --- After much discussion with my attorneys, they allowed
> > that I could say: (1) If I were asked if I would sue DaimlerChrysler
> > again if I felt my trademark was being infringed, I could reply - "Hell
> > yes. In a second. Without hesitation." (2) If I were asked if I am a
> > happy camper, I could reply - "I am one damn happy camper, sitting by
> > the campfire, near Sedona, under the stars, singing - Home, home on the
> > range, where the deer and the antelope play; where seldom is heard a
> > discouraging word, and the skies are not cloudy all day." --- You may
> > quote me on that. (: --- Regards --- Dennis J. Ewald
> > http://www.SpecialForces4x4.com